Sea level rise: It's worse than we th...

Sea level rise: It's worse than we thought

There are 3772 comments on the New Scientist story from Jul 2, 2009, titled Sea level rise: It's worse than we thought. In it, New Scientist reports that:

FOR a few minutes David Holland forgets about his work and screams like a kid on a roller coaster.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Scientist.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#2745 Mar 19, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>This FEMA document doesn't mitigate earthquakes
Please write to FEMA and tell them they have wrongly titled the document. Tell them you are a cash till repair man and internet troll- eminently qualified to offer advice on the definition of mitigation.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2746 Mar 19, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Very thoughtful Brian, but the file you don't want people to read is clean.
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/3e6bb8a93e...
True, Fair Game. It's clean because I've read it a few times.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2747 Mar 19, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
See how Fair Game changes moves the goal post from: "one of the islands most threatened by global warming and sea level rise!" to "Jamaica is taking global warming mitigation very seriously."
Actually, in science, complementary facts.

Like this:.. global warming mitigation taken seriously by Jamaica because their island's threatened by global warming and sea-level rise...

This means you are like Jamaica. Did you think of that?
Brian_G wrote:
Truth doesn't matter to global warming alarmists because truth isn't on their side. They believe because of emotion, fear; not science.
Where's your evidence for this nonsense?
SpaceBlues

United States

#2748 Mar 19, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>just as we'll find more ways to adapt to climate change.
Status quo is not adaptation.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>
Climate change mitigation is a hoax.
Where's your science?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#2749 Mar 19, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Status quo is not adaptation.
<quoted text>Where's your science?
So submit your scientific science fiction nonsense to Hollywood and make another scientific science fiction movie. You have spammed to world more than 900,000times with your nonsense. Go compete with the proper scientific science fiction movie arena.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2750 Mar 19, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So submit your scientific science fiction nonsense to Hollywood and make another scientific science fiction movie. You have spammed to world more than 900,000times with your nonsense. Go compete with the proper scientific science fiction movie arena.
If you were sane, you would be embarrassed posting your stuff to the world.

You are dismissed again.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#2751 Mar 19, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
Very thoughtful Brian, but the file you don't want people to read is clean.
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/3e6bb8a93e...
I don't care if people read it, I just won't download it based on Fair Game's words. His cite above might be valid, it says the file was tested less than four hours ago.

It might be clean now.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2752 Mar 19, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I don't care if people read it, I just won't download it based on Fair Game's words. His cite above might be valid, it says the file was tested less than four hours ago.
It might be clean now.
Deniers are not science-based. You don't read the science because you want to stay a denier.

That means you are not really a skeptic that you call yourself.

Back to your understanding of English. After writing "was tested less than four hours ago," you could have realized you could test it again, thus negating "might be" for sure.

See you do have technology problems, logic problems, education problems, etc. What are you playing judge and jury for the science of scientists in a public forum for years and years?

It appears that you play such towards Internet confusion because you might despise the innocent people of the world.
litesong

Everett, WA

#2753 Mar 19, 2013
brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:
They believe because of emotion, fear; not science.
'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' doesn't believe, because it elected to have no upper class science or mathematics for its poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has no emotion because it is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig.'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has no fear since it has no inkling of the future, except the same-o, same-o.'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' never integrated science & mathematics in its being, having errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, & 73 million TIMES.
litesong

Everett, WA

#2754 Mar 20, 2013
brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:
..... truth isn't on their side. They believe because of emotion, fear; not science.
"brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" chose not to have any upper class science or mathematics in its poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, because it feared, rightly, that it would fail. Its lethargic & sidewise diversions into calculations, ended with errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES & 73 million TIMES.

In addition to its errors, "brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2755 Mar 20, 2013
Reminders..

1. Precise measurements of the rising concentration of atmospheric CO2 are irrefutable.

2. Precise measurements of rising temperatures are leaving no doubt that global warming is happening.

3. Geological evidence shows that 450 ppm of atmospheric CO2 is the critical level that is needed to sustain polar ice caps.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#2756 Mar 21, 2013
Reminder: Neither climate change mitigation or any anthropogenic global climate change has been experimentally demonstrated.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#2757 Mar 31, 2013
Sea level rise means surf's up.

Higher surf, what's not to like about global warming?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#2758 Mar 31, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>If you were sane, you would be embarrassed posting your stuff to the world.
You are dismissed again.
So submit your scientific science fiction nonsense to Hollywood and make another scientific science fiction movie. You have spammed to world more than 900,000times with your nonsense. Go compete with the proper scientific science fiction movie arena. You have been dismissed for years now and you keep on returning. Have you made it to Hollywood yet?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#2759 Apr 3, 2013
Steve Case wrote:
<quoted text>
The warmer and wetter the climate, the more diversified the fauna and flora.
The man-made threat facing us is no other than the eighth extinction event but the first man-made kind and the first for the modern human species..

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#2760 Apr 3, 2013
This isn't the first man made extinction event; man has destroyed megafauna predators on every continent except Africa. There've been thousands of species extinguished by hunting, fishing and habitat destruction.

Look at the bright side, no species has gone extinct from man made climate change.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#2761 Apr 3, 2013
b_gone is wrong without a doubt.

Steve is wrong, too. But he does not post here anymore.

Since mid-2011 a giant “speed bump” has been encountered. In roughly the last two years the global oceans have risen approximately 20 millimetres (mm), or 10 mm per year. This is over three times the rate of sea level rise during the time of satellite-based observations (currently 3.18 mm per year), from 1993 to the present.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/03/1...

Deniers are in the business of lying for the fossil fuels industry.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#2762 Apr 3, 2013
Am I wrong about past man made extinctions or wrong about no species going extinct because of man made climate change?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#2763 Apr 3, 2013
Yes, b-gone, you are wrong about extinctions just as you and your denier buddy Steve are wrong about the sea-level rise.

http://www.aviso.oceanobs.com/fileadmin/image...

Ref: Post #2757 above.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#2764 Apr 3, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>The man-made threat facing us is no other than the eighth extinction event but the first man-made kind and the first for the modern human species..
b_gone does not pay attention to the word "event."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oceanography Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obvious science from Antarctica: ice melts in w... Jun '17 Hail Hydra 6
News Poor Education Leads To Lost Dreams And Low Inc... Mar '17 The Real Karen 78
What is this formation called? Mar '17 STUDENT 1
News Volcano blows hole in global warming fight (Oct '10) Mar '17 Volcano 10
News Poor Education Leads To Lost Dreams And Low Inc... Mar '17 Jace 11
News Scientists Beg for Climate Action (Dec '07) Dec '16 Patriot 1,864
Lost in the sea (Sep '16) Sep '16 clement 1
More from around the web