Sea level rise: It's worse than we thought

Jul 2, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: New Scientist

FOR a few minutes David Holland forgets about his work and screams like a kid on a roller coaster.

Comments
2,481 - 2,500 of 3,119 Comments Last updated Jun 23, 2014

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2588
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Seriously, now is a good time for a tropical vacation. Climate, deal with it.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2589
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:
...... now is a good time for a tropical vacation.
"brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" went on vacation for 10 years, instead of getting mathematics & science degrees. While on vacation, he became a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener & holds down a 2-bit oil can job.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2590
Feb 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
"brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" went on vacation for 10 years, instead of getting mathematics & science degrees. While on vacation, he became a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener & holds down a 2-bit oil can job.
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2591
Feb 3, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
<quoted text>
DUH. EVERYONE knows China is the #1 emitter of CO2 now. The US is still much larger per capita, & the US is the country most responsible for current warming (the UK is #2).
China doesn't want Shanghai to be underwater, or for ShanDong (birthplace of Confucius) to be an island. They have millions of people living near sea level. Just north of Beijing, desertification is moving southward. They are vulnerable to tropical cyclones (called typhoons there). Their leaders have to breathe the air in Beijing just like everyone else.
The Chinese WILL act to mitigate AGW/CC based on their own interests. If we do something meaningful that'll give them the opening to act as well.
As mentioned before good luck with that idea. DUH your idea to date has never worked.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2592
Feb 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

It's time to show the future sea-level rise graph for global temperature(s):

http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/Projec...
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2593
Feb 4, 2013
 
SpaceBlues wrote:
It's time to show the future sea-level rise graph for global temperature(s):
http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/Projec...
We already told you the sea level rise really really means nothing. Here is an out for you, do show your peer reviewed published work that will dispute sea level rise and the real effects.
Steve Case

Milwaukee, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2594
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
It's time to show the future sea-level rise graph for global temperature(s):
http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/Projec...
And once again it's time to do the arithmetic. Here's that same graphic
http://oi49.tinypic.com/14id2yx.jpg
run on Excel with the addition of the final rate of sea level rise in 2100. Nearly 20 mm/yr. How likely do you think that is? realistically that's 10 times today's rate. All the rivers and glaciers in the world flowing at time times today's rate. All the rivers, not just the Amazon or the creek in your local park, everything.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2595
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

And we are in a drought with the rivers and lakes at an alarming low level. Sure sounds like scientific science fiction.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2596
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Steve Case wrote:
<quoted text>
And once again it's time to do the arithmetic. Here's that same graphic
http://oi49.tinypic.com/14id2yx.jpg
run on Excel with the addition of the final rate of sea level rise in 2100. Nearly 20 mm/yr. How likely do you think that is? realistically that's 10 times today's rate. All the rivers and glaciers in the world flowing at time times today's rate. All the rivers, not just the Amazon or the creek in your local park, everything.
Er, no. The ice sheets flowing at a higher rate.

Ice loss from Greenland has accelerated, ice is beginning to be lost from the Antarctic. That's where the extra water is going to come from.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2597
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Water, water everywhere except where the water needs to be. More scientific science fiction.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2598
Feb 4, 2013
 
Steve Case wrote:
<quoted text>
And once again it's time to do the arithmetic. Here's that same graphic
http://oi49.tinypic.com/14id2yx.jpg
run on Excel with the addition of the final rate of sea level rise in 2100. Nearly 20 mm/yr. How likely do you think that is? realistically that's 10 times today's rate. All the rivers and glaciers in the world flowing at time times today's rate. All the rivers, not just the Amazon or the creek in your local park, everything.
Yes, Steve, if you project historical sea level rises that have occurred so far, & extend them ~linearly (depending on the intervals you use)into the future , sea level rise by 2100 shouldn't be a problem.

This is certainly what the North Carolina legislature wanted to be true. They passed a bill saying future estimates of flooding risks could be based ONLY on historical rates. Evidently you agree with them.

Luckily, the flaw in their (& YOUR) "logic" is extremely easy to see, & they were almost laughed out of office. The bill was withdrawn.

Past history is a guideline, but it is NOT a prediction. If you're walking down the center of railroad tracks, everything looks fine until just before the train hits you.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2599
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Guideline, prediction, opinion, could be should be and forecast more scientific science fiction.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2600
Feb 7, 2013
 
Does ph'd play the stock market without "guideline, prediction, opinion" and "could be, should be, and forecast?"

So the stock market is science fiction to it. LOL.
litesong

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2601
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:
Water, water everywhere except where the water needs to be.
You stumbled onto the answer, but do NOT believe it. Our Pacific Northwest had plenty of water, now gets more....... except at the times we need it worst. Those areas that were short of water, are even more short of water now. Its going to get worse.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2602
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
You stumbled onto the answer, but do NOT believe it. Our Pacific Northwest had plenty of water, now gets more....... except at the times we need it worst. Those areas that were short of water, are even more short of water now. Its going to get worse.
And you think topix doesn’t know what you publish? Attacks on me won't delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2603
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
Does ph'd play the stock market without "guideline, prediction, opinion" and "could be, should be, and forecast?"
So the stock market is science fiction to it. LOL.
No but your scientific science fiction does.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2604
Feb 9, 2013
 
SpaceBlues wrote:
Does ph'd play the stock market without "guideline, prediction, opinion" and "could be, should be, and forecast?"
So the stock market is science fiction to it. LOL.
ph'd replies:
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>No but your scientific science fiction does.
huh, clueless.

LOL.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2605
Feb 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>ph'd replies:
<quoted text>huh, clueless.
LOL.
Your dazed and confused again and again.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2606
Feb 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

---troll ignored.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2607
Feb 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
---troll ignored.
So you the Commander TROLL continues to answer directly or indirectly. You keep the topix forums entertained and free at that.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••