New study documents the natural relat...

New study documents the natural relationship between CO2 concentrations and sea level

There are 23 comments on the EurekAlert! story from Jan 2, 2013, titled New study documents the natural relationship between CO2 concentrations and sea level. In it, EurekAlert! reports that:

By comparing reconstructions of atmospheric CO2 concentrations and sea level over the past 40 million years, researchers based at the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton have found that greenhouse gas concentrations similar to the present were systematically associated with sea levels at least nine metres above current levels.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EurekAlert!.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1 Jan 2, 2013
Based on these results, which document how the Earth system has operated in the past, future stabilization of CO2 at 400-450 parts per million is unlikely to be sufficient to avoid a significant steady long-term sea level rise.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-01-documents-natura...
PHD

Overton, TX

#2 Jan 14, 2013
No they said they were uncertain of the change.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#3 Jan 14, 2013
We copy and paste the evidence. So it's not just an opinion but the fact is based on science.

So #1 is the fact based on science.
PHD

Overton, TX

#4 Jan 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
We copy and paste the evidence. So it's not just an opinion but the fact is based on science.
So #1 is the fact based on science.
Again science makes corrections to errors to discover more errors to discover that their corrections are in error. Or they just plain say in my opinion.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#5 Jan 14, 2013
How can you explain science to someone without any science? Impossible.

This is why some deniers are doomed to stay the same for ever.
PHD

Overton, TX

#6 Jan 14, 2013
Why you could do the usual cut and paste thing your famous for thatís how.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#7 Jan 20, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
to PHD How can you explain science to someone without any science? Impossible.
This is why some deniers are doomed to stay the same for ever.
Per PHD, you're supposed to make up your posts from your "gut", like he always does.[no joke].
PHD

Overton, TX

#8 Jan 21, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Per PHD, you're supposed to make up your posts from your "gut", sorry I never do.[no joke].
More science fiction.Follow the money.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#9 Jan 21, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>More science fiction.Follow the money.
From the same nut case who said "all science is science fiction"
PHD

Overton, TX

#10 Jan 23, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
From the same nut case who said "all science is science fiction"
Wrong again walloped. Scientific science fiction are my words. Try again, this time get it correct.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#11 Feb 12, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Per PHD, you're supposed to make up your posts from your "gut", like he always does.[no joke].
And it repeats the same. For example about tina, at least for three years, "a box of rocks."
PHD

Overton, TX

#12 Feb 13, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>And it repeats the same. For example about tina, at least for three years, "a box of rocks."
There you have it folks the spaced out spacedoutblues got its crystal ball out and made another prediction.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#13 Feb 13, 2013
ph'd to tina:.. "a box of rocks"

for at least three years.
PHD

Overton, TX

#14 Feb 13, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
ph'd to tina:.. "a box of rocks"
for at least three years.
There you have it folks the spaced out spacedoutblues got its crystal ball out and made another prediction.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#15 Feb 13, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
ph'd to tina:.. "a box of rocks"
for at least three years.
Worth a repeat.
PHD

Overton, TX

#16 Feb 13, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Worth a repeat.
Ok here it is anything to help you out. There you have it folks the spaced out spacedoutblues got its crystal ball out and made another prediction.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#17 Feb 13, 2013
A peanut for Troll PennyHD
PHD

Overton, TX

#18 Feb 14, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
A peanut for Troll PennyHD
More scientific science fiction and hate from the walloped again and again.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#21 Mar 13, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
A peanut for Troll PennyHD
.. it had too many peanuts and got runny...

If you know what I mean... NOT our fault.
PHD

Overton, TX

#22 Mar 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>.. it had too many peanuts and got runny...
If you know what I mean... NOT our fault.
Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oceanography Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Officials solve mystery of explosion on Rhode I... Jul 24 Sterkfontein Swar... 1
News New research maps out trajectory of April 2015 ... Jul 24 Kate 1
News Pope urges revolution to save Earth, fix 'perve... Jul 20 ELIAS IBARRA 9
News Pope urges revolution to save Earth, fix 'perve... Jun '15 Sterkfontein Swar... 30
News Inter-decadal Pacific Oscillation Explains Glob... Apr '15 SpaceBlues 1
News Japanese reactor radiation detected off B.C. coast Apr '15 RDL 2
News Shrinking of Ice Shelves Raises Sea Level Concerns Apr '15 Earthling-1 10
More from around the web