Inhofe Exposes Another Epic Fail by G...

Inhofe Exposes Another Epic Fail by Global Warming Alarmists Thursday

There are 79 comments on the NorCalBlogs story from Aug 2, 2012, titled Inhofe Exposes Another Epic Fail by Global Warming Alarmists Thursday. In it, NorCalBlogs reports that:

Washington, D.C. - Today the far-left blog Think Progress posted a photo of street lights in Oklahoma that had melted, they claimed, because of extreme heat.A Global warming alarmist Bill McKibben took to Twitter immediately to publicize what he believed to be proof of global warming, tweeting to Senator James Inhofe , Ranking Member of the Senate ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NorCalBlogs.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#1 Aug 2, 2012
The only 'epic fail' here is Imhofe and his spin and spam campaign. Sure some media gets any story wrong. But they do it on BOTH sides and it is irrelevant to the FACTS of AGW.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#2 Aug 2, 2012
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
The only 'epic fail' here is Imhofe......
Imhofe was right of Ronald Reagan, with the following education:
He worked ...... as a real estate developer, and in insurance, eventually becoming the president of the Quaker Life Insurance Company. During the time he worked for Quaker Life, the company went into receivership; it was liquidated in 1986.
//////////
Finally, the only thing Imhofe can expose is his manhood..... & then, only if he hands out magnifying glasses to everyone.
Fu Que

Granite, OK

#3 Aug 2, 2012
Both of you posted well.

You must be indoctrinated leftists.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#4 Aug 2, 2012
fuq wrote:
Both of you posted well.
I'm glad you agree about Inhofe.
Fu Que

Granite, OK

#5 Aug 2, 2012
I don't agree with you. I'm sure your understand sarcasm.

More and more studies show global warming is happening as a matter of cyclical processes of nature. They also claim man made effects are not close to principle in it.

Nothing environmentalists or Global Warming theorists have said addresses how to diminish the warming effects except to pay a tax on it.

That is ridiculous.

Since: Apr 10

Milwaukee, WI USA

#6 Aug 2, 2012
Fu Que wrote:
Nothing environmentalists or Global Warming theorists have said addresses how to diminish the warming effects except to pay a tax on it.
There isn't any need to diminish the warming effects. It's not a problem.

Since: Jun 12

Brewster, NY

#7 Aug 3, 2012
Global warming = Obsessive compulsive panic.

It was warmer than now many times through out the past 8,000 yrs.

Global warming nuts act like the Earth is a biosphere controlled by humans & any change must be all by humans.

Temperature changes constantly change.

These idiots don't seem to grasp that
Fu Que

Granite, OK

#8 Aug 3, 2012
That's my point
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#9 Aug 3, 2012
Fu Que wrote:
That's my point
You have no 'point'.

i.e.
Interviewer: So how do you feel about drinking and driving.

Fu Que: Cars crash all the time.

Interviewer: So you drink and drive?

Fu Que: Cars crash all the time.

The obvious error in Fu Que's argument is that 'natural' change or accidents from good sober drivers does NOT obviate responsibility for the anthropogenic (drunks and GHGs) factors. It just shows that Fu Que is not a responsible adult.
Fun Facts

Las Cruces, NM

#10 Aug 3, 2012
LOL lights melting from warming. I suppose lights melt in Saudi Arabia? Gets pretty warm there. My area gets really warm at times, we have yet to have the street lights melt.

But as they say,

"'can't let a good crisis go to waste' so what if it's not true, until someone posts something different, our lie can get around the world before the truth gets it's pants on....We'll take what we can get."

And this folks, is the level at which your global warming news is created, everytime. Pay attention or you'll miss the 'oops we were wrong'.

Since: Jul 12

Oklahoma City, OK

#11 Aug 3, 2012
Fun Facts wrote:
LOL lights melting from warming. I suppose lights melt in Saudi Arabia? Gets pretty warm there. My area gets really warm at times, we have yet to have the street lights melt.
But as they say,
"'can't let a good crisis go to waste' so what if it's not true, until someone posts something different, our lie can get around the world before the truth gets it's pants on....We'll take what we can get."
And this folks, is the level at which your global warming news is created, everytime. Pay attention or you'll miss the 'oops we were wrong'.
Yep.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#12 Aug 3, 2012
Fun Facts wrote:
Pay attention or you'll miss the 'oops we were wrong'.
What you really miss is that it was the JOURNALIST that got it wrong. When he asked the source of the photos (a photographer), he was corrected.

It just goes to show the lack of science education in the right wing (Contrad Black, Rupert Murdoch) dominated journalism.
voteearlyvoteoft en

Lexington Park, MD

#13 Aug 3, 2012
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no 'point'.
i.e.
Interviewer: So how do you feel about drinking and driving.
Fu Que: Cars crash all the time.
Interviewer: So you drink and drive?
Fu Que: Cars crash all the time.
The obvious error in Fu Que's argument is that 'natural' change or accidents from good sober drivers does NOT obviate responsibility for the anthropogenic (drunks and GHGs) factors. It just shows that Fu Que is not a responsible adult.
But statistics on the % of accidents caused by drunks are readily available.

Where are the stats on the % of AGW caused directly by man? Best I've seen is that it is somewhere between 0 and 100%.....
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#14 Aug 3, 2012
voteearlyvoteoften wrote:
<quoted text>
But statistics on the % of accidents caused by drunks are readily available.
Where are the stats on the % of AGW caused directly by man? Best I've seen is that it is somewhere between 0 and 100%.....
IPCC 2001

Solar (200 year cycle)+.02C
Aerosols (industry)-.02C
GHG (industry)+.06C
----------
Total +.06C

But that is a 'snapshot'. The percentages will change with each analysis since the 200 year cycle will go from adding +.02C to negating +.02C, while aerosols will vary only a little and GHG's will increase steadily becoming the overwhelming factor as we hit 400ppm and over.

I am assuming you were serious in your ignorance and not just yanking my chain, of course. Yes. We have at least as good 'statistics' on AGW as we have on drunk driving odds.

Since: Jul 12

Oklahoma City, OK

#15 Aug 3, 2012
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
IPCC 2001
Solar (200 year cycle)+.02C
Aerosols (industry)-.02C
GHG (industry)+.06C
----------
Total +.06C
But that is a 'snapshot'. The percentages will change with each analysis since the 200 year cycle will go from adding +.02C to negating +.02C, while aerosols will vary only a little and GHG's will increase steadily becoming the overwhelming factor as we hit 400ppm and over.
I am assuming you were serious in your ignorance and not just yanking my chain, of course. Yes. We have at least as good 'statistics' on AGW as we have on drunk driving odds.
I challenge you to do some math:

How many years until the human population reaches its threshold?
How many years until Oil and Gasoline become scarce/unusable?
How many years until global warming makes earth's equatorial region inhabitable?
Outta Luck

Santa Rosa Beach, FL

#16 Aug 3, 2012
The math and science appliedd to global climate change and it predictions are way too much for the average conservative doo doo bird to figure out.
Denyig it is so much more "christian" then buying into such complicted "science".
Bringmedinner

San Jose, CA

#17 Aug 3, 2012
These Democrat fear-mongers tried the same BS under Jimmy Carter and were proven wrong by actual occurrences. Now, they stubbornly refuse to consider that Mars is warming in the same timeframe of Earth warming, or that the Earth experienced a mini-Ice Age only a few hundred years ago. For any rational person, that would be a wake-up call.

“DEMOCRATS THE PARTY OF FAKE”

Since: Mar 09

MARRIAGES AND FAKE HEALTHCARE

#18 Aug 3, 2012
These eco terrorists are getting crazier by the day.

Vote Romney bring back sanity and humanity to America!!

Since: Jul 12

Oklahoma City, OK

#19 Aug 3, 2012
Outta Luck wrote:
The math and science appliedd to global climate change and it predictions are way too much for the average conservative doo doo bird to figure out.
Denyig it is so much more "christian" then buying into such complicted "science".
Hey now.

“DEMOCRATS THE PARTY OF FAKE”

Since: Mar 09

MARRIAGES AND FAKE HEALTHCARE

#20 Aug 3, 2012
Outta Luck wrote:
The math and science appliedd to global climate change and it predictions are way too much for the average conservative doo doo bird to figure out.
Denyig it is so much more "christian" then buying into such complicted "science".
How do you calculate a myth?

Well?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Environment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 8 min red and right 332,323
News James Inhofe to Pope Francis: Shut up with your... 25 min 2all 42
News O say can you breathe? Fireworks pollute air, s... 49 min SpaceBlues 1
News Supreme Court smacks EPA for ignoring costs, bu... 5 hr hasaballa 1
News Papal Draft Blames Most Global Warming on Human... Jun 28 Mr Obvious 126
News Judge Declines to Dismiss Suit Against ExxonMobil (May '13) Jun 28 Freefarts 6
News Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing A... Jun 27 Earthling-1 186
More from around the web