Climate change study casts doubt on g...

Climate change study casts doubt on global warming

There are 9 comments on the Pacific Daily News story from Oct 17, 2013, titled Climate change study casts doubt on global warming. In it, Pacific Daily News reports that:

Environmentalists hoped the latest study from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, would finally end the increasingly acrimonious debate over the causes and consequences of climate change.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Pacific Daily News.

SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1 Oct 17, 2013
[b]ast of the heartless inc did his bast.. so it's worth five rotten fish out of five.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#2 Oct 17, 2013
Policymakers and the public have no reason to believe this discredited oracle.
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#3 Oct 17, 2013
"The most precise criticism of the IPCC's report came from the editors of "Nature," one of the world's most distinguished science journals: "Scientists cannot say with any certainty what rate of warming might be expected, or what effects humanity might want to prepare for, hedge against or avoid at all costs."

This is not a criticism. It implicitly backs the FACT of AGW science. The most it does is say that we cannot know the exact risks, just as you cannot be sure you will have an accident with loss of life when you drive a car drunk. But you DO know that it is better to be safe than sorry.

"Significantly, the IPCC has backed down from its previous forecasts of increases in droughts and hurricanes. And it admits, but does not explain, why no warming has occurred for the past 15 years."

There is nothing to this either. Their is still science to back the increase in storm severity with warmer waters fueling them and the 'pause' in the air temperatures was fully explained. I can only assume the writer of this piece was too dim to understand it.

"It's time to start listening to other voices in the debate, such as the 50-some scientists who make up the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, or NIPCC."

Nope. There is only one CLIMATE scientist on that group, funded by petro-dollars and with no science to present. Not one serious paper went into this sham. And there is never a 'right time' for stupidity.
No Warming

Athens, OH

#4 Oct 17, 2013
People expect answers from the IPCC, not topix political wanna-bees.
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#5 Oct 17, 2013
No Warming wrote:
People expect answers from the IPCC, not topix political wanna-bees.
And they got them. That you and your denialists don't understand any of it (or appear to be clueless) is perfect for "topix political wanna-bees". P.S. what is it you think I 'wanna-be'? Other than with the right, instead of easy answers?
litesong

Everett, WA

#6 Oct 18, 2013
no warming wrote:
People expect answers from the IPCC, not topix political wanna-bees.
/////////
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
And they got them. That you and your denialists don't understand any of it........
//////////
litesong wrote:
......is because toxic topix AGW deniers have almost no science & mathematics degrees, & seldom have science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, & pre-calc in their poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. A surprisingly large percentage of toxic topix AGW deniers have no hi skule DEE-plooomaas, either. It is NOT surprising, that an extraordinary percentage of toxic topix AGW deniers, who are also slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigs AND alleged & proud threateners, have no hi skule DEE-plooomas.

toxic topix AGW deniers from the beginning select incompetence as a way of life.
Jim

Katy, TX

#7 Oct 18, 2013
litesong wrote:
no warming wrote:
People expect answers from the IPCC, not topix political wanna-bees.
/////////
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
And they got them. That you and your denialists don't understand any of it........
//////////
litesong wrote:
......is because toxic topix AGW deniers have almost no science & mathematics degrees, & seldom have science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, & pre-calc in their poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. A surprisingly large percentage of toxic topix AGW deniers have no hi skule DEE-plooomaas, either. It is NOT surprising, that an extraordinary percentage of toxic topix AGW deniers, who are also slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigs AND alleged & proud threateners, have no hi skule DEE-plooomas.
toxic topix AGW deniers from the beginning select incompetence as a way of life.
HoHum. Mire dullard rantings from litebrain. What outta happen is someone cast a net over all the hucksters selling the anthropoglobalclimategenicwarm ingchange hoax.
Jim

Katy, TX

#8 Oct 18, 2013
litebrain wrote:
no warming wrote:
People expect answers from the IPCC, not topix political wanna-bees.
/////////
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
And they got them. That you and your denialists don't understand any of it........
//////////
litesong wrote:
......is because toxic topix AGW deniers have almost no science & mathematics degrees, & seldom have science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, & pre-calc in their poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. A surprisingly large percentage of toxic topix AGW deniers have no hi skule DEE-plooomaas, either. It is NOT surprising, that an extraordinary percentage of toxic topix AGW deniers, who are also slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigs AND alleged & proud threateners, have no hi skule DEE-plooomas.
toxic topix AGW deniers from the beginning select incompetence as a way of life.
And oh, litebrain, to put the lie to your ignorant rantings about "almost no science", I recommend you peruse the following. Well, assuming you know the definition of peruse. It shines the light on the ignorant saliva spewing rants you so often undertake. Lol, the results even surprised the libutard "researcher"...

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/tea-par...
B as in B S as in s

Eden Prairie, MN

#9 Oct 18, 2013
"
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
"...no warming has occurred for the past 15 years."
There is nothing to this either. Their is still science to back the increase in storm severity with warmer waters fueling them and the 'pause' in the air temperatures was fully explained. I can only assume....
What you call science is better known as "an opinion on what the future may bring". So... What ever happened to the belief that CAGW is "unequivocal"?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Environment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Europeans making sales pitch to Trump on climat... 18 hr POTUS 4 Sale 1
Fracking: Progress or Poison? (Apr '15) Thu AreUBrainDead 1,053
News My Word: Congress must counter Trumpa s damage ... May 22 No doubt 1
News Rising sea levels could mean twice as much floo... May 18 Climate Science 1
News U.S. Senate tees up 'accountability act' as reg... May 17 tomin cali 1
News The Latest: GOP lawmakers mark success with rul... May 16 CodeTalker 8
News Episode 2: The Birth of Climate Denial May 14 Subduction Zone 4
More from around the web