Achillibator Giganticus vs. Utahrapto...

Achillibator Giganticus vs. Utahraptor Ostrommaysorum

Posted in the Dinosaur Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Megatron

United States

#1 Jan 1, 2008
I'm not really sure about this one. I mean, they're both of the same family and they're both pracitcally the same size ( I think achillibator is slightly bigger) Oh, I just realized that i could've put this idea in the "Make up your own dino/dino fight," forum. But, this is better, I guess.
sebedin

Köln, Germany

#2 Jan 1, 2008
Hello,
I think Achillobator would lose, its 6 foot smaller than Utahraptor, and not as heavy build.
BR
Jan
REDMAN

Fort Rucker, AL

#3 Jan 1, 2008
I think Utahraptor will definately beat Archillobator and shred it up!

“not selena gomez just a fan ”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#4 Jan 1, 2008
I have no clue what you guys are talking about!
lol
Megatron

Lucas, OH

#5 Jan 2, 2008
sebedin wrote:
Hello,
I think Achillobator would lose, its 6 foot smaller than Utahraptor, and not as heavy build.
BR
Jan
Actually,achillibator is 15-20 ft. long and utahrator is the same length.Also, achillbtor's weight is unnown. And where's your proof that achillobator wasn't as heavilly built as utahraptor? Oh, and here'smy proof that achillo is as big as I said it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achillobator
One more thing, I may have said before that Wikipedia gets their facts from anywhere, but that's just a rumor and sometimes rumors can end up being false. So, like I said before I'm unsure who would rein victorious in this battle.
sebedin

Köln, Germany

#6 Jan 3, 2008
Achillobator was 5 metres long, that is right,
and he was 1,8 metres tall weighthing about 250 kg,( sorry for writing in metric system),
Utah was up to seven metres long 2 metres tall, weighthing 900 kg. I think Achillobator was lighter built of evolutional reasons, he lived 40 million years later than utah, and i think he was more bird like.
I can write my source, its gallery with nearly all dinosaurs but its mostly in german.
And wikipedia isnt a very good source, every one can write there.
BR
Jan
and renember, ever breath through your pants!
Pieman

Canonsburg, PA

#7 Feb 3, 2008
I think that Utahraptor would take the cake. It had a foot-long claw on it's foot(possibly larger). It is also faster than achillibator ( i think).

P.S.I actually never think. <('.'<)(>'.')>
<('.')> <('.'<)(>'.')> <('.')>
Spino009

Arlington, TX

#8 Dec 14, 2008
Achillibator is bigger than Utha and more heaviuly built!
Celebi "I agree."

“I don't exist:youve gone crazy”

Since: Aug 08

Australia

#9 Dec 14, 2008
No, utahraptor was slighlty larger, and utahraptor would have also been the more powerful.

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#10 Apr 16, 2010
Since those dinosaurs are so similar, it would depend on the size and power of the individual animals.
ajakelhihi

New York, NY

#11 Feb 8, 2013
"Spino009"]Achilliba tor is bigger than Utha and more heaviuly built!
no,utahraptor was bigger,thats all.oh and im voting for utah-r
DinoRex

Honolulu, HI

#13 Feb 8, 2013
uthraptor weighs 1600 Ib. so it loses.
ajakelhihi

New York, NY

#14 Mar 3, 2013
DinoRex wrote:
uthraptor weighs 1600 Ib. so it loses.
why?
predatorX sucks

Honolulu, HI

#15 Mar 3, 2013
cuz it is to smol. it is smoler then Achillibator.
PredatorX

United States

#16 Mar 3, 2013
It was bigger. Not smaller.
predatorX sucks

Honolulu, HI

#17 Mar 3, 2013
stop facing the jokes!!!

“'SPOT' The Diplodocus”

Since: Feb 12

Cheshire UK

#18 Mar 3, 2013
predatorX sucks wrote:
stop facing the jokes!!!
Have you got nothing better to do, why don't you go talk to a balloon.
Or go look in a mirror and watch yourself dying.
You sad, sad, very sad, stupid imbecilic cretin.
Macromerus

Fremont, CA

#19 Mar 4, 2013
Yeah... stating an exaggerated weight (1600ibs = 800kg; Utahraptor closer to 400-500kg) for an animal then stating it is smaller than something it is bigger than is not a good joke, not in this context.
PredatorX

Kent, WA

#20 Mar 4, 2013
Macromerus wrote:
Yeah... stating an exaggerated weight (1600ibs = 800kg; Utahraptor closer to 400-500kg) for an animal then stating it is smaller than something it is bigger than is not a good joke, not in this context.
Agreed.

“Sigma beta alpha rho kappa”

Since: Jan 13

Talkeetna, AK

#21 Mar 4, 2013
ajakelhihi wrote:
"Spino009"]Achilliba tor is bigger than Utha and more heaviuly built!
no,utahraptor was bigger,thats all.oh and im voting for utah-r
You do realize you are rplying to a post from 2010?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Dinosaur Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gorosaurus vs Elephant 1 hr Franky 1
Dimetrodon vs Orca 1 hr Franky 1
Goat vs Moose 1 hr Franky 1
Moose vs Velociraptor Mon Orcacrusher333 2
Tell me a animal that can beat megalodon. No ar... (Jan '13) Mon Orcacrusher333 90
Velociraptor vs Orca Mon Orcacrusher333 2
Spinosaurus would easily beat T rex in a fight (Jun '14) Sun Dungeontrigger 407
More from around the web