T-Rex vs Allosaurus vs Giganotosaurus...
jhet77

Richmond, Canada

#592 Mar 18, 2013
Im pretty sure a T-Rex could easily kill an Allo,probbably has a good chance aginst a gigantosaurus,and probbably a 50% chance of killing a carchdontosaurus but if it fights all those in a row.He'd either die from the carchdontosaurus or the spino. This is obviously a 1v1 situation guys!.NOW STOP ARGUING AND JUST GET ALONG AND ADMIT WHO EVERS WRONG AND THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A 1V1 SITUATION...random rage xD
jhet77

Richmond, Canada

#593 Mar 18, 2013
Lord Vader Garfield wrote:
Spinosaurus is the only one that can beat T.Rex. T.Rex sucks.
Your that dumb ''lord vader garfield''? a T.Rex could easily beat a Spinosaurus with just 1 or 2 bites to the neck,plus its giant head can easily knock over the spino if the T.Rex is charging.And if a Spino got bit in the sail,it would be paralyzed which makes it easy to kill for a T.Rex.So get your facts right.
PredatorX

Kent, WA

#594 Mar 18, 2013
He can't. He never did.
Lord Vader Garfield

Honolulu, HI

#595 Mar 19, 2013
jhet77 wrote:
<quoted text> Your that dumb ''lord vader garfield''? a T.Rex could easily beat a Spinosaurus with just 1 or 2 bites to the neck,plus its giant head can easily knock over the spino if the T.Rex is charging.And if a Spino got bit in the sail,it would be paralyzed which makes it easy to kill for a T.Rex.So get your facts right.
wow, are you an idiot or something? That is just bullshit. Spinosaurus has great claws that can knock over T.Rex, and was bigger. T.Rex may be heavier(so it was slow) and bigger bite, but it has no chance of standing against spinosaurus. T.Rex has 2 stupid, tiny claws on it's hands. Spinosaurus was by far faster, bigger claws, bigger, longer, etc. Go back "Daycare Center Toddler and Infant School" to learn! You are the dumbest person I ever seen, and I'm the king of Honolulu(at least now, I'm not cuz I picked a new king and president, lol), so I will kill your cockesucker bullshits!!!
dat herp derp

Richmond, Canada

#597 Mar 19, 2013
jhet and garfield stop arguing and cant you 2 just get along?jhet admit spino does hav some advantages over t.rex and garfield admit t.rex still has quite a good chance to kill spino.
dat herp derp

Richmond, Canada

#598 Mar 20, 2013
Lord Vader Garfield wrote:
<quoted text>wow, are you an idiot or something? That is just bullshit. Spinosaurus has great claws that can knock over T.Rex, and was bigger. T.Rex may be heavier(so it was slow) and bigger bite, but it has no chance of standing against spinosaurus. T.Rex has 2 stupid, tiny claws on it's hands. Spinosaurus was by far faster, bigger claws, bigger, longer, etc. Go back "Daycare Center Toddler and Infant School" to learn! You are the dumbest person I ever seen, and I'm the king of Honolulu(at least now, I'm not cuz I picked a new king and president, lol), so I will kill your cockesucker bullshits!!!
HAH!,A Spino was slender and had hollow bones and could easily be knocked down by a T.Rex and dont forget T.Rex is the strongest of dinosaurs and a charging T.Rex at full speed could outrun a charging rhinoceros?Besides a Spinosaurus's claws were slung under his head and too far down low to actually hit a therapod like T.Rex.And that weak little mouth is as strong as a twig.And all the T.Rex has to do is bite the Spino in the neck once or twice and Spino is dead.And if a Spino gets bit in the sail it will lead to massive blood loss.A T.Rex can also just charge at the Spino and easily knock it over with its huge head and speed.And if you dont believe me then go ask a real Paleontoligist because my dad is a Paleontoligist
dat herp derp

Richmond, Canada

#599 Mar 20, 2013
Im with jhet77.He actually knows his facts.And king of Honlulu?Ha!I bet your not even a king of a sandwhich.And who cares about Honolulu?Its just a island in the pacific.
jhet77

Richmond, Canada

#600 Mar 20, 2013
I gotta bunch of friends here.I never even realized it.
Lord Vader Garfield

Honolulu, HI

#601 Mar 21, 2013
Ha, are you an idiot? Honolulu is a city, and HI is an island. Get your facts right, dumbarse.
jhet77

Richmond, Canada

#602 Mar 22, 2013
Lord Vader Garfield wrote:
Ha, are you an idiot? Honolulu is a city, and HI is an island. Get your facts right, dumbarse.
dafuq is a dumbarse?
Hyper Squid

San Francisco, CA

#603 Mar 22, 2013
Lord Vader Garfield wrote:
Ha, are you an idiot? Honolulu is a city, and HI is an island. Get your facts right, dumbarse.
Hawaii is an island chain, genius.
Lord Vader Garfield

Honolulu, HI

#604 Mar 22, 2013
Hyper Squid wrote:
<quoted text>
Hawaii is an island chain, genius.
I know that, you genius.(calling people genius means they're showing off to be smart but are actually very dumb)
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus

Parklea, Australia

#605 Apr 19, 2013
Well none of those other theropods could reach spinosaurus's neck, his jaws could grip and obsorb struggle, his neck was powerful enough to lift 4 to at least 6 tons of weight, the sail is also out of reach, it's tail is to short to be bitten directly, long arms with long claws ABLE to reach these other theropods and inflict massive amounts of damage, bigger than every large theropod in every aspect including weight height and length, face it Spinosaurus was to OP to be matched it would probably scare the other theropods away.Spinosaurus aegyptiacus would win to many advantages.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#606 Jun 10, 2013
1. Giga
2. Rex
3. Spino/charch/allo
Allos largest size was 13 metres, that's easily big enough to take on the rest.

“Clash of the titans!”

Since: May 13

Isla Sorna,JP

#607 Jun 13, 2013
xenoxomo wrote:
1. T.rex
2. Spino
3. Giga/charch/allo
Allos largest size was 9.7 metres, that's easily big enough to take on the rest.
Fixed!
Oase

Jakarta, Indonesia

#608 Jun 13, 2013
Tyrannosauridae wrote:
<quoted text>
Fixed!
1. T.rex
2. Spino
3. Carch
4. Giga
5. Allo

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#609 Jun 13, 2013
No. Allosaurus amplexus was capable of growing up to 12 metres long.
And btw I meant to put 12 metres not 13 metres.
Oase

Jakarta, Indonesia

#610 Jun 13, 2013
xenoxomo wrote:
No. Allosaurus amplexus was capable of growing up to 12 metres long.
And btw I meant to put 12 metres not 13 metres.
It's Epanterias amplexus. Allosaurus amplexus never existed or it's just fantasy.
Anyway, T.rex wins.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#611 Jun 13, 2013
Allosaurus is not even a question. Last place.

Giganotosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus are extremely similar(a few paleontologists even consider them to be the same genus), they tie for third place.

T. rex and Spinosaurus are about tied for first place if not maybe a very slight advantage to Tyrannosaurus due to its unimaginably strong bite force and greater intelligence compared to Spinosaurus, although Spinosaurus still has immense size and mass on its size.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#612 Jun 14, 2013
Oase wrote:
<quoted text>
It's Epanterias amplexus. Allosaurus amplexus never existed or it's just fantasy.
Anyway, T.rex wins.
Allosaurus could still grow up to 12 metres long, it was still just called allosaurus.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Dinosaur Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Entelodont vs Stegosaurus, Triceratops, Ankylos... 5 hr DinoCoat 2
Save dinosaur!akgator! From the corrupt media Fri Ceolophysis 1
News The "Birds Are Not Dinosaurs" Movement Fri Ceolophysis 14
Discord Vs Tlaloc - The Perilous Rivers Of Madn... Thu Kiryu2012 1
Baragon vs. Elephant In Who Would Win Wed Kiryu2013 1
Some Dino Book I Can't Remember Jan 15 Ateesiks 3
African Bush Elephant vs. Centrosaurus apertus Jan 14 Kiryu2012 1
More from around the web