Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains...

Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times

There are 1 comment on the Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph story from Sep 16, 2013, titled Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times. In it, Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph reports that:

University of Maryland professor of geography and environmental systems Erle Ellis published a splendidly lucid op/ed, " Overpopulation Is Not The Problem ," in Saturday's New York Times .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph.

Frank Abernathy

Cincinnati, OH

#1 Sep 16, 2013
Overpopulation is not the problem? So we can just keep this up indefinitely? From 6 billion to 12 billion, 24, 48, 96, over 100 billion people? What planet is this guy talking about, anyway?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Biology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 3 min replaytime 209,999
News Cancer and Genetics: What's the Connection? 59 min Stephany McDowell 2
News Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Opens Prostate Can... 1 hr Stephany McDowell 1
News How our cells use mother's and father's genes 1 hr Stephany McDowell 1
News Milo: Why Islamic Preachers Prey On Gingers 14 hr west is best 7
News New research offers clues to cause of Crohn's d... 18 hr Stephany McDowell 1
News Study brings grasp of autism gene a 'step closer' Tue Stephany McDowell 1
More from around the web