Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times
There are 1 comment on the Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph story from Sep 16, 2013, titled Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times. In it, Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph reports that:
University of Maryland professor of geography and environmental systems Erle Ellis published a splendidly lucid op/ed, " Overpopulation Is Not The Problem ," in Saturday's New York Times .
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph.
#1 Sep 16, 2013
Overpopulation is not the problem? So we can just keep this up indefinitely? From 6 billion to 12 billion, 24, 48, 96, over 100 billion people? What planet is this guy talking about, anyway?
Add your comments below
|Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11)||3 min||replaytime||209,999|
|Cancer and Genetics: What's the Connection?||59 min||Stephany McDowell||2|
|Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Opens Prostate Can...||1 hr||Stephany McDowell||1|
|How our cells use mother's and father's genes||1 hr||Stephany McDowell||1|
|Milo: Why Islamic Preachers Prey On Gingers||14 hr||west is best||7|
|New research offers clues to cause of Crohn's d...||18 hr||Stephany McDowell||1|
|Study brings grasp of autism gene a 'step closer'||Tue||Stephany McDowell||1|
Find what you want!
Search Biology Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC