Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times
Sep 16, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph
University of Maryland professor of geography and environmental systems Erle Ellis published a splendidly lucid op/ed, " Overpopulation Is Not The Problem ," in Saturday's New York Times .
Overpopulation is not the problem? So we can just keep this up indefinitely? From 6 billion to 12 billion, 24, 48, 96, over 100 billion people? What planet is this guy talking about, anyway?
7 Users are viewing the Biology Forum right now
|Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11)||10 min||HMT 123 Observatory||112,064|
|Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08)||1 hr||Chimney1||171,275|
|Armwrestling, who's the stronger gender? (Oct '08)||Jul 8||MrJean||48|
|Origin of Hindu Brahmins (Aug '08)||Jul 6||FACT||177|
|A bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligase IpaH9.8 targets... (Dec '09)||Jun 29||Snafu_||2|
|Are Pollen Count Forecasts Reliable? (Mar '11)||Jun 29||what||11|
|Botanists head to Nunavut to help fill out gaps...||Jun 28||link above broken maybe||2|