Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 256424 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166406 Mar 8, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
The Greek Septuagint was never not considered the Holy Scripture. It was just a simple and a very poor translation of the first five books of the Jewish Bible.
Jesus could not read Greek.
which when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians; or Hellenist Jews, who were born and brought up in Greece, and spoke the Greek language; though the Alexandrian copy, and the Syriac version, read "Greeks", as if they were native Greeks,
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166407 Mar 8, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>

lol! That was cute!
Ya Ma.

Isn't Ma a popular Chinese name?

(smiles)

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166408 Mar 8, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
For three years, the disciples could not understand a thing of what Jesus spoke. How much could Jesus teach and how much could they have learned within a short walk on the track?
In Acts 2, Peter lies boldly by saying, "32 God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of it."
He and other disciples were not witnesses to the alleged resurrection.
And here I am opening your mind on the broadband, to show the deliberately twisted and distorted translations in the OT.
Your mind is twisted like a pretzel.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#166409 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>Your mind is twisted like a pretzel.
Actually it should be applied to you and not to BMZ.

How you people "believed" that Jesus "appointed" Paul as his 13th Apostle?

Your problem started with this "assumption" and it shall never end unless you solve this basic riddle.

This is the Pretzel Twist you are calling about.

If your "basic hypothesis" is wrong, all conclusions derived from it would be wrong.

Just expunge all the letters of Paul from your NT and then re-read it. It would make a totally different sense.

It shows that twists of your pretzel and getting straightened!! Try it and I tried it and it helped a lot!!
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#166410 Mar 9, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has claimed to an expert translator. The problem with you is that you have no knowledge of Hebrew, Aramaic and te non-scriptural language Greek.
Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic are very close. Idioms, figuratives, etc are strikingly similar. And that is why we can easily understand the context and true meanings of Jewish Scripture, without even knowing Hebrew.
By the way, there are many words, which are common among Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic but there is nothing common between Hebrew and Greek.
We just want you to try and compare different translations and try to detect wrong insertions, forgeries, etc.
A very masterpiece post BMZ.

We can understand most of "aramaic words" which Jesus spoke and which are recoded "verbatim" in the NT books, even when we do not understand Aramaic as a language. The same holds for Hebrew.

And as you pointed out there is nothing common between Hebrew and Greek.

East is east and west is west and the twain shall never meet.

Christianity (of St. Paul) was an attempt to patch Western Ideas into an "eastern religion" preached by Jesus, and that is why there is so much confusion.

But your post was really brilliant.

Salaam

MUQ
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166411 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
Jesus in Matthew 28:19 gave the disciples the command to baptize
In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
Peter did not follow that so-called command at all.

Peter baptized ONLY in the name of Jesus.

You cannot deny this! Don't even try. OK?

How come that trinitarian formula for baptism was not mentioned in the other three gospels?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166412 Mar 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
A very masterpiece post BMZ.

We can understand most of "aramaic words" which Jesus spoke and which are recoded "verbatim" in the NT books, even when we do not understand Aramaic as a language. The same holds for Hebrew.

And as you pointed out there is nothing common between Hebrew and Greek.
East is east and west is west and the twain shall never meet.

Christianity (of St. Paul) was an attempt to patch Western Ideas into an "eastern religion" preached by Jesus, and that is why there is so much confusion.

But your post was really brilliant.

Salaam
MUQ
Thanks, MUQ for the compliment.

If Jesus' teachings were understood in his native language, there would have been no Christianity at all.

The Greek language ruined it all.

If Paul had not gone West (Turkey, Greece and Rome), this triune God would never have been concocted and created to win pagan converts for the religion founded by Constantine.

Salaams

BMZ
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166414 Mar 9, 2013
JOEL wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya Ma.
Isn't Ma a popular Chinese name?
(smiles)
Not really. It is spelled as Mah. Another name is Mak.

The most popular names are Tan, Lim, Leong, Wong, Ho and Loh here.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166415 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>

Which name are you referring too?

Jesus was called by many different names by his disciples. Including the Messiah, Master, the one promised by the prophets and rabbi. While many of his disciples may have been uneducated fisherman they seemed to know that he was the one promised in the Old Testament.

Jesus in Matthew 28:19 gave the disciples the command to baptize
In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
Which name was I referring to? I did not ask you the various names of Jesus.

The question was: Under whose name did Peter baptize the people?

And my post showed that Peter did not baptize folks in the name of the three. So, it is quite obvious that Matthew 28:19 was a forgery.

Under whose name did John baptize Jesus?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166416 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>You are ignorant
Jesus read Isiah from it in the Hellenist Greek Jews synagogue.
Another lie! Jesus spoke Aramaic and possibly Hebrew.

Now it is Hellenist Greek Jews Synagogue! lol!

Scripture was always read in Hebrew in all synagogues. Ever heard of Jews reciting and praying in English or Greek?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166417 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>You need to get a new translator.
Read mu post.
It may be added that this interpretation accords with the connection in which the word occurs. Though it may be admitted that the connection would not "necessarily" lead to this view, yet this interpretation is in entire harmony with the statements in the previous verses, and in the following verse. Thus, in the previous verse, the psalmist had said that "his flesh would rest in hope," - a sentiment which accords with either the idea that he would at some future period be raised from the grave, and would not perish forever, though the period of the resurrection might be remote; or with the idea of being raised up so soon that the body would not return to corruption, that is, before the change consequent on death would take place. The sentiment in the following verse also agrees with this view. That sentiment is, that there is a path to life; that in the presence of God there is fulness of joy; that at his right hand there are pleasures forevermore - a sentiment, in this connection, founded on the belief of the resurrection from the dead, and equally true whether the dead should be raised immediately or at some remote period. I infer, therefore, that the apostles Peter and Paul made a legitimate use of this passage; that the argument which they urged was derived from a proper interpretation of the language; that the fair construction of the psalm, and the fact that David "had" returned to corruption, fully justified them in the application which they made of the passage; and that, therefore, it was the design of the Holy Spirit to convey the idea that "the Messiah" would be raised from the dead without undergoing the change which others undergo in the grave; and that it was thus "predicted" in the
Utter nonsense!

There is no mention of a Messiah in the Torah. Only a prophet was foretold.

And there is no mention in the Jewish Scriptures of a messiah, who was to be a son of God, who would die and get resurrected.

Please stop lying and start thinking hard.

Your salvation is only from the Jews as Jesus said. So please listen to Jesus, revert to Judaism and start going to synagogues.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#166418 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>which when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians; or Hellenist Jews, who were born and brought up in Greece, and spoke the Greek language; though the Alexandrian copy, and the Syriac version, read "Greeks", as if they were native Greeks,
What has this piece from Acts 11 to do with what I said?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166419 Mar 9, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Another lie! Jesus spoke Aramaic and possibly Hebrew.
Now it is Hellenist Greek Jews Synagogue! lol!
Scripture was always read in Hebrew in all synagogues. Ever heard of Jews reciting and praying in English or Greek?
What do you know?
NOTHING, NOTHING, NOTHING, NOTHING.

The Muslim flock you control must live in terror of your arrogance.
You must show your Muslim flock how to handle the infidel, right?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166420 Mar 9, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Utter nonsense!
There is no mention of a Messiah in the Torah. Only a prophet was foretold.
And there is no mention in the Jewish Scriptures of a messiah, who was to be a son of God, who would die and get resurrected.
Please stop lying and start thinking hard.
Your salvation is only from the Jews as Jesus said. So please listen to Jesus, revert to Judaism and start going to synagogues.
You are just being a smart ass to show your flock how to handle the infidels.
You inordinately cannot be that stupid.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#166421 Mar 9, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>You are just being a smart ass to show your flock how to handle the infidels.
You inordinately cannot be that stupid.
All the stupidity is reserved for Pauline Christian.

I am yet to see any religion with roots so weak and shallow as Pauline Christianity.

Wherever you touch the wall is ready to fall down!!

No doubt Jews have totally neutralized Christianity in the west, there is no Christian Scholar worth his name who can stand to Jews in any religious debate and hold his ground even for 5 minutes.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166422 Mar 9, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>

Not really. It is spelled as Mah. Another name is Mak.

The most popular names are Tan, Lim, Leong, Wong, Ho and Loh here.
Thank you, Ma.

(smiles)

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166423 Mar 9, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Utter nonsense!
There is no mention of a Messiah in the Torah. Only a prophet was foretold.
And there is no mention in the Jewish Scriptures of a messiah, who was to be a son of God, who would die and get resurrected.
Please stop lying and start thinking hard.
Your salvation is only from the Jews as Jesus said. So please listen to Jesus, revert to Judaism and start going to synagogues.
The whole Torah is about the Messiah.
The Jews are still waiting for a Messiah.
Your replays are based on the evil satanic worship of evil.
You have no soul, are you a jinn?

“STILL SEEKING OBAMA'S JAILING”

Since: Nov 08

Swift Water,NY

#166424 Mar 9, 2013
jimmie c boswell wrote:
well it is true, that calling HaShem G-D anything other than what is given in TheTorah, is the forbidden art of witchraft of altering TheTorah. and there is no allah name mentioned in TheTorah. and you cannot even call YHVH, yaweh cause that is not how YeHOO VHee (Redemption is HE And SHE is pronounced. this according to TheOUR IMAGE of G-D, always given to Adam in the first comming of Adam. and not revealed unto always the second of adam here in always TheTorah, from TheG-D of Only and Always TheTorah is unceasingly now. and TheG-D of Only TheTorah does not give the koran to Moshe. shalomcha vshalomech???,?...
"allah" is the false god of the moon. "Allah" is NOT God. God is REAL,allah is NOT!

“STILL SEEKING OBAMA'S JAILING”

Since: Nov 08

Swift Water,NY

#166425 Mar 9, 2013
alla is the non existent god that degenerate miscreant disgusting people called "Muslims" worship.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166426 Mar 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
All the stupidity is reserved for Pauline Christian.
I am yet to see any religion with roots so weak and shallow as Pauline Christianity.
Wherever you touch the wall is ready to fall down!!
No doubt Jews have totally neutralized Christianity in the west, there is no Christian Scholar worth his name who can stand to Jews in any religious debate and hold his ground even for 5 minutes.
Are you a jinn MUQ?
jinns are ignorant of truth.
And you show you are ignorant MUQ.
By posting the fraudulently copy of Barnabas

[Arabic jinn, demonic, demon, from jinn, demons, from janna, to cover, conceal; see gnn in Semitic roots.]

The American HeritageĀ® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright Ā©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

jinni, jinnee, djinni, djinny [d&#658;&#618;&#71 2;ni&#720; &#712;d&#658;&#618 ;n&#618;]
n pl jinn, djinn [d&#658;&#618;n]

(Non-Christian Religions / Islam) a being or spirit in Muslim belief who could assume human or animal form and influence man by supernatural powers
[from Arabic]

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Peru seeks dog breed status for ancient llama h... (Sep '06) May 11 Parden Pard 3
News Ancient artifacts seized from Hobby Lobby retur... May 2 WarForOil 2
An Exceptional Discovery-Unearthed Child at Pom... Apr 30 Jeff 5
News Archaeologists find ancient mass child sacrific... Apr 30 Poster Child for ... 1
News Experts unite to condemn plans for road tunnel ... Apr '18 TheNi6htTrain 1
News Florida beachgoers discover 'holy grail of ship... Apr '18 Vicki 1
News Mystery rock is 330,000 years old and proves an... Feb '18 Chris 1