Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 228468 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Buford

Hurricane, WV

#160159 Jan 26, 2013
bmz,

Go to bed, but better yet, schedule a brain transplant. The one that you have now doesn't work. Period.

No one can deny this fact.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#160160 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
We do not have such stories in the books.
Polemic Christians and Christianity have been notoriously famous for lifting off others' scripture and stories to distort and misinform.
That is how Christianity flourished utilizing the tools such as lies, deceit, distortion, fraud and forgeries.
The above story fits the biblical Jesus' bill. He was into the dead. Better check.
Idiot Liar,

Christians simply have to quote MUSLIM "scripture and stories" VERBATIM.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160161 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorant Fool,
Think hard if you really have a brain. Why would the so-called Treasurer of the Jews hide the people's wealth? If he had done that, the Jews would have killed Kinana.
And you think that Kinana was the treasurer of all the Jews?
Can you confirm from Jewish sources if Kinana had been appointed Treasure by the Jews?
The Jews never let anyone take control of their wealth. Each person had his own wealth. And you fools believe that he was their treasurer?
Kinana, the murderer, was killed by Muhammad b. Maslama because Kinana had murdered his brother. And the punishment was justified. Kinana earned it.
Stefano, are you coming from the lineage of Kinana? LMAO! Buford surely is from Kinana's line.
I will be off to bed and will read your incoherence tomorrow. Thanks and good night
Do I have to think hard in order to answer to the conjecture you made up?

Don't be more ridiculous than ever.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#160162 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that all that you could spell and say?
Read again!
You need to get Tu Quoque out of your mind, Buford. That will never help you.
Was this fellow Paul like Joshua or Isaiah or Jeremiah or Ezekiel and many others?
The man was neither a prophet nor ever had met Jesus. He did not even sit in the company of Jesus for a second.
So, in terms of Scripture, Paul was a nobody!
Was Luke a disciple of Jesus? Did he sit for ten seconds in the company of Jesus or his disciples?
Obviously, the answer is a NO!
And what is Paul's contribution? A dozen or so letters that he wrote to a few people? What right do you have to call those letters, scripture?
Same goes for the gospels! Was Mark a disciple of Jesus? No! Right? The man just collected tales and wrote his hadith book. He was the Ibne Ishaq of his time. Was that book endorsed by Jesus? Was it left by Jesus?
I have already told you that Injeel means the wisdom and knowledge granted by God to one of the most obedient slaves of God, namely Jesus.
The New Testament cannot be called a scripture. Period. Now, you know why I cannot call the NT a scripture.
Muhammad recited Qur'aan. What did Jesus recite or what did he exacly reveal? Nothing!
Jesus was just a teacher and he came to reform Judaism. That is why some of the Jews considered him a Rabbi.
Question: Did Jesus ever talk to his disciples about Paul?
Baloney and baloney again.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#160163 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Both of you are clueless fools.
So, you accept that God made the donkey and baby Jesus speak? Right?
Now, do you seriously believe that the Nazarene walked on water?
The Mussolini and Italians would walk on water if thats the quickest way to retreat from the Brave Allied forces!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#160164 Jan 26, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Wow! You really are THAT stupid!
Your "hole..yeah" Church gets everything from the ghost version of a dead mangod........so it must be accurate...and being guided by the ghost it must be creepy.
This is 21st century and holy ghost is denying the paternity charge..
george whyte

London, UK

#160165 Jan 26, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Baloney
Is it in semitic language- yenolab?
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#160166 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Both of you are clueless fools.
So, you accept that God made the donkey and baby Jesus speak? Right?
Now, do you seriously believe that the Nazarene walked on water?
rabbee: hey if i have done it, then so could TheWeBoth of done it. it is not impossible, since it depends on ThePower G-D gives to you. and it is evil and wicked men, who try to make it look as if G-D is not doing anything. if G-D says you can do it, then you can do it. it is not our saying TheWord of G-D, that keeps me safe. it is what G-D, actally says that keeps me safe. for the words of alleged as men, are worse than weak.
endtime

AOL

#160168 Jan 26, 2013
.

A N T I C H R I S T ------ 6-6-6



.
John

Australia

#160171 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello, Christ-turd
We don't have to spin any thing. The Christian Bible can be spun anyone, one wants.
We were discussing the gospels. Actually none of them makes any sense and do not have any core message of any value.
What we have is the bullshit spun by the early Church fathers, which is still kept wet and damp by folks like your goodself.
By the way, do you seriously believe that Herod, a Jew, ordered the slaughter of little kids? Do you think Matthew was copying the script to talk about Pharoah?
No, we're discussing the fraud of islam.
Mo the butchering paedophile is obviously a false prophet.
Herod was a Greek Hellenistic ruler subject to the Romans you idiot. He didn't give a rat's arse about the Jews.
John

Australia

#160172 Jan 26, 2013
John Preacher wrote:
MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS
www.islam-watch.org/authors/107-khalaf/1032-i...
Mohammad was a phedophile his youngest wife was 6. This man was evil, its no wonder his nurse said that he was possessed from birth. You have been deceived. No other prophet was accused of being demon posessed.
Muzzies are sick beasts.
muslim

Shrewsbury, UK

#160173 Jan 26, 2013
In my distress I called to the LORD; I called out to my God. From his temple he heard my voice; my cry came to his ears. 2 Samuel 22:7

"The earth trembled and quaked, the foundations of the heavens shook; they trembled because he was angry. 22.8

Smoke rose from his nostrils; consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it. 22.9

LOL! Sumthing out of lord of the rings.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160174 Jan 26, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Baloney and baloney again.
Is that all you could say?

Read my post addressed to Buford again and try to reply point by point, if you can.

"Is that all that you could spell and say?

Read again!

" You need to get Tu Quoque out of your mind, Buford. That will never help you.

Was this fellow Paul like Joshua or Isaiah or Jeremiah or Ezekiel and many others?

The man was neither a prophet nor ever had met Jesus. He did not even sit in the company of Jesus for a second.

So, in terms of Scripture, Paul was a nobody!

Was Luke a disciple of Jesus? Did he sit for ten seconds in the company of Jesus or his disciples?
Obviously, the answer is a NO!

And what is Paul's contribution? A dozen or so letters that he wrote to a few people? What right do you have to call those letters, scripture?

Same goes for the gospels! Was Mark a disciple of Jesus? No! Right? The man just collected tales and wrote his hadith book. He was the Ibne Ishaq of his time. Was that book endorsed by Jesus? Was it left by Jesus?

I have already told you that Injeel means the wisdom and knowledge granted by God to one of the most obedient slaves of God, namely Jesus.

The New Testament cannot be called a scripture. Period. Now, you know why I cannot call the NT a scripture.

Muhammad recited Qur'aan. What did Jesus recite or what did he exacly reveal? Nothing!

Jesus was just a teacher and he came to reform Judaism. That is why some of the Jews considered him a Rabbi.

Question: Did Jesus ever talk to his disciples about Paul? "

Give it your best shot and remember the Bible cannot help you.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160175 Jan 26, 2013
John wrote:
Herod was a Greek Hellenistic ruler subject to the Romans you idiot. He didn't give a rat's arse about the Jews.
Classic!

Ignorant Fool!

The point was that Matthew churned out big lies. There was no massacre of little boys carried out.

If there were any massacre, it would have been reported and recorded in the Jewish History and also in the Roman History.

So, you should not give a rat's arse about Matthew's junk and stuff.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160176 Jan 26, 2013
george whyte wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it in semitic language- yenolab?
Baloney is the right word for the New Testament. Might have come from the non-scriptural language Greek too! lol! The Greek word is pronounced as Aaloysia.

Salaams
BMZ
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160177 Jan 26, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Do I have to think hard in order to answer to the conjecture you made up?
Don't be more ridiculous than ever.
Is that all you could offer in your off-topic rebuttal?

Read again what I wrote:

Ignorant Fool,

Think hard if you really have a brain. Why would the so-called Treasurer of the Jews hide the people's wealth? If he had done that, the Jews would have killed Kinana.

And you think that Kinana was the treasurer of all the Jews?

Can you confirm from Jewish sources if Kinana had been appointed Treasure by the Jews?

The Jews never let anyone take control of their wealth. Each person had his own wealth. And you fools believe that he was their treasurer?

Kinana, the murderer, was killed by Muhammad b. Maslama because Kinana had murdered his brother. And the punishment was justified. Kinana earned it.

Stefano, are you coming from the lineage of Kinana? LMAO! Buford surely is from Kinana's line.

I will be off to bed and will read your incoherence tomorrow. Thanks and good night"

Try your level best to reply point by point. OK?
muslim

Shrewsbury, UK

#160178 Jan 26, 2013
John Preacher wrote:
MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS
www.islam-watch.org/authors/107-khalaf/1032-i ...
Mohammad was a phedophile his youngest wife was 6. This man was evil, its no wonder his nurse said that he was possessed from birth. You have been deceived. No other prophet was accused of being demon posessed.
King James
Numbers 31:17.
Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that has known man by lying with him.

Numbers 31:18.. But all the young girls, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

Webster's Bible
Numbers 31:18..
But all the female children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

Young's Literal Translation
and all the infants among the women, who have not known the lying of a male, ye have kept alive for yourselves.

New Living Translation
Numbers 31:40.. and 16,000 virgin girls, of whom 32 were the LORD's share.

3-year old virgin girls! sic trinity!
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160180 Jan 26, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Idiot,
You believe Mohammad's testimony for no good reason. Period.
I believe in Muhammad's testimony for a very good reason and that is:
Your God is only one God! There is no other besides God.
How to believe in the absurd testimony of Paul and others, which led to the absurdity, monstrosity and abomination known as Trinity or the Triune God of Christianity?

A wretched man comes out of the blue, sees Satan masquerading as Jesus and fills the vacuum left by Jesus and his disciples after they ran into hiding. Why should I believe in this rubbish?

You need to think hard!
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#160181 Jan 26, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Ignorant Fool,
How many times do you need to be reminded that the best evidence suggests that your precious "Gospel of Barnabas" was written by a 16th century Christian convert to Islam, that is, by someone who knew the Gospel accounts well enough to rewrite them as a lying Muslim would do in the hope of fooling ignorant Christians into believing that his counterfeit account was the only TRUE one.
Is this any different than what bmz and MUQ have been doing day after day in this very thread when they post what "Jesus" or "God" should have said? You need to start thinking for a change.
OH, now it is a "Christian Convert to Islam"? So the "Blame" has to be shared between Islam and Christianity?

Or may be first he was a Jew, then he converted to Christianity and then he converted to Islam?

Who knows when "experts" get on the tail, they can "discover and prove anything"!!

The ONLY thing these "experts" do not agree upon is the Truth!!

Why Barnabas should not write a Gospel, I do not know. he was there with Disciples since the very beginning. he fell out with Paul, so he must have some differences with him.

And these differences were not "why you take red pencil from my cupboard type"....they were deep theological differences.

So it is very "logical" for Barnabas to put his side of the story.
And it had to be different from Paul's views that is also certain.

And the Church is against this Gospel that is also certain.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#160182 Jan 26, 2013
Excerpts from the Gospel of Barnabas, Part-41

Chapter 84 Prayers to God should be pure

.. "Now I tell you that there be in the world greater madmen, said Jesus, "because with the service of God they mingle the service of the world. So much so that many of blameless life have been deceived of Satan, and while praying have mingled with their prayer worldly business, whereupon they have become at that time abominable in the sight of God. Tell me, when you wash yourselves for prayer, do you take care that no unclean thing touch you? Yes, assuredly. But what do you when you are making prayer? You wash your soul from sins through the mercy of God. Would you be willing then, while you are making prayer, to speak of worldly things? Take care not to do so, for every worldly word becomes dung of the devil upon the soul of him that speaks."

The disciples answered: "It is most true." Then Jesus said: "Truly I say to you, that every one when he prays speaks with God. Is it then right that you should leave speaking with God in order to speak with man? Is it right that your friend should for this cause be offended, because you have more reverence for God than for him
Note: These preachings of Jesus are missing in Gospels- MUQ

Chapter 85, Satan and his ways

"When a man works ill or talks ill, if one go to correct him, and hinder such work, what does such an one?" said Jesus. The disciples answered: "He does well, because he serves God, who always seeks to hinder evil, even as the sun that always seeks to chase away the darkness." Jesus said: "And I tell you on the contrary that when one works well or, speaks well, whosoever seeks to hinder him, under pretext of aught that is not better, he serves the devil, no, he even becomes his companion.

For the devil attends to nought else but to hinder every good thing. "But what shall I say to you now? I will say to you as said Solomon ;the prophet, holy one, and friend of God: "Of a thousand whom you know, one be your friend."
Then said Matthew: "Then shall we not be able to love any one." Jesus answered: "Truly I say to you, that it is not lawful for you to hate anything save only sin: insomuch that you cannot hate even Satan as creature of God, but rather as enemy of God. Know you wherefore?

I will tell you; because he is a creature of God, and all that God has created is good and perfect. Accordingly, whoever hates the creature hates also the creator. But the friend is a singular thing, that is not easily found, but is easily lost. For the friend will not suffer contradiction against him whom he supremely loves. Beware, be you cautious, and choose not for friend one who loves not him whom you love. Know you what friend means? Friend means nothing but physician of the soul;.

And so, just as one rarely finds a good physician who knows the sicknesses and understands to apply the medicines thereto, so also are friends rare who know the faults and understand how to guide to good. But herein is an evil, that there are many who have friends that feign not to see the faults of their friend; others excuse them; others defend them under earthly pretext; and, what is worse, there are friends who invite and aid their friend to err, whose end shall be like to their villainy. Beware that you receive not such men for friends, for that in truth they are enemies and slayers of the soul.

Note: Where else to find such beautiful preaching except in this Gospel- MUQ
(Abridged)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Confederate flags placed at Martin Luther King'... Fri DieShadowHelix 1
News Customs officials crack down on Pakistan's mill... (Aug '12) Jul 30 mICHEAL 24
need info on a artifact I found Jul 20 neyney 1
News Archaeology and Mormonism (Jun '07) Jul 17 Barnsweb 104
News Tonga's Nukuleka, the birth place of Polynesia (Jan '08) Jul 15 Tui_Tonga 1,973
'Skulls, Shamans and Sacrifice in Stone Age Bri... Jul 13 Dave 1
Are 2 Million People Really Buried In 74 Graves? Jul 12 Candy 1
More from around the web