Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 228463 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

george whyte

Market Rasen, UK

#159121 Jan 19, 2013
we must conclude that since the Hebrew word for "mouse" is akbar, we should translate the Arabic sentence "Allahu Akbar" as

"Allah is a mouse"!
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#159122 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159123 Jan 19, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Al-EX the Phallocentric,
Matthew 12:38 Then some of the Pharisees and teachers of the law said to him,“Teacher, we want to see a sign from you.”
39 He answered,“A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a sign! But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. 40 For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."
brainless buttboy..
LOL...
and?
Was NonGenJonah ALIVE before, during and after the belly incident?
lol.........
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159124 Jan 19, 2013
george whyte wrote:
Buford he was using the jewish calender , a new day starts at sun set,,,remeber..
by this is an old debate, i remeber debating this with muslims 10 years ago
lol..........
Was it wed, thurs or friday?
when did your people MURDDER him?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159125 Jan 19, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Al-EX the Phallocentric,
Matthew 12:38 Then some of the Pharisees and teachers of the law said to him,“Teacher, we want to see a sign from you.”
39 He answered,“A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a sign! But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. 40 For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."
lol..
Who is this son of man? Why do you use "upper case"?
Did B.JEWsus use upper case in his language?
son of man.....son of adam or just a human being?
oh...are you suggesting this Son of Man is not B. JEWsus?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#159126 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
brainless buttboy..
LOL...
and?
Was NonGenJonah ALIVE before, during and after the belly incident?
lol.........
Al-EX the Phallocentric,

"NonGenJonah" was alive before, during, and after "the belly incident," but died at some point post-Ninevah, presumably. For his part, Jesus physically died on the cross but spent his "time" in death preaching to the dead.

1 Peter 3:18 For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive by the Spirit, 19 through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison 20 who disobeyed long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built.

1 Peter 4:6 For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead, so that they might be judged according to men in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit.

It goes without saying that Mohammad did nothing of the sort, or the Qur'an would have told us so!
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#159127 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
lol..........
Was it wed, thurs or friday?
when did your people MURDDER him?
Al-EX the Phallocentric,

Are you sure that there aren't THREE D'S in MURDDER?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159128 Jan 19, 2013
..........The Need for a Clarification. Christians coming from a Gentile background had to learn this Judeo-Christian nomenclature of the week-days, because in the pagan world the week-days were not numbered but named after the seven planetary deities (dies solis, dies lunae,...). This may explain why Mark, in writing to a Gentile-Christian readership who had only recently learned the Judeo-Christian nomenclature of the week-days, deemed it necessary to clarify what he meant by "paraskeue-preparation, " by adding the qualifying phrase, "that is, the day before the sabbath" (Mark 15:42). This clarification may also have been necessitated by the fact that the seven-day planetary week itself had been recently introduced in the Roman world where the eight-day week (nundinum) was still used side by side with the planetary week.7

Additional and conclusive evidence that "paraskeue-Preparation " is used in the Gospels to designate "Friday" and not "Wednesday" is provided by the sequence in which the days of the Passion weekend are given: "Preparation, Sabbath, first day" (Matt 27:62; 28:1; Mark 15:42; 16:1; Luke 24:54-55; 24:1). Both Mark and Matthew explicitly place the beginning of the first day at the end of the Sabbath (Mark 16:1; Matt 28:1). The latter could hardly have been a Thursday Passover Sabbath, because Thursday is not followed by the first day of the week..........

Conclusion. The foregoing analysis of John 19:14, the second key text of the Wednesday Crucifixion theory, has shown that such a theory is based on human fantasy and not on a Biblical fact. We have submitted abundant evidence indicating that John’s expression "the day of Preparation of the Passover" (John 19:14), simply means, as most scholars acknowledge, "the Friday of the Passover week." Thus the Crucifixion took place on Friday and not on Wednesday.
http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/cru...
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159130 Jan 19, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Al-EX the Phallocentric,
"NonGenJonah" was alive before, during, and after "the belly incident," but died at some point post-Ninevah, presumably. For his part, Jesus physically died on the cross but spent his "time" in death preaching to the dead.
1 Peter 3:18 For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive by the Spirit, 19 through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison 20 who disobeyed long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built.
1 Peter 4:6 For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead, so that they might be judged according to men in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit.
It goes without saying that Mohammad did nothing of the sort, or the Qur'an would have told us so!
NONGENJONAH WAS ALIVE FOR THREE DAYS...B-JEWSUS WAS "DEAD" FOR THREE DAYS....THERE THE COMPARISON ENDS!!!
Are you sure Christ and B-Jewsus are one and same person?
LOL....
WHAT IS THE DARN POINT IN PREACHING TO THE DEAD YOU FOOL!!!!!! ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT YOU CAN DO WHAT THE HELL YOU LIKE HERE AND GET PREACHED AGAIN WHEN DEAD SO YOU CAN GET ANOTHER GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD FROM THE FALL GUY??
You are a bigger moron than the writers of some of these silly books!
If BJ died for the sins of those who by accepting can have Eternal life; Where are they? LOL....HAVE YOU SEEN ANYONE WITH ETERNAL LIFE?LOL..
What has changed since BJ "died" for the sins of non-gentiles?
Nothing!
Only thing that happened was the brainless uneducated Gentiles misinterpreted non-gentile scriptures and MURDERED millions of non-gentiles including the "recent" holocaust!
Stop lying.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159131 Jan 19, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Al-EX the Phallocentric,
Are you sure that there aren't THREE D'S in MURDDER?
Why not, if you can have THREE D(EITIE)'S in GODDD!!!
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#159132 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not, if you can have THREE D(EITIE)'S in GODDD!!!
Why do you think mohammad was a prophet of God? He was not a descendent of Israel nor a born again Christian.

Why do you think the koran is uncorrupt when the original versions were all burnt after someone rewrote it decades later?

When did mohammad authorize the hadiths?

The biographies of mohammad can not be trusted since they were written a hundred years after he died.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#159133 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
..........The Need for a Clarification. Christians coming from a Gentile background had to learn this Judeo-Christian nomenclature of the week-days, because in the pagan world the week-days were not numbered but named after the seven planetary deities (dies solis, dies lunae,...). This may explain why Mark, in writing to a Gentile-Christian readership who had only recently learned the Judeo-Christian nomenclature of the week-days, deemed it necessary to clarify what he meant by "paraskeue-preparation, " by adding the qualifying phrase, "that is, the day before the sabbath" (Mark 15:42). This clarification may also have been necessitated by the fact that the seven-day planetary week itself had been recently introduced in the Roman world where the eight-day week (nundinum) was still used side by side with the planetary week.7
Additional and conclusive evidence that "paraskeue-Preparation " is used in the Gospels to designate "Friday" and not "Wednesday" is provided by the sequence in which the days of the Passion weekend are given: "Preparation, Sabbath, first day" (Matt 27:62; 28:1; Mark 15:42; 16:1; Luke 24:54-55; 24:1). Both Mark and Matthew explicitly place the beginning of the first day at the end of the Sabbath (Mark 16:1; Matt 28:1). The latter could hardly have been a Thursday Passover Sabbath, because Thursday is not followed by the first day of the week..........
Conclusion. The foregoing analysis of John 19:14, the second key text of the Wednesday Crucifixion theory, has shown that such a theory is based on human fantasy and not on a Biblical fact. We have submitted abundant evidence indicating that John’s expression "the day of Preparation of the Passover" (John 19:14), simply means, as most scholars acknowledge, "the Friday of the Passover week." Thus the Crucifixion took place on Friday and not on Wednesday.
http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/cru...
Is it suprising that Christian's Holy Day is Sunday, the day of the Lord's resurrection, while muslims day of prayer is on Friday, the day of our Lord's crucifixtion?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#159134 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
..........The Need for a Clarification. Christians coming from a Gentile background had to learn this Judeo-Christian nomenclature of the week-days, because in the pagan world the week-days were not numbered but named after the seven planetary deities (dies solis, dies lunae,...). This may explain why Mark, in writing to a Gentile-Christian readership who had only recently learned the Judeo-Christian nomenclature of the week-days, deemed it necessary to clarify what he meant by "paraskeue-preparation, " by adding the qualifying phrase, "that is, the day before the sabbath" (Mark 15:42). This clarification may also have been necessitated by the fact that the seven-day planetary week itself had been recently introduced in the Roman world where the eight-day week (nundinum) was still used side by side with the planetary week.7
Additional and conclusive evidence that "paraskeue-Preparation " is used in the Gospels to designate "Friday" and not "Wednesday" is provided by the sequence in which the days of the Passion weekend are given: "Preparation, Sabbath, first day" (Matt 27:62; 28:1; Mark 15:42; 16:1; Luke 24:54-55; 24:1). Both Mark and Matthew explicitly place the beginning of the first day at the end of the Sabbath (Mark 16:1; Matt 28:1). The latter could hardly have been a Thursday Passover Sabbath, because Thursday is not followed by the first day of the week..........
Conclusion. The foregoing analysis of John 19:14, the second key text of the Wednesday Crucifixion theory, has shown that such a theory is based on human fantasy and not on a Biblical fact. We have submitted abundant evidence indicating that John’s expression "the day of Preparation of the Passover" (John 19:14), simply means, as most scholars acknowledge, "the Friday of the Passover week." Thus the Crucifixion took place on Friday and not on Wednesday.
http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/cru...
So what?

Samuele Bacchiocchi was a Seventh-day Adventist, i.e., a Christian, who rejected the Wednesday crucifiction scenario as unsupported by the text of the NT as he understood it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuele_Bacchioc...

Samuele R. Bacchiocchi (29 January 1938, Rome, Italy – 20 December 2008) was a Seventh-day Adventist author and theologian, best known for his work on the Sabbath in Christianity, particularly in the historical work From Sabbath to Sunday, based on his doctoral thesis from the Pontifical Gregorian University. He was also known for his opposition to rock music, certain dress standards, alcohol and the ordination of women. He was one of the best known Adventist scholars outside of the Adventist church.
...
Bacchiocchi taught in the religion department of Andrews University from 1974 till his retirement in 2000. He served as professor of theology and church history. He regularly presented seminars worldwide, and has written many books and articles on biblical topics, although he has been criticized by some Adventists for straying beyond his area of expertise - the Sabbath.
__________
Incidentally, Muslims don't observe the Jewish Sabbath, either, their excuse being that Mohammad -considered by them to be the last and best prophet ever, even the very "seal" of the prophets- abrogated it and many other Jewish doctrines and observances.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159135 Jan 19, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you think mohammad was a prophet of God? He was not a descendent of Israel nor a born again Christian.
Why do you think the koran is uncorrupt when the original versions were all burnt after someone rewrote it decades later?
When did mohammad authorize the hadiths?
The biographies of mohammad can not be trusted since they were written a hundred years after he died.
Welcome clueless Paul. How are you my old mucker?

- THE MOST HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMED IS THE TRUE MESSENGER FROM GOD....there are thousands of reasons and one key reason is he has given the the Secret to true salvation:
Salvation is THROUGH GOD.
Salvation is NOT through non-gentile men who came ONLY for non-gentiles (and who insulted Gentiles as DOGS and PIGS), NOW marketed as "god" of clueless Gentiles like you!!!!!

- There is NO such thing called "Christian" in the books of Holy Prophet Jesus PBUH! Therefore, there is even less chance of him recognising a "concocted born again Christian"!!!!

- Just because non-gentiles chose to edit THEIR books to elevate themselves and claim EXCLUSIVE access to GOD,(thus excluding EVERY Gentile including you, me, chinese and the lamp post!) does NOT mean that it is correct!

Only a fools will believe that God only reaches humans through Jacob's lot that even in the edited non-gentile books are caught lying, cheating and correcting the message while handing over power to only the boys of Judah by eliminatiing every other son of jacob.

Jacob in the non-gentile books is lying his way into taking Isaacs' title from Esau. Isaac himself is not entitled to the title of Abraham while his older brother Ishmael is alive!!!

- Quran burning must have helped get rid of books written by liars? There was a need to ensure Quran was consistent and as originally written by scribes. Unlike today, if people were keeping their own records or parts of it, such confusing materials needed to be get rid of.

- Imagine if 100 different versions of Quran is put about today in different languages without the orginal version in Arabic as source, how confusing and unreliable it would be!!

OOOOOOPSSSSSS.,....that MUST ring a HUGE bell in your ears...as YOU are trapped in such confusion called "Holy Bible" in 100's of confusing different versions (all inspired by a confusing ghostly god!!) without ANY original in the language of Jesus!!!!!!!!!!

- Your last questions are not relevant as I know how to understand Hadith and the HOLY Prophets life by judging it in terms of QURAN as my ultimate source! If anything agrees with Quran I accept them and if anything leaves even a shadow of doubt if judged through Quran I reject them!!!!!!!!!

VERY SIMPLE!

- Why do you shamelessly cling on to non-gentile books and religion, when they consider you to be inferior and deserve to be UTTERLY destroyed? Poor clueless paul!
- Why do you talk about a non-gentile man who cam eonly for the non-gentiles and considered you to be DOG and PIG? Poor you!
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#159136 Jan 19, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it suprising that Christian's Holy Day is Sunday, the day of the Lord's resurrection, while muslims day of prayer is on Friday, the day of our Lord's crucifixtion?
Once Mohammad realized that he wasn't going to convince the Jews that he was any kind of prophet, much less a prophet like Moses, he turned on them with a vengeance and did everything that he could to distance his new religion of Islam from Jewish observances, an effort that included establishing his own "Sabbath," Friday, and changing the prayer direction from Jerusalem to Mecca.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159137 Jan 19, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it suprising that Christian's Holy Day is Sunday, the day of the Lord's resurrection, while muslims day of prayer is on Friday, the day of our Lord's crucifixtion?
Hey clueless paul. The non-gentile man who couldn't give a toss for gentiles is NOT your "lord"!!!!
The LORD GOD who loves and shows mercy on you is NOT a non-gentile man!!
Wake up!
Sunday is irrelevant to non-gentiles because it is based on a tissue of lies!
Sunday is PAGAN day and you are dumb enough to think that BJ got up and ran off on that day!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159138 Jan 19, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>So what?
Samuele Bacchiocchi was a Seventh-day Adventist, i.e., a Christian, who rejected the Wednesday crucifiction scenario as unsupported by the text of the NT as he understood it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuele_Bacchioc...
Samuele R. Bacchiocchi (29 January 1938, Rome, Italy – 20 December 2008) was a Seventh-day Adventist author and theologian, best known for his work on the Sabbath in Christianity, particularly in the historical work From Sabbath to Sunday, based on his doctoral thesis from the Pontifical Gregorian University. He was also known for his opposition to rock music, certain dress standards, alcohol and the ordination of women. He was one of the best known Adventist scholars outside of the Adventist church.
...
Bacchiocchi taught in the religion department of Andrews University from 1974 till his retirement in 2000. He served as professor of theology and church history. He regularly presented seminars worldwide, and has written many books and articles on biblical topics, although he has been criticized by some Adventists for straying beyond his area of expertise - the Sabbath.
__________
Incidentally, Muslims don't observe the Jewish Sabbath, either, their excuse being that Mohammad -considered by them to be the last and best prophet ever, even the very "seal" of the prophets- abrogated it and many other Jewish doctrines and observances.
Hey simpleton....John was cooked up as an afterthought with many "insertions" including "word/flesh bs" "son"."jewish killers" plus many other stories...to change the direction of Paulianity.
To you BJ was crucified on Wednesday...and after preaching to the dead(or was it deaf?!!!!!!!!!he said "i must now save the gentile dog and pig called bu(tteredbuttturdlick)ford ", got up on sunday banged 7 demons off Mary while she moaned oh god..oh god, grabbed broiled fish and honeycombe off the REBUKED and starving cowards and ran off to enjoy the cosy life of heaven!!!!! very nice!!lol..

The best answer: Even if he was crucified everyday for your sins that will not be enough to wipe off your sins.
For him to believe that he could die for your sins would make him a misguided false prophet who should have known better... THUS PROVING NON-GENTILE CLAIM THAT HE IS A FALSE MESSENGER!!!!
- BY ADMITTING HE DIED, YOU FALL INTO THE HANDS OF NON-GENTILES WHO "KNOW" HE IS A FALSE PROPHET.
- BY ADMITTING HE DIED FOR THE SINS OF GENTILES, YOU DISPLAY YOUR IGNORANCE OF NON-GENTILE RELIGION.
- IN SHORT YOU ARE A DONKEY WHO IS CARRYING THE NONGENTILE BOOKS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING ABOUT THEM.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#159139 Jan 19, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Once Mohammad realized that he wasn't going to convince the Jews that he was any kind of prophet, much less a prophet like Moses, he turned on them with a vengeance and did everything that he could to distance his new religion of Islam from Jewish observances, an effort that included establishing his own "Sabbath," Friday, and changing the prayer direction from Jerusalem to Mecca.
Are you listening to yourself clueless fool?!
Why did the clueless non-gentiles choose Sunday instead of sticking to Saturday the special day of non-gentile BJ?
Is it because the clueless mangod worshippers could not convince the non-gentiles and got p'd off with them. so they switched to sunday and started worshipping a naked pagan on a cross to annoy the non-gentiles who NEVER worship idols?
lol...
Eat your own words...

Lol...Holy Prophet Muhammed is certainly as Moses and better because there is nothing in history about even Moses!! Only stories. And even worse...Both Moses and BJ could not give a moneky's fart to Gentile fools like you!!!!

Only the HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMED PBUH, CARED FOR GENTILES....and came as a Mercy to All mankind including non-Gentiles.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#159140 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello HughBe ...allow me to clarify your above point:
Question, does Judaism support homosexuality?
Answer is below.
Traditionally, Judaism has understood homosexual intercourse as contrary to Judaism, and this opinion is still maintained by ORTHODOX Judaism. On the other hand, RECONSTRUCTIONIST Judaism and REFORM Judaism do not hold this view and allow homosexual intercourse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism_and_sexu...
Peace.
Alex---Hello HughBe ...allow me to CLARIFY your above point:

HughBe--- I thank you for your comment, Alex. Now please keep the question in mind i.e.does Judaism support homosexuality?

Answer is YES.

PROOF:"Reconstructionist Judaism and REFORM Judaism do not hold this view and ALLOW HOMOSEXUAL intercourse."

Did you see ALLOW homosexual intercourse? It says that Judaism approves of HOMOSEXUALITY. Now it is not just one sect but note and understand that "42 percent of American Jews regard themselves as Reform".
This is highly SIGNIFICANT as nearly 50% of Jews are SECULAR and not religious. Put it this way, in America the DOMINANT view of Judaism is that homosexuality is ACCEPTABLE and it is the view of almost ALL of the Judahites. Eric and Frijoles positions confirm this before your very eyes.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#159141 Jan 19, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome clueless Paul. How are you my old mucker?
- THE MOST HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMED IS THE TRUE MESSENGER FROM GOD....there are thousands of reasons and one key reason is he has given the the Secret to true salvation:
Salvation is THROUGH GOD.
Salvation is NOT through non-gentile men who came ONLY for non-gentiles (and who insulted Gentiles as DOGS and PIGS), NOW marketed as "god" of clueless Gentiles like you!!!!!
- There is NO such thing called "Christian" in the books of Holy Prophet Jesus PBUH! Therefore, there is even less chance of him recognising a "concocted born again Christian"!!!!
- Just because non-gentiles chose to edit THEIR books to elevate themselves and claim EXCLUSIVE access to GOD,(thus excluding EVERY Gentile including you, me, chinese and the lamp post!) does NOT mean that it is correct!
Only a fools will believe that God only reaches humans through Jacob's lot that even in the edited non-gentile books are caught lying, cheating and correcting the message while handing over power to only the boys of Judah by eliminatiing every other son of jacob.
Jacob in the non-gentile books is lying his way into taking Isaacs' title from Esau. Isaac himself is not entitled to the title of Abraham while his older brother Ishmael is alive!!!
- Quran burning must have helped get rid of books written by liars? There was a need to ensure Quran was consistent and as originally written by scribes. Unlike today, if people were keeping their own records or parts of it, such confusing materials needed to be get rid of.
- Imagine if 100 different versions of Quran is put about today in different languages without the orginal version in Arabic as source, how confusing and unreliable it would be!!
OOOOOOPSSSSSS.,....that MUST ring a HUGE bell in your ears...as YOU are trapped in such confusion called "Holy Bible" in 100's of confusing different versions (all inspired by a confusing ghostly god!!) without ANY original in the language of Jesus!!!!!!!!!!
- Your last questions are not relevant as I know how to understand Hadith and the HOLY Prophets life by judging it in terms of QURAN as my ultimate source! If anything agrees with Quran I accept them and if anything leaves even a shadow of doubt if judged through Quran I reject them!!!!!!!!!
VERY SIMPLE!
- Why do you shamelessly cling on to non-gentile books and religion, when they consider you to be inferior and deserve to be UTTERLY destroyed? Poor clueless paul!
- Why do you talk about a non-gentile man who cam eonly for the non-gentiles and considered you to be DOG and PIG? Poor you!
The koran now used was written decades after mohammad died and all the other versions of the koran were burnt! This means islam is based on a false premise: that the koran they are using is the original on mohammad had dictated on scraps of wood, leaves, stones, and animal skins that have long ago disapeared. How convenient!

So if you say a something agrees with the koran then it's an hadith that all muslims must follow? Where did mohammad give you this authority to determine what is an hadith? Not all muslims agree on the hadiths; so why don't you set them all straight, since you have authority given you by mohammad, and tell them which ones are okay to use?

muslims say the Gospels where written decades after Jesus ascended into Heaven and thus cannot be trusted. If that logic is true then the biographies of mohammad written a hundred years after he died can not be trusted.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Confederate flags placed at Martin Luther King'... Fri DieShadowHelix 1
News Customs officials crack down on Pakistan's mill... (Aug '12) Jul 30 mICHEAL 24
need info on a artifact I found Jul 20 neyney 1
News Archaeology and Mormonism (Jun '07) Jul 17 Barnsweb 104
News Tonga's Nukuleka, the birth place of Polynesia (Jan '08) Jul 15 Tui_Tonga 1,973
'Skulls, Shamans and Sacrifice in Stone Age Bri... Jul 13 Dave 1
Are 2 Million People Really Buried In 74 Graves? Jul 12 Candy 1
More from around the web