Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 252928 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158870 Jan 17, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>That terrified fool of a "prophet" of yours needed his wife's cousin Waraqa to tell him that it was Gabriel/Jibreel who tried to crush the life out of him in the cave, since Mohammad's new life-long friend and OWNER didn't introduce ITself by name.
This doesn't mean that it was actually Gabriel/Jibreel that Mohammad conjured up, but that Mohammad's handlers were shrewd enough to embrace this "truth" that has persisted to this day.
Thus saith the non-gentile bu(tteredbuttturdlick)ford the resident moron.
(a bit surprised you are having a go at bum loving "F" on homosexuality...you seem to talk some sense...unless you are bluffing!)
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158871 Jan 17, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, you cannot compare Jesus with Muhammad. The biblical Jesus achieved nothing, his mission flopped, he had no success and he was taken off, I mean recalled.
Muhammad completed the mission ordained.
When I examine the biblical Jesus closely, I do find that he was up to something great but his lousy disciples were not willing to give him full support and told him they had two swords. The man knew his disciples were stingy and he was helpless.
If the disciples and the free food munchers had bought swords as recommended by Jesus, he would have stood up against the Romans to free his people and would have been successful in getting recognized as the Messiah, the Deliverer, the Jews were waiting for.
Only way to attribute all success to BJ, is to suspend disbelief...accept blind faith, ignorance and superstition.
BJ was incapable of running even a tiny tea boutique, let alone all kingdom heaven earh and everything created!!!!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158872 Jan 17, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>What matters most, slave, is that your "prophet" ordered the MURDERS of people who opposed him.
The judge orders the murder of criminals.
Moses and David ordered no murder because they are non-gentiles!
To a non-gentile bu(tteredbuttturdlick)ford.... anything gentile is unacceptable..
Why don't you call BJ.."Jewsus"...?
Why don't you call non-gentile mini slave god..."Jewhovah"?
PAthetic non-gentile ass-worshipper!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158873 Jan 17, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Al-Ex the Phallocentric and Model Muslim,
How many scientists believe in the existence of your "firey pit of hell?"
Take your meds.
Atlest you admit that you are uneducated.

Hey buttboy, entertain me with you angel light and satan fire challenge!

You are the fake "christian".... have you forgotten loads of reference to fiery pit that is ready for YOU!!

Matt 5:22 "But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever shall say to his brother,'Raca,' shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever shall say,'You fool,' shall be guilty [enough to go] into the FIERY HELL.

Matt 5:29 "And if your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out, and throw it from you; for it is better for you that one of the parts of your body perish, than for your whole body to be thrown into HELL. 30 "And if your right hand makes you stumble, cut it off, and throw it from you; for it is better for you that one of the parts of your body perish, than for your whole body to go into HELL.

Matt 10:28 "And do not fear those who kill the body, but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in HELL.

Matt 18:8 "And if your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; it is better for you to enter life crippled or lame, than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into the ETERNAL FIRE. 9 "And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out, and throw it from you. It is better for you to enter life with one eye, than having two eyes, to be cast into the FIERY HELL.

Matt 23:15 "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you travel about on sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of HELL as yourselves.

Matt 23:33 "You serpents, you brood of vipers, how shall you escape the sentence of HELL?

Mark 9:43 "And if your hand causes you to stumble, cut it off; it is better for you to enter life crippled, than having your two hands, to go into HELL, into THE UNQUENCHABLE FIRE,

Mark 9:45 "And if your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off; it is better for you to enter life lame, than having your two feet, to be CAST INTO HELL...47 "And if your eye causes you to stumble, cast it out; it is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes, to be CAST INTO HELL FIRE,

Luke 12:4 "And I say to you, My friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. 5 "But I will warn you whom to fear: fear the One who after He has killed has authority to cast into HELL; yes, I tell you, fear Him!

James 3:6 And the tongue is a fire, the [very] world of iniquity; the tongue is set among our members as that which defiles the entire body, and sets on fire the course of [our] life, and is SET on FIRE by HELL.

HELL IS FIERY (Mt 5:22)

The FIRE is "ETERNAL" and it is "HELL". It is so bad that it would be better to cut off a part of your body to avoid going there.(Mt 5:29-30; 18:8-9; Mk 9:43-48) Does that sound like "the grave" to you?

HELL is FOR the SOUL as well as the BODY.(Mt 10:28)

Some people are sentenced to HELL (Mt 23:33)

They are then CAST INTO HELL.(Mk 9:45,47)

Those who only kill the body do not cast anyone into hell; they merely cast someone into their grave. Only the Lord has the authority to cast a person into HELL.(Luke 12:4)
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158874 Jan 17, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Here you show your hipocrisy aka double standard. As far as Islam allows polygyny, all is fine, when it's the OT then it's a negative.
Really? I thought you were insulting Muslims as usual without using your pause button!
Then I reminded you of OT. You then continued to attack Islam carefully avoiding any OT bashing.
So who is showing hypocrisy? May be you? Lol..

I did say you knew how to give topix readers narcolepsy through boredom…lol..
There is no COMPULSION to marry more than one. It depends on the circumstances.
This verse is merciful giving man real responsibility.
Man MUST TOTALLY PROVIDE for the woman, He can’t chase her off to an “equal opportunity” job expecting her to take care of family! Even if she chooses to work, what a woman earns remains with her.
If a man cannot fulfil a whole load of STRICT conditions he cannot marry.
There are many men in the West (and I know a “few”) who sleep with many and go home to their ONE official wife. Now that is cowardice because they dip and run with no responsibility. Many rely on Social Services to take care of their “by-products” while playing “absent or “missing daddy”! This is disgraceful, irresponsible and unmanly.
The MOST HOLY PROPHET WAS A REAL MAN. He took responsibility and there is wisdom in his alliances.
Do you stop to wonder about the Prophets of OT who married more than you me and the HOLY PROPHET put together?
I repeat the OT has NO limit on wives. You can have AS MANY AS YOU WISH!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158875 Jan 17, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Even eating is something biological, but then Allah came out with ramadan then you have to make sacrifies for it. The same can do Muslim men being in abstinence, and so the even women are allowed to have as much hubbies as they want.
A problem that come with polygyny you seem unware of is that when a man has many wives, say three or four, it happenes pretty often that he may have a special regard for one wife, which make jealous the others, and create friction, to say the least, in daily living.
Gee!!!!
Your brain is overworking and actually boiling!!
The same Allah “came out” with “period”“pregnancy” and other ailment when man cannot “eat”!!!

But that does not mean that man has to be forced into waiting in a queue behind 4 other men for several months in an unnatural state, when there are other women about!
Why don’t you recognise evolution and biology?

Hey man….you jump to conclusions…are you really a man?

You are correct about problem with Polygamy….
THAT IS PRECISELY THE REASON WHY ALLAH IN HIS WISDOM SAYS IT IS BETTER TO MARRY ONE!!!!!!!!
ALLAH CLEARLY SAYS IF YOU CANNOT BE FAIR EQUAL AND CANNOT DO JUSTICE, THEN STICK TO ONE!!!!

NOW I AM ASKING YOU….SHOW ME RESTRICTION IN OT…AND SHOW ME WHERE JESUS ACTIVELY DISAGREED WITH POLYGAMY..(don’t quote honest paul!!). Why did Jesus not have a woman or did the “editors” edit out his escapades between 12 and 30?

I said….Let me be sickly and graphic…

Imagine Four HEALTHY men (who NEED at least 3-4 times a week minimum) with huge erections waiting in a queue and the poor woman gets banged 12-16 times a week.
Now…with the first bang she ends up with a bun or even two in the oven!!
Even periods will be a huge inconvenience.
Now what do the men do with their enormous erections NEEDING 3 shots a week?

Man is BIOLOGICALLY polygamous. Let me repeat…A man makes love to 100 different women over one month…..Assuming the 100 women and him are fertile and healthy, how many babies are expected to come out of those 100 women in 9 months or so?
If you apply the same logic with a woman making love to 100 men, how many babies are expected to come out of her?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158876 Jan 17, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
You are sexist in the very moment you don't recognize women's needs.
By reading your post I have the sensation that you live in 15th century and see women to be people that stay in home, doing home's stuff, waiting their men to come home.
How dare you call me sexist?
I recognise women’s needs and there is not a single complaint form that “department”!!
Yeah, you live in 21st century, making women go out in the dark, work like dogs, fully stresses and come home in the dark tired to have a family or spend time with children. Yes the nanny is paid to keep the kids!!!
Are you not a REAL man? Why can’t you be a REAL man, go OUT work hard and provide for your wife and children instead of hiding behind equal opportunity to be a half a man who is relying on woman abandoning home to earn because eyou are incapable of providing!!
Equal opportunities is invented by cowardly men who are incapable of providing for their women.
By the way, I am not against any woman going to work if she needs to work…when she is married to half a man, if she is divorced or widowed, if husband is too ill to work etc!!
Be a man and don’t rely on woman’s money.
Islam allows women to work and also forbids men from taking the woman’s money!
Whether woman works or not it is the duty of man to provide for all the comforts of his wife!!
Shameless men hide under the bed sending women to work!!!
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't try this card with me. We know from Quran men will enjoy sex with the everlasting virgin houris in Paradise, and we know women are left with nothing but to watch their husbands have sex with houris.
Here we go again!
Islam says BOTH believing men and women performing good deeds etc will enter heaven.

Men are the beasts who usually pine for virgins and they can have what they wish for in heaven.
Similarly if women wish for virgin boys, they can have them.
Have you come across many women wanting virgin boys?
Usually women prefer experienced virile men who can please them.
May be you have a different kind of experience tainted by questionable virility?
Again I said…you were taking us to another dimension!!
I am not an authority on what happens in “heaven”.
We will talk about it when we get there!!!!

The non-gentile books are full of man made tales promoted as words from God.
There is a movement to surgically remove the non gentile books from the Gentile pagan books that can stand on their own thanks to St. Paul.
The Gentiles don't need a whole host of non-gentile rhetoric just to use a few verses to justify the case of the Gentile Messiah.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#158877 Jan 17, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>You refer to the gnostic Gospel of Thomas that was REJECTED by the Church as unworthy of inclusion in the Canon for obvious reasons that somehow escape you...
See: http://gnosis.org/naghamm/gthlamb.html
Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas
It begins: "These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas wrote down."
Yeah, right.
Verse 114 in this compilation of gnostic rubbish (and probably your favorite) reads as follows:
Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life."
Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven."
Other ridiculous verses of special note:
(105) Jesus said, "He who knows the father and the mother will be called the son of a harlot."
(100) They showed Jesus a gold coin and said to him, "Caesar's men demand taxes from us."
He said to them, "Give Caesar what belongs to Caesar, give God what belongs to God, and give me what is mine."
Then for what good reasons did the Church choose four ridiculous gospels, which are also full of absurdities?

Of special note, the most ridiculous verses of Matthew, telling us of Gentiles following a star, Herod ordering to kill kids and Jesus asking people who did they think he was, as if he did not know who he was.
SamBee

Orlando, FL

#158878 Jan 17, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
No, how about rape, incest, promotion of violence, lack of respect for property and personal boundaries?

ALL of those behaviors were promoted by the Sodomites in that series of passages. WHY do people dwell on homosexuality as an exclusive?
THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA & MOVEMENT
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#158879 Jan 17, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>
http://quran.com/5/3
Prohibited to you are dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah , and [those animals] killed by strangling or by a violent blow or by a head-long fall or by the goring of horns, and those from which a wild animal has eaten, except what you [are able to] slaughter [before its death], and those which are sacrificed on stone altars, and [prohibited is] that you seek decision through divining arrows. That is grave disobedience. This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion. But whoever is forced by severe hunger with no inclination to sin - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

IOW, if you're starving to death, it is permissible to eat dead pigs and even dead humans.
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-and-scrip...
Q. "Can someone please tell me what type of shell fish is haraam and what type is halal, and why this is the case."
A. "Any creature that drinks blood is haraam. Some argue that its makrooh, not haraam. However, the consensus is, that its not advisable to eat any creature that drinks blood.
Blood is consumed by animals of prey. On the land, we have animals like the tiger, lion, etc. In the sky we have eagles, falcons, buzzards etc. These classifications have some further classifications as well. But specifically talking about seafood here, first of all you have to look for creatures of prey.
Very few fish are actually vegetarians. Most fish eat smaller fish. So the division here is made in how they eat them. Most fish eat smaller fish by swallowing them whole. And they are allowed. But fish like the shark, whale, octopus, etc, bite into their prey and make them bleed, and then eat them. That makes their consumption by humans haraam or makrooh, depending on who you are talking to. But nonetheless, its not advisable.
The only shellfish that meet this criterion are shrimps/prawns. Lobsters cut into their prey, hence are termed haram or makrooh by different scholars. I believe squids have the same process of capturing and eating their prey, except they have beaks for biting into their prey instead of teeth, hence they too are haraam/makrooh."
Again, if you're starving to death, it is permissible to eat dead sharks and even dead humans.
Kill any bird or animal that moves and eat, when you are starving to death. But do not eat a dead human body. But for Christians it is okay to chew a man's flesh and drink his blood.

It is all about food. If you are lost in a jungle or in a desert and fear that you may die of hunger, you can eat any damn thing to survive. That is allowed. Use common sense.

Dead animals and carrions are already forbidden. When you starve and fear death, go for any other living thing, such as wild birds, snakes, comodo dragons, lizards, rats, frogs, etc. That will be no sin because you will be close to death and at that time, so do not think of Kosher, Non-Kosher, Haraam and Halal.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#158880 Jan 17, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>
You remain as clueless and uncomprehending as ever.
So, what did Jesus achieve?

Death? If your answer is a yes, then John already had achieved it, without wasting three years.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#158881 Jan 17, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
When non-gentiles lied about their "audience" with "god"....the HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMED MAINTAINED THAT HE WAS VISITED BY AN ANGEL.
HE COULD HAVE CLAIMED THAT GOD VISITED HIM!!
rabbee: so what? when i have investigated, those who claim to be visited by an Angel or jesus. they generally lie about the name, of the alleged angel that visited them. when you can't assume that, all Angels, are the angels of only all good deeds. as the angel that visited muhammed, seems to be an angel, of religious tribal selfishness.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#158882 Jan 17, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
The judge orders the murder of criminals.
Moses and David ordered no murder because they are non-gentiles!
To a non-gentile bu(tteredbuttturdlick)ford.... anything gentile is unacceptable..
Why don't you call BJ.."Jewsus"...?
Why don't you call non-gentile mini slave god..."Jewhovah"?
PAthetic non-gentile ass-worshipper!
Actually you have given a great idea to the Church and Christendom.

A thousand years from now, folks might see Jewhovah written in the New Testament. It would show folks of future how much Christians loved the Jews for a thousand years, during the darkest history of Christianity.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158883 Jan 17, 2013
SamBee wrote:
<quoted text>
THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA & MOVEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =WQ5eVNR19jcXX
What are these people doing with the books of non-gentiles?
The non-gentile writers of the books NEVER imagined these chaps would be allowed into their club!
What a joke! Have they no shame?
The non-gentile books are for the non-gentiles.
They couldn't give a ratsass to these people!
ignorance is bliss!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158884 Jan 17, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what did Jesus achieve?
Death? If your answer is a yes, then John already had achieved it, without wasting three years.
cool!!
Also what did BJ do between 12 and 30?
Being a hot blooded young man or a nice little mummy's boy who never went near girls?
lol...

When should BJEWSUS have gone to get "no-nailed" to the cross?
Immediately after the baptism!
That was when he was cleanest- allegedly spiritually and physically!!!!
But they bumped off JTB instead of JEWSUS!!

A non-gentile calls him..john the lamb chop!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158885 Jan 17, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: so what? when i have investigated, those who claim to be visited by an Angel or jesus. they generally lie about the name, of the alleged angel that visited them. when you can't assume that, all Angels, are the angels of only all good deeds. as the angel that visited muhammed, seems to be an angel, of religious tribal selfishness.
dear clueless person..
The angel who visited the MOST HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMED PBUH....told him there was only ONE God who created us, that God was NOT a man or woman and that Jesus was a Messenger and NOT son or daughter of God!!
There is no indication about Arab superiority as the "chosen" people!
If that is the work of Satan then you need to see more doctors than I first thought.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158886 Jan 17, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually you have given a great idea to the Church and Christendom.
A thousand years from now, folks might see Jewhovah written in the New Testament. It would show folks of future how much Christians loved the Jews for a thousand years, during the darkest history of Christianity.
Sure thing dear BMZ.
The gentile hating JEWHOVAH comes in human form as his own son known as non-gentile JEWSUS who later becomes Gentile CHRIST!!
Now that is real love for the non-gentiles by the fast fading Christianity...
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#158887 Jan 17, 2013
SamBee wrote:
<quoted text>
THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA & MOVEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =WQ5eVNR19jcXX
It is deeply embarrassing to see these "outsider" gentiles reading from the books of non-gentiles!
Don't they realise they are not in the picture when these books were written?
Just because their slave masters forced them to accept Christianity they are blindly following the menaingless non-gentile books!
It is time the slave woke up and worshipped God instead of worshipping non-gentile slave god.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#158888 Jan 17, 2013
SamBee wrote:
<quoted text>
THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA & MOVEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =WQ5eVNR19jcXX
Sure, if you have nothing else to bring to the table on the subject, you might as well be bring homophobia

Do you believe in cooties as well?

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#158889 Jan 17, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
lol! I am glad you noticed!
Yes, I learnt that from Buford, Colonna and some others.
It is no use writing and explaining more to posters, who cannot comprehend and offer red herrings and silly replies.
I am trying that out and looks like it works.
Its a good style to adopt. Its brief, two lines of explanation and a punch line.

And its more likely to get read

Kind of an anti-Hughbe

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Origin of Hindu Brahmins (Aug '08) Jun 7 MUQ2 194
News If Captain Cook's ship is found, whose is it? R... Jun 1 Hostis Publicus 24
News Who Is Allah? (Jul '08) May '16 Joel 13,168
News Giant sphere sparks debate Apr '16 Phyllis Schlafly ... 1
News Did Islam reach France 1,300 years ago? DNA and... Apr '16 Muslim Bounty Hunter 19
News Send in the archaeologists to help restore Palm... Mar '16 Ostreology 1
Stunning 2200-Year-Old Mosaics Discovered in An... Mar '16 west38 1
More from around the web