Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 255956 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Frijoles

United States

#157392 Jan 4, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
lol!
Thanks - I am glad SOMEONE acknowledged my pun

Its gets lonely here sometimes being ignored
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157393 Jan 4, 2013
Tony Blair wrote:
<quoted text>
I beg your pardon?
Oh dear oh dear...non-gentile bu(utteredbuttturdlick)ford has gone potty!
Are you the peace maker of palestine or the pss taker of palestine?
The latter obviously.
X factor and non-gentile bu(tteredbuttturdlick)ford are poles apart!
You should be ashamed of yourself for licking butts of non-gentiles who insult your mangod AND his mother who to them are whore and son!
Deal with it MORON.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157394 Jan 4, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Never mind.
Was Jesus, the "I am he", a prophet?
lol....
When the non-gentiles reject Jesus and his mother as "whore and son", that is fine by the brainless gentile Christian!!
How brainwashed are these morons.
Thankfully, some Churches are still aware of covert non-gentile games against Christ and his Mother.

What a dilemma for the brainless gentile, thanks to the non-gentile!!!
Either accept Muhammed AND Jesus PBUT or reject them both!!!

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#157395 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks - I am glad SOMEONE acknowledged my pun
Its gets lonely here sometimes being ignored
We should grow a lot more skin for the biblical Lake of Fire!

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#157396 Jan 4, 2013
jesus is wrote:
<quoted text>
MATTHEW 19:7,8 FOR DUMMIES:
'7 “Why then,” they asked,“did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?”
8 Jesus replied,“Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
These lines were also cooked up.

If you wish, I can do an exegesis of that part.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157398 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Dont regret. I have thick skin - I can take it.
This is what non-gentile bu(utteredbuttturdlick)ford posted....from an ANTI Muslim site....
Buford wrote:
Frijoles,
I regret to inform you that the skin burning off in hell forever and ever and ever and ever thing concerned unbelieving Jews, primarily, at least according to this site: http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Hell ....

Usually our resident non-gentile apologists will squeal.."Ah that is from a neo fascist or antisemitic site"

BUT...
I did NOT hear from our TWO FACED resident non-gentile apologist any cries like "Ah that is an ANTI Muslim site...!!"

Rock on two faced non-gentile.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#157399 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
He could be real. i have no problem with accepting history that a man named jesus was around at that time. But that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion. I mean, you are real too, arent you?
Frijoles--- i have no problem with accepting history that a man named jesus was around at that time.But that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion.

HughBe--- Do you accept YOUR Jesus as your landsman?

Explain the meaning of "that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion."
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157400 Jan 4, 2013
jesus is wrote:
It says that the HUSBAND has done wrong unless he has good reason for the divorce (her unchastity). If he does it simply because he's tired of her and wants a young 6-YEAR-OLD chick, HE IS GUILTY IN GOD'S EYES!
Why do you read into it what's not there?
wow...you are brilliantly stupid!
Tell us this mr jesus...
Why aren't there similar strong verses referring to addultery if a woman marries a divorced man?
LOL...
Tony Blair

London, UK

#157401 Jan 4, 2013
jesus is wrote:
a
MUHAMMED WANTED A YOUNG CHICKIE TO FK!!!!!!! PROVING THAT HE IS NOT A PROPHET'S ARRRSSS-HOLE!
Awww...BJ slept with young boys and whacked demons off women of ill repute, offered living tadpole water to quench the "thirst" of women whose husbands are at work!
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#157402 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, we were not discussing the "rabbinate" we were discussing our personal views
Secondly, I am not even convinced you are correct
Uhuh---the rabbanite view is that there was, and will be no prophets coming from gentiles, YHWH forbids
"Job could not have been a gentile prophet. How could the shechinah rest upon a gentile seeing that Moses prayed that it should not rest upon them, and God granted his request as Scripture says 'We have been distinguished -I and Thy people- from all the people who are on the face of the earth'(Exo 33:16)" (Baba Bathra 15b)

Frijoles---First off, we were not discussing the "rabbinate" we were discussing our personal views

Secondly, I am not even convinced you are correct

HughBe-- Please do the necessary research to confirm or disprove the poster's points.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#157403 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote: like Nathanels idea - its particularism - the idea would be that Islam is for the Arabs only, and leave the rest of us the F alone.
It also allows for other religions - with the same caveat.

HughBe--- Is such a position in harmony with the Tanach?

If yes, support.
Tony Blair

London, UK

#157404 Jan 4, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
Frijoles--- i have no problem with accepting history that a man named jesus was around at that time.But that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion.
HughBe--- Do you accept YOUR Jesus as your landsman?
Explain the meaning of "that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion."
Hello HughBe, Happy New Year to you and family.
Good points....

In other words our resident non-gentile apologist says "We reject Jesus and we don't want anything to do with him"!!

Buford is happy to accept the "expert" opinion of our resident non-gentile apologist when it comes to Prophet Muhammed but Buford is ignoring our resident non-gentile apologist's take on Jesus and his mother!

That makes buford an ignorant fool.
Alex123 aka Tony Blair

London, UK

#157405 Jan 4, 2013
@@@HughBe.....
Buford calls me Tony blair....another poster used that name...and now I did that too!

Let me post this again....
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
Frijoles--- i have no problem with accepting history that a man named jesus was around at that time.But that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion.
HughBe--- Do you accept YOUR Jesus as your landsman?
Explain the meaning of "that dosent mean I incorporate him into my religion."
Hello HughBe, Happy New Year to you and family.
Good points....

In other words our resident non-gentile apologist says "We reject Jesus and we don't want anything to do with him"!!

Buford is happy to accept the "expert" opinion of our resident non-gentile apologist when it comes to Prophet Muhammed but Buford is ignoring our resident non-gentile apologist's take on Jesus and his mother!

That makes buford an ignorant fool.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#157406 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
I get the feeling you believe in a historically rooted frozen version of Judaism. From the middle ages.
However, out of curiosity, do you currently practice any form of Judaism?
Or do you just enjoy taking historical potshots against it?
Uhuh---"Yeshua ha-Notzri -may his bones erode- the mamzer stirred our people into believing that he was a prophet sent by God to clarify perplexities in the Torah and to re-interpret the Law. The sages -of blessed memory- having become aware of his plans meted out fitting punishment to him before his reputation spread. He was overpowered and put a stop to by us when he fell into our hands, and his fate is well known" (Iggeret Teman)
to reinterpret the rabbinical Law is a no-no
that's why Maimonides said that Jesus the mamzer got what he deserved

Frijoles---I get the feeling you believe in a historically rooted frozen version of Judaism. From the middle ages.

HughBe---"The sages -of blessed memory- having become aware of his plans meted out fitting punishment to him before his REPUTATION spread"
Are above words TRUE? NO. The reputation of Jesus is UNPARALLELED in history.

Observation, the words are typical of the god-men of Judaism and cannot be trusted because they are LIES.

Is your concept that there is no "frozen version of Judaism" in harmony with the Tanach or is in harmony with the the FALSE teachings of the god-men of Judaism?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157407 Jan 4, 2013
HughBe wrote:
Frijoles wrote: like Nathanels idea - its particularism - the idea would be that Islam is for the Arabs only, and leave the rest of us the F alone.
It also allows for other religions - with the same caveat.
HughBe--- Is such a position in harmony with the Tanach?
If yes, support.
This resident non-gentile is a two-faced person....
Unlike his tribal, racist, bigoted, sexist, anti-gentile religion with a slave god created by evil non-gentile writers, Islam invites ALL humans.
It is very unfair for that non-gentile apologist to come up with such lies.
His books are concerned ONLY with the non-gentile superiority over "gentiles who should be UTTERLY destroyed".
Quran invites ALL Children of Adam.

The Holy Prophet Muhammed pbuh, clarified this in his last sermon....

"...All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; white has no superiority over black, nor does a black have any superiority over white; [none have superiority over another] except by piety and good action. "

Let our resident non-gentile apologist produce such a statement from his "prophets" or even his "true" master Judah!!
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#157408 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
I get the feeling you believe in a historically rooted frozen version of Judaism. From the middle ages.
However, out of curiosity, do you currently practice any form of Judaism?
Or do you just enjoy taking historical potshots against it?
"In the case of Jewish moserim, minim and apikorsim, it is a mitzvah to kill them with our own hands for they distress Israel and prevent the people from going in the way of the Lord [such as Yeshua ha-Notzri and his followers and Tzadok and Baytus and their followers (Sadducees and Boethusians)-may the name of the wicked rot]" (MT, Hilchot Avodah Kochavim 10:1)[...]

HughBe--- Based on their own words above what should be done to the god-men of Judaism who lead the Jewish people AWAY from God?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157409 Jan 4, 2013
jesus is wrote:
<quoted text>
WHO CARES WHAT YOU THINK???????
Why did some 'misogynist' add it??????? So he could ignore the truth and hurt his own chances of an after-life?
WHERE'S YOUR FN PROOF?????
Do you have your own version of the Gospels full of "f"'s and "Schiitts"?
Well there are thousands of "versions" of Gospels...so you can make up your own..lol
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#157410 Jan 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Misleading is a matter of opinion.
Its been my experience among modern Judaism that there is a breadth of diversity on this and other subjects.
For what its worth, very little in the Talmud stands without a counter opinion.
Uhuh---"It has been taught: Many prophets arose FOR Israel, double the number of the Israelites who came out of Egypt" (Megillah 14a)

Frijoles---very little in the Talmud stands without a counter opinion.

HughBe--- PLEASE give the counter opinion, in the Talmud. Thanks.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157411 Jan 4, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
The wisdom of ensuring that the message was passed on "firsthand" for a longer period of time through a younger person like Mother Aisha, after the departure of the Holy Prophet is something that person will never understand.
Allah is Most Merciful, Wise and The Guide.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#157412 Jan 4, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
HughBe--- Based on their own words above what should be done to the god-men of Judaism who lead the Jewish people AWAY from God?
Dear HughBe, hope you realise you speak like a TRUE Believer.
This is what Holy Prophet Muhammed and Jesus said.
The god-men were making innovation..invention interpolation and insertion to make unlawful what God made lawful and to make lawful what God made unlawful.
This is the work of evil men.
They are doing it right now and many Gentiles haven't a clue!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ark of the Covenant @ Stonehenge Sat Garry Denke 1
International Conference on Cultural Sustainabl... Nov 27 moabdallah 1
News Australian Aboriginal prehistory, new research Nov 4 Sambo 2
News Tonga's Nukuleka, the birth place of Polynesia (Jan '08) Oct '16 Folauimanuka 1,979
News Post-UNESCO blues: Whither interfaith meetings? Oct '16 Marie-Luise_J 2
News Bones, tools unearthed by Alberta flood could f... Oct '16 Rockets Richard Bone 1
News History lesson - Oct '16 Mark Newell PhD -... 1
More from around the web