Who Is Allah?

There are 220091 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Buford

Hurricane, WV

#157238 Jan 2, 2013
I should add that BIBLICAL prophet Jesus frowned on adultery, but then, the "last prophet" abrogated all sorts of things that BIBLICAL prophet Jesus taught, which might be one reason why devout Muslims like Braindead and George have nothing good to say about him.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157239 Jan 2, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose that in your circle of friends, you are regarded as the most brilliant...
No, I consider myself the least among all my brilliant friends. You are lucky that they are not writing here. ;)
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157240 Jan 2, 2013
Buford wrote:
I should add that BIBLICAL prophet Jesus frowned on adultery, but then, the "last prophet" abrogated all sorts of things that BIBLICAL prophet Jesus taught, which might be one reason why devout Muslims like Braindead and George have nothing good to say about him.
The Last Prophet abrogated all what brother Jesus did not teach.

For example, our dear Prophet rejected and condemned the Trinity or the triune God and clarified that God has no son and neither God is the father of Jesus.

In fact, brother Jesus, the son of Mary and our dear Prophet are in agreement with the following:

Jesus said, "You have heard that it was said,‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

Here, you can see brother Jesus talking about Hijab of eyes. In other words, lower your gaze and stop looking into the eyes of a woman. Jesus thus discouraged staring. And that is what Qur'aan instructs men and women to do.

Our dear brother Jesus said many good things and one can find those in Matthew 5-7 and his parables only. Most of the bulk was not uttered by Jesus.

The son of Mary was a good man and he taught well but after he was gone, the writers and men, who penned the New Testament and formed the Church respectively, PERVERTED his teachings.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157241 Jan 2, 2013
Buford wrote:
One of the "actions of the last prophet" was to commit adultery with the wife of his adopted son, who conveniently divorced her when he noticed that Mohammad wanted her, badly.
One can be accused of adultery, only when one screws a married woman, who is another's wife.

Zainab was a widow before she married Zayd.

Zayd was not a legally adopted son. The Prophet treated that slave as one loves a son. He was not even the Prophet's own slave.

After their marriage turned sour, Zayd divorced her.

The Prophet married her after their divorce.

So, there was no adultery committed.

The biblical Jesus was having fun with girls and women without even marrying them. You know jolly well that Jesus was maintained by women and was a man of women. The Church cleaned it up. So, you see a white-washed biblical Jesus.

Cheers
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157242 Jan 2, 2013
jesus is wrote:
FROM THE GOSPEL OF BARNABAS (CHAPTER 20):
'Jesus went to the sea of Galilee, and having embarked in a ship sailed to his city of Nazareth; whereupon there was a great tempest in the sea, insomuch that the ship was nigh unto sinking.'
NAZARETH WASW ABOUT 20KM AWAY FROM THE LAKE.
That story is a hoax. Never happened! That Jesus walked on water, is absurd!
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#157246 Jan 3, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
One can be accused of adultery, only when one screws a married woman, who is another's wife.
Zainab was a widow before she married Zayd.
Zayd was not a legally adopted son. The Prophet treated that slave as one loves a son. He was not even the Prophet's own slave.
After their marriage turned sour, Zayd divorced her.
The Prophet married her after their divorce.
So, there was no adultery committed.
The biblical Jesus was having fun with girls and women without even marrying them. You know jolly well that Jesus was maintained by women and was a man of women. The Church cleaned it up. So, you see a white-washed biblical Jesus.
Cheers
Fool of a Lying Muslim,

Matt 5:31 "It was said,'WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE'; 32 but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Wait, don't tell me. Let me guess.

Mohammad abrogated this prohibition on marrying a divorced woman because Jesus never taught it, or Zanaib was unchaste which is why Zaid divorced her, right?

As for your charge that Jesus was a fornicator, not even your adulterous "prophet" believed that about him.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#157247 Jan 3, 2013
bmz wrote:
That story is a hoax. Never happened! That Jesus walked on water, is absurd!
Fool of a Lying Muslim,

You know this for a FACT because you were there.

Also, Mohammad did in FACT fly an invisible human/horse looking creature to heaven and back, while never physically leaving his bed. We know this is true because it's in the Qur'an!

Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things).

—Qur'an, sura 17 (Al-Isra), ayah 1

Then he [Gabriel] brought the Buraq, handsome-faced and bridled, a tall, white beast, bigger than the donkey but smaller than the mule. He could place his hooves at the farthest boundary of his gaze. He had long ears. Whenever he faced a mountain his hind legs would extend, and whenever he went downhill his front legs would extend. He had two wings on his thighs which lent strength to his legs. He bucked when Muhammad came to mount him. The angel Jibril (Gabriel) put his hand on his mane and said: "Are you not ashamed, O Buraq? By Allah, no-one has ridden you in all creation more dear to Allah than he is." Hearing this he was so ashamed that he sweated until he became soaked, and he stood still so that the Prophet mounted him.

-Muhammad al-Alawi al-Maliki

Here's what the Buraq looks like: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
Alex123 aka WM

Ilford, UK

#157248 Jan 3, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
That story is a hoax. Never happened! That Jesus walked on water, is absurd!
Why is it absurd? Allah (pbuh) can do anything he wishes to, like when he given a son mother Mary by his will. Without god doing this, anything will be a hoax.
Alex123 aka WM

Ilford, UK

#157249 Jan 3, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Fool of a Lying Muslim,
You know this for a FACT because you were there.
Also, Mohammad did in FACT fly an invisible human/horse looking creature to heaven and back, while never physically leaving his bed. We know this is true because it's in the Qur'an!
Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things).
—Qur'an, sura 17 (Al-Isra), ayah 1
Then he [Gabriel] brought the Buraq, handsome-faced and bridled, a tall, white beast, bigger than the donkey but smaller than the mule. He could place his hooves at the farthest boundary of his gaze. He had long ears. Whenever he faced a mountain his hind legs would extend, and whenever he went downhill his front legs would extend. He had two wings on his thighs which lent strength to his legs. He bucked when Muhammad came to mount him. The angel Jibril (Gabriel) put his hand on his mane and said: "Are you not ashamed, O Buraq? By Allah, no-one has ridden you in all creation more dear to Allah than he is." Hearing this he was so ashamed that he sweated until he became soaked, and he stood still so that the Prophet mounted him.
-Muhammad al-Alawi al-Maliki
Here's what the Buraq looks like: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
Hey non-gentile bu(tteredbuttturd lick)ford still think about my phallus? lol
Frijoles

Stamford, CT

#157250 Jan 3, 2013
jesus is wrote:
FROM THE GOSPEL OF BARNABAS (CHAPTER 20):
'Jesus went to the sea of Galilee, and having embarked in a ship sailed to his city of Nazareth; whereupon there was a great tempest in the sea, insomuch that the ship was nigh unto sinking.'
NAZARETH WASW ABOUT 20KM AWAY FROM THE LAKE.
You never heard of taxis?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157251 Jan 3, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Fool of a Lying Muslim,
Matt 5:31 "It was said,'WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE'; 32 but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Wait, don't tell me. Let me guess.
Mohammad abrogated this prohibition on marrying a divorced woman because Jesus never taught it, or Zanaib was unchaste which is why Zaid divorced her, right?
As for your charge that Jesus was a fornicator, not even your adulterous "prophet" believed that about him.
Ignorant and clueless fool!

I never lie! Jesus was not living among Arabs. He would not have lasted 24 hours there. Even paul ran away from Arabia after he went in.

I quoted Matthew 5:27-28 and showed you the Hijab of eyes, commanded by Jesus!!!

27 “You have heard that it was said,‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157252 Jan 3, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Fool of a Lying Muslim,
You know this for a FACT because you were there.
Also, Mohammad did in FACT fly an invisible human/horse looking creature to heaven and back, while never physically leaving his bed. We know this is true because it's in the Qur'an!
Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things).

—Qur'an, sura 17 (Al-Isra), ayah 1

Then he [Gabriel] brought the Buraq, handsome-faced and bridled, a tall, white beast, bigger than the donkey but smaller than the mule. He could place his hooves at the farthest boundary of his gaze. He had long ears. Whenever he faced a mountain his hind legs would extend, and whenever he went downhill his front legs would extend. He had two wings on his thighs which lent strength to his legs. He bucked when Muhammad came to mount him. The angel Jibril (Gabriel) put his hand on his mane and said: "Are you not ashamed, O Buraq? By Allah, no-one has ridden you in all creation more dear to Allah than he is." Hearing this he was so ashamed that he sweated until he became soaked, and he stood still so that the Prophet mounted him.
-Muhammad al-Alawi al-Maliki
Here's what the Buraq looks like: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
Hello, ignorant mischievous fool,

Qur'aan does not say that Muhammad rode Buraq.

M-al-Alawi al-Maliki is an ignorant fool. Some Muslims like him believe absurd stories, just as the Christians believe in the absurd stories of the gospels.

That Jesus walked on water, is absurd! And that Muhammad rode Buraq, is also absurd.
Mahmood

Woodstock, Canada

#157253 Jan 3, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a defeatist attitude and a defeatist answer.
You have already proved to me that you have not read 'sooooo many' books on Islam.
I do not have to rely on anything. The point is that all polemicists including your goodself are ignorant fools, who think that the history of Islam was written by three bloody fools only, namely the trinity of Ibn Asshaq-Hisham-Waqidi, who wrote their scraps and rubbish 130 plus years after the Prophet had passed away and think that there was no one else who wrote. That is idiotic.
All anti-Islam folks and polemicists only talk through that junk and stuff of the three stooges.
Sometime ago, you had told me that you have a copy of the book by Ibn Ishaq. Right? There is no copy of any book by Ibn Ishaq. It does not exist.
Anyway, my point still is that you need to do more search in order to find out the names of folks, who wrote before those three bloody fools and what they wrote is still preserved.
Your comments also tell me that you have not even read the entire book written by the William Muir, the crudest polemicist, who wrote on the prophet and Islam and never realized how utterly absurd were his own Bible and his own religion Christianity.
If you had read so well as you claim, you would have known that. I don't believe that you are that well-read.
That's correct, I have read many books on Islam and bios on Mo and Muir happens to be only one of them. What has Muir written that others have not?

You on the other hand is a bull&hit artist par excellence, telling me that there are pre-Ishaq bios on Mo but refusing to release names and authors. The problem is that there is none. You have no names, no authors, nothing. You are lying when you tell me you have sources that pre-date Ishaq? And why would you believe those sources when you revile all material outside the Koran?

Ishaq's book was later completed by his student Hisham, this is old news, so lets not go there. However, for a moment let us agree that Ishaq/Hisham were both liars, what makes you so sure that the imaginary works that pre-date them are all true? A billion Mohammadans dont even know where the orignal copy of the Koran is.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157254 Jan 3, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it absurd? Allah (pbuh) can do anything he wishes to, like when he given a son mother Mary by his will. Without god doing this, anything will be a hoax.
Hello, Impostor

No Muslim will write pbuh after Allah's name.

It is absurd because Jesus was heavier than water. He would have sunk straight away.

Technically speaking, a body has to displace more water to be able to float. The soles cannot displace that kind of volume.

God can also give a baby to a cow also but God wouldn't be called the father of the calf.
Alex123 aka WM

Ilford, UK

#157261 Jan 3, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello, Impostor
No Muslim will write pbuh after Allah's name.
It is absurd because Jesus was heavier than water. He would have sunk straight away.
Technically speaking, a body has to displace more water to be able to float. The soles cannot displace that kind of volume.
God can also give a baby to a cow also but God wouldn't be called the father of the calf.
Hi brother,

Jesus is heavier than water, but if God wanted him to walk over the water, who we are to tell it's a hoax? If god wanted to give to a virgin a son without sexual intercourse who we are to tell it's a hoax? Allah can do everything beyond our imagination.

God is father of everything, which implies he's also the father of cattle.

Salaams.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#157262 Jan 3, 2013
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi brother,
Jesus is heavier than water, but if God wanted him to walk over the water, who we are to tell it's a hoax? If god wanted to give to a virgin a son without sexual intercourse who we are to tell it's a hoax? Allah can do everything beyond our imagination.
God is father of everything, which implies he's also the father of cattle.
Salaams.
No wonder God is the father of the Holy Cow in India. lol!
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#157263 Jan 3, 2013
Buford wrote:
CORRECTION:
Truth be told, Jesus' enemies at the time of his appearance in Israel thought that he was a demon possessed and empowered bastard, being certain that his mother Mary was a FORNICATOR who, for whatever reason, was rescued from the penalty of death, as specified in the law of Moses as it applied to FORNICATORS, by some lawbreaking guy named Joseph who decided to marry her anyway, according to Luke.
rabbee: people need to be much more careful, when talking about TheG-D Child. as you can see the primary bases for this, in Parashas Bereeshees. as it indicates, that only Adam, is arrived by some sort of virgin surrogate birth.

and that adam and his assigned mate, also return in a similar manner. and do not think i had trouble, with G-D telling me this. how i am THEIR, Male child adam. and that i have a surrogate Mother, and a non-earthly PROGENITORS. and that i was actually conceived in HEAVEN, and then somehow placed in Her woumb. and is hard to comprehend, since this is not the normal birth process taught by the world.

and that there is more going on, in this whole worlds birth process. than even science, can comprehend. it is all too precise and accurate thrice again, to be happening the way science is telling it. you can't even imagine, the shock i felt. when i finally realize, what G-D had came and said to me that day, to THEIR Male Child.

essentially that science, had lied to us all, about how we all get here so precisely, one, two, three, or four times. with everyone that had been here twice before, all being here again so accurately. because even science, cannot accept that kind of precision control from G-D.

as you have no idea, of the implications of everything G-D came and said to me for that about half an hour. when G-D stopped all of physical totality, to come to speak to THEIR Son adam. in the great show and tell, unlike anything this world could even imagine. and my Parent, Both have the power to do this all.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#157264 Jan 3, 2013
bmz wrote:
Truth be told, no Messiah was promised by God to the Hebrews and others through Moses and the Torah.
Truth also be told, the Messiah was never supposed to be the so-called 'Son of God'. No such thing as "the Son of God" was ever mentioned or promised
to the Hebrews and the Jews.
Truth also be told, God never told anyone that God would come down as the Messiah.
Truth again be told, the Messiah for whom the Jews were and still are waiting for, was and is supposed to be a man coming from the line of David. And we don't know if there is a person, who can claim that he is truly from David's line. Even DNA and other methods would not be of any help.
Truth be finally told, God can create anything that God wishes to. So, God created a man by the name Jesus, without any man touching his mother. That was no problem for God. No big deal!
End of the story.
rabbee: that! is an outright lie. since G-D has forever promised, that Noach, Avraham, Yeetzak, Yaachov, Moshe, Daveed, Shlomoh, Adam and adam and his mate, and Shet, Enoch, shall always appear here in TheStory of Creation in always the exact same precise order. and that your all lying about it, won't change any of this in TheHappening.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#157265 Jan 3, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose that in your circle of friends, you are regarded as the most brilliant...
rabbee: touche!
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#157266 Jan 3, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Well the Talmud has got that wrong, because the Last of Prophet has come and the world till its end shall need the sayings and actions of the last prophet.
But there are many things in your post with which I agree.
rabbee: horse man ur! there are many more prophets, to come after my being here. including, Shet, Enoch, and Noach again! no different than the last two times, or other Torot times before. your story of being here in non-creation here in TheStory of Creation is a lie.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hands-on Archaeology of New Mexico Exhibit at t... Sat Dairine 1
News Hair Extension Found On Ancient Egyptian Woman May 5 Akhenaten 1
News Giant Easter Island 'Hats' Rolled Into Place, S... Apr 27 peterw 1
Is Nebuchadnezzar II responsible for the ruins ... Apr 26 Cyler 1
News The History of Human Migration (Feb '13) Apr '15 jake10 2
News "Digging" the Archaeological Study Bible; Curre... (Jan '08) Apr '15 Crazy Talk 12
News Origin of Hindu Brahmins (Aug '08) Apr '15 MUQ2 189
More from around the web