Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 225726 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155428 Dec 4, 2012
Those who "believe" in Allah and those who "disbelieve" in Allah.
Let us leave it at that!!!
Frijoles

Madison, CT

#155429 Dec 4, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Answer to my response to you on JEWISH BANKERS and GREEKS.
You're still promoting this crap?

My allah!

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#155430 Dec 4, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a waste of time.
You really don't know anything.
Will you be honest and deal with these now:
1. Answer to my response to you on JEWISH BANKERS and GREEKS.
2. Read my response on your dumb comment about kindrgarten alphabet and apologise.
3. Now you lied again!!
When did I defend Christianity on topix, besides defending good human beings who happen to be Christians (and there are many of them)??
Apologise now.
You and your mate are a bunch of time wasters.

1. I have nothing to say about Greeks and Jewish bankers because I saw your conclusion of Greeks and Germans hating Jewish bankers was only your own conjecture. No evidence at all was showed. No need to keep this up. If you need it write for yourself.

2. You are attacking me for some typos... LOL Also you are trying to win a debate against me putting out the discourse am not fluent in English, with the difference that am not British while you are. Little detail that your little head forgot, is that you don't know at all the most basic grammar rules... To attack a non-English speaker on English is a thing that a person does to change the argument when he has been challenged very bad.

3. If I was wrong I retire, matter of fact as you come here and defend Islam in this way, may you had defended Christianity in the same way when you were a Christian "priest"? If yes, my point does not change.

Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155431 Dec 4, 2012
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
You're still promoting this crap?
My allah!
I am not promoting it. I am not ignoring it either as there is something that is going on.
Just for your information there is a "tiny" bit of banking blood in my family.
I have given some of the details of the Greek/German/Jewish banking links.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155432 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your mate are a bunch of time wasters.
1. I have nothing to say about Greeks and Jewish bankers because I saw your conclusion of Greeks and Germans hating Jewish bankers was only your own conjecture. No evidence at all was showed. No need to keep this up. If you need it write for yourself.
2. You are attacking me for some typos... LOL Also you are trying to win a debate against me putting out the discourse am not fluent in English, with the difference that am not British while you are. Little detail that your little head forgot, is that you don't know at all the most basic grammar rules... To attack a non-English speaker on English is a thing that a person does to change the argument when he has been challenged very bad.
3. If I was wrong I retire, matter of fact as you come here and defend Islam in this way, may you had defended Christianity in the same way when you were a Christian "priest"? If yes, my point does not change.
1. you lying b*std. I DID provide a LOAD of links and NOT my conjecture! hope you know what it means you uneducated liar.
2. This has nothing to do with your typo you ignorant fool. You said there was no alphabet in kindergartens. I provided proof that you were lying as usual.
3. You assumed again and you were wrong. That makes you a liar for the third time.

APologise if you are a real man and apologise properly for each one you ignorant fool.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#155433 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
Voltaire is right! I also add that if a person claim to be prophet or messenger of god and this person to convert the others use the violence against many people, then that is the sign he's charlatan or his god is not almighty.
Since it's impossible to believe that an almighty entity can act in this rdiculous way, I prefer to think that the pseudo prophet is a charlatan, to say the least.
According to the Gospel record, Jesus prayed for his enemies. "Father, forgive them," he prayed from the cross, "they don't know what they are doing."

In stark contrast, according to Muslim records, Mohammad had any number of his enemies murdered because they had supposedly said "injurious things about Allah and His Apostle."

(Bukhari:V4B52N270 "Allah's Messenger said,'Who is ready to kill Ashraf? He has said injurious things about Allah and His Apostle.' Maslama got up saying,'Would you like me to kill him?' The Prophet proclaimed,'Yes.' Maslama said,'Then allow me to lie so that I will be able to deceive him.' Muhammad said,'You may do so.'")

IOW, Jesus the Jew was far more merciful than Mohammad the ARAB, but it goes without saying that ARABS prefer their "own" prophet, and especially how he dealt with "unbelievers," consigning them to the flames as he did:

Qur'an 3:10 Indeed, those who disbelieve - never will their wealth or their children avail them against Allah at all. And it is they who are fuel for the Fire.

Incidentally, it isn't enough that Jews are monotheists. What matters MOST to "Allah" is their rejection of Mohammad as a false prophet.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#155434 Dec 4, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
1. you lying b*std. I DID provide a LOAD of links and NOT my conjecture! hope you know what it means you uneducated liar.
2. This has nothing to do with your typo you ignorant fool. You said there was no alphabet in kindergartens. I provided proof that you were lying as usual.
3. You assumed again and you were wrong. That makes you a liar for the third time.
APologise if you are a real man and apologise properly for each one you ignorant fool.
1. No link were provided, only your own conjecture. On a second thought I think you may refer to the chairmen of the banks you listed. If you meant that then you were off topic since I NEVER told you to show me whether or not the banks were led by Jews, but ONLY to show me that Germans and Greeks are angry with Jewish bankers, and untill today not even a shred of evidence from you.

2. Has it nothing to do with e typo? LOL That is the link where you responded about alphabet and kindergarten, comment#155419:
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/judaism/T...

Now we know who's the liar. Take your pill, dizzy idiot.

3. No, that is not a lie in this planet. Assumptions are not a lies.

You know what, now I do remember why few months ago I used to avoid answer you, you suffer of mental problems, it's useless any communication with you. You need pills.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#155435 Dec 4, 2012
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>According to the Gospel record, Jesus prayed for his enemies. "Father, forgive them," he prayed from the cross, "they don't know what they are doing."
In stark contrast, according to Muslim records, Mohammad had any number of his enemies murdered because they had supposedly said "injurious things about Allah and His Apostle."
(Bukhari:V4B52N270 "Allah's Messenger said,'Who is ready to kill Ashraf? He has said injurious things about Allah and His Apostle.' Maslama got up saying,'Would you like me to kill him?' The Prophet proclaimed,'Yes.' Maslama said,'Then allow me to lie so that I will be able to deceive him.' Muhammad said,'You may do so.'")
IOW, Jesus the Jew was far more merciful than Mohammad the ARAB, but it goes without saying that ARABS prefer their "own" prophet, and especially how he dealt with "unbelievers," consigning them to the flames as he did:
Qur'an 3:10 Indeed, those who disbelieve - never will their wealth or their children avail them against Allah at all. And it is they who are fuel for the Fire.
Incidentally, it isn't enough that Jews are monotheists. What matters MOST to "Allah" is their rejection of Mohammad as a false prophet.
Nevertheless Muhammad is considered to be more righteous and pious than the Nazarene.

In your posts you always stressed on Muhammad being a false prophet, raper, slaver, warlord, rubber ect.providing good sources and point of views. After discussing for so long with Muslims what idea you have of them?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#155436 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
Nevertheless Muhammad is considered to be more righteous and pious than the Nazarene.
In your posts you always stressed on Muhammad being a false prophet, raper, slaver, warlord, rubber ect.providing good sources and point of views. After discussing for so long with Muslims what idea you have of them?
Muslims have little choice but to believe that Mohammad the Arab, that lying, thieving, rape enabling and sadistic murderer, was more righteous and pious than Jesus the Jew, otherwise Mohammad would yield to Jesus in everything, but yielding to ANY other prophet is something that Mohammad, promoted by his sycophants and slaves as the Last and Best Ever Prophet of Allah, simply does not do.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#155437 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Nevertheless Muhammad is considered to be more righteous and pious than the Nazarene.
In your posts you always stressed on Muhammad being a false prophet, raper, slaver, warlord, rubber ect.providing good sources and point of views. After discussing for so long with Muslims what idea you have of them?
I would imagine that when considering how bloody and vengeance-minded Mohammad was, many Muslims take COMFORT in knowing that YHWH ordered the Jews under Joshua and Moses to show no mercy to certain inhabitants of Canaan, because IF Mohammad was the prophet to come that Moses prophesied in Deut. 18:18 (See: http://answering-islam.org/Silas/deut1818.htm ) then everything that he did to establish HIS rule in Arabia and beyond, no matter how barbaric, was permitted "by Allah."
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#155438 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Nevertheless Muhammad is considered to be more righteous and pious than the Nazarene.
In your posts you always stressed on Muhammad being a false prophet, raper, slaver, warlord, rubber ect.providing good sources and point of views. After discussing for so long with Muslims what idea you have of them?
SC---Nevertheless Muhammad is considered to be more righteous and pious than the Nazarene.

HughBe--- Who holds such a view? Usually in the REAL world one cannot be more righteous than He/Jesus who has no unrighteousness.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155439 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
1. No link were provided, only your own conjecture. On a second thought I think you may refer to the chairmen of the banks you listed. If you meant that then you were off topic since I NEVER told you to show me whether or not the banks were led by Jews, but ONLY to show me that Germans and Greeks are angry with Jewish bankers, and untill today not even a shred of evidence from you.
2. Has it nothing to do with e typo? LOL That is the link where you responded about alphabet and kindergarten, comment#155419:
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/judaism/T...
Now we know who's the liar. Take your pill, dizzy idiot.
3. No, that is not a lie in this planet. Assumptions are not a lies.
You know what, now I do remember why few months ago I used to avoid answer you, you suffer of mental problems, it's useless any communication with you. You need pills.
You are not only a lying b*std but a mentally unstable and demented little creep!
I wkill prove to the international readers that you lied time and again.
Frijoles

Madison, CT

#155440 Dec 4, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not promoting it. I am not ignoring it either as there is something that is going on.
Just for your information there is a "tiny" bit of banking blood in my family.
I have given some of the details of the Greek/German/Jewish banking links.
Dont forget the blood libel too. Passover is only 5 months away...

I wonder how much anti-semitism there would actually be if those promoting it would just take their meds as prescribed.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155441 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
1. No link were provided, only your own conjecture. On a second thought I think you may refer to the chairmen of the banks you listed. If you meant that then you were off topic since I NEVER told you to show me whether or not the banks were led by Jews, but ONLY to show me that Germans and Greeks are angry with Jewish bankers, and untill today not even a shred of evidence from you....
You mentally deranged lying b*std. You were given many links and you ignored them. Here they are again you lying sh*t:

Thanks to greed by extremist zionists, the world at large suffers including innocent Jews and Muslims.
http://www.jewishproblem.com/category/golden-...

For every Jew who lives in Greece, there are about 100 Greeks who voted for the country’s neo-Nazi party, Golden Dawn, last spring.
..........
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155442 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
1. No link were provided, only your own conjecture. On a second thought I think you may refer to the chairmen of the banks you listed. If you meant that then you were off topic since I NEVER told you to show me whether or not the banks were led by Jews, but ONLY to show me that Germans and Greeks are angry with Jewish bankers, and untill today not even a shred of evidence from you....
For every Jew who lives in Greece, there are about 100 Greeks who voted for the country’s neo-Nazi party, Golden Dawn, last spring.
..........
The party now controls 18 seats in Greece’s 300-member parliament, and its popularity is rising rapidly. A poll taken last month showed that if elections were held again today, Golden Dawn would capture 14 per cent of the vote, making it Greece’s third-largest party. A September poll showed that 22 per cent of Greeks have positive views of Golden Dawn, up from 12 per cent in May.

With its swastika-like flag, gangs of black-shirted thugs attacking immigrants and its ideology of Greek racial superiority, Golden Dawn’s sudden and significant rise has prompted condemnations from around the world. It also has put many of Greece’s 5,000 Jews on edge. Community leaders already have begun a campaign to educate Greeks about the dangers of allowing a neo-Nazi party to flourish, and Greek Jews are trying to figure out what more they can do to arrest Golden Dawn’s rise.
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/international/a...
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155444 Dec 4, 2012
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
1. No link were provided, only your own conjecture. On a second thought I think you may refer to the chairmen of the banks you listed. If you meant that then you were off topic since I NEVER told you to show me whether or not the banks were led by Jews, but ONLY to show me that Germans and Greeks are angry with Jewish bankers, and untill today not even a shred of evidence from you....
The Rape Of Greece, By JEWISH Bankers, By Mike Stathis
7-10-12
http://rense.com/general95/rapeof.html

......
What did Venizelos just say about the Jews?
In General on October 14, 2012 at 5:54 pm

At first I wasn’t sure whether to believe them or not. A few tweets claiming that Evangelos Venizelos, the current Pasok leader and former Greek finance minister, said that the only names he’d seen on a controversial catalogue – the so-called Lagarde list – of about 2,000 Greeks with LARGE BANK ACCOUNTS IN a SWISS BANK were “JEWISH”.(!!!)

But the tweets grew in number and a quick search of the Greek press proved that they were correct.

The LEADER of the SECOND LARGEST PARTY supporting Antonis Samaras’ coalition government had specifically SINGLED OUT JEWS when discussing a list of suspected tax evaders.

http://damomac.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/veniz...
..........
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155446 Dec 4, 2012
Somebdy has been removing the links and solid proof of the greek german banking fiasco.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#155448 Dec 4, 2012
Excerpts from the Gospel of Barnabas- Part-0 (Introduction)(Contd.)

4. Then they say, that since the Italian manuscript came into light in 16th Century, then it must be a forgery of that century. They forget that if we use the same standard, then we find that during the reign of Josiah …”the then high priest , while cleaning Temple, discovered an old manuscript of Torah, and he presented it to King Josiah and he accepted that manuscript as original Torah”. So why cant the high priest would have written it himself and claimed that it is old Torah?

5. Then they say that some thoughts in this Gospel match with that of Poet Dante, who lived in 14th Century, so the writer could be his contemporary or came after him. What if Dante got his ideas from this Gospel?

6. They put forward such lame excuses against this Gospel, while dismiss more serious charges against existing Gospels.

I. Accusation that it is written by a Muslim: Just because GOB confirms some Islamic teachings, Christians make an unsubstantiated claim that this book was probably written by a Muslim. This is a mere accusation, and without any proof.

1. If it was written by any Muslim, then it should have been very popular amongst Muslims, but no Muslim knew about this Gospel, till it came to light as mentioned earlier. No Muslim even then knew about it, till it was translated into Arabic and English languages by Christians themselves.

2. Quran says that Jesus mentioned name of last prophet as Ahmed, where as in GOB it is mentioned that name of Last prophet is Mohammad and never even once mention the name Ahmed. How could any Muslim make such a grave error.

3. I doubt if any Muslim has such deep knowledge of OT books (in 13th – 16th Century) to write such a book with a false name.

4. It says that Jesus denies that I am Messiah, but says that Last Prophet is the promised Messiah. In Quran the Title Messiah is reserved for Jesus and at no place it calls Prophet Mohammad as Messiah. How could a Muslim writing a false gospel could have made such a mistake?

5. It mentions number of skies as Nine, whereas in Quran they are mentioned as seven at many places, no Muslim will accept that.

6. Then number of Important angels known to Muslims are Four, this Gospel mentions some more names which are not known to Muslims.

7. This Gospel says, that Jesus after ascending into heavens (to escape capture from jews) returned to earth for a brief period, this is a thing which is not known to Muslims.

There are many such things, which deny that any Muslim could have written this Gospel.

I. Some peculiarities of this Gospel: There are a few characteristics of this Gospel.

1. It lists all the miracles mentioned in all four of Gospels. Most episodes spread in different gospels are found here in one book.

2. It provides answers to “difficult” passages mentioned in Gospels without any answer. For Example Jesus asks Scribes and Pharisees “How could Messiah be David’s son, since David calls him his Lord”? There is no answer to this question in any of the four Gospels.

3. It provides the true picture of Jesus as a prophet and as a teacher. It shows how jesus taught his chosen disciples. It is totally different from what we see in other Gospels.

Contd.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#155449 Dec 4, 2012
4. It shows how much Jesus detested the title “Son of God” and God. How severe was his reaction when Peter called him Son of God and Christ.

5. It solves the riddle of crucifixion, the riddle of “Missing Judas Iscariot”, the riddle of “Missing Corpse” and various Jesus’ sighting after alleged crucifixion.

I. Some shortcomings of This Gospel: The most evident shortcoming of this Gospel is total omission of the mention of John the Baptist. The writer puts many words attributed to John the Baptist into the mouth of Jesus.

J. How authentic is the Gospel of Barnabas: It is certain that what Copy we have is translation of the original gospel. Barnabas must have written it in Hebrew, from which it was translated into old Italian, Spanish and then English.

It could have suffered in translation and transmission as other books, may be somewhat more, but that is not the reason to reject it totally. Because none of OT and NT books can claim immunity from these.

I think Christianity is doing itself a great injustice by totally ignoring this Gospel. If they considered this Gospel with care, it would have solved many of their theological disputes and infighting between sects.

With these opening remarks, I present an abridged version of this Bible for those who are interested in serious reading. Full version of this Gospel could be downloaded from Internet sites life www.scribd.com
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#155450 Dec 4, 2012
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>According to the Gospel record, Jesus prayed for his enemies. "Father, forgive them," he prayed from the cross, "they don't know what they are doing."
In stark contrast, according to Muslim records, Mohammad had any number of his enemies murdered because they had supposedly said "injurious things about Allah and His Apostle."
(Bukhari:V4B52N270 "Allah's Messenger said,'Who is ready to kill Ashraf? He has said injurious things about Allah and His Apostle.' Maslama got up saying,'Would you like me to kill him?' The Prophet proclaimed,'Yes.' Maslama said,'Then allow me to lie so that I will be able to deceive him.' Muhammad said,'You may do so.'")
IOW, Jesus the Jew was far more merciful than Mohammad the ARAB, but it goes without saying that ARABS prefer their "own" prophet, and especially how he dealt with "unbelievers," consigning them to the flames as he did:
Qur'an 3:10 Indeed, those who disbelieve - never will their wealth or their children avail them against Allah at all. And it is they who are fuel for the Fire.
Incidentally, it isn't enough that Jews are monotheists. What matters MOST to "Allah" is their rejection of Mohammad as a false prophet.
you are another lying moron.
Bj did try to fight with swords after selling cloaks to buy swords!
It was a disaster....his main sidekick messed it up by cutting ear off an innocent servant!
When they were about to be given a good beating BJ started talking about those who live by sword will "die" by it!! and told the chaps to put away the swords...or hide them!
When all his sidekicks fled...and when he was helpless he was grabbed and put on a cross!
What will he do fight?
So it is easy for any helpless person to plead with "father" to forgive them hoping they woujld let him go.
That trick did not work!
BJ was nailed to die on a roman pole.
Big hero eh.

(But Holy prophet Jesus pbuh was saved by God and was NOT killed by Jews)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Archaeology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News From riches to ruins: Ancient Greeks 'stored mi... Jul 1 SpaceBlues 1
News Mummified Remains Found in Indiana Jun 29 wichita-rick 6
News El Paso Museum of Archaeology trails need repair Jun 29 eyes of texas 1
News Islamic State Group Blows up 2 Mausoleums in Sy... Jun 26 Mawar 2
News Tonga's Nukuleka, the birth place of Polynesia (Jan '08) Jun 20 Frankie Lucas 1,972
News Before us, the Chickasaw: Their history is ofte... Jun 20 Different times 1
News LBL managers working on plans, seeking input on... (Jun '10) Jun 13 Just Sayin 2
More from around the web