Proposed drinking water tax is drivin...

Proposed drinking water tax is driving us not to drink

There are 1 comment on the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin story from Jun 12, 2018, titled Proposed drinking water tax is driving us not to drink. In it, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin reports that:

A plan to hit Californians with a first-of-its-kind statewide tax on drinking water is on ice, for now. The proposed tax would cost most Californians about $1 per month on their residential water bills.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.


Dewey, AZ

#1 Jun 12, 2018
"But on Friday, a deal to add the tax increase to a budget trailer bill fell apart. Trailer bills, also called spot bills, are blank pieces of legislation that are passed by the Legislature earlier in the session. During the semi-secret budget process, the blank bills are amended to add last-minute agreements, then quickly passed into law."

Therein lies the major problem in our representative system of government across the land. Every State of the Union and even the government at the federal level have been using ,"trailer bills", "spot bills" or sometimes "riders" are making it difficult to pass ANY bill worth its weight in sh!t. One party likes to blame the other for a bill NOT passing. One group will not allow the bill to go to vote with the amount of "trailer bills" and sundry crap infused into a bill that might just be worthy of a yes vote. IT SHOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL to add these asinine pieces of crap pork programs, not even remotely part of the larger Legislation that is to be voted on to ANY bill. IF this "trailer trash bill" is worth anything, it should be able to stand on its own without being hidden in another unrelated piece of legislation. The OTHER favorite practice in Commiefornia is the bait and switch. When the Legislature or Governor "sells" to the voters, bond measures, tax increases, they "say" it will be used for a particular purpose. After the vote, the public is usually unaware that somewhere along the line any language that made it clear that "this" money was to be used for a "particular purpose only" was removed before the vote. SO NOW the money goes into the "General Fund" and used for "other" purposes.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Agriculture Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News As aid checks go out, farmers worry bailout won... 13 hr As Usual 15
News Ground beef recall: 130,000 pounds possibly con... Sun WelbyMD 21
News Dead Mouse Found in Beans at Oak Ridge School (Jan '07) Sat Jackie 37
News Tyson Foods: New facility in Tennessee to creat... (Nov '17) Sep 22 Grow up 126
News White House mulls letting states require drug t... Sep 21 reality 22
News Meet Jim Waldbusser: the American with a heart ... Sep 20 need same 4 Ticky 3
News Niman Ranch Awards $106,000 in Scholarships to ... Sep 19 Lawchick 2