Yes. And for some strange reason you are claiming that the entire science department at Berkeley is wrong about evolution. And not just that science department, but every single science department at every single top university in the entire world.<quoted text>
"The definition of micro and macro-evolution from that link is incorrect or misused. lol"
That link was Berkeley's evolution teams web page.
In fact, I cannot imagine that a university could be "creationist," and certainly not a biological science department. The closest any biologists come is the ID movement - and there's less than a handful of them who are a disgrace to their departments. Michael Behe, for example - his own department has a paragraph declaring his silly ideas about ID non-scientific. And he hasn't produced a real research based scientific article in quite a few years.
See? You are delusional.
You proclaim that others cannot argue with Berkeley and then you take a stance that no biological department at any university takes - in fact, you proclaim that they are all wrong, despite all their evidence, and that your religion's silly idea, based on an ancient mythological text, is somehow correct.