Then if this is your opinion you should be able to demonstrte for all where and what I actually misrepresented.<quoted text>
You can call it whatever you want, it doesn't change the fact that it's quote mining and misrepresenting the evidence in a pitiful attempt to discredit the very people you are using as evidence.
These researchers still accept TOE. The point I am making is that it is all woffle and not empirical evidence at all.
If all this woffle was empirical evidence it would not change like the wind and refute itself on a regular basis.
Evolutionary research is one of the few fields of work where one can be consistently worng and not get fired.
Data is provided, but just how valid is it? Further to that any data can be interpreted based on a predefined assumption.
TOE is not a science. It is a faith and you have faith in these boofheads that change their mind all the time.
You have many words but you cannot articulate an appropriate refute backed by research. You can quack and that appears to be about it.