And we're all in the same boat, including many professional climatologists and particularly our resident pseudo variety, FuGyou and Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty.So what is one to think? The scientific topic involved is complex and specialized, requiring years of academic study to properly comprehend. The experts seem divided, with nasty accusations of dishonesty and corruption flying in both directions. The mainstream media and our political elites seem overwhelmingly to favor one side, but given their recent track record, that almost constitutes a negative indicator. Tens of billions of dollars are at stake, so the volume of propaganda is enormous, and I would need hundreds of hours just to dip my toe into the topic. Therefore, my considered verdict is: I just dont know.
Two Cheers for Heresy on Global Warming
I first encountered the strong case for global warming in the early 1970s in an Isaac Asimov science column.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The American Conservative.
“Happy, warm and comfortable”
Since: Oct 10
Mountain retreat, SE Spain
#1 Sep 24, 2012
#2 Sep 24, 2012
NO!!! Youre in a boat of your own. You are the commander of useless babble tainted with hate covered with span cut and paste. We see youre having a low patch lowering your self.
Add your comments below
|The President has failed us (Jun '12)||1 min||Agents of Corruption||391,839|
|Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11)||37 min||DanFromSmithville||201,839|
|Will Green Political Machine Foil Trump?||2 hr||WasteWater||66|
|Top StoryObama signs bill requiring labeling of...||3 hr||Snidely70448||10|
|Lack of capital tough on young farmers||6 hr||FarmerTed||2|
|Who Is Allah? (Aug '07)||9 hr||KAB||253,562|
|John Kerry says Air Conditioners, Refrigerators...||11 hr||tina anne||5|
Find what you want!
Search Science Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC