Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201881 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#205532 Jul 29, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, people are leaving religion because they don't want the possibility of being associated with filthy people like you.
Exactly right
Big D

Modesto, CA

#205533 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
No, dear, you missed my point...
If heterosexual marriages were scrutinized to the same degree that homosexual marriages have been, then many heterosexual marriages simply would not meet the "standard" that so many of the people in here say must be met in order to qualify for marriage.
Do you se what I'm saying?
Millions and millions of people, likely including the people that are making these statements.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#205534 Jul 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You said heterosexuals have made a mockery of marriage and implied that homosexuals will not. I submit the mockery will continue now that gay marriage is legal.
I support SSM but I am under no delusions that you will do any better than heterosexuals have.
Oh, maybe the mockery will continue. You know, I say to Kim and Rock that we'll make better marriages simply to annoy them.

They take such great delight in telling us that our marriages don't count.

It annoys me that they do this, so I feel that turn-about is fair play.

Nevertheless, I will stand by my comment that heterosexual marriages could not stand the level of study and scrutiny that has been heaped on same-sex marriages for the past several years.

If people looked at heterosexual marriage the way they've judged and picked apart gay relationships, there's not a doubt in my mind that they couldn't pass muster.

Seriously... If they're going to look at every single aspect of same-sex marriage and demand that we aren't fit, then their marriages should be just as closely inspected.

So, if they're going to continue to insist that only certain people should be allowed to marry, then I'm going to suggest that probing investigations be done on couples who wish to marry. They should be evaluated for potential adultery problems, divorce likelihood, anger management issues (to stem any abuse problems), etc.

And only after they've passed these rigorous tests should they be issued a license to marry.

That way, people like Kimare Kardashian, could be certain that only the cream of the crop are allowed to marry.
Gustavo

North Hollywood, CA

#205535 Jul 29, 2013
Frakie Rizzo is a very mentally sick boi. Please seek mental help boi . . .
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205536 Jul 29, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly right
Nice!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205538 Jul 29, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
Frakie Rizzo is a very mentally sick boi. Please seek mental help boi ...
It didn't work for you.
laughing man

Pulaski, TN

#205539 Jul 29, 2013
What's all this hoho talk of "filthy people"?

At least there's no foreign fecal matter mixed with Crisco on MY pee-pee.

*snicker*
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205541 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Cute joke I read today...
12 priests were about to be ordained. The final test was for them to line up in a straight row, totally nude in a garden while a sexy and beautiful, big-breasted, nude model danced before them.
Each priest had a small bell attached to his penis and they were told that anyone whose bell rang when she danced in front of them would not be ordained because he had not reached a state of spiritual purity.
The beautiful model danced before the first candidate, with no reaction.
She proceeded down the line with the same response from all the priests until she got to the final priest, Carlos.
As she danced, his bell began to ring so loudly that it flew off and fell clattering to the ground. Embarrassed, Carlos took a few steps forward, and bent over to pick it up.
Then, all the other bells started to ring, and all hell broke loose....
HAR!HAR!HAR! Good one.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205542 Jul 29, 2013
laughing man wrote:
What's all this hoho talk of "filthy people"?
At least there's no foreign fecal matter mixed with Crisco on MY pee-pee.
*snicker*
You tell 'em laughing man!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205543 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, maybe the mockery will continue. You know, I say to Kim and Rock that we'll make better marriages simply to annoy them.
They take such great delight in telling us that our marriages don't count.
It annoys me that they do this, so I feel that turn-about is fair play.
Nevertheless, I will stand by my comment that heterosexual marriages could not stand the level of study and scrutiny that has been heaped on same-sex marriages for the past several years.
If people looked at heterosexual marriage the way they've judged and picked apart gay relationships, there's not a doubt in my mind that they couldn't pass muster.
Seriously... If they're going to look at every single aspect of same-sex marriage and demand that we aren't fit, then their marriages should be just as closely inspected.
So, if they're going to continue to insist that only certain people should be allowed to marry, then I'm going to suggest that probing investigations be done on couples who wish to marry. They should be evaluated for potential adultery problems, divorce likelihood, anger management issues (to stem any abuse problems), etc.
And only after they've passed these rigorous tests should they be issued a license to marry.
That way, people like Kimare Kardashian, could be certain that only the cream of the crop are allowed to marry.
Too long and boring. I started dozing off halfway through. You drone on and on.
Tellit

Chico, CA

#205544 Jul 29, 2013
Pope Francis has said gay people should not be marginalized but integrated into society, in some of the most conciliatory remarks by a pontiff on the issue of homosexuality and he's the Boss.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205545 Jul 29, 2013
VV, Jonah1 and Big D walk into a bar. The bartender says "Get the hell out of here".

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205546 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Can you imagine if heterosexual marriages were called before the courts and scrutinized the way same-sex marriages have been?
Can you imagine a group of couples who have had abortions, extramarital affairs, multiple divorces, dead-beat dads, etc. having to try to argue why it is that heterosexuals should have the right to marry?
The state could show statistics about how unstable heterosexual marriages have become over the past few decades. They could ask courts to either eliminate states supported heterosexual marriages or they could argue for severe restrictions on heterosexual marriages; making potential couples go through a series of medical and psychiatric tests, just to make sure that couples are truly worthy of marriage.
That's what gays have had to do. We have been scrutinized and had our personal lives investigated at every step of the way in the fight to obtain the right to marry.
And while many straight couples would qualify for marriage after being thoroughly tested; many would not qualify. They would be banned from marriage.
I'm just trying to point out the ridiculousness of the arguments that Kim keeps making, especially the argument that only couples who have the ability or potential to procreate should be allowed to marry.
If he and others are going to so narrowly define marriage for gays, then they need to narrowly define it for themselves. They need to put structures in place that would reduce domestic violence, abortion, child abuse/neglect, parental abandonment, divorce, adultery, etc. BEFORE a heterosexual couple could marry.
What's good for the chimera goose is good for the devastatingly gorgeous gander.
There is no such thing as a ss marriage.

Your denial is only proved by your last statement. I'm not trying to be offensive, but a Bruce Willis look-a-like is disparaged by a down right scary ugly gander. Really???

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205547 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Major announcement from the Vatican...
"Pope Francis reached out to gays, saying he won't judge priests for their sexual orientation in a remarkably open and wide-ranging news conference Monday as he returned from his first foreign trip.
'If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?' Francis asked.'We shouldn't marginalize people for this. They must be integrated into society'."
----------
WOW!
Being homosexual and immorality are two distinct things. I'm sure the Pope distinguishes between them. I also doubt he would okay calling ss couples married.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205548 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, maybe the mockery will continue. You know, I say to Kim and Rock that we'll make better marriages simply to annoy them.
They take such great delight in telling us that our marriages don't count.
It annoys me that they do this, so I feel that turn-about is fair play.
Nevertheless, I will stand by my comment that heterosexual marriages could not stand the level of study and scrutiny that has been heaped on same-sex marriages for the past several years.
If people looked at heterosexual marriage the way they've judged and picked apart gay relationships, there's not a doubt in my mind that they couldn't pass muster.
Seriously... If they're going to look at every single aspect of same-sex marriage and demand that we aren't fit, then their marriages should be just as closely inspected.
So, if they're going to continue to insist that only certain people should be allowed to marry, then I'm going to suggest that probing investigations be done on couples who wish to marry. They should be evaluated for potential adultery problems, divorce likelihood, anger management issues (to stem any abuse problems), etc.
And only after they've passed these rigorous tests should they be issued a license to marry.
That way, people like Kimare Kardashian, could be certain that only the cream of the crop are allowed to marry.
How can something that does not exist annoy me?

ss marriage is an oxymoron.
laughing moron

Chicago, IL

#205549 Jul 29, 2013
laughing man wrote:
What's all this hoho talk of "filthy people"?
At least there's no foreign fecal matter mixed with Crisco on MY pee-pee.
*snicker*
Not since you used your fingers to scoop it all into your mouth.
Huh

Faribault, MN

#205550 Jul 29, 2013
I cant wait until the SCOTUS overturns all the UNCONSTITUTIONAL same sex bans. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH OF THIS TYRANNICAL RELIGOUS CONTROL.
well

Round Lake, IL

#205551 Jul 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such thing as a ss marriage.
Your denial is only proved by your last statement. I'm not trying to be offensive, but a Bruce Willis look-a-like is disparaged by a down right scary ugly gander. Really???
You keep insisting there is no such thing as ss marriage - so why are you even here?

Yeah, you're not trying to be offensive..."Bruce Willis look a like" only in your dreams.~gag~
well

Round Lake, IL

#205552 Jul 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How can something that does not exist annoy me?
ss marriage is an oxymoron.
If it doesn't exist...shuddup about it already!
Bingo

Covina, CA

#205553 Jul 29, 2013
Just more useless blatthering

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Mateo Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Senior Helpers (Mar '16) Sep 23 John A 3
San Francisco County Mugshots and Criminal Arre... Sep 21 Smith 2
News Mills principal starts new career chapter: Pam ... Sep 20 George Guiver 1
san mateo home depot vendor fair! Aug '16 fje0711 1
DA/Public Officials VIOLATES FEDERAL LAWS AETA/... (May '15) Aug '16 UN AGENDA 21 17
News Five Months into the Year and Market Finally Re... Aug '16 LAVON AFFAIR 3
News Best and Worst States to Grow Old Aug '16 ZIOTARD MONITOR 2

San Mateo Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

San Mateo Mortgages