Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,794

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#184160 Mar 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You may miss the days when divorce was more difficult, battered women ( or men ) stuck where they could not get out, molested children where they wife would actively turn her had the other way as she had no where else she could go other than to cover it up.
I donít
Our marriages are stronger today because of how easy divorce is.
there is a saying you may have heard of. "He that doeth evil hateth the light", that applies directly here.
Today marriages are more active, couples do things together to keep their marriages alive and strong and rely less on a piece of paper to keep it so.
I prefer my wife to be my wife because she wants to be my wife, not because some piece of paper makes her so. What is it that you are so afraid of? What is it that you want to do so desperately that you know it is too easy for your wife to divorce you for?
You may not be old enough to remember, but I can tell you, the good old days werenít all that good, and tomorrow is not as bad as it seems.( I should call Billy Joel and get permission to use that )
Let see, marriages are 'stronger' because they can be broken easier. Oh, and never mind the children...

Been married 36 years. Fallen in and out of love a number of times, but been committed the whole time. Good thing my wife stayed through the times she didn't want to.

Need hip boots for the BS level tonight...

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#184161 Mar 22, 2013
Gregory Dale wrote:
Kimare is soooooo completely out of touch with mainstream Christianity. It's no wonder he didn't have a successful career in the United Church of Christ (UCC) as a pastor in Hawaii. The UCC, of course, has always been at the forefront of social activism. Kimare's beliefs, however, would set social issues back at least one century.
Had one of the largest UCC churches in HI, in a small outer island community.

Growing too, while most UCC churches are rapidly dying.

Smile.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#184162 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Let see, marriages are 'stronger' because they can be broken easier. Oh, and never mind the children...
Been married 36 years. Fallen in and out of love a number of times, but been committed the whole time. Good thing my wife stayed through the times she didn't want to.
Need hip boots for the BS level tonight...
Smirk.
Thanks for the assist and chuckle.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#184163 Mar 22, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you serious? I simply pointed out the Constitution does not treat all citizens "equal" in all matters, the constitution has to interpreted. How the heck in the name of Francis Albert Sinatra, did u think I was "comparing the the rules regarding qualifying for POTUS to the rights of Gay Americans"?
<quoted text>
it amuses me how some rainbow flag wavers toss around the word "bigot" simply because one opposes the legal redefinition of marriage, that it is, pun intended", inconceivable. Heaven forbid, you realize you already do, as do I, possess the right to marry. You simply do not wish to exercise such a right in the same manner as everybody else.
<quoted text>
That's when you all start whining like little children. What will YOU chooches come up with next? Just admit it, you are weirded out by the fact that you were created by a sex act, coital intercourse, between a man and a woman, and that clouds YOUR judgement. In other words, the only one who is a bigot here is you!
You pointed it out to justify why you think itís okay that Gay Americans are not afforded equal marriage rights. Otherwise, why would you say it? That makes you a bigot, bigot. The rest of your post is just hysterical ramblings.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#184164 Mar 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
California would be one of them if the vote were held again today
Yeah, I think more and more people are realizing there just isn't a rational argument against gay marriage.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#184165 Mar 22, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
You pointed it out to justify why you think itís okay that Gay Americans are not afforded equal marriage rights.
Actually, they are, no different than any other American.
Otherwise, why would you say it?
That u already have the right to marry, or that u were creared as a result if sex between a man and a woman?
That makes you a bigot, bigot. The rest of your post is just hysterical ramblings.
It makes both if the above statements true. The only bigot here is u bigot.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#184166 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Didn't say 'restraint'. Social scientists say it is a constraint, you prove it's not.
2. No one said it had to be successful
3. There is no such thing as gay 'marriage'. The only result of saying there is, would be the redefinition of the word. Meaning that ss couples would still not really be married in the true sense of the word.
Smirk.
You think our rights should depend on our genes? Should you be allowed to marry, as you are a monster mutation?
:)

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#184168 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What an ignorant joke,'the wrong side of history'!
In all of recorded history, every single culture has had marriage.
In all that time, not one SINGLE culture has embraced ss marriage from start to finish. It barely shows up, and quickly disappears. It NEVER has established itself and spread.
You can't blame a Christian, you can't blame the Republicans, you can't blame a single culture.
Do you understand how profound that is?
At this point, it's you who is on 'the wrong side of history'.
Snicker.
What an ignorant joke,'the wrong side of history'!
In all of recorded history, every single culture has killed or ostracized mutants.
In all that time, not one SINGLE culture has embraced mutants from start to finish. When they show up, they are killed. They ALWAYS are hated.
You can't blame a Christian, you can't blame the Republicans, you can't blame a single culture.
Do you understand how profound that is?
At this point, it's you who is on 'the wrong side of history'.
What good are you?
Do you think you should have been aborted?
:)
Every culture would hate hated you. Every culture EVER!
:)
PressedRed

La Puente, CA

#184169 Mar 22, 2013
Look what you did, you pushed the Red button.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#184170 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
We distinguish human rights for a number of different classifications. SCOTUS has done so a number of times because marriage is the best birthplace of every member of society.
You claim a ss couple who is mutually procreative desolate deserves the same rights and protections? Do you understand how stupid and ridiculous that is?
Smile.
You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry. Your whole argument is stupid and ridiculous, like you are.

:)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#184171 Mar 22, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
You pointed it out to justify why you think itís okay that Gay Americans are not afforded equal marriage rights. Otherwise, why would you say it? That makes you a bigot, bigot. The rest of your post is just hysterical ramblings.
I think he clearly pointed out that you are an idiot in denial.

How can a duplicated half of a marriage equate to marriage.

The math clearly doesn't add up.

Smirk.
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#184172 Mar 22, 2013
yea!!!

next week the state supream court will likely overturn prop hate.

a sad day for all you bigots who are clearly on the wrong side of history.

just look at all the prominent people coming out in favor of gay marriage lately.

and next year massachusetts will celebrate 10 years of gays getting hitched!!

while massachussetts now sports the lowest divorce rate in the nation.

ive yet to hear a cohearant arguement against gays getting all the rights that heterosexuals have.
KAPOOYA

La Puente, CA

#184173 Mar 22, 2013
K

A

P

O

O

Y

A

And that's how it's spelt.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#184174 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
With all your 'moral' indignation, you somehow missed admitting you lied about what you claimed I said. Kind of makes the rest of your rant suspect.
Once again, you dig the hole deeper. Nothing you said changes the fact that killing an unborn child is murder, and a obedient Christian would never do it.
Christians get abortions all the time.
BTW, the buy bull teaches that human life begins with the first breath. There was no knowledge of conception back when it was written, stupid.
KiMare wrote:
Moreover, the Bible is also clear about just war and just execution for severe crimes. Your assertion would leave people like Hitler loose. Are you serious???
Godwin's Law.
KiMare wrote:
Nor do I claim anything. Evolution determined homosexuality is a defect.
Evolution determined chimeras are defective.
:)
And you are wrong, homosexuality isn't a defect, it's just a difference.
KiMare wrote:
Scientists have virtually proved it. You are having a hissy fit because I'm the messenger.
Hardly wise behavior for someone whose existence depends on people like me...
Smile.
Like you? Monsters!?
LOL!
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#184175 Mar 22, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Many people do, but James Madison explains it quite well in Federalist#42. He clearly shows how one may have certain "privileges" in one State while not enjoying the same in another. The only requirement is that a Citizen of one State be granted the SAME privileges as the citizen's of said state are granted while visiting.
" It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of free inhabitants of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of free citizens of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State... " James Madison- Federalist#42
federalism should apply to expanding rights, not supressing them.

doma will go the way of DADT.extinct

bad shot bill, but then again, he was only trying to appeal to southern evengelicals who were sour on dole.

until the 90's.....the constittuion was generally used to EXPAND peoples rights, not take them away.

clinton knows he was wrong.

will rick santorum figure out that a constitutional amendment TAKING rights away is wrong?? I doubt it.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#184176 Mar 22, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
You pointed it out to justify why you think itís okay that Gay Americans are not afforded equal marriage rights. Otherwise, why would you say it? That makes you a bigot, bigot. The rest of your post is just hysterical ramblings.
You really are dense.. We should build something out of you.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#184177 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Of course it doesn't have to be. The law determined that faithfulness to a mate was unnecessary with no-fault divorce. Now we have horrendous consequences of domestic violence and child abuse. Not to mention a devastating drop in every area of the social health of children of divorce.
Now there is a silly and stupid attempt to dumb down marriage to a friendship of any gender, totally denying the part of children. Any sensible person would say the law will be two for two if that happens.
2. That would be like the law requiring sex or children or any other such silly demands.
Here is an analogy that exposes that idiocy;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
What's even funnier is that you think you came up with a good analogy!
Stupid monster, the ability to bear apples is part of the definition of an apple tree, in fact it's pretty much the definition.
The ability to bear children is not part of the definition of marriage.

Have you ever been run out of town by villagers with torches?
:)

Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#184178 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he clearly pointed out that you are an idiot in denial.
How can a duplicated half of a marriage equate to marriage.
The math clearly doesn't add up.
Smirk.
the only math that adds up is that marriage is between two people who love each other.
Some Never Came Home

Toronto, Canada

#184179 Mar 22, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, they are, no different than any other American.
<quoted text>
That u already have the right to marry, or that u were creared as a result if sex between a man and a woman?
<quoted text>
It makes both if the above statements true. The only bigot here is u bigot.
So,I guess what you're saying is you'd be fine with a gay man marrying your daughter or a gay women marrying your son? LoL, Sorry but not the same! Not equality,don't be ridiculous! Bottom line,marriage equality is coming and you can't do anything to stop it,rightfully so! And it will do nothing to harm your marriage and it will do nothing to harm my marriage! And it will be of great benefit to the 10's of thousands of children being raised in same sex marriages and family's,Great isn't it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#184180 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he clearly pointed out that you are an idiot in denial.
How can a duplicated half of a marriage equate to marriage.
The math clearly doesn't add up.
Smirk.
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
the only math that adds up is that marriage is between two people who love each other.
Do you mean like the union of Mars and Venus, or the collision of Uranus and Uranus?

Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. You equate that to a loving act between two people?

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Mateo Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
b..bot 2 hr boy 1
hi Mar 25 SURAJ 9867221101 1
does anyone need a good dog walker (May '07) Mar 25 chicagodawg 46
Review: Cathy Jean Shoes (Jan '09) Mar 23 Shoe Collector 84
Clash of clans Feb 27 Clash of Clans Forum 1
News Tesla gearing up for release of batteries for t... Feb 26 Solarman 1
Black Seadevil caught on camera at depths of 1,... Feb '15 MR BEN 1
San Mateo Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

San Mateo People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]