|
Michael Charles
|
Good for them! Convention bureau's do what needs to be done to attract tourism and money to the economy. That is their purpose. When they see an opportunity to bring revenue to the area they act on it. Residents of San Diego should be happy that their convention bureau is doing their job and helping the economy especially in these bad economic times. It's time that bigots who not only want to destroy people's lives but also want to keep fellow citizens from economic growth be told to take a hike. It's obvious that there are those whose hatred is so deep that they would sacrifice the economic well being of their entire community for their selfish and evil agenda. San Diego should support it's convention bureau and tell these bigots where to go.
|
|
xX619Xx
|
"We have one contest for all and one for gays" Where is the equil in that? How can you want to be treated the same but have different contests? Need to change the city name to San Diaidsgo!
|
|
“A Gay Baby Combs His Own Hair”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
|
xX619Xx wrote: "We have one contest for all and one for gays" Where is the equil in that? How can you want to be treated the same but have different contests? Need to change the city name to San Diaidsgo! Hey, sweetie! How are you? I guess you missed me, eh? We can make up for lost time. You promised me all the Koolaide from your stand. Daddy's thirsty baby!
|
|
Squeal like a pig
|
Judged:
1
What about "normal" people wanting to get married in San Diego. Isn't this discrimination?
|
|
“A Gay Baby Combs His Own Hair”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
|
Judged:
1
Righteous__1 wrote: <quoted text>
"daddy's thirsty baby"....You are a sick pervert!!You should not lust after those little ones...what you gonna do nest....lust after little boy scouts or something? xX619Xx and I go way back. He calls me Brokeback, and I give him a mountin'. It's a beautiful relationship.
|
|
“A Gay Baby Combs His Own Hair”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
|
Squeal like a pig wrote: What about "normal" people wanting to get married in San Diego. Isn't this discrimination? It's a contest. They can set whatever eligibility requirements that they want to, you big baby.
|
|
“A Gay Baby Combs His Own Hair”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
|
Squeal like a pig wrote: What about "normal" people wanting to get married in San Diego. Isn't this discrimination? Here, Pig: ---------- No Queers Allowed to Rent at Rybolt Reserve "The tidy palm lined streets and affordable homes of the Rybolt Reserve subdivision in suburban Orlando have become popular with middle class homebuyers and speculators but if you are a gay or unmarried opposite-sex couple the Homeowners Association has a message - don't bother to try to rent here according to some property owners. Several owners say they have been told by the Association they cannot rent their properties in the East Orange County subdivision to couples who are not legally married or to same-sex pairs. "The Homeowner's Association is totally out of control," Suzane Musashe, who leases homes in the subdivision for investors, told WFTV. "I feel like I am back in the 60's because there is such discrimination going on," Musashe told the station. The prohibitions are listed in a set of rules passed by the HOA, which describes Rybolt Reserve as a family oriented community. Musahse said the strict rules are so limiting they will send some homeowners into foreclosure. "You can only rent to a married couple, that's it. That eliminates more than half your market," she told WFTV. The HOA restrictions are legal. Orlando has an ordinance protecting same-sex couples who purchase homes, but not renters. County Commissioner Bill Segal told the station that he may introduce an ordinance to protect gay and lesbian couples who rent." (365gay) ---------- We're even now. You can't enter the contest, and we can't buy a condo in this development. Are you happy??
|
|
verad
|
Judged:
1
Squeal like a pig wrote: What about "normal" people wanting to get married in San Diego. Isn't this discrimination? Wow, "discrimination" isn't so fun when you are on the receiving end, is it? Such a typical attitude.
|
|
|
|
“A Gay Baby Combs His Own Hair”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
|
Aram wrote: <quoted text>You really don't have a mind do you! The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging. SPAM REPORTED
|
|
verad
|
Judged:
1
1
Poor Wil - the epitome of "misery loves company." He knows there is no hope of his ever having a loving, committed, long-term relationship of any kind so he doens't want all of the well-adjusted, self-accepting gays to have what he never will. So pathetic.
|
|
“A Gay Baby Combs His Own Hair”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
|
Judged:
1
verad wrote: Poor Wil - the epitome of "misery loves company." He knows there is no hope of his ever having a loving, committed, long-term relationship of any kind so he doens't want all of the well-adjusted, self-accepting gays to have what he never will. So pathetic. I don't know what he's afraid of. It's a BIG world outside of the closet. There's room for everyone.
|
|
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
|
Clerkerist wrote: <quoted text>
I don't know what he's afraid of. It's a BIG world outside of the closet. There's room for everyone. He can't be happy because he can't accept himself, so therefore, no one else is to be happy. His drivel is getting so old that I often think he just has his mother posting the same copy and paste crap in his place while he is out trolling the truck stops and public restrooms. His poor mother thinks he's out job hunting!
|
|
Michael Charles
|
xX619Xx wrote: <quoted text>FO The closet door opened and look what stepped out. LOL
|
|
Michael Charles
|
xX619Xx wrote: "We have one contest for all and one for gays" Where is the equil in that? How can you want to be treated the same but have different contests? Need to change the city name to San Diaidsgo! Yep do the best you can to keep money out of San Diego because of bigotry. You're neighbors will really like you for that.
|
|
Michael Charles
|
Squeal like a pig wrote: What about "normal" people wanting to get married in San Diego. Isn't this discrimination? Why would care? Normal obviously wouldn't apply.
|
|
Michael Charles
|
Aram wrote: <quoted text>You really don't have a mind do you! The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging. Looks like you brought your self loathing to yet another board. You're a sad case.
|
|
Joined: May 31, 2008
|
Aram wrote: <quoted text>You really don't have a mind do you! The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging. So what does that say about you?
|
|
Michael Charles
|
xX619Xx wrote: <quoted text>SPANDEX REPORTED You probably need a lot at your size.
|
|
“Irish all the way, baby! ”
Joined: Jul 4, 2008
|
San Diego needs this. After the California Supreme Court ruling, San Diego was labeled somewhat conservative on this, so this is a good way for San Diego to show that they are in support of this.
We got married in Marin County though, otherwise I would send an essay in and just see what happens.
|
|
“Irish all the way, baby! ”
Joined: Jul 4, 2008
|
xX619Xx wrote: <quoted text>FO You are not representing your city in the most positive light here.
|
Olympics
Entertainment
Yellow Pages
Judge it!
74°F
Taurus
Most Popular