Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
161,681 - 161,700 of 200,552 Comments Last updated 52 min ago
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185148
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot. There is no point in continuing a conversation with you when you obviously have no clue as to the implications of the 17th Amendment, nor do you even have a basic understanding as to why the Senate was not designed as the house with direct election from the popular vote.
Beyond that, you can't even form complete sentences.
perfect!!

you bring up the 17th amendment, and then I tell the everyone what is in it??

and you call me an idiot??

you sound like youd feel right at home at a "town hall meeting" that wasnt open to the public.

michigans actions are racist, and the party at large will not "graduate" the twentieth century, until they stop trying to keep black people from voting!!

these sort of action seem to backfire, see 1965, and 2012.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185149
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

3

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am indeed disappointed in Obama for not un-doing the republican created disasters faster than he did.( and in some cases still has not done )
well lets be fair..

..the rethugs fillibustered EVERY jobs bill after the aca that obama and the dems proposed.....so we could be furtHER ahead.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185151
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Slow down, put the bong down, it's not good for your heart to smoke that much. You don't make any sense. Maybe you are having a stroke.
a tax on pot is imminent in washington and colorado!!
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185152
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
well lets be fair..
..the rethugs fillibustered EVERY jobs bill after the aca that obama and the dems proposed.....so we could be furtHER ahead.
I do know that... still, deregulation is still a major issue and causing major problems, I personally think we would have been better off to just go off the fiscal cliff which would have undone most of the previous administrations tax windfalls for their friends.

I don’t only blame Obama, the majority of the blame resides with the house republicans, and everyone knows that.

Obama has done better than the previous administration, but that bar is pretty darn low.

My disappointment with Obama does not lead me to put the people that got us in this mess back in charge.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185153
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
...
And stop thinking you are a lawyer because you watch Judge Judy.
pot, meet kettle.

look, read the transcripts of the trials. read the findings. you'll see, maybe not understand, the applicability.

gee, looks like you failed to properly inform your side's chuckie with all your vast knowledge. that, or he chose to ignore you - some nutjob internet stranger that you are.

can you hear that last wheezing breaths your side is taking pal? press your little ear up harder to the door and you won't miss it. they're dieing off due to lack of oxygen.

good luck.
Cements

La Puente, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185154
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

You mean BUSH is going to blow us all again?
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185155
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Well what is happening is that the republican leadership is starting to realize that they cannot have the Limbaugh's and O'Reilly's leading the party down the road to oblivion
The Tea Party is part of the problem with being the party of stupid.
It is a civil war within the party, they only have 2 choices, leave the idiots vetting their candidates ( which is the road to oblivion ) or shed them and start working on more serious, and viable candidates that are willing to work with both sides of the isle.
that is the bitch about civil war.....you either reconcile and chose either adgenda(or a compromise?) or you GO your separate ways..

do you really think the TEa party is going to compromise on issues like marraige eqality and immigration reform??

those two are their bread and butter, as far as whipping their sheep into a state of hyteria, those and "they are coming for your guns".....

republican lawmakers, who arnt as loony, who want to stay with the brand, are having to pass an orthodoxy test to remain in office, they are ACTIVEly purging their party into a more REICH wing institution, everyday.
Global

La Puente, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185156
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

No need to thank me your silence is enough.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185157
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
pot, meet kettle.
look, read the transcripts of the trials. read the findings. you'll see, maybe not understand, the applicability.
gee, looks like you failed to properly inform your side's chuckie with all your vast knowledge. that, or he chose to ignore you - some nutjob internet stranger that you are.
can you hear that last wheezing breaths your side is taking pal? press your little ear up harder to the door and you won't miss it. they're dieing off due to lack of oxygen.
good luck.
83% of people UNDER 30 approve of your right to get married and enjoy all the advantages(or bummers) that could include.

52% of rethuglicans UNDER 30 support gay marraige.

those still clutching this dying philosophy, will indeed be a dying breed from now on....

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185158
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, those were done by people who were looking forward, not back
thank you for making my point.
Of course we look at the past, but we don’t glorify it, we don’t say that if something was true before, it has to be true now and in the future. We did exactly the opposite in every example you gave, by people that looked to a bright future, rather than wishing for some non-existent "gold old days"
You have trouble with critical thinking don't you?

Forward thinking? Our discussion has nothing to do with your meaningless buz words.

Each and every one of those changes went through the proper process as set forth in Article V. That is looking to and understanding the past. Today we want to completely ignore the Constitution unless we can twist and mangle it into some new form that was never intended. To expedite the process we ignore Article V, that's simply too much work, and circumvent the Constitution by running to any court that will "rule" that the Constitution says something it doesn't, then we claim it's Constitutional.

This is a product of this "living breathing" nonsense. The Constitution is the law, it does not change with social whims or public opinion. The ONLY way it changes is through the Amendment process set forth in Article V. This process was meant to be difficult and time cosuming to prevent quick and ill thought public opinionated whims from becoming law.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185159
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
perfect!!
you bring up the 17th amendment, and then I tell the everyone what is in it??
and you call me an idiot??
you sound like youd feel right at home at a "town hall meeting" that wasnt open to the public.
michigans actions are racist, and the party at large will not "graduate" the twentieth century, until they stop trying to keep black people from voting!!
these sort of action seem to backfire, see 1965, and 2012.
You're an idiot. You are ill equiped to educate anyone.

You still have no idea why the Senate was not designed to be elected by the general populous, and rather than go an educate yourself on the topic you immediately reply with more of your ignorant ranting.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185160
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You have trouble with critical thinking don't you?
Forward thinking? Our discussion has nothing to do with your meaningless buz words.
Each and every one of those changes went through the proper process as set forth in Article V. That is looking to and understanding the past. Today we want to completely ignore the Constitution unless we can twist and mangle it into some new form that was never intended. To expedite the process we ignore Article V, that's simply too much work, and circumvent the Constitution by running to any court that will "rule" that the Constitution says something it doesn't, then we claim it's Constitutional.
This is a product of this "living breathing" nonsense. The Constitution is the law, it does not change with social whims or public opinion. The ONLY way it changes is through the Amendment process set forth in Article V. This process was meant to be difficult and time cosuming to prevent quick and ill thought public opinionated whims from becoming law.
that is the problem you guys cannot get over....

that we ALL have to follow some sort of invisible religious "common sense"

most of us think this is nonsense.

these are called 'religious beliefs" and the cobstituiton does indeed provide for a separation of church and state....in fact it is stated in the pre-amble.

public opinion does indeed drive the court......it is the whole reason this issue is coming to bear right now, you fool.

..........public support has gone from 23% to 58%.

why are you so simple??

go back to school, if you even believe in school.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185161
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot. You are ill equiped to educate anyone.
You still have no idea why the Senate was not designed to be elected by the general populous, and rather than go an educate yourself on the topic you immediately reply with more of your ignorant ranting.
Im getting the picture....

you like the original version of the constitution the best...

the one without all those pesky additions that came later.

if we left you guys alone on a date with the constitution??

we WOULD NOT get back anything recognizable.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185162
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You have trouble with critical thinking don't you?
Forward thinking? Our discussion has nothing to do with your meaningless buz words.
Each and every one of those changes went through the proper process as set forth in Article V. That is looking to and understanding the past. Today we want to completely ignore the Constitution unless we can twist and mangle it into some new form that was never intended. To expedite the process we ignore Article V, that's simply too much work, and circumvent the Constitution by running to any court that will "rule" that the Constitution says something it doesn't, then we claim it's Constitutional.
This is a product of this "living breathing" nonsense. The Constitution is the law, it does not change with social whims or public opinion. The ONLY way it changes is through the Amendment process set forth in Article V. This process was meant to be difficult and time cosuming to prevent quick and ill thought public opinionated whims from becoming law.
Our founders disagreed with you, and created it as a document that could be changed and has been changed quite a number of times.

Yes it is meant to be difficult and time consuming and I think that is a good thing as well.

There are dramatic changes to that document, ones some of our founders would not have even imagined.

Some were mistakes, and reversed later

There is no question, it is an excellent document, and its power comes from the fact that it is a changeable document over the years.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185163
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
that is the problem you guys cannot get over....
that we ALL have to follow some sort of invisible religious "common sense"
most of us think this is nonsense.
these are called 'religious beliefs" and the cobstituiton does indeed provide for a separation of church and state....in fact it is stated in the pre-amble.
public opinion does indeed drive the court......it is the whole reason this issue is coming to bear right now, you fool.
..........public support has gone from 23% to 58%.
why are you so simple??
go back to school, if you even believe in school.
WTF are you talking about?

Are you having a conversation with me or the voices in your head?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185164
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>there are also things i like about it.....

either way???

you guys are not winning the presidncy for a LONG LONG time...

frankly, until you get on the right side of history, realize this is a VERY diverse country(not just diverse amongst white folk)

and become a party of INCLUSION instead of what i see presently, which is a party of exclusion, you are not going to be anything but a curiousity of the past, or in other words.......a relic.

as far as im concerned, those of you have hijacked your party(to the far right), can keep hijacking it until kingdom come.
Be careful what you say. Our politics swing like a pendulum. Eventually the "other" party takes over. It isn't because the "other" party has come up with a spectacular solution for the problems at hand, it is because the one with the most power has done such a spectactular job of disappointing us.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185165
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am indeed disappointed in Obama for not un-doing the republican created disasters faster than he did.( and in some cases still has not done )
It's fools like you that hold back this country fighting for one party and blaming one party for all the problems. And not seeing the damage from your own party lines.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185166
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Our founders disagreed with you, and created it as a document that could be changed and has been changed quite a number of times.
Yes it is meant to be difficult and time consuming and I think that is a good thing as well.
There are dramatic changes to that document, ones some of our founders would not have even imagined.
Some were mistakes, and reversed later
There is no question, it is an excellent document, and its power comes from the fact that it is a changeable document over the years.
The founders didn't disagree, they wrote Article V.

The problem is you don't want to use the process, you want to bypass the Amendment process and the States and simply use the court.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185167
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why do the D's keep repeating history?
Because they're really no different from the Rs in this respect.
DemoRats do not inhale

Windsor, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185168
Mar 28, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

The Democrats and the birth of American imperialism
I want to take this occasion to say that the United States will never again seek one additional foot of territory by conquest.
—Woodrow Wilson, 19133
Democratic President Woodrow Wilson’s rationale for modern imperialism, in which “the flag follows commerce,” contained no lofty appeals to freedom and democracy:
Since trade ignores national boundaries and the manufacturer insists on having the world as a market, the flag of his nation must follow him, and the doors of the nations which are closed against him must be battered down. Concessions obtained by financiers must be safeguarded by ministers of state, even if the sovereignty of unwilling nations be outraged in the process. Colonies must be obtained or planted, in order that no useful corner of the world may be overlooked or left unused.4
Wilson wrote these words just after the Spanish-American War that began in 1898, which launched the U.S. as an imperial contender. A “splendid little war”—as the New York papers dubbed it—during which Cuba became a sugar colony of the U.S., Puerto Rico began its long history as a U.S.“protectorate,” and 8 million Filipinos were subjected to brutalities beginning the very day that Rudyard Kipling published his poem calling upon the U.S. to “Take up the White Man’s burden.”5
Wilson, the mild-mannered professor from Princeton who opposed women’s suffrage, established a reputation for warmongering and brutality that was to become a hallmark of Democratic Party foreign policy. He intervened in more countries where he stationed troops for longer periods of time than had the previous Republican administrations of Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft combined.
Aside from dispatching troops to Europe in the waning years of the First World War, Wilson’s presidency exercised “gunboat diplomacy,” sending in the marines to Mexico, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, Panama, the Soviet Union, Honduras, China, and Guatemala. The raid on Haiti, where U.S. troops remained for 19 years, is instructive as to the ways of Democratic methods. When National City Bank in New York insisted that the Haitian customhouses relinquish a hefty amount of the only existing reserves of Haitian capital, they refused. American troops landed at Port au Prince in December 1914 and stole $500,000 that they then loaded onto their gunship and deposited in the vaults of National City Bank. After a series of uprisings that ended in the assassination of the Haitian president, U.S. troops launched a full-blown occupation, killed thousands who resisted, disbanded the Haitian military, trained a puppet force under direct leadership of U.S. officers, and built the infrastructure necessary to turn Haiti into the haven for cheap labor that it remains today. he Nation reported that,“Those who protested or resisted were beaten into submissionÖ.Those attempting to escape were shot.”

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

8 Users are viewing the San Diego Forum right now

Search the San Diego Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Mon Mudflys to 7,901
Basketball courts near Petco park Mon onowee 2
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Mon Green Soilent 4,975
Poll: "Obama the worst president since WWII!" Sun my2cents 7
San Diego Voted Nation's Most Patriotic City Aug 17 Halle Berry Sister 15
I need help... BAD Aug 17 Jackplag 1
Why are so many cops corrupt or mean? (Mar '11) Aug 15 topgun0848 294
•••
•••
•••
San Diego Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

San Diego Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

San Diego People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

San Diego News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in San Diego
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••