Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#179617 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You said it had the same validity as any other religion. Which is exactly what I said. If you're too stupid to realize that, that's funny!
So now you're saying you give polygamous religions the same respect as any other? Need I re-post your many contradictory posts?
I wasnít responding to you Poly boy, I was responding to someone else

I have said from the beginning that I donít have a problem with the concept of poly marriage itself, just many of the practitioners of it who are guilty of other crimes. A rather large percentage of practitioners of it.

Go after those criminals to the full extent of the law and I have no problem with Poly marriage.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179618 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasnít responding to you Poly boy, I was responding to someone else
I have said from the beginning that I donít have a problem with the concept of poly marriage itself, just many of the practitioners of it who are guilty of other crimes. A rather large percentage of practitioners of it.
Go after those criminals to the full extent of the law and I have no problem with Poly marriage.
But I am responding to you Fruitcake.

Let's take a look and see how that sounds replacing same sex marriage with polygamy.

"I have said from the beginning that I donít have a problem with the concept of same sex marriage itself, just many of the practitioners of it who are guilty of other crimes. A rather large percentage of practitioners of it.
Go after those criminals to the full extent of the law and I have no problem with same sex marriage."

Listen jackass. We already have laws against all the evils your imagination conjures up against polygamy. There's no reason the throw the baby out with the bathwater. There's no reason to deny committed adult polyamorists a shot at a real family with all the benifits every other family gets.

Some homosexuals in same sex marriages are bad, do you want to ban gay marriage? If so you are not a hyopcrite, just a bigot I guess. If not you are both.
HighMilage

Monrovia, CA

#179619 Feb 14, 2013
Just lke this stupid posts topic and Tea Bagers:

Freedom Works, the powerful Tea Party organization,

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179620 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Part of the reason this is opening up is the requirements are changing now, reguardless of women.
equipment is becomming more technological, lighter, and more complex. Drones are replacing jobs only pilots could do in the past, they are close to self driving viecheles and that will quickly relate to tanks, soon there will be no tank crews on the battlefield.
War is changing fast.
I agree that a seal team for example should have the same standard reguardless of sex. And trust me there are women that can and will handle that.
However the standards for much of the military is changing fast, and it isnt because of women, but because of technology
True, as is the nature of potential enemies. A major ground campaign against a viable power is unlikely.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179621 Feb 14, 2013
HighMilage wrote:
Just lke this stupid posts topic and Tea Bagers:
Freedom Works, the powerful Tea Party organization,
Aw shuddup you silly jackass!
Huge News

Covina, CA

#179622 Feb 14, 2013
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179623 Feb 14, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
True, as is the nature of potential enemies. A major ground campaign against a viable power is unlikely.
Fortunately that is less likely.

You can see what is coming, remote control warfare, it is a reality to a limited degree now, but it is becoming the mainstream
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179624 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
But I am responding to you Fruitcake.
Let's take a look and see how that sounds replacing same sex marriage with polygamy.
"I have said from the beginning that I donít have a problem with the concept of same sex marriage itself, just many of the practitioners of it who are guilty of other crimes. A rather large percentage of practitioners of it.
Go after those criminals to the full extent of the law and I have no problem with same sex marriage."
Listen jackass. We already have laws against all the evils your imagination conjures up against polygamy. There's no reason the throw the baby out with the bathwater. There's no reason to deny committed adult polyamorists a shot at a real family with all the benifits every other family gets.
Some homosexuals in same sex marriages are bad, do you want to ban gay marriage? If so you are not a hyopcrite, just a bigot I guess. If not you are both.
You are such an idiot It is amazing to me you can type

I think the same crimes committed by homosexuals, polygamists, Heterosexuals or however else you want to divide people should be treated exactly the same. The criminals should be persecuted to the full extent of the law.

Your problem is that the general population ( not me ) sees only the negative side of poly marriage, and until you get better advocates of it, it will be a steep hill to climb.

again, I am not opposed to poly marriage

“I'm walkin' here!”

Since: May 12

New York, New York

#179625 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately that is less likely.
You can see what is coming, remote control warfare, it is a reality to a limited degree now, but it is becoming the mainstream
Your war posts are hijacking this thread! The topic is marriage equality. War is a red herring!

What a jackass!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179626 Feb 14, 2013
Enrico Salvatore Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your war posts are hijacking this thread! The topic is marriage equality. War is a red herring!
What a jackass!
I am responding to others

Get Frankie off of poly marriage and I might take notice, till then, we will talk about whatever we want to.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179627 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are such an idiot It is amazing to me you can type
I think the same crimes committed by homosexuals, polygamists, Heterosexuals or however else you want to divide people should be treated exactly the same. The criminals should be persecuted to the full extent of the law.
Your problem is that the general population ( not me ) sees only the negative side of poly marriage, and until you get better advocates of it, it will be a steep hill to climb.
again, I am not opposed to poly marriage
No, your ignorance and bigotry is NOT my problem. It's yours.

Need I re-post some of your hateful rants? Why bother. You cannot see you are being as bad as the people you despise.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179628 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am responding to others
Get Frankie off of poly marriage and I might take notice, till then, we will talk about whatever we want to.
That mouse in your pocket is a talker, is he?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179629 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are such an idiot It is amazing to me you can type
I think the same crimes committed by homosexuals, polygamists, Heterosexuals or however else you want to divide people should be treated exactly the same. The criminals should be persecuted to the full extent of the law.
Your problem is that the general population ( not me ) sees only the negative side of poly marriage, and until you get better advocates of it, it will be a steep hill to climb.
again, I am not opposed to poly marriage
You are so full of sh!t! Now you don't look at polygamy like those other dumb mean people do? What a liar! You have many posts directly contradicting that. Anyone can read them.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179630 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so full of sh!t! Now you don't look at polygamy like those other dumb mean people do? What a liar! You have many posts directly contradicting that. Anyone can read them.
Dummy the only thing I have been trying to convey is that the issue has a public image problem.

But you are not listening

You cannot find a single post where I said I personally was opposed, I did say I donít expect any movement whatsoever on the issue.

You will find a LOT that say I donít think it will happen for decades, you will find a lot where I have issues with many that practice it, you will find lots of them teasing you on being so obsessed.

You wont find one where I said I personally was opposed, I have said the general public is opposed due to the image problem your obsession has.

Yes everyone can read except you

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179631 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That mouse in your pocket is a talker, is he?
Shooting for move votes?
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#179632 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Shooting for move votes?
I believe he has enough votes to capture the title of World's Dumbest Blowhard.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179633 Feb 14, 2013
http://www.google.com/url...

The Illinois Senate passed a measure Thursday to legalize same-sex marriage, voting 34-21. The state House will consider it next.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#179634 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
Don't waste your homo time sending me links to open, cuz I don't open gay porn ...
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179635 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t &rct=j&q=&esrc=s &frm=1&source=web& cd=2&ved=0CDsQFjAB&url =http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F20 13%2F02%2F14%2Fus%2Fillinois-s ame-sex%2F&ei=eWMdUfeKJKb6 2gWg34HoCQ&usg=AFQjCNH2U4T fRbH3WV68R0aUp32sG1AnCQ&si g2=tSflv1KNItcXiqFrLatv-A& bvm=bv.42452523,d.b2I
The Illinois Senate passed a measure Thursday to legalize same-sex marriage, voting 34-21. The state House will consider it next.
Will that be the 10th state?

It is changing so fast it is hard to keep up

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179636 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Your problem is that the general population ( not me ) sees only the negative side of poly marriage, and until you get better advocates of it, it will be a steep hill to climb.
again, I am not opposed to poly marriage
That perception is changing, one "Sister Wife" at a time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Diego Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll SUSTAINABLE JOBs/new Business Creations IN Agri... Tue Un agenda 21 and ... 10
cloud nine or bizzaro vap Tue snoopy99 1
Need Black Sun dirty nj 30
Review: SelfHelpWorks Sun Anonymous 21
Why are so many cops corrupt or mean? (Mar '11) May 24 jeff6 301
Looking for black May 22 Junglist 2
Open Borders Immigration Policy Adds Injury to ... May 19 Culture Auditor 1
More from around the web

San Diego People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]