Who do you support for U.S. Senate in California in 2010?

[Jimbo]

rictard n nixon of corse
vote jimbo/jones
jimbo"s the won

[Moved over]

I heard the good citizens of Bell have chipped in to build a new wooden Gallows to hang all six of the scum-bags.

Six former officials of the scandal-ridden city of Bell, Ca. go on trial January, 2013 in a massive corruption case that nearly bankrupted the Los Angeles suburb.

If it works out as planned in Bell, California maybe the next stop for criminal trials will be for the local city government officials of Glendora, California.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
It's his M.O. He loses an argument, he calls you a liar to try and change the subject so he can save face.

I only call liars a liar Mike

you dont lie, and I wont call you on your lying

it really is that simple

[Rasins]

Glad the city of Bell, California will be getting a pound of flesh from these 6 pieces of dung.

Glendora, California is next to strip down the crooks running this city as I'm told.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
You call everyone who disagrees with you a liar. Either everyone who disagrees with you and no one who agrees with you are liars, or you are.
I'll let people decide who is telling the truth on their own, jackass.
I suppose I'm lying now?

NO I call people that lie liars

As long as you don’t intentionally misrepresent what others say, we don’t have a problem. But when you claim someone said something that they have not said... that is a lie.

I challenged you long ago, to come up with a single example, and you were unable to do so

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
NO I call people that lie liars
As long as you don’t intentionally misrepresent what others say, we don’t have a problem. But when you claim someone said something that they have not said... that is a lie.
I challenged you long ago, to come up with a single example, and you were unable to do so

Then how come you intentionally misrepresent what others say?

[RiccardoFire]

When does andy get released?

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I challenged you long ago to provide some evidence for your false allegations but you are unable to do so.
It's no matter, as I've said before. I don't care if you call me a liar. You and I both know it's not true.
The other posters you've pulled this on are painfully aware that you are the liar here too.

I did, and you ignored it, I am not going to do it over and over and over for your potential ADHD issue

you claimed I said something I never said

You claimed I was harping on a subject that you kept bringing up, even after a 2 week hiatus

I have repeated your posts where you lied several times, weeks ago, I am not going to bother doing it any more as you will ignore them again.

You have not once substantiated your lying by providing a single post of mine saying what you claimed I said.

[Big D]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Then how come you intentionally misrepresent what others say?

show one time I have done that

[Buno is Boozo]

A man who federal agents say is a main character in the infamous unsolved mystery about the disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa is breaking his silence after decades of refusing to answer questions.

[Bunho is Boozo]

A wise guy who federal agents say is a main character in the infamous unsolved mystery about the disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa is breaking his silence after decades of refusing to answer questions.

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
show one time I have done that

Look at all your rants on Clinton for one.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I claimed that you said Clinton wasn't impeached. Which is true. You said Clinton's impeachment failed. If it failed he wasn't impeached.
I challenge you to provide evidence to the contrary.
Now fetch it, or else you remain a proven liar.

and you cannot find a single post where I ever said that

Yes he was impeached ( which I have said from the beginning )

yes it failed, it failed to achieve every objective that was written into it.

and here you are substantiating you lying, you will not find a single post I have ever made that says he was not impeached, because I have never said that, I don’t need to lie to wipe the floor with you

[Bunho is Boozo]

BunHo has lost track of time so please put a new battery in.

[Horsert]

NewYork is left back on the East coast where it belongs, keep your stupid laws back there also.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
In this very post you say "yes it failed". You're crazy! What more can I say? It didn't fail. Clinton was impeached on Dec 19, 1998.

Find a post where I said he was not impeached and you have won, else you have lost

It really is that simple

That you cannot comprehend that he was impeached, yet the impeachment later failed is a different lack of education issue on your part. Just as OJ Simpson was charged criminally with the murder of his wife, but those charges failed at trial, didn’t change the fact that he was charged

same thing, I get it that you don’t understand that part, you don’t have to explain that you don’t understand, I know you don’t.

The point is, you claim I said he was not impeached, that is a lie, I have never ever said that.

He was impeached

[Horsert]

Natched only way to hard for the idiot from NY, New York to handle, P.S> go back or stay there.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't care who you claim "won". We both know that I have. It's that simple.
I'm saying the alleged "lie" again right now- YOU SAID "CLINTON'S IMPEACHMENT FAILED". How is that a "lie"? You're crazy.
Clinton's impeachment did not fail. You were wrong. Admit it and move on.

and you cant come up with a quote, so you remain a liar

I never ever once said he was not impeached, in fact I have said hundreds of times that he was

I get it that you don’t understand how, you can stop explaining you don’t understand, I know you don’t.

[Horsert]

I wonder if the vending machines will be guarded 24/7 and will they be open 7 days a week 24 hrs a day?

Will there be a drive up window?

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Read your post again. See how silly you are.
You didn't know what impeachment meant. You thought it meant removal from office. Now you're trying to change the subject to save face.
You know damn well I understand, liar.

still cant find a post to substantiate your lying Mike?

You wont