Romanian fined for allegedly making 6,442 profane calls

BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) -- A Romanian man has been fined for making 6,442 profane phone calls to an emergency number, police said Thursday.

[Purple Gurl]

Is this [bleeping] 911? I'm reporting a [bleeping] crime on [bleeping] street, you mother-[bleepers.]

[Creamed Fetus on Toast]

Have you got Prince Albert in a can?
Yes, I know it's the **ing police station, just answer the **ing question, you **ing **ole!!

[beatlesinthebog]

Somebody has to tell them!

[Twinkles]

"Hello, may I speak to Mike Hunt?"

[Purple Gurl]

Twinkles wrote:

"Hello, may I speak to Mike Hunt?"

No, he's speaking to Ms. Fisterbottom, but you can speak to Homer.

[Uh Clem]

Well cr-p the bed.

[Twinkles]

Purple Gurl wrote:

<quoted text>
No, he's speaking to Ms. Fisterbottom, but you can speak to Homer.

Does anyone know Anita Mann?

[MGPD 327]

Twinkles wrote:

"Hello, may I speak to Mike Hunt?"

Hee-hee. I love that old joke. "Hey, has anybody seen Mike Hunt?" LOL!

[MGPD 327]

I once got banned by Topix for making a bunch of profane posts. It wasn't my fault though. The people I said bad words to started it first. I was framed.

[lvl100]

MGPD 327 wrote:

I once got banned by Topix for making a bunch of profane posts. It wasn't my fault though. The people I said bad words to started it first. I was framed.

Is there such thing like banned on topix ?
Cause from what i saw topix its the pinnacle of cursing and racism rofl

[Purple Gurl]

Twinkles wrote:

<quoted text>
Does anyone know Anita Mann?

We do now. I hope you find Mr. Right, and do go check to see if your refrigerator is running.

[Purple Gurl]

lvl100 wrote:

<quoted text>
Is there such thing like banned on topix ?
Cause from what i saw topix its the pinnacle of cursing and racism rofl

I've been banned from Wikipedia for "edit warring" and use of obscenities in the editor notes. The other editors kept putting untruthful things in the article due to a personal agenda. I called them on it and the opposition had more clout, and I admit I should have held my fingers a bit. But I washed out my mouse with soap and water and resumed editing 24 hours later.

Oh, I've been fined points on Yahoo! Answers a number of times. I remember giving a metaphorical answer on the gay issue. Well, others didn't like the position I took and reported me. The Y! team member was too dense to get what I wrote and assumed it was not an answer. Similar happened more recently when I tried to paint a picture of my view of the LGBT community. At least I was able to appeal that one, but it was too late for it to be considered as a "best answer." I had about 3-4 questions and/or answers in a row deleted as violations. Two were reinstated after I appealed. So I think I got on some troll's nerves. What was funny was that in 2 of my questions, at least 1 person in each suggested that I kill myself, and I think those answers stayed up there for a good while.

With Y! Answers, I believe the majority of users are doing something wrong. It is just that action is only taken on what is reported, and a lot of times, the reports are bogus. They used to have a public appeals board, and that was amusing to watch. One guy gave as part of his answer, "You wanna buy the Brooklyn Bridge?" Guess why they deleted his answer? They took his cliched expression as spam/solicitation. My guess was that the staffer was an ESL student. There was the person who asked, "What is the best looking thing about Linds?" Linds is a city in some country, and the asker had considered visiting it and wanted to know the best tourist attractions. That question was deleted as "chat or personal correspondence." He kept appealing that question. It would be reinstated, then reported again, etc. The staff and users to I guess, didn't understand that was a place.

[beatlesinthebog]

Purple Gurl wrote:

<quoted text>
I've been banned from Wikipedia for "edit warring" and use of obscenities in the editor notes. The other editors kept putting untruthful things in the article due to a personal agenda. I called them on it and the opposition had more clout, and I admit I should have held my fingers a bit. But I washed out my mouse with soap and water and resumed editing 24 hours later.
Oh, I've been fined points on Yahoo! Answers a number of times. I remember giving a metaphorical answer on the gay issue. Well, others didn't like the position I took and reported me. The Y! team member was too dense to get what I wrote and assumed it was not an answer. Similar happened more recently when I tried to paint a picture of my view of the LGBT community. At least I was able to appeal that one, but it was too late for it to be considered as a "best answer." I had about 3-4 questions and/or answers in a row deleted as violations. Two were reinstated after I appealed. So I think I got on some troll's nerves. What was funny was that in 2 of my questions, at least 1 person in each suggested that I kill myself, and I think those answers stayed up there for a good while.
With Y! Answers, I believe the majority of users are doing something wrong. It is just that action is only taken on what is reported, and a lot of times, the reports are bogus. They used to have a public appeals board, and that was amusing to watch. One guy gave as part of his answer, "You wanna buy the Brooklyn Bridge?" Guess why they deleted his answer? They took his cliched expression as spam/solicitation. My guess was that the staffer was an ESL student. There was the person who asked, "What is the best looking thing about Linds?" Linds is a city in some country, and the asker had considered visiting it and wanted to know the best tourist attractions. That question was deleted as "chat or personal correspondence." He kept appealing that question. It would be reinstated, then reported again, etc. The staff and users to I guess, didn't understand that was a place.

Ah,..ah...sorry

[ElectricFence]

Richard Hertz please

[ElectricFence]

you all know the nick name for Richard. Topix would not allow it

[Twinkles]

I. P. Freely?