Sikhs v. Rajputs: War Medal Count

Sikhs v. Rajputs: War Medal Count

Posted in the Sikh Forum

First Prev
of 70
Next Last
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#1 Aug 26, 2007
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Arm...

The Sikhs outnumber the Rajputs in India to a count of appx. about 1.50 : 1 -- now....=)

I won't take all the Rajputs from all over India in this count, i'll strictly take two Rajput regiments and two 'Sikh' regiments:

Sikh Regiment: 211
Punjab Regiment (not entirely sikh): 267

Rajputana Rifles: 400
Rajputana Regiment: 201

RAJPUTANA RIFLES
Honours & Awards: 1 Param Vir Chakra, 1 Ashok Chakra, 1 Padma Bushan, 11 Param Vishisht Seva Medals, 10 Maha Vir Chakras, 8 Kirti Chakras, 11 Ati Vishisht Seva Medals, 1 Uttam Yudh Seva Medal, 41 Vir Chakras, 25 Shaurya Chakras, 112 Sena Medals (including Bar), 36 Vishisht Seva Medals, 2 Yudh Seva Medals, 85 Mention-in-Despatches and 55 Arjun Awards.

RAJPUTANA REGIMENT
Honours & Awards: 1 Param Vir Chakra, 1 Ashok Chakra, 5 Param Vishisht Seva Medals, 7 Maha Vir Chakras, 12 Kirti Chakras, 5 Ati Vishisht Seva Medals, 58 Vir Chakras, 20 Shaurya Chakras 4 Yudh Seva Medals, 67 Sena Medals, 19 Vishisht Seva Medals, 1 Bar to Vishisht Seva Medal, 1 Padma Shri.

PUNJAB REGIMENT
Honours & Awards: 2 Padma Bushan, 1 Padma Shri, 4 Param Vishisht Seva Medals, 18 Maha Vir Chakras, 9 Kirti Chakras, 1 Uttam Yudh Seva Medal, 6 Ati Vishisht Seva Medals, 56 Vir Chakras, 29 Shaurya Chakras, 1 Yudh Seva Medal, 121 Sena Medals, 19 Vishisht Seva Medals

SIKH REGIMENT
Honours & Awards: 2 Param Vir Chakras, 2 Ashok Chakras, 14 Maha Vir Chakras, 14 Kirti Chakras, 64 Vir Chakras, 15 Shaurya Chakras, 75 Sena Medals and 25 Vishisht Seva Medals

We own you boy!
Sher Singh

Bournemouth, UK

#2 Aug 26, 2007
Yes, and? According to your figures, the Sikh Regiment has more honours than the Rajput Regiments.

There was no Sikh 'rifles', so why are you bringing in the Rajputna rifles - do you know what the difference is between a rifle unit and an regiment infantry prostitute?
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#3 Aug 26, 2007
Read the title of this thread carefully, the list of the medals are the same none the less, regardless of whehter they were Rajputana Rifles or not...what a moron you are comparing Rajput medal counts to Sikh medal counts I haven't even added the Dogra or Purbiya Rajputs you wh0re ;)

I knew you'd resort to this tactic of comparing "equal regiments" that is why I had already counted the # of batallions in all 4 regiments so your point is baseless.
Sher Singh

Wellingborough, UK

#4 Aug 26, 2007
And why then is the Sikh Regiment is labelled "The Sikh Regiment Indian Army's Most Decorated Regiment" on that very website you HIV positive ancestor of a mughal f*ckin a hindu wh*re?

Yes the list is the same - but answer the question d*ck wad - what is the difference between Rifles & an Infantry unit?
Sher Singh

Wellingborough, UK

#6 Aug 26, 2007
Also, why have you failed to mention that the Sikh Regiment was only around from 150 years ago, when:

"The association of the Rajputs with the British Indian army started in 1778, when the 3rd Battalion was raised"

So you have been around for 230 years
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#7 Aug 26, 2007
Sher Singh wrote:
And why then is the Sikh Regiment is labelled "The Sikh Regiment Indian Army's Most Decorated Regiment" on that very website you HIV positive ancestor of a mughal f*ckin a hindu wh*re?
Yes the list is the same - but answer the question d*ck wad - what is the difference between Rifles & an Infantry unit?
One difference was that Infantry units used muskets while the Rifles used rifles which had more accuracy. BUT, the difference between an Infantry and Rifle unit does not apply to post 19th century wars. Both the Rajputana Rifles and other Regimens including Sikhs were using similar weapons and fighting the similar type of wars, especially now!

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Arm...

LMAO!!!! Read the website again and carefully: it says the Sikh regiment is "ONE OF THE HIGHEST DECORATED" NOT THE HIGHEST YOU CU*NT...lol

You moron the medal count is post 1920's and mainly from the Indian army...hahahahaha LMAO!!!!!! Has nothing to do with the British pre-WWI lol!!!!!
Sher Singh

Wellingborough, UK

#9 Aug 27, 2007
I see, post 1920, so it doesnt include may of the battle honours before - like Saragarhi?
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#10 Aug 27, 2007
Dearest C*nt,

Its a fu*king Sikh, D.S. Sandhu who quotes this and personally, the link I provided, "one of the most decorated" better fits your bill since I just showed you the medal counts and D.S. Sandhu the smelly turbaned pi$$head does not realize that Sikh regiment was NOT ALL SIKH during the times of the British Indian Army ... LMAO!!!! you had rajputs, gurkhas and punjabi hindus/muslims in it as well ROFL!!!

Moreover a Jaat singing his own praises and you can bet that Saragarhi is included because if you are not blind then you'd read the whole site. I'll give the turbaned pi$$head one credit, you read what he writes about Purbiya Rajputs and he actually gives instances of how they ran off the Dal Khalsa troops into a fort during the Battle of Gujrat...lol
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#12 Aug 27, 2007
1) THE RAJPUTS FOUGHT THE BRITISH - AWADH RESISTANCE IN THE LATE 1700s - U.P. RAJPUTS FOUGHT THEM IN 1803 (WELL RECORDED BY THE BRITS) AND THE RAJPUTANA AREA WAS AUTONOMOUS EVEN AFTER THE BRITS TOOK OVER PUNJAB...PU$$Y!!!!

2)P!$$ ON THE BRITISH PARLIMENT YOU TURBANED BRIT-SLAVE THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT DOES NOT OWN THE 'DEFENCE JOURNAL WEBSITE' LOL!!!!!

3) JUST BECAUSE YOUR DASTARD FOREFATHERS CONVERTED TO SIKHISM DOES NOT HIDE WHAT THEIR FATHERS HAD BEEN DOING SINCE THE TIMES OF AKBAR, YOUR BRITISH AND MUGHAL MASTERS HAVE RECORDED THE HISTORY OF YOUR FOREFATHERS GIVING YOUR B*TCHES TO THEM =)

4) THE SIKHS THMSELVES ADMIT THAT UNDER THE MAJITHIA SARDARS THEIR CANNONS AND GUNS RIVALED THOSE OF THE ENGLISH AND SURPASSED THE ENGLISH IN QUANTITY -- ALREADY BEEN PROVEN LOOOSERS!!!

5)GURU GOBIND SINGH DID NOT DO SH!T OUT AND OUT BECAUSE THE DOGRA RAJPUTS ARE STILL QUITE POWERFUL IN THEIR AREA MOTHER FU*ER DON'T HIDE BEHIND GURU GOBIND SINGH, TELL ME HOW LONG HAD YOUR FAMILY BEEN SIKHS??? LOL DID YOUR FOREFATHER GET HIS WARRIOR SIKH CERTIFICATE FROM YOUR GURU???

6) WHY DID BHAGEL SINGH SIGN A TREATY WITH JAIPUR AND JODHPUR???? THE BRITISH WERE STILL IN BENGAL DURING THE 1700s SO WHY DID THAT PR*CK DO THIS???

YOU KNOW WHO CAME TO JAI SINGH FOR AID WHEN HARIKRISHAN WAS IN DELHI???-- SIKHS

YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR SIKH MOTHER RANI JINDAN'S NICKNAME WAS??-- GANG BANG QUEEN OF SHER-E-PUNJAB....
Sher Singh

Wellingborough, UK

#13 Aug 27, 2007
BWWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

1) You diss turbans when Rajputs wore them and warriors did - you thick smelly c*nt!

2) Guru Gobind Singh fought many battles against the Hilly Ratpoo chieftans and you got destroyed. Then you ran to your pimps the mughals for help - who squirted thier loads in your mothers mouth!

3) The British f*cked you over early as you were the p*ssys of the lot. The Sikhs were attacked LAST and when the empire was fighting over leadership rights - WELL DOCUMENTED BY BRITISH YOU TW*T.

4) I have read up on the treatt and found that it was nothing but a freidnly agreement between the Sikhs and Ratpoos.

You are such a thick f*cking tw*t, how can you even diss Sikhism WHEN THE SIKHS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HINDOOS EXISTENCE IN NORTH OF INDIA? We saved your asses. You are aaaalll P U S S Y!!!!

Here is how much your precios ratpoos needed the Sikhs:

"Guru Tegh Bahadur played a major role to boost the morale of Rajput soldiers to face the occult powers of the Ahoms" (S.K. Bhuyan, op.cit., p. 129., Sarup Das Bhalla, op.cit., pp. 727-32.)

And you think you helped the Sikhs? Who asked the Sikhs for help?-

"However, a number of Rajasthani documents prove that Jaipur state had taken the services of some Sikh leaders chiefly from military point of view."

"The Jaipur records confirm that as early as 1739, S. Gurbakhsh Singh, a leader of the Sikhs had come into contact with the Jaipur state. In 1740, the same S. Gurbakhsh Singh was entrusted to employ 500 Sikh horsemen and 500 riflemen"

(Vakil Reports Rajasthani, No. 121.)

YOU NEEDED OUR HELP YOU IDOL F*CKING WH*RES!!!!

Face the facts - you are sh*t infront of the Singhs. You are a bunch of tw*ts who need help against us - and you have made loads of lies up because you feel bad that your wh*re mothers were b*tches who were ripped away from you and given to mughals while you married the holy cows to produce decendants like you - cow-boy!!!!
mard singh

UK

#14 Aug 27, 2007
Its a simple fact that Ratputs betrayed Sikhs as soon as they realised that the Sikhs were becoming powerful in the Punjab. They were friendly when they needed the Gurus , but became hostile when Sikhs were openly challenging the Mugals. The hill rajas begged Guru Hargobind Ji to free them from Gwalior prison, and He got 52 of them freed. These same traitors betrayed Guru Gobind Singh Ji --the grandson of Guru Hargobind Ji-- by attacking the Guru. I am aware of Rajputs fighting in Guru Ji's army, those Rajputs had converted to Sikhi and hence had denounced cast system --by becoming Sikhs.
These brave Ratputs betrayed India by selling their women to Mugals for little kingdoms, for the same kingdoms they helped the British to rule India. These pimps played a major role in the defeat of the Sikhs in Anglo Sikh wars.
Sher Singh

Wellingborough, UK

#16 Aug 27, 2007
I am cool. I had no problem with Ratputna until he/she included Sikhs in her/his bashing of Jats.

I have said what I wanted to say, which was that Sikhs have defeated Rajputs more times than Rajputs did Sikh. Ultimetly, both have aided eachother at times.

1)Ratputna hasnt come to admit the fact that the Rajputs that fought in the ANGLO (meaning British)- Sikh wars were under the British, hence it is a British victory.

2) Rajputna admitted that Rajputs sold thier daughters, and tried to lie that Sikhs did, afterwards admitting that they were the hindu ancestors

3) Rajputna lied that the British won in Chillianwala when they lost

4) And then insulting the Gurus? Look how much the Gurus have done for justice and truth, let alone the Hindus.

5) Most of Rajputs 'quotes' or 'comments' are from authors or historians. I showed that the British themselves appluaded the Sikhs. Even today, you can find so much about Sikhs in the World Wars. On one hand, Rajputna is applauding the Rajputs for helping the British, on the other, laments the British quotes about the Sikhs. Make no sense.

Admittingly, after all the bashing I have done, I am humble enough to call Rajputna brother/sister, since that is what Sikhi says and that is what I believe. So I will leave it at that.

Now, I'll read into that website Project Naad.
projectnaad

Harrow, UK

#17 Aug 27, 2007
Rajputana is also a great scholar of Sikhism. I have read some of the sorts he made and he most definately knows his Dharma better than 98% of Sikhs...so I have only respect.

www.ProjectNaad.com
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#18 Aug 27, 2007
Insulting the gurus???? mother fu*er you insult my religion and i'm suppose to shower praises on your gurus??? You better tahnk your guru nanak that I dont live near you else i'd castrate you inside your guru ka dwara!

Rajputs never sold their daughters, there is a big difference between matrimonial alliances and 'selling' of daughters, btw before your forefathers converted to sikhism (i'm assuming post 1800s) they were doing the selling -- you're no brother of mine i'd make war with god himself if you were one of his you son of a whor*!!!
Sher Singh

Bournemouth, UK

#19 Aug 28, 2007
BWAAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Im glad i've got God on my side then Ratpoo. You insulted Guru Nanak - so why would I not insult you religion back? I've had it with Hindoos who think Sikhs are Hindoo, we are a seperate race cow-boy.

You cant take the FACT that your daughters were married off, to muslims, and that HINDUS see muslim-hindu hybrids as disgusting and unappropraite, because of your backward caste system. But because everyone all came from the monkey, you like to talk about the past when we were all related, even though Sikhs are a seperate race and did not sell thier sisters like Rajpuuts.

Evolution - Monkey - Hind - Singh!
ProjectNaad

London, UK

#20 Aug 28, 2007
*copy pasted from pervious thread*

please guys ... lets stop this thread. It breaks my heart to see us fighting like this. Both Sikhs and Rajputs have done plenty of seva

We must respect the seva of one and all...
Rajputana

Bronx, NY

#21 Aug 28, 2007
Tell us how many of your relatives were at chamkaur?, how many battles have you fought in? how many of your ancestors were even sikhs during the time of Gobind Singh...? lol 0 i bet!

"Sikhs are a seperate race and did not sell their sisters like Rajputs" - Sher Singh

LAMO!!!!!!! so now sikhs are a race? ROFL!!!...prey tell what race the sikhs are? The intial insults were,are and always will be started by you and your people. What your gurus failed to realize was that just by creating a new religion you can't teach an old dog, such as yourself, new tricks - you were and always will be a chamaar trying to hide behind the guise of a sikh.

We're not related man...not even remotely related I guarantee you that much if not anything else lol
ProjectNaad

London, UK

#22 Aug 29, 2007
Rajputana bro...

Tell us how many of your relatives were at chamkaur?,

- None

how many battles have you fought in?
- None

how many of your ancestors were even sikhs during the time of Gobind Singh...? lol 0 i bet!

- None we are rajputs

"Sikhs are a seperate race and did not sell their sisters like Rajputs" - Sher Singh
LAMO!!!!!!! so now sikhs are a race?

- No. sikhs are from many different culturals and races

ROFL!!!...prey tell what race the sikhs are?

- You are correct Rajpuatana. Sikhs are not a homogenous race

The intial insults were,are and always will be started by you and your people.

- I have not insulted any of the Hindu Gods and never will

What your gurus failed to realize was that just by creating a new religion you can't teach an old dog, such as yourself, new tricks - you were and always will be a chamaar trying to hide behind the guise of a sikh.

- The Gurus have given a dharma par excellence to humanity. It is up to us how we live up to it.

We're not related man...not even remotely related I guarantee you that much if not anything else lol

- God made all of us bro. We are all one
Harinder

Delhi, India

#23 Aug 29, 2007
Insult Hindu GOD.( Quote )

This is a foolish activity no SIKH will indulge into it.
What to talk of Hindu GODS, No true Sikh can ever insult any GOD for then he is no more a SIKH if he does that.
No where is in Guru Granth Sahib is any GOD critisised.

We are all children of one GOD and must know how to respect every of GODS creation from flies , HIV,animals,aliens,different religions as all are his manifestation ultimately.
Harinder

Delhi, India

#24 Aug 29, 2007
Rajputs are brave people and has been mentioned in variety of internet sites.
Sikhs respect Rajputs and have no animosity towards them .
If u need any help do let us know.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 70
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sikh Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mujhe chodo koi (Apr '15) 3 min small land 12,368
Vadodara gay (Sep '15) 18 min Raju 173
Poll excellent video on izlam explains everything we... (Feb '14) 37 min rakesh BJP UKIP EDL 330
Koi housewife hai ? Jiska pati bahar job krta 38 min kabeer 972
bihar ki randiyaa yha msg kare or whats group m... 57 min sonuhot 87
Poll Jatt VS Brahmin VS Pashtun VS Kashmiri Muslim: ... (Sep '13) 1 hr from observation 93
Ahmedabad hot gay pm here (Apr '15) 1 hr raj 23,911
More from around the web