who dare shudra rajputs to compare with royal yadav

Posted in the Sikh Forum

First Prev
of 218
Next Last
chauhan

New Delhi, India

#1 Dec 23, 2011
saalo in shudra rajputs ki to koi izzat hi nahi hain, pata nahi kin kin ki nazayaz aulad hain ye shudra rajput. or gujjar are great. gujjars are royal
yadav power

New Delhi, India

#2 Dec 23, 2011
yadav power is great. hum in shudra rajput ko to apne paas baithne tak nahi dete
mard singh

Cardiff, UK

#4 Jan 13, 2012
WHY ALL THIS RUBBISH ??????????
Kishan kumar yadav

United States

#5 Jan 24, 2012
This really is pitiful.yadavs and rajputs are integral part of our nation.we must avoid any such circumstances where some nasty creatures are trying to divide us on the basis of caste.
Everybody is and should be proud of their traditions but it should not hurt anybodys sintiment.
And as far as class and conditions are concerned,it involves money and not the caste.
Nitin singh

New Delhi, India

#6 Jan 25, 2012
Actual history of ahirs -

Ahirs ( not yadavs ) is a farming and cowherd grazing community from time unknown, this caste is regarded as a vaishya caste in brahamnical caste system as it is involved in milk trading. There is no royalty attached with ahir caste.

To be continued.........
Nitin singh

New Delhi, India

#7 Jan 26, 2012
How ahirs are connected with lord krishna -
lord krishna was handed over to foster parents nanda and yashoda ( of ahir caste ) by his real father vasudev ( a yaduvanshi/jaduvanshi kshatriya, now known as jadaun/jadeja/bhati rajput ). Lord krishna was grown up as a ahir in vrindavan in his childhood, there after in his youth he retuned back to mathura to perform his kshatriya duties
Nitin singh

New Delhi, India

#8 Jan 26, 2012
In the beginning of 20th century during british era, census according to caste was organised. Then like other lower castes ahir also try to glorify themselves by attaching themselves with great personalities like lord krishna and start calling themselves yadavs, however they were not supported by britishers and always written as ahirs in government records. After independence they get some power due to reservation and get big mouths to propogate their false claims.
Nitin singh

New Delhi, India

#11 Feb 20, 2012
yadav ahir veer wrote:
<quoted text>
Behanchod kutea;shudra tera bap hoga;tumne mulon se ma kyon chodvaui'salea apnni chori aur behan bej kar tumne raj kiya.humne kabhe bhe molun ka khoon apne chahe kitna he sangrash kyon na karna pada ho;par tumhe to thodi se garmi mehsoos hotea hi mulon k aage apni ma pesh kar de.tumhari ek jati gadea lohar tu aaj bhe chand rupeyon k liye apni ladki ka sat solu dete h
this is not the answer of the reality of ahirs that i mentioned in my previous posts. Ahir is basically a shudra caste in hindu caste system and no way connected to lord krishna ( a jaduvanshi rajput )
yaduvanshi

Kota, India

#12 Feb 23, 2012
abe tu krishna aur yadavs ke bare main janata kya h ai.yadavs are called ahir. "ahi kahi sarp eer jo mare,kahi ahir jab sarp sanghare'' "Prabhu aagya yadu sarp sanghara,tab yaduvansh ahir pukara''
hindu

India

#13 Mar 1, 2012
theek issi tarah ladtae rahae h hum history me... muslim aur firangi hamaari gaand maar ke chalae gayae....congrats....

i m a rajput and my best friend is yadav..he can die for me..i can die for him..har burae waqt me saath h hum.....

come on friends dont b pshyco....ab aagae dekhna h...china and pakistan collaboration is going on slowly...should we give chance to repeat history??????????

dushman bhi h .....rajput bhi h ...yadav bhi h..ab kya hoga??????????
hindu

India

#14 Mar 1, 2012
in history of hindus...muslims and britishers knew hindu may not b a strong religion but a strong division....that how it happened...

..... 1196----1947.....lost pakistan lost bangladesh
disputed kashmir .....1947--2012....row of counter attacks.....before 2050 surprised attack from combined pakistan china......what is rajput what is yadav tell me...bcoz i m not a hindu i m yadav or i am rajput first...congrats...

really sad to read ur comments guys..never open this page again
Indian

New Delhi, India

#15 Mar 2, 2012
shame on you guys, u guys made india proud by such fucking thoughts.....
you all hv no rights to ever call u INDIANS.....stay happy by calling yourself RAJPUTS, YADAVAS n whatever....

Cmon people, wake up, don't try to repeat the history, as we are still facing the effects of partition happened in past, lotz of bomb blast killed our frnz, don't let that situation to come again in future.

PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN
kshatriya

New Delhi, India

#16 Mar 2, 2012
name of the tough fighting indian martial race

AJGR(from a snake name)
A-Ahirs
J-jats
G-Gurjars
R-Rajputs

All of them fight with invaders from middle east..but without internal colleboration...and u know the result...how the indian history took a great turn

I still believe if all these brave castes of hindus might have collaborated and fight with muslims u can imagine the results..

Romans collaborated and ruled d world for more than 500 years

Alexender the great gathered sm romans greeks and different races ...won the world

Mangols collaborated and ruled d world for more than 200 years..changez khan never lost a single war

britishers did the same thing as united kingdom

but jarurat se jayada samajhdaar hindus(tough martial race of india AJGR ) never collaborated themselves.... see the result

it is said that in vedic times afghanistan and most of the parts of iran were hindu population....where r they now and why???

Raja vikramaditya made great lord shiva temple at makka madina after attacking middle east

I still believe that hindus were the bravest race and great warriors....

and india today is without its head THE KASHMIR
left and right hands PAKISTAN and BANGLADESH

crores of hindus compelled to convert as muslims

why such a weak history we carry today

but where was the lackings

we all have d answers in our mind

plz post more comments...
Manish Yadav

Delhi, India

#17 Mar 7, 2012
Nitin singh wrote:
Actual history of ahirs -
Ahirs ( not yadavs ) is a farming and cowherd grazing community from time unknown, this caste is regarded as a vaishya caste in brahamnical caste system as it is involved in milk trading. There is no royalty attached with ahir caste.
To be continued.........
IF Your Brother Lives in Village does it mean that he has lower standard and you have higher.Please go and read "Shrimad Bhagwad" and you would find that Nand Rai and Vasudev were the children of same forefathers.Stop understanding anyone lower.It's totally cheap.
Thanks
Manish Yadav

Delhi, India

#18 Mar 7, 2012
hindu wrote:
theek issi tarah ladtae rahae h hum history me... muslim aur firangi hamaari gaand maar ke chalae gayae....congrats....
i m a rajput and my best friend is yadav..he can die for me..i can die for him..har burae waqt me saath h hum.....
come on friends dont b pshyco....ab aagae dekhna h...china and pakistan collaboration is going on slowly...should we give chance to repeat history??????????
dushman bhi h .....rajput bhi h ...yadav bhi h..ab kya hoga??????????
Brother your view is totally appreciatable.We should not indulge in caste superiority.But nobody has right to insult anyone.
Thanks

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#19 Mar 9, 2012
yaduvanshi wrote:
abe tu krishna aur yadavs ke bare main janata kya h ai.yadavs are called ahir. "ahi kahi sarp eer jo mare,kahi ahir jab sarp sanghare'' "Prabhu aagya yadu sarp sanghara,tab yaduvansh ahir pukara''
first of you tell me how much you know about krishna. I am a jadaun rajput, a real yaduvanshi. Your caste become yadav from past 100, when a ahir zamindar of haryana formed yadav mahasabha and invited several milk trading castes from all over india which were known at that time with different names like ahir, gop, gwale, kuruba and several other names. Due to your big population and mandal commision your caste become politically powerful, and persons like you start propogating false history and false interpretation of religious texts.
And by the way destroyer of sarp or nags were purus(janmejya) not yadus.
yadav ahir veer

India

#21 Mar 9, 2012
tu salea tum thakerea ab akhilesh yadav k charano m kyon padea ho apni ma chodnea
EQUAL STATUS

India

#23 Mar 10, 2012
Manish Yadav wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you mean by Rajputs or Thakurs.In the ancient era there was no Rajput or Thakurs.There were Kshtriyas.Rajput term was stated by kings of Rajasthan in 1st century.Thakur means zamindar, a person who has excess land and he does farming with the help of labourers.One more thing zamindar was also used to live in village.Second thing, after some generations descendents of Zamindars also had to plough there own lands.There was a custom in the royal families that the elder son used to become the king of the empire and his brothers were given charge of different divisions of army and civil administration and cousins were made head of zagirs just to keep control of grain supply.Manny of the yaduvanshi kings married to Ahir girls and the King of Rewari Rao Tula Ram who fought against britishers is known as Yadav aa well as Ahir.We have manny relatives from his village "Garhi Bolni" even one of my aunt is from that village.They use to call themselves as "Yadav" and "Ahir" Both.I think you have some phenoma about "Yadavs" and "Ahirs" by the cause of which you are not able to accept that yadavs are kshtriyas or you are not able to understand the difference between yadavs and ahirs.If you are talking about the Rajputs,they are also farming and cattle grazing in Haryana Rajasthan Bihar Up etc.Being a famer does not mean that you are a lower cast and one more thing in "Shrimad Bhagwat" it is also written that Nand Rai was a Zaminder and he had one million cows.
Thanks
DOST BAKI SAB BAAT TU THEEK SI HI H PAR TUM LOG LE DE K RAO TULA RAM KA NAM LETE HO,JISKA STATUS EK JAILDAR KA THA AUR VO DAR K MAREA ANGREJO SE BHAGTA HOA AFGANISTAN M DAST LAGNE SE MARA GAYA THA,BATAO VO REWARI KA THA TU AFGAHISTAN KYON BHAGA,YE BAAT MUJHE EK AHIR DOST NE HI BATAYE AUR VO US LADAI KA SHREYE KISE AUR AHIR KO DE RAHA THA;USKE BAAD USKE PATNI NE FATAFAT ANGREJO K SOVEREINTY KABUL KAR LE THE AUR KAHANI KHATAM HO GAYI-EK JAILDAR STATUS K ADMI KO TUM LOG JARURAT SE JYAYDA DARJA DETE HO;KYON KE TUMHARE PAS LE DE KE AUR KOI NAM LENE KO NAHI HOTA.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#24 Mar 10, 2012
If yaduvanshi kshatriyas or rajputs are concerned, then take any story of religious texts or indian history. They are always considerd as always very descent royals who several times ruled all india.For example first take example of religious texts :-
1. Kartvirya arjun , a haihai kshatriya, a branch of yaduvansh whose kingdom was destroyed by parshuram,2. Lord krishna, 3. His uncle king kansa, 4. His cousin shisupal, 5. His aunty(bua) kunti, 6. His cousin dantavakra
these were the persons who have blood relations with krishna, they were all kshatriyas no one was ahir. Nandbaba of vrindavan was a ahir zamindar under bhoj vanshi king kansha . He was not at all connected to vasudev ( the king of dwarka )with any blood relation. Geonology connecting nandbaba and vasudev are later created by some ahir scholars.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25 Mar 10, 2012
Now take all historical kingdoms attached to yaduvansh

1. Bhati vansh of punjab and jaisalmer
2. Jadaun vansh of karauli and awagarh
3. Jadeja and chudasama of gujrat
4. Yadavs of devgiri
5. Wodyars of mysore

descendents of all of these are rajputs , in some cases marathas and no one is ahir.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 218
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sikh Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
who dare shudra yadav to compare with royal raj... (Mar '13) 46 min Singh Garjan 479
Sikh gurus were less than a human made fake gOD... (May '14) 1 hr HinduISSatanic 4
India will be a muslim country by 2030. (May '13) 1 hr HinduISSatanic 89
Sikh fake history 40 sikhs vs 10 lakh mainly mu... (Jan '14) 3 hr Nikhil Singh Kharey 15
who dare to compare shudra jatt with royal rajput (Dec '11) 4 hr chutiye jaat OBC 2,614
Sikh Guru Nank was a double life double faced C... (Nov '13) 5 hr HinduISSatanic 35
How come Pakistani Jatts are stronger then indi... (Sep '08) 5 hr HinduISSatanic 695
More from around the web