Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#147 Feb 1, 2013
DM 1869
No threat or peril could put him in fear .No hardship could exhaust his endurance. No temptation could turn him aside from his duty.
Page 191
It is interesting to note that Marsh is writing about Elijah.
EGW 1902
Christ's Steadfastness. No threat could intimate Him, no peril awaken His fears, no hardship exhaust His endurance, no temptation allure Him from duty.{18MR 90.2}
Now we'lll "highlight" the similar words in EGW's text:

Christ's Steadfastness. >>No threat<< could intimate Him, no >>peril<< awaken His fears, >>no hardship exhaust His endurance<<, >>no temptation<< allure Him >>from<< >>duty<<.{18MR 90.2}

This is called paraphrasing--a legit literary technique. Only an idiot would call it plagiarism. If you brought this to court the judge would say: the accuser "was not in a condition of mind to judge fairly of the very serious charges she was bringing" (609. Pollock, Channing "The Plagiarism Racket," American Mercury 60 (1945): 613-619. pages 615-6)

===
568. O'Rourke, Meghan "The Copycat Syndrome: Plagiarists at work," The Slate (Jan. 11, 2007); found online at http://www.slate.com/id/2157435/... .

"We may know pornography when we see it, but the same can't be said of plagiarism.... Judge Richard A. Posner [The Little Book of Plagiarism] attributes today's "increasing attention" to plagiarism largely to a "cult of originality" first shaped by the Romantics... We carve out exceptions for writers like Shakespeare--a plagiarist by modern-day standards--because they are creative in their use of borrowed material; such copying isn't "slavish" but inventive, or, as Posner puts it, "The imitation is producing value."

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#148 Feb 1, 2013
Dm

He was accustomed to steal away alone to the silent sanctuary of the mountains, and spend the whole night in prayer to God.

EGW
"It came to pass in those days, that he went out into a mountain to pray, and continued all night in prayer to God" {UL 80.2}
"night in prayer to God."

Luke 6:12 And it came to pass in those days, that he went out into a mountain to pray, and continued all >>night in prayer to God.<<
Game over...again
You've barely begun! All you shown here is that you don't know the Bible!

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#149 Feb 1, 2013
DM 1869
We must obey the voice of duty when there are many other voices crying against it, and it
requires earnest heed to distinguish the one which speaks for God. We must cherish the impulse of conscience in the moment when it urges us to action, lest it cease from its promptings and we be left to the blind guidance of appetite and passion.
. Night scenes in the Bible Daniel Marsh page 202
"Highlighting" the exact words:
The Lord requires us to >>obey the voice of duty, when there are<< >>other voices<< all around us urging us to pursue an opposite course. >>It requires earnest<< attention from us >>to distinguish the<< voice >>which speaks<< from >>God. We must<< resist and conquer inclination, and obey the voice of conscience without parleying or compromise, >>lest<< its >>promptings//cease <<, and will and impulse control.{1SM 27.3} Ellen was prompted to also put Marsh’s work into
{5T 69.1}{YRP 230.3}{RH, August 30, 1906 par. 15}This is called a paraphrase.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#150 Feb 1, 2013
>I have 1000s BRING IT ON...

Yeah, I see: http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AoxqWvAef...

Anyone can cut-and-paste and claim that it was original work.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#151 Feb 1, 2013
LOMALINDAPROF wrote:
Conklin you loose and Tim clearly has you checkmated
You've just proven that you are NOT a prof; you can't even see paraphrasing when it is right in front of you.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#152 Feb 1, 2013
657. Robinson, B. A. "Seventh-day Adventist Church Its origin, beliefs, practices, etc.," Retrieved and printed Nov. 17, 2010, from http://www.religioustolerance.org/sda2.htm .

He concluded (without seeing the type of study recommended by Dr. Veltman*--he looked at this: http://dedication.www3.50megs.com/David/ ) that I had already "demonstrate[d] that there is no proof of Ellen White's plagiarism."

* In fact, Dr. Veltman proved back in 1988 that EGW was NOT a plagiarist.
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#154 Feb 1, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't say that you went off Rea's (correct spelling) work. Rea didn't do the work that is in his book. A lawyer did--I forget the guy's name. You don't need fancy software to find the flaws in his work.
idle chatter, no compelling evidence

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#155 Feb 1, 2013
Its called anecdotal. If you don't believe, do like I did and write a letter to Rea.refer to call people a liar when they tell you the truth.

You won't do that; you are too lazy and stupid to deal with it.
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#156 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Its called anecdotal. If you don't believe, do like I did and write a letter to Rea.refer to call people a liar when they tell you the truth.
You won't do that; you are too lazy and stupid to deal with it.
The usual MO of the lying CON McDoodle who insists others to show the evidence but when pressed has none but then comes up with the usual BS about anecdotal this and that.

Talk about SDA hypocrites!
DANNO

London, UK

#157 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Its called anecdotal. If you don't believe, do like I did and write a letter to Rea.refer to call people a liar when they tell you the truth.
You won't do that; you are too lazy and stupid to deal with it.
Conkie

How much money did you lend to Ex-Pastor Koot to fight Google to have letters 4 to 10 removed??

Do you really believe he will win in the end agianst Goog and agianst truth and GOD???

Google: Letters from Patsy Koot
DANNO

London, UK

#158 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
>I have 1000s BRING IT ON...
Yeah, I see: http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AoxqWvAef...
Anyone can cut-and-paste and claim that it was original work.
Conkie

How much money did you lend to Ex-Pastor Koot to fight Google to have letters 4 to 10 removed??

Do you really believe he will win in the end agianst Goog and agianst truth and GOD???

Google: Letters from Patsy Koot

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#159 Feb 2, 2013
Lay Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
The usual MO of the lying CON McDoodle who insists others to show the evidence but when pressed has none but then comes up with the usual BS about anecdotal this and that.
Talk about SDA hypocrites!
How can it be "the usual" when this is the first time I've even used the word? How does that work liar?
DANNO

London, UK

#160 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>How can it be "the usual" when this is the first time I've even used the word? How does that work liar?
Conkie

Say HELL O to CON MAN KOOT for me plz.

Dan
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#161 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>How can it be "the usual" when this is the first time I've even used the word? How does that work liar?
learn to read - learn to follow a thread, learn how to follow grammar without imposing assumptions and above all why parrot the errors of the confusion out of Andrews including bowing to the OMEGA of deadly heresies
DANNO

London, UK

#162 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>How can it be "the usual" when this is the first time I've even used the word? How does that work liar?
CONK

Will you be reporting my posts to admin and to your god?

Will you be reporting GOOG too?

Dan

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#163 Feb 2, 2013
Lay Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
learn to read - learn to follow a thread, learn how to follow grammar without imposing assumptions and above all why parrot the errors of the confusion out of Andrews including bowing to the OMEGA of deadly heresies
i.e., he lied yet again.

If we compare the RCC catechism and FB#2 (and later LW expanded the claim to include FB #4), what do we find?

Here's the texts that both use in common--no other similarity:

1) John 3:16

2) 2 Cor. 5:19 -- "To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation."

3) John 1:29 -- The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.[See also verse 33. Who is speaking?]

4) 1 John 4:2 -- Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

5) John 1:14 (used twice?)-- And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,(and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

6) Phil. 2:6, 7 -- Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

7) Mark 1:15 -- And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

8) Matt. 21:9 -- And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.

Since: Aug 10

Pacific Northwest USA

#164 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Its called anecdotal. If you don't believe, do like I did and write a letter to Rea.refer to call people a liar when they tell you the truth.
You won't do that; you are too lazy and stupid to deal with it.
You could make a mint giving "Life Lessons," since you (and you alone) seem to have absolutely EVERYTHING in life completely and accurately figured out!
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#165 Feb 2, 2013
GrammyJoanne wrote:
<quoted text>You could make a mint giving "Life Lessons," since you (and you alone) seem to have absolutely EVERYTHING in life completely and accurately figured out!
GummyJoanne has CON McDOODLE pegged!

CON McDoodle not once produce primary evidence about Rea yet holds the temerity to quote Boslop.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#166 Feb 2, 2013
GrammyJoanne wrote:
<quoted text>You could make a mint giving "Life Lessons," since you (and you alone) seem to have absolutely EVERYTHING in life completely and accurately figured out!
Said the liar.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#167 Feb 2, 2013
>CON McDoodle not once produce primary evidence about Rea yet holds the temerity to quote Boslop.

And I never will, because I never mnade that claim--you are such a poor liar!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Seventh-day Adventist Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
...The number OF A MAN (Jun '14) 5 min Earburner 762
DISCUSSION ON 2 nd PETER 3 : 15-16 58 min sitka happy 11
Exposing the Skeleton in the S.D.A. Closet of 1888 1 hr sitka happy 17
The sky is blue. 1 hr sitka happy 17
If The sabbaths are jewish then why did God cal... 2 hr Doubting Thomas 38
Evangelism in a sickly church (Feb '10) 2 hr JesusWasNOTaJew -... 6
SDA main PILLAR coming DOWN! (May '14) 3 hr JesusWasNOTaJew -... 2,824
Time is running out.... 7 hr Anonymous 60
EGW Deception of the Sabbath 19 hr sitka happy 228
merry christmas all 22 hr JesusWasNOTaJew -... 67
More from around the web