Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#48 Mar 2, 2013
Here's a perfect representation of the dershbag djconklin:

"There are many honest souls in these valleys; but they do not understand the truth for this time, and it is not merely by argument that they are to learn it. There is a work to be done of feeding these hungry, starving sheep with spiritual food. Many of the professed teachers of the people are perfectly content to set their stakes and make no advancement themselves, and they are much disturbed when others are induced to seek for truth. When new light is presented, they feel as the Pharisees felt when Christ came with new light for the Jewish nation. They want to stop the increase of light. They not only refuse to search the Scriptures for themselves, but they do all in their power to prevent others from searching." RH, June 29, 1886.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#49 Mar 2, 2013
Hey dershbag, you forgot this post: "expose the lie, promoted by Adventist leaders, that the untested drug zidovudine (AZT) is beneficial and effective." So, there was no misrepresentation as the dershbag claimed.

Secondly, as for your lie that it was "untested" you somehow, in your haste to paste, missed the all important fact that "A rigorously maintained double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of AZT was subsequently conducted by Burroughs-Wellcome." The FDA isn't in the bait of releasing drugs to the public which have NOT been tested. Even a low-life dershbag would know that.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#50 Mar 2, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Here's a perfect representation of the dershbag djconklin:
"There are many honest souls in these valleys; but they do not understand the truth for this time, and it is not merely by argument that they are to learn it. There is a work to be done of feeding these hungry, starving sheep with spiritual food. Many of the professed teachers of the people are perfectly content to set their stakes and make no advancement themselves, and they are much disturbed when others are induced to seek for truth. When new light is presented, they feel as the Pharisees felt when Christ came with new light for the Jewish nation. They want to stop the increase of light. They not only refuse to search the Scriptures for themselves, but they do all in their power to prevent others from searching." RH, June 29, 1886.
That's you and the rest of the critics in a nut shell: "Listen to me, I know the answer, you don't need to read the Bible, I'll tell you what it says." I show Scripture:

Job 38:2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#51 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
The diff between him and me is that I know I don't know enough (what he calls "blind")

No, you're willfully blind because you refuse to check very easy to confirm claims.
ROFL! I'm the one who came up with the 5 minute "rule"!

Even when I show people where to go: http://catalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi... ^*&CNT=100&hist=1& type=quick and tell you to count the number of copies of The Great Controversy that are in the Library of Congress--according to the critics there aren't any "because of the plagiarisms involved", you don't do it!

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#52 Mar 2, 2013
>Furthermore, I'm not aware of any egotistical boasts in my critique of Einstein's misperceptions.

You just did it.

"Eugene Shubert is a middle school math teacher form Richardson, Texas with delusions of scientific importance. He has tried to get a few of his math "papers" peer reviewed and published, but has been unable to do so. Some of his conversations with REAL mathematicians and physicists are available on the internet.

He has in the past pretended to be a working mathematician (as opposed to a math teacher) and a working theoretical physicist.

Further, he was arrested and forcibly removed from his SDA church and even many SDA thinks he's nuts. Some of his conversations with other SDA members are on the internet as well.

All this may explain why he's always on internet debate boards trying to prove how "smart" he is. "

From http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TAD... , post #10

"Ha! From reading his posts and glancing at his website, I knew that he was suffering from some sort of pathology, but I didn't think it was this bad... Thanks for the info.

Shubert would fail reality testing in a heart beat. "

Same page as above, post #12

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#53 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
The FDA isn't in the bait of releasing drugs to the public which have NOT been tested.
Of course they are. Every drug that has been recalled by the FDA was first approved by the FDA.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#54 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Job 38:2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
That's your rebuttal to the remarkable claims of an impressive list of accomplished scientists? Why not be more honest and just affirm your faith in the false prophet power and the paid shills at the FDA?

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#55 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
>Furthermore, I'm not aware of any egotistical boasts in my critique of Einstein's misperceptions.
You just did it.
No. You just did it. The scientific world is on record mouthing worshipful praise for Albert Einstein and I must be egotistical for dismissing the beliefs of a deluded world.
everythingimportant.org/Einstein_worship/

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#56 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
"Eugene Shubert is a middle school math teacher form Richardson, Texas with delusions of scientific importance. He has tried to get a few of his math "papers" peer reviewed and published, but has been unable to do so. Some of his conversations with REAL mathematicians and physicists are available on the internet.
He has in the past pretended to be a working mathematician (as opposed to a math teacher) and a working theoretical physicist.
Further, he was arrested and forcibly removed from his SDA church and even many SDA thinks he's nuts. Some of his conversations with other SDA members are on the internet as well.
All this may explain why he's always on internet debate boards trying to prove how "smart" he is. "
From http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TAD... , post #10
"Ha! From reading his posts and glancing at his website, I knew that he was suffering from some sort of pathology, but I didn't think it was this bad... Thanks for the info.
So you unjustly repeat the creative slander of God-hating evolutionists because you imagine that invalidates my airtight arguments against the leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist Church?

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#57 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Secondly, as for your lie that it was "untested" you somehow, in your haste to paste, missed the all important fact that "A rigorously maintained double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of AZT was subsequently conducted by Burroughs-Wellcome."
I believe the testimonies of the accomplished scientists in the referenced 9 videos, not the paid shills at the FDA nor the paid shills at the General Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#58 Mar 2, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Of course they are. Every drug that has been recalled by the FDA was first approved by the FDA.
Using the word "every" makes it sound like it is all, when in fact it is a few. Secondly, your claim that the drug was untested is proven to be a lie.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#59 Mar 2, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>So you unjustly repeat the creative slander of God-hating evolutionists because you imagine that invalidates my airtight arguments against the leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist Church?
ROFL! Real humble ain't he! You'll get your comeuppance soon enough for your lies and slander.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#60 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>Using the word "every" makes it sound like it is all, when in fact it is a few. Secondly, your claim that the drug was untested is proven to be a lie.
Itís not my claim. Itís the claim of some very honorable dissident scientists, some of whom are Nobel Laureates. And they are very well aware of the fraudulent testing that dupes dullards like you into thinking that government agencies can be trusted.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#61 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
You'll get your comeuppance soon enough for your lies and slander.
You have proven yourself to be a Pharisee and a dershbag. It's just a simple matter of understanding the Spirit of Prophecy and your character, which is like the kindred dershbag spirit of Allen Dersh-Bag Dershowitz.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#62 Mar 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Hey dershbag, you forgot this post: "expose the lie, promoted by Adventist leaders, that the untested drug zidovudine (AZT) is beneficial and effective."
No, I haven't forgotten what I've written. And the only additional fact you've proven is your ability to act like a shit-throwing chimpanzee.

Continue enjoying your Dersh-Bag Dershowitz character if you insist. It's not going to survive much longer.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#63 Mar 3, 2013
djconklin wrote:
"A rigorously maintained double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of AZT was subsequently conducted by Burroughs-Wellcome."
"It should be clear that Burroughs-Wellcome is a thoroughly unscrupulous company, and that collusion between the FDA and Burroughs-Wellcome is as strong as ever." -- Peter Duesberg, professor of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkeley. http://www.duesberg.com/articles/jlsecond.htm...
Klink

Kazakhstan

#64 Mar 7, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Secondly, as for your lie that it was "untested" you somehow, in your haste to paste, missed the all important fact that "A rigorously maintained double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of AZT was subsequently conducted by Burroughs-Wellcome." The FDA isn't in the bait of releasing drugs to the public which have NOT been tested. Even a low-life dershbag would know that.

Of course the drugs are tested before they can be placed on the market. The question is did the drug receive a fair test unbiased by drug manufacturers. That is almost always, no. The people who sit on the FDA come from the drug companies themselves. They just switch chairs every few years.

According to reports from the trial subjects the specific AZT was given to some and placebo to others. Those who received the real drug were doing so poorly the others were given the drug as well taken off the placebo to make the results even - and that was the test. AZT was previously rejected as too toxic for a chemo drug only then allowed for HIV, even now given to children.

You may want to hear what is said about these drugs before continuing to help the UN WHO administer the toxic drug worldwide claiming to be doing missions.

AZT retroviral drugs are the most toxic ever made.
www.tig.org.za

www.virusmyth.com/aids/video
www.helpforhiv.com
2700+ AIDS Rethinkers - doctors and professionals
http://rethinkingaids.com

The HIV test is known to seriously flawed returning false positives, actually just testing for antibodies.

Tommy Morrison Says He Never Had HIV
www.thesweetscience.com/news/articles/12686-t...
Klink

Kazakhstan

#65 Mar 7, 2013

Swine and other processed meats = early death!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21682779

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#66 Mar 7, 2013
Klink wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course the drugs are tested before they can be placed on the market. The question is did the drug receive a fair test unbiased by drug manufacturers. That is almost always, no. The people who sit on the FDA come from the drug companies themselves. They just switch chairs every few years.

You may want to hear what is said about these drugs before continuing to help the UN WHO administer the toxic drug worldwide claiming to be doing missions.
AZT retroviral drugs are the most toxic ever made.
www.tig.org.za
www.virusmyth.com/aids/video
www.helpforhiv.com
2700+ AIDS Rethinkers - doctors and professionals
http://rethinkingaids.com
djconklin will be standing with SDA leaders in the final judgment because he refuses to believe that the church he supports is guilty of practicing genocide.
George Bush Jnr

Brampton, Canada

#67 Mar 8, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>djconklin will be standing with SDA leaders in the final judgment because he refuses to believe that the church he supports is guilty of practicing genocide.
Shubes, you're practicing false prophecy. Please explain how is that any different. Thanks.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Seventh-day Adventist Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Rev. 13:11 - What do the two horns mean ? 6 min 10commandments 21
EXAMPLE of one in a CULT 14 min sitka happy 2,368
False Prophet Jeanine Sautron (Nov '08) 24 min royallastgleam 431
SDA main PILLAR coming DOWN! (May '14) 45 min sitka happy 3,380
The Investigative Judgement is False Doctrine 2 hr Lay Worker 148
iS IT WRONG TO WORSHIP GOD ON SUNDAY? (Mar '10) 2 hr sitka happy 5,015
Catholic Christians are being beheaded 3 hr sitka happy 187
More from around the web