Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#651 Feb 1, 2013
Crazy Baptist wrote:
i believe Lucifer was probably under Gabriel and Michael, where would that put him? Certainly NOT included in the Godhead. that is a heresy for sure.
CB
Do you think Lucifer was higher than those two, but they got promoted after Lucifer got kicked out of heaven?
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#652 Feb 1, 2013
Crazy Baptist wrote:
<quoted text>
No Ill will here.
Back to business:
i believe Lucifer was probably under Gabriel and Michael, where would that put him? Certainly NOT included in the Godhead. that is a heresy for sure.
CB
The Crzy B prefers extent of probability without Scriptures.

The King of Tyrus knew the answer.

As to the denial of the Godhead by the Crzy B - regular Bible students are familiar that Isaiah was aware of the "equality" intentions of Lucifer, the son of the morning who desired to ascend will ascend above the heights of the clouds to be like the Most High.

One of the Eternal Verities, One of the ELohim in the COunsels of Peace chose the form of a slave and thought it not robbery to be equal with God - verily to be "as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him,[there is] no beauty that we should desire him."

Learn to join the dots
birdman

Owaneco, IL

#653 Feb 1, 2013
Crazy Baptist wrote:
<quoted text>
yep
i am sorry for getting you envolved with this mess Brother Bird.
the guy couldn't take what he was dishing out.
That is clear.
CB
I was just commenting on the RC Priest.

No harm here.
birdman

Owaneco, IL

#654 Feb 1, 2013
Lay Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
The Crzy B prefers extent of probability without Scriptures.
The King of Tyrus knew the answer.
As to the denial of the Godhead by the Crzy B - regular Bible students are familiar that Isaiah was aware of the "equality" intentions of Lucifer, the son of the morning who desired to ascend will ascend above the heights of the clouds to be like the Most High.
One of the Eternal Verities, One of the ELohim in the COunsels of Peace chose the form of a slave and thought it not robbery to be equal with God - verily to be "as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him,[there is] no beauty that we should desire him."
Learn to join the dots
NO PROOF yet tho.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#655 Feb 1, 2013
Never will be from LW. Just lots of assertions.
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#656 Feb 1, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Never will be from LW. Just lots of assertions.
obviously and painfully unfamiliar with the Scriptures who plagiarises the 27 FBs to say its true

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#657 Feb 2, 2013
If we compare the RCC catechism and FB#2 (and later LW expanded the claim to include FB #4), what do we find?

Here's the texts that both use in common--no other similarity:

1) John 3:16

2) 2 Cor. 5:19 -- "To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation."

3) John 1:29 -- The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.[See also verse 33. Who is speaking?]

4) 1 John 4:2 -- Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

5) John 1:14 (used twice?)-- And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,(and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

6) Phil. 2:6, 7 -- Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

7) Mark 1:15 -- And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

8) Matt. 21:9 -- And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#658 Feb 2, 2013
Lay Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
obviously and painfully unfamiliar with the Scriptures who plagiarises the 27 FBs to say its true
Said the lying CON who doesn't know what plagairism is.
DANNO

London, UK

#659 Feb 2, 2013
Conkie

How much money did you lend to Ex-Pastor Koot to fight Google to have letters 4 to 10 removed??

Do you really believe he will win in the end agianst Goog and agianst truth and GOD???

Google: Letters from Patsy Koot
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#660 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>Said the lying CON who doesn't know what plagairism is.
Said the lying CON who cites Veltman and then claims to know what plagairism is

try harder
DANNO

London, UK

#661 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
Never will be from LW. Just lots of assertions.
Say HELL O to the CON man Koot for me plz.

Dan
Pioneer

Scottsdale, AZ

#662 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
If we compare the RCC catechism and FB#2 (and later LW expanded the claim to include FB #4), what do we find?
Here's the texts that both use in common--no other similarity:
1) John 3:16
2) 2 Cor. 5:19 -- "To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation."
3) John 1:29 -- The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.[See also verse 33. Who is speaking?]
4) 1 John 4:2 -- Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
5) John 1:14 (used twice?)-- And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,(and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
6) Phil. 2:6, 7 -- Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
7) Mark 1:15 -- And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
8) Matt. 21:9 -- And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.
djconklin, That's not all the texts, they have been listed will not supply them again but the point is your CLUELESS to the twists they do to the Bible to make their own doctrins which are all errors.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#663 Feb 2, 2013
Lay Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
Said the lying CON who cites Veltman and then claims to know what plagairism is
try harder
I've never made that claim--you just lied yet again.
Lay Worker

Yea, Australia

#664 Feb 2, 2013
djconklin wrote:
<quoted text>I've never made that claim--you just lied yet again.
Nope - its the wilfull ignorance and forgetfullness of CON McDoodle that is astounding - even the man with the pointy hat says Peter is the rock and upon this rock the man with the point hats church was built

Same Scriptures used by the man with the pointy hat and they dont arrive with the same answer.

With the Triune Trinity - the man with the pointy hat twists the same Scriptures but CON thinks the twist that they plagiarise is different but the answer is the same - SDAs say there is only ONE GOD.

Both twist the Scriptures to give the same answer as recorded in the CAtechism and the FB #2 and then says its different.

Go figure
jebus sheep

Tunbridge Wells, UK

#665 Feb 2, 2013
Crazy Baptist wrote:
<quoted text>
i have already given an explanation for why i said that.
What, do you deny that catholic priest are always getting caught having sex with young boys??
C'mon dude. shame the devil and tell the truth.
CB
yet again more slander I am not trying to disprove the bible I am trying to understand it. What I don't understand is how you are still unable to see what iyous are writing is slander with what you are saying. Yes the church as had a child scandal however does that mean everyone in the church are the same no. An example if one man in a village goes around raping women does that mean I can say most men are rapist . No I. Cant because this would be slander towards the innocent . Look I was trying to get back on topic but yet again you are unable to drop this.
jebus sheep

Tunbridge Wells, UK

#666 Feb 2, 2013
jebus sheep wrote:
<quoted text> yet again more slander I am not trying to disprove the bible I am trying to understand it. What I don't understand is how you are still unable to see what iyous are writing is slander with what you are saying. Yes the church as had a child scandal however does that mean everyone in the church are the same no. An example if one man in a village goes around raping women does that mean I can say most men are rapist . No I. Cant because this would be slander towards the innocent . Look I was trying to get back on topic but yet again you are unable to drop this.
look I truly get where your coming from but it is only a select few. All I am saying is be careful with the way you word things because in this day and age it just takes one person to be offended by it and they could try to get you prosecuted. Remember forum emails facebook all this can be used in a court of law.
jebus sheep

Tunbridge Wells, UK

#667 Feb 2, 2013
Lay Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope - its the wilfull ignorance and forgetfullness of CON McDoodle that is astounding - even the man with the pointy hat says Peter is the rock and upon this rock the man with the point hats church was built
Same Scriptures used by the man with the pointy hat and they dont arrive with the same answer.
With the Triune Trinity - the man with the pointy hat twists the same Scriptures but CON thinks the twist that they plagiarise is different but the answer is the same - SDAs say there is only ONE GOD.
Both twist the Scriptures to give the same answer as recorded in the CAtechism and the FB #2 and then says its different.
Go figure
just a question then how would you explain Hindu or Buddhism then or even vodoun.
birdman

Owaneco, IL

#668 Feb 2, 2013
jebus sheep wrote:
<quoted text> just a question then how would you explain Hindu or Buddhism then or even vodoun.
Boils down to ANY religion that REJECTS Christ.

PERVERT= to lead astray; corrupt; to misuse; to distort.

Now study the Bible for it is full of imformation to tell a person on religions or humans that fit that word!
jebus sheep

Tunbridge Wells, UK

#669 Feb 2, 2013
birdman wrote:
<quoted text>
Boils down to ANY religion that REJECTS Christ.
PERVERT= to lead astray; corrupt; to misuse; to distort.
Now study the Bible for it is full of imformation to tell a person on religions or humans that fit that word!
you say that yet these religions are older than Christianity and also they say it is a sin to stray from path. Don't you find that odd how all these religions say that I have right religion yours is wrong shouldn't we look at history and look at origins of religion. By looking at the origins wouldn't that give everyone a better picture of what religion is.
Jebus sheep

Tunbridge Wells, UK

#670 Feb 2, 2013
http://www.google.co.uk/url... pleas heave a look at this web page and explain why all people share the same attributes as Jesus. Also all these religions state it is a sin to worship other gods

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Seventh-day Adventist Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Rev. 13:11 - What do the two horns mean ? 12 min Earburner 74
iS IT WRONG TO WORSHIP GOD ON SUNDAY? (Mar '10) 17 min Saved By Grace 5,038
SDA main PILLAR coming DOWN! (May '14) 45 min Saved By Grace 3,397
Re-baptism; Please help me. 2 hr DANNO 2
SUNDAY represents GOD who is LOVE (Aug '11) 3 hr jonebgood 4,626
At the Tomb 19 hr 10commandments 16
EXAMPLE of one in a CULT 20 hr JesusWasNOTaJew -... 2,377
The Investigative Judgement is False Doctrine 21 hr Saved By Grace 150
More from around the web