Ellen G White Exposed

Since: Aug 08

Christchurch New Zealand

#42 Sep 23, 2012
Tony wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you be part of the end time saved "Remnant Church" if you do not have current SDA membership? yes or no?
YES read THE UPWARD LOOK page 315

Since: Aug 08

Christchurch New Zealand

#43 Sep 23, 2012
Tony wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you be part of the end time saved "Remnant Church" if you do not have current SDA membership? yes or no?
The SDA church are not upholding REMNANT CHURCH principles.
KoalaGums

Ryde, Australia

#44 Sep 23, 2012
robert two wrote:
<quoted text>
The SDA CHURCH oppose me outright and I resigned in 1981.
So now what. I oppose the SDA stand in this end of the world.
I think you are a bit mixed up.
I'm not mixed up, Robert. I know the SDA church for what they are.

Matthew 7
16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

And it's all what Billie Holiday would have called a "bitter crop".
Tony

Sydney, Australia

#45 Sep 23, 2012
robert two wrote:
<quoted text>
YES read THE UPWARD LOOK page 315
That's NICE to know robert :) lol

According to you, ALL Christians who are never member of the SDA Cult, will be part of the end time saved "Remnant Church".

Thank you for that robert lol

No wonder you were booted out of the SDA Cult :)
Tony

Sydney, Australia

#46 Sep 23, 2012
KoalaGums wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not mixed up, Robert. I know the SDA church for what they are.
Matthew 7
16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
And it's all what Billie Holiday would have called a "bitter crop".
Amen!
Earthcaller

Deland, FL

#47 Sep 24, 2012
Tony wrote:
<quoted text>
That's NICE to know robert :) lol
According to you, ALL Christians who are never member of the SDA Cult, will be part of the end time saved "Remnant Church".
Thank you for that robert lol
No wonder you were booted out of the SDA Cult :)
Your one Atonement theology is no different from the errors of the mainline. Error is error in whatever form or fashion. You need to repent.
birdman

Arthur, IL

#48 Sep 24, 2012
robert two wrote:
<quoted text>
The SDA church are not upholding REMNANT CHURCH principles.
Who says? you?

Since: Aug 08

Christchurch New Zealand

#49 Sep 24, 2012
KoalaGums wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not mixed up, Robert. I know the SDA church for what they are.
Matthew 7
16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
And it's all what Billie Holiday would have called a "bitter crop".
But at the bottom there are a few good folk but hard to find.

Since: Aug 08

Christchurch New Zealand

#50 Sep 24, 2012
birdman wrote:
<quoted text>
Who says? you?
This is not a war between people this is between CHRIST & SATAN.
Truth stands alone.
birdman

Arthur, IL

#51 Sep 24, 2012
robert two wrote:
<quoted text>
This is not a war between people this is between CHRIST & SATAN.
Truth stands alone.
That is not what I commented on. Read what you posted.
Better stuff

Brampton, Canada

#52 Sep 24, 2012
robert two wrote:
<quoted text>
This is not a war between people this is between CHRIST & SATAN.
Truth stands alone.
Robes,I was thinking about what you said, "TRUTH STANDS ALONE". Yet, you behave as though the Bible is spineless and needs the support of Ellen White.

I just want you to know that my Bible has a backbone, and the backbone of my Bible is made of cobweb http://tinyurl.com/9jy3mlq

My Bible stands alone, period.
Mr no proof

Prestons, Australia

#53 Sep 24, 2012
Jewinchrist wrote:
No...That is not a good website, wanna know aboyut sister White? READ HER BOOKS, then make your own opinion.
Those are slanderers...that is all, also been debunked many times.
well you see that is the problem ..You have noy read enough so hears alittle for you to read...
Ellen Dreams of James Shortly After His Death
A few days since, I was pleading with the Lord for light in regard to my duty. In the night I dreamed I was in the carriage, driving, sitting at the right hand. Father was in the carriage, seated at my left hand. He was very pale, but calm and composed. "Why Father," I exclaimed, "I am so happy to have you by my side once more! I have felt that half of me was gone. Father, I saw you die; I saw you buried. Has the Lord pitied me and let you come back to me again, and we work together as we used to?" {RY 161.1}
He looked very sad. He said, "The Lord knows what is best for you and for me. My work was very dear to me. We have made a mistake. We have responded to urgent invitations of our brethren to attend important meetings. We had not the heart to refuse. These meetings have worn us both more than we were aware. Our good brethren were gratified, but they did not realize that in these meetings we took upon us greater burdens than at our age we could safely carry. They will never know the result of this long-continued strain upon us. God would have had them bear the burdens we have carried for years. Our nervous energies have been continuously taxed, and then our brethren misjudging our motives and not realizing our burdens have weakened the action
162
of the heart. I have made mistakes, the greatest of which was in allowing my sympathies for the people of God to lead me to take work upon me which others should have borne.{RY 161.2}
"Now, Ellen, calls will be made as they have been, desiring you to attend important meetings, as has been the case in the past. But lay this matter before God and make no response to the most earnest invitations. Your life hangs as it were upon a thread. You must have quiet rest, freedom from all excitement and from all disagreeable cares. We might have done a great deal for years with our pens, on subjects the people need that we have had light upon and can present before them, which others do not have. Thus you can work when your strength returns, as it will, and you can do far more with your pen than with your voice." {RY 162.1}
He looked at me appealingly and said, "You will not neglect these cautions, will you, Ellen? Our people will never know under what infirmities we have labored to serve them because our lives were interwoven with the progress of the work, but God knows it all. I regret that I have felt so deeply and labored unreasonably in emergencies, regardless of the laws of life and health. The Lord did not require us to carry so heavy burdens and many of our brethren so few. We ought to have gone to the Pacific Coast before, and devoted our time and energies to writing. Will you do this now? Will you, as your strength returns, take your pen and write out these things we have so long anticipated, and make haste slowly? There is important matter which the people need. Make this your first business. You will have to
163
speak some to the people, but shun the responsibilities which have borne us down." {RY 162.2}
"Well," said I, "James, you are always to stay with me now and we will work together." ........I feel no duty to go to Battle Creek for the purpose of shouldering the responsibilities in General Conference. I have no duty to stand in General Conference. The Lord forbids me. That is enough.-- Letter 17, 1881.{RY 163.2}
mine.-- Ms 21, 1888.{RY 163.3}
Ellen White Reflects on
James White's Death

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#54 Oct 6, 2012
Tony wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are claiming that EGW never once plagiarised, then there is no hope for you David, if you continue to defend a lie and block your ears to the truth.
656. Robinson, B. A. "Seventh-day Adventist Church Its origin, beliefs, practices, etc.," Retrieved and printed Nov. 17, 2010, from http://www.religioustolerance.org/sda2.htm .

He concluded (without seeing the type of study recommended by Dr. Veltman*--he looked at this: http://dedication.www3.50megs.com/David/ ) that I had already "demonstrate[d] that there is no proof of Ellen White's plagiarism."

* In fact, Dr. Veltman proved back in 1988 that EGW was NOT a plagiarist.

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#55 Oct 6, 2012
>Error is error in whatever form or fashion. You need to repent.

Excellant points! Thanks!
Jesus is the Truth

Sydney, Australia

#56 Oct 6, 2012
djconklin wrote:
>Error is error in whatever form or fashion. You need to repent.
Excellant points! Thanks!
Repent David and leave Babylon! Repent or perish!

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#58 Oct 12, 2012
Tony, Tony, Tony. Always hiding and yet being exposed.
Joe

Medford, OR

#61 Oct 21, 2012
Jewinchrist wrote:
No...That is not a good website, wanna know aboyut sister White? READ HER BOOKS, then make your own opinion.
Those are slanderers...that is all, also been debunked many times.
"debunked" by Adventists only.
Hmmmm....
Tim

Australia

#63 Oct 26, 2012
djconklin wrote:
>Ellen G. White, never envisioned in her wildest dreams that the day would come when computer technology would accurately assist in exposing her as a false prophetess and rampant plagiarist.
Actually, thanks to the Internet and the computer program WCopyfind, I found that EGW was NOT a plagiarist. Of course, it requires that one actually do the work vs lying through one's teeth about the subject.
654. Robinson, B. A. "Seventh-day Adventist Church Its origin, beliefs, practices, etc.," Retrieved and printed Nov. 17, 2010, from http://www.religioustolerance.org/sda2.htm .
He concluded (without seeing the type of study recommended by Dr. Veltman--he looked at this: http://dedication.www3.50megs.com/David/ ) that I had already "demonstrate[d] that there is no proof of Ellen White's plagiarism."
LIAR AND YOUR DADDY MUST BE THE DEVIL
Tim

Australia

#64 Oct 26, 2012
Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
"debunked" by Adventists only.
Hmmmm....
a THINKER i see..well done

Since: Jul 09

St. Paul

#66 Oct 27, 2012
See http://dedication.www3.50megs.com/David/index...

Note how the evuidence itself does NOT support the conclusions--the website is nothoing more than an appeal to authority vs. looking at the facts. Secondly, my study shows how the "evidence" produced in Rea's work has been manipulated and distorted.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Seventh-day Adventist Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why I Believe Ellen G. White was a Prophet (May '17) 2 hr Zog Has-fallen 349
What was the light from Gen. 1:3? 10 hr teacher 57
1260 days of the Papacy from 538 AD to 1798 (May '14) 10 hr teacher 631
Heb. 9:23 revisited 10 hr teacher 29
Questions for Seventh-Day Adventist 19 hr Zog Has-fallen 3
The Mark of the Beast is Imminent! 20 hr Earburner 68
Does sabbath day still exist 23 hr Romans 3-31 and 13-9 813
More from around the web