Local: Los Angeles, CA  (change)

 | 

Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment
Scientology

Specialist Training in How to lie as a scientologist

Comments (Page 3)

Showing posts 41 - 52 of 52
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:

Joined: Feb 12, 2007
Comments: 464
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Jun 8, 2007
 
PR Guy wrote:
According to L. Ron Hubbard as he writes in all caps from the book Management Series 3 in the policy PR Series 2,'The Missing Ingredient': "The more lies you use in PR the more likely it is that the PR will recoil. Thus the law: NEVER USE LIES IN PR."
This policy is in books all over the world, the one mentioned above, TR L, I have never seen except on the internet and I was trained as a PR person in Scientology.
So, which would I follow, the one that is in the core references that I use and that are available to anyone or the one that I have only seen on the internet and never seen as an approved policy anywhere else?
What you are quoting is part of what Hubbard called "PR of PR." It's the version of "PR tech" to be presented to outsiders.

Per Hubbard, there is "PR of PR," there is "PR," there is "Black PR," there is "Propaganda," and there is "Black Propaganda" - and then there is "Intelligence gathering" (data collection) and then there is "Attack" ("Support," or "covert dirty tricks Operations")"Intelli gence."

They, according to Hubbard, are supposed to work together.

Apparently, you have not seen the confidential PR Series issues (not in the Green volumes), and you have not seen senior tactical, PR and Propaganda tech writings, by Hubbard, such as 'Battle Tactics'.

And, no doubt, you have not seen the many confidential Propaganda Tech issues by Hubbard.

But this you can do, for a start: Read Public Relations Series 18, that you can find in the PR Series in the Green Volumes. Do that, and then read the entire (available, non-confidential) PR Series while you're at it. Then get back to this Forum with what you've learned.

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Joined: Apr 3, 2007
Comments: 1361
Can't say
ISP Location: Brighton, UK
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Jun 8, 2007
 
Follow the honesty line perhaps, whatever that may be.

Joined: Feb 12, 2007
Comments: 464
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Jun 9, 2007
 
jack starkey wrote:
<quoted text>
What you are quoting is part of what Hubbard called "PR of PR." It's the version of "PR tech" to be presented to outsiders.

Per Hubbard, there is "PR of PR," there is "PR," there is "Black PR," there is "Propaganda," and there is "Black Propaganda" - and then there is "Intelligence gathering" (data collection) and then there is "Attack" ("Support," or "covert dirty tricks Operations")"Intelli gence."

They, according to Hubbard, are supposed to work together.

Apparently, you have not seen the confidential PR Series issues (not in the Green volumes), and you have not seen senior tactical, PR and Propaganda tech writings, by Hubbard, such as 'Battle Tactics'.
And, no doubt, you have not seen the many confidential Propaganda Tech issues by Hubbard.

But this you can do, for a start: Read Public Relations Series 18, that you can find in the PR Series in the Green Volumes. Do that, and then read the entire (available, non-confidential) PR Series while you're at it. Then get back to this Forum with what you've learned.
Hello, PR Guy, are you reading the non-confidential part of the Scientology (Green Volume) "PR Series"?

Let me know when you're done, and what you've discovered.(Suggest reading 'PR Series 18' two times.)

Here's a tip for you: Even this part (the non-confidential Hubbard writings on "Public Relations") can be a bit confusing, as it mixes "PR of PR" with "PR" with "black PR" with "black propaganda."

(That's partly because Hubbard regarded himself as having - in his own words - tremendous "flair" endowment, and he could - thus - "get away with" all sorts of things, because of his skill level and special "charm.")

So take your time. When you're ready, you can begin to study - bit by bit - L. Ron Hubbard's *confidential writings*(the senior tech) on Public Relations, and related topics.

Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Comments: 618
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Jun 11, 2007
 
and so the authority on all things scientological and not worth a damn speaks. You attack me I'll attack you - I am not an op I am in no need of psychiatric help. You rehash and rehash and report source material albeit not from L-Ron in some cases and you claim you are cured from the influence of scientology. If you are not an op jack there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy. And by the way I now have 30,000 words written on my memoires - why should I post my pain on the internet with no compensation - are you mad this stuff is gold dust - not because it blows the lid on anything but because it comes from a true sane heart.

“Scn is a big, fat global scam”

Joined: Apr 19, 2007
Comments: 3194
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Jun 12, 2007
 
Anti- Jack is not an op.

Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Comments: 618
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Jun 13, 2007
 
Red Pill wrote:
Anti- Jack is not an op.
Well you can see why I have that perspective - he attacks like an op with defamatory comments. I am not an op either nor a liar nor deluded as suggested by jack elsewhere.

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Comments: 893
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Jan 24, 2008
 
Polly wrote:
Scientologists have a specific PRO TR for training Stdudents to effectively lie and be 100% believable, the Process is called TR-L.
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE - TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To
train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Position: Same as TR-1.
Commands: Part 1 "Tell me a lie". Command given by coach. Part 2 interview
type 2 WC by coach.
Training Stress: In Part 1 coach gives command, student originates a
falsehood. Coach flunks for out TR 1 or TR 0. In Part 2 coach asks
questions of the student on his background or a subject. Student gives
untrue data of a plausible sort that the student backs up with further
explanatory data upon the coach asking further questions. The coach flunks
for out TR 0 and TR 1, and for student fumbling on question answers. The
student should be coached on a gradient until he/she can lie facilely.
Short example:
Coach: Where do you come from?
Student: I come from the Housewives Committee on Drug Abuse.
Coach: But you said earlier that you were single.
Student: Well, actually I was married but am divorced. I have 2 kids in the
suburbs where I am a housewife, in fact I'm a member of the P.T.A.
Coach: What town is it that you live in?
Student: West Brighton.
Coach: But there is no public school in West Brighton.
Student: I know, I send my children to school in Brighton, and that's where
I'm a P.T.A. member.
Coach: Oh, and who is the Chairman there?..."
Hey check it out Polly, this has been referenced directly by Mark Bunker:

http://xenutv.wordpress.com/
Lleyton
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Jan 24, 2008
 
lie? NEVER!!!
Philly
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Jan 24, 2008
 
Scientology is bullshit. All churches are cults. Hope you all figure that out soon.

¡Hasta Luego!
Lleyton Hewitt is GAY
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Jan 24, 2008
 
Philly wrote:
Scientology is bullshit. All churches are cults. Hope you all figure that out soon.
¡Hasta Luego!
LIIIIER!!!

Joined: Jan 5, 2007
Comments: 1711
Jellystone Park
ISP Location: Dubois, WY
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Jan 24, 2008
 
lying is a sacrament in scientology
they spend hours studying how to lie effectively

“Scn is a big, fat global scam”

Joined: Apr 19, 2007
Comments: 3194
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Jan 24, 2008
 
Yogi Bear wrote:
lying is a sacrament in scientology
they spend hours studying how to lie effectively
Welcome home Yogi. You've been gone too long.
Showing posts 41 - 52 of 52
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Scientology Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
What is Scientology about? 10 hr Erica 16
Warning placard at the Scientology Org Berlin Sat Rachel99 4
porns Sat anon 1
YouTube does it again! Accounts suspended Sat Rachel99 11
Katie Holmes' Opening To Be Protested By Anti-S... Sep 4 Bane 3
i r haf quaston Sep 3 Anonymous 1
Scientology isn't in curriculum, chief of Will ... Sep 3 Bane 10