Very simple. You have to go back in time.BMZ, see if you can understand this very basic logic. It almost seems as though you are saying that if one sneaks into someone's home when they are not home or are asleep and quietly takes things, that is theft. But if someone breaks into someone's home, takes it over and kills them and takes their stuff, suddenly that is not theft, but "booty". How do you arrive at these bizarre conclusions?
Not to change the subject, but as an example, when the US invaded Iraq, they didn't start carting off the Iraqis' possessions back to the US and no Generals said it was OK to rape and sell the Iraqi women that they found. But Muhammad DID do things like this. George Bush Jr had more morals than Muhammad did and I have no idea why any Muslims should hate him so badly when he didn't do or condone as many bad things as Muhammad himself did.
If there were a US back then, it would have done the same. Nobody does that now, not even the Europeans, who looted the East.
Just 200 plus years ago, the Americans, the British and the French looted the Indian lands and properties. Right?
No General or a Commander would ask his troops to loot and rape. Soldiers may do that. For example, in Okinawa, the Commander has never been accused of rapes but the US soldiers get frequently accused of rapes. Right?
What morals does that wretched liar George Bush Jr. have as a former Commander-in-Chief?