Look, I say what I believe in detail, and I answer every single point you try to make in detail, while you ignore half of the things that I say and only answer the parts you think you can answer and then pretend the other parts never even existed. Sorry, but this is not a discussion, it is merely a complete attempt at manipulation on your part and picking and choosing what you want to answer, and what you don't want to answer and then dictating the order that YOU want the discussion to go or think it should go so that it is most beneficial for your ideas. This simply is not a proper discussion in any universes, and I am not going to allow this nonsense anymore and I never should have in the first place.<quoted text>
Thank you Brother for your appreciation.
What you need is to be on the Right Side of truth and then every things becomes easy.
The problem is that Mr. Seeker is standing on the left side of truth and thinks he is on the right side!!
I only object to the way you are conducting this conversation. You have dictated what can be asked and what cannot and have dictated the order in which things shall be discussed. That isn't right in any universe and it is not going to continue. Just because your twisted sense of reasoning can't see the problem with this, does not mean that anybody should appease it.<quoted text>
That is why he throws tantrums,
I said Muhammad condoned rape and I proved it using Islamic sources themselves and you had nothing specific to say about that except to call me biased. Well if I am biased, then so is Bukhari and Sahih Muslim where these things can be found. And so is the Quran itself where condoning of rape is also found. You make it sound like I am just making all of this up out of thin air, but I quote the sources accurately and all you can do is to level some general, incorrect charge of bias to avoid specifically addressing what I have quoted. Sorry, but that ain't gunna work. This is yet another reason why I have no more interest in pursuing this with you. You cannot conduct yourself properly in a fair, two sided, objective manner, so you do not deserve someone's time and attention.<quoted text>
starts calling me and my prophet names,
I don't have to prove who they are. YOU are the one who makes the claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Hasn't anybody ever taught you that? Where do you get your twisted sense of logic from that violates basic reasoning? You have it completely backwards. If you make the claim, then the burden of proof is on you. Have you noticed that if I say I think Isaiah 9:6 is about Jesus, I try to explain why I think that and I have never challenged you to tell me who YOU think it applies to? That's because the burden of proof is upon me if I make the claim. Same exact thing if you make a claim about Muhammad being the one prophecised. How come nobody has ever explained this very basic rule to you? This is what I mean about you having no decent education.<quoted text>
starts abusing him and does every type of dramatics, except proving "who" is the object of prophesies which I Quote to him.
No, what is really sad is your complete lack of proper education and the fact that you don't even have any idea of all of the logic errors you are making because you are not educated enough to realize them. What is also sad is all of the time I have wasted with someone like you when I should have known better right from the beginning.<quoted text>
This is the general condition of every one of these "experts"...
Just watch what happens when we reach Deut. 18:18, which he was dieing for when we started this discussion, now he will say, he is already done and does not feel any "inner urge" to respond to my post.
Sad end to one, who started with so much energy, is it not?
I thank you brother for your support and appreciation.