Who Is Allah?

Aug 24, 2007 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Brussels Journal

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Comments
173,161 - 173,180 of 199,694 Comments Last updated 27 min ago
Alex123 WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183865
Jul 30, 2013
 
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>Buddhism is no different then the theory of evolution.
It has no beginning, it relies on already created matter and energy.
In this case, the true Buddhist view is that the impersonal stream of consciousness flows on — impelled by ignorance and craving — from life to life. Though the process is impersonal, the illusion of personality continues as it does in this life.
In terms of Absolute Truth, there is no "immortal soul" that manifests in a succession of bodies, but in terms of the relative truth by which we are normally guided, there is a "being" that is reborn. In order to gain Enlightenment, it is necessary to come to a realization of the situation as it is according to absolute truth; in order to face and begin to understand the problem of death we can, in the first instance, view it in terms of that "relative truth" which normally rules our lives and which has its validity in its own sphere. We need merely, for the present, to remind ourselves that this is but a "provisional" view of things. In this connection, too, we have to observe that we are dealing only with the question of death as it affects the ordinary person, not one who has attained Enlightenment.
In other words our lives live on after death in the body of other people.
Nirvana enlightenment is obtained through the consciousness of other people after death.
A never ending pattern of consciousness.
Complete Hindu bull-shit.
Yes!
hu·man·i·ty
[hyoo-man-i-tee or, often, yoo-] Show IPA
noun, plural hu·man·i·ties.
1.
all human beings collectively; the human race; humankind.
2.
the quality or condition of being human; human nature.
3.
the quality of being humane; kindness; benevolence.
Who si your God, Shamma?
What is his/her name?
Alex123 WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183866
Jul 30, 2013
 
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>LOL AMEN!
Glad you liked it Susan!
El Cid

Charleston, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183867
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

bmz wrote:
@ Buford
How are you, Buford? Hope all is well with you.
BMZ
I am fine, for now, meaning that if JOEL THE STUDIED EUNUCH WHOSE FORMER MASTER IS A SORCERER WHO MEANS TO POSSESS HIS FORMER SLAVE AND RAPE HIS BRAIN AND THEN SOME, and Susan Bling/Blang/Blung the recovering psychotic are right about the impending deaths of billions owing to the malevolent machinations of the Masons and their ilk, then I suppose that I should probably take my vacation to Azerbaijan sooner rather than later, but my impression is that these luminaries, for all of their pontifications, don't REALLY know jack shit about anything, so I'll just continue living my life as usual...
El Cid

Charleston, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183868
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

Alex123 WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Joel stop displaying your ignorance.
If you think that I am a homosexual then your yogic powers are a load of bull...and you convince us that you have no insight...IQ or EQ
JOEL craves attention because he didn't get enough of his mama's teats.
El Cid

Charleston, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183869
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

http://t.now.msn.com/breast-feeding-longer-ca...

Breast-feeding longer boosts baby's IQ later in life, study says

Next time you wonder how your friends or colleagues got so darned smart, consider this: It may have something to do with how long they were breast-fed. A new study from Harvard University shows that children who are breast-fed longer have higher IQs than formula-fed kids, and the longer and more exclusively kids are given breast milk, the better. Researchers are careful to say it's an association, not causation, but each month the child was breast-fed exclusively in the first six months, he or she gained four-fifths of a point in verbal IQ by age 7. "It’s not like you get an early advantage that falls away. Their study showed that the advantage seems to persist,” said Sean Deoni, head of Brown University's Advanced Baby Imaging Lab.
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183870
Jul 30, 2013
 
Alex123 WM wrote:
<quoted text>Glad you liked it Susan!
(smiles)
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183871
Jul 30, 2013
 
El Cid wrote:
<quoted text>I am fine, for now, meaning that if JOEL THE STUDIED EUNUCH WHOSE FORMER MASTER IS A SORCERER WHO MEANS TO POSSESS HIS FORMER SLAVE AND RAPE HIS BRAIN AND THEN SOME, and Susan Bling/Blang/Blung the recovering psychotic are right about the impending deaths of billions owing to the malevolent machinations of the Masons and their ilk, then I suppose that I should probably take my vacation to Azerbaijan sooner rather than later, but my impression is that these luminaries, for all of their pontifications, don't REALLY know jack shit about anything, so I'll just continue living my life as usual...
Isaiah 28:22 "Now therefore be you not mockers, lest your bands be made strong: for I have heard from the Lord God of hosts a consumption, even determined upon the whole earth".
JOEL

India

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183872
Jul 30, 2013
 
Buford, find yourself a boy and roll into bed with him. Ha ha ha.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183873
Jul 30, 2013
 
JOEL wrote:
<quoted text>
Good is part of a dualism and so where there's good there's also bad. I(t's a play of the forces of good and bad with each jostling the other and attempting to dominate the play.
Buddha's innate nature was drawn from the Illumined Mind and so was transcendent - above the dualism of good and bad which are attributes of the physical, vital and mental ranges of consciousnesses.
The Higher Mind, Illumined Mind, Intuition Mind, Overmind, Supermind, Bliss and other superior ranges of consciousness stand above the lower triple planes of mind, vital and matter and are more inclined to the transcendental in an ascending hierarchy than to the dualism of good and bad which are inherent characteristics of the lower planes of mind, vital and matter.
Read the Buddha's grand teachings and read about his sublime actions and you'll learn why he was transcendant and not within the realm of the dualism of good and bad or light and shadow.
So let me try to understand this. Buddha was neither a good or a bad person? And an auxiliary question is who sets the standards for what means goodness or badness?
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183874
Jul 30, 2013
 
El Cid wrote:
http://t.now.msn.com/breast-fe eding-longer-can-increase-iq-o f-child-later-in-life
Breast-feeding longer boosts baby's IQ later in life, study says
Next time you wonder how your friends or colleagues got so darned smart, consider this: It may have something to do with how long they were breast-fed. A new study from Harvard University shows that children who are breast-fed longer have higher IQs than formula-fed kids, and the longer and more exclusively kids are given breast milk, the better. Researchers are careful to say it's an association, not causation, but each month the child was breast-fed exclusively in the first six months, he or she gained four-fifths of a point in verbal IQ by age 7. "It’s not like you get an early advantage that falls away. Their study showed that the advantage seems to persist,” said Sean Deoni, head of Brown University's Advanced Baby Imaging Lab.
rabbee: and if you go into any research, with forgone conclusion. then you will slant your research results to support those preconceptions.

if you look long enough, if you measure a sufficient number of attributes, and if you are highly selective, you can eventually find statistical evidence to prove or disprove any claim.
MUQ

Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183875
Jul 30, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Ramadan Kareem, MUQ
I must also appreciate the manner in which you are conducting your exchanges with our friend Seeker, who has still a long way to go in order to be able to understand Isaiah, who cannot be understood using Greek glasses.
The Greek language is the mother of all confusions and problems in Christianity and it is the sole reason for her inability to grasp the Hebrew Scriptures, which we find it very easy to grasp.
Salaams
BMZ
I Thank you for following it our little chit chat.

He started with big boasts that No One can stand in debate with him and runs away.

I took the challenge and started it slowly and one step at a time.


He is trying to "Jump the queue" and start his vehement condemnation of our prophet, but I will bring that subject, Inshallah at its proper time.

Thanks once again for your comments.

Salaam and Ramadan Kareem.
david

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183876
Jul 30, 2013
 
when you know or understand something that no one knows , you only get smarter and more powerful everyday. your ideas and plans are bigger than the one before. you discover the world,and your mentors or leaders are nothing but mear humans that you can control from the bag of your exclusive knollege. why am I saying this, nothing am just board so I am here for fun so back to my bulcrap ,
to get this wisdom that will make you smart , you need the fallowing
1. need a arabic or heberew or geez or akadian or sumarian aramaic or what ever that is lisan shem dictionary
2. you need a book about music for dumies
3. you need the books of moses the old testaments and or the new testaments .
4. a pen and papers , a calculator
why ? because what I will tell you is a false statement. for fun to f k with your mind. This false statement should be said or shall I say I will say it in a way that should almost make sense or could be true . So here is the false statements why you need the 4 requirements mentioned above to attain this wisdom whitch is false.

in the beginig god created the heavens and the earth ?

why heavens and not " earths " ? are we really alone? lol , is not mars an earth ? is there not other word to discribe that god made this particular singular "earth " and another verb for mars , because common sense says mars and the moon or an astroied are not part of heavens . they are rocks ,solid , is heaven solid ? so mars should be part of earth but the book said " earth" singular , mars the moon etc were forgoten and were counted as a non " earth" rock but a solid visible "heavens ". NOW DO YOU LIKE THIS FALSE STATMENTS AND QUESTIONS ? more ? ok .

BY WHITCH CAME FIRST OF THE DEED OF GOD , HE SKY'ED AND HE EARTH'ED

sky'ed is the heavens for they are not solid . earth'ed is the solid . skying and earthying refers to every thing meaning plural even right now in english let alon in a sematic language created by god. speaking of language of god here is another false statement I just pulled right out of my bulst bagg. There is a code in the bible . surprised ? why would not be one,I mean seriously its a book from god . and why someone writting a book thats going to be the one book would not put a code ? I would . any ways this code are numbers and what u need is the 4 mentioned above . I will not give you any other hint. because I am having fun being the only one to notice when some one dips into there bulsht bagg. what will you discover ? I dont know . you tell me . I would love to see how you will walk up to a muslim a christian or a jew and say " let me explain to you what your messenger is trying to tell you " because you will discover nothing. there is nothing. its just a book. because this is a false statment and I am writting it because I am board .

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183877
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

david wrote:
when you know or understand something that no one knows , you only get smarter and more powerful everyday. your ideas and plans are bigger than the one before. you discover the world,and your mentors or leaders are nothing but mear humans that you can control from the bag of your exclusive knollege. why am I saying this, nothing am just board so I am here for fun so back to my bulcrap ,
to get this wisdom that will make you smart , you need the fallowing
1. need a arabic or heberew or geez or akadian or sumarian aramaic or what ever that is lisan shem dictionary
2. you need a book about music for dumies
3. you need the books of moses the old testaments and or the new testaments .
4. a pen and papers , a calculator
why ? because what I will tell you is a false statement. for fun to f k with your mind. This false statement should be said or shall I say I will say it in a way that should almost make sense or could be true . So here is the false statements why you need the 4 requirements mentioned above to attain this wisdom whitch is false.
in the beginig god created the heavens and the earth ?
why heavens and not " earths " ? are we really alone? lol , is not mars an earth ? is there not other word to discribe that god made this particular singular "earth " and another verb for mars , because common sense says mars and the moon or an astroied are not part of heavens . they are rocks ,solid , is heaven solid ? so mars should be part of earth but the book said " earth" singular , mars the moon etc were forgoten and were counted as a non " earth" rock but a solid visible "heavens ". NOW DO YOU LIKE THIS FALSE STATMENTS AND QUESTIONS ? more ? ok .
BY WHITCH CAME FIRST OF THE DEED OF GOD , HE SKY'ED AND HE EARTH'ED
sky'ed is the heavens for they are not solid . earth'ed is the solid . skying and earthying refers to every thing meaning plural even right now in english let alon in a sematic language created by god. speaking of language of god here is another false statement I just pulled right out of my bulst bagg. There is a code in the bible . surprised ? why would not be one,I mean seriously its a book from god . and why someone writting a book thats going to be the one book would not put a code ? I would . any ways this code are numbers and what u need is the 4 mentioned above . I will not give you any other hint. because I am having fun being the only one to notice when some one dips into there bulsht bagg. what will you discover ? I dont know . you tell me . I would love to see how you will walk up to a muslim a christian or a jew and say " let me explain to you what your messenger is trying to tell you " because you will discover nothing. there is nothing. its just a book. because this is a false statment and I am writting it because I am board .
Dictionaries and lexicons are aids. They are ostensibly written by those who know the subject. Some of us wonder about things beyond that which we can see, feel, and touch. We wonder how it is that the earth is the only known body with green plants and animals and things like these, including humans. Therefore, some of us look to God, or a Higher Power, unseen, for answers. I do not believe the earth and heavenly bodies just happened. I believe Someone caused them to be. Therefore, I also believe this Person or Creator is a superior being and knows more than we do.
david

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183878
Jul 30, 2013
 
CouldThisBeTrue wrote:
<quoted text>
Dictionaries and lexicons are aids. They are ostensibly written by those who know the subject. Some of us wonder about things beyond that which we can see, feel, and touch. We wonder how it is that the earth is the only known body with green plants and animals and things like these, including humans. Therefore, some of us look to God, or a Higher Power, unseen, for answers. I do not believe the earth and heavenly bodies just happened. I believe Someone caused them to be. Therefore, I also believe this Person or Creator is a superior being and knows more than we do.
I belive and love and Will do my best to walk with the one.
El Cid

Charleston, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183879
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

JOEL wrote:
Buford, find yourself a boy and roll into bed with him. Ha ha ha.
JOWL, if you'd simply start playing with your Hostile Vital Penis, you wouldn't be so obsessed with mine.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183880
Jul 30, 2013
 
CouldThisBeTrue wrote:
<quoted text>
Dictionaries and lexicons are aids. They are ostensibly written by those who know the subject. Some of us wonder about things beyond that which we can see, feel, and touch. We wonder how it is that the earth is the only known body with green plants and animals and things like these, including humans.

Therefore, some of us look to God, or a Higher Power, unseen, for answers. I do not believe the earth and heavenly bodies just happened. I believe Someone caused them to be. Therefore, I also believe this Person or Creator is a superior being and knows more than we do.
Well said.

I use the same answer, when responding to atheists. Thanks

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183881
Jul 31, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said.
I use the same answer, when responding to atheists. Thanks
Thank you. The Creator is bigger than we are.:-) God can lead us to the truth and faith, but, as the Bible says, not everyone has faith.
Seeker

Billerica, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183882
Jul 31, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
02. Now you are trying "reverse logic", instead of Jesus being prophesized, now you say "Nothing excludes him from being prophesized"!! So instead of "Qualifying, we work on Not being excluded"?
That is not a reversal of my logic at all. I have consistently said that that if there is something important that outright excludes the person, then there is no need to look further. That is the first thing we look at because if something excludes that person, there is no need to look any further. That logic has been plastered all over my posts repeatedly. If there is something important that outright excludes Jesus from being the person prophecized, then we throw Jesus out and say he cannot be that person prophecized. If there is not, THEN we further explore any similarities that he might have or might not have and we look at things such as the context of the verse and other things. This is proper logic, and if you do not agree, there is no need to continue the discussion.

Sorry if proper logic does not allow you to build your case, but logic is logic. All you want to do is to ignore a very important key factor of the prophecy that Muhammad fails on, and merely pay attention to where he MIGHT succeed. This is flawed logic, and I have wasted a TON of time in this discussion. You should have told me what you wanted to do up front and we both could have saved a lot of time, but you refused to do so, and I knew it would inevitably lead to this and I tried to tell you that time and time again, but you kept ignoring it and now we have both wasted a lot of time and it all could have easily been avoided. So, as I predicted I would be, I am now pissed off for wasting this time, and I shouldn't have kept wasting it because I knew where it was going to lead right from the beginning. So I guess it's my fault as well. There was nothing clever or even sound at all in your methodology and what you were trying to build and I don't know why you thought there was. Take some formal courses in logic and philosophy. They train people how to properly dissect an issue rather than attempt to skew the rules of logic.
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183884
Jul 31, 2013
 
david wrote:
<quoted text>
I belive and love and Will do my best to walk with the one.
rabbee: how many have said that before, when they didn't really? when i can tell by all the leaders in this world, this is not a G-Dly Nation or world. because of the evil and wicked leaders, you all deserve in your own hell.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183885
Jul 31, 2013
 
Rabbeen Al Jihad wrote:
<quoted text>SalaamZ & Salutations O Comedic ONE! LOL! I really appreciate your sense of piousness.its one of your strong suites in light of your keen sensibilities and scholarly nature. The link was absolutely a lesson in laughter.The news person had no clue what to really ask,even though the master scholar literally gave her so many waypoints even a child with an open mind would have responded better!LOL! May ALLAH lead you to a fine bottle of Shiraz! lets say yr-1969!LOL! CheerZ
lol!

Skinner,

At home, we call Fox, the Comedy Central. When I get bored of CNN, BBC and others, I ask my family to switch to Comedy Central and Fox comes on.

Every presenter and every character on that channel is a clown, Rabbeen.

The best that I heard from Fox was this gem of a hypocrisy:

"If you observe any media bias, please alert Fox!" (Something like this)

1950-53 Shiraz would be lovely, because that is the time, when the US and the UK destroyed democracy in Iran.

She sounded more like Shamma!

Salaams
BMZ

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••