Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 256599 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#176155 May 14, 2013
SC wrote:
CORRECTION POST #176028

1) Can you tell me WHO, WHERE and WHEN set all the criterion from which we can establish who is the true prophet of god and who is not?

You know, according to any MUM his or her son is the most beautiful one ever born in this world. No matter which son you show to them, they won't never accept another as more beautiful of their own son. You Muslims are the same, no matter that out there, there are books better off than Quran you still BELIEVE Quran is the best book ever.
Ans.

01. Search your own scripture and find out "all the qualities" of True prophets of God that are mentioned there.

Combine then and make a list, and check and verify as to how many qualities and criterion whom you "believe" to be True prophets fulfill.

This is a time consuming and slow process and needs thorough study of your own scripture.

Some time back I started this discussion with some one on this very thread, but after a couple of exchanges, my correspondent lost interest in the discussion, because he did not study his scripture well.

If you think, you have patience and time for doing it with me, I will be very happy.

But it has to be done is a slow process, one point at a time, not a free for all, moving around the circle type of endless arguments, which are trade marks of these threads,

02. It is not as simple as that , You should have criterion for which book is greatest also.

Fix those criterion and then let us analyze, which is the Greatest book in the world.

Let us be logical and objective and do not deal in hyperbole, should we?

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#176156 May 14, 2013
MUQ wrote:
Did you notice "all that babbling from our friend Shamma".

He / She has touched "every point" except the proofs that God spoke to Moses and Abraham!!

That is the level on which these people play.

And they expect that I would engage in an "pointless and endless debates / discussions with them?
No Chance!!
Better, keep hammering that point. Usually, she shies away from discussing.

Salaams
BMZ

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#176157 May 15, 2013
Power of prophecy and demonstration of paranormal phenomena are the signs of prophethood as well as of demonic possession. Besides, the prophecies invariably fail and the paranormal powers brought into manifestation are too evanescent and feeble to engineer a transformation of the unregenerate earth nature and so the world conditions remain as perverse as before or in many cases they get worse. One look at the sadistic and ignorant teachings of these so-called prophets and a cursory analysis of the mess their teachings have created in those societies where they have a mass following are sufficient to label such prophets as madmen or evil hate-mongers.
the profit

Lowell, MA

#176158 May 15, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>You don't understand prophet (I think that's what you mean)
No, it's a joke. Get it? Get it?
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>
that the snake was a part of Adams anatomy[/QUOTER]

Quote it from the Torah. You can't. You are merely making things up.

[QUOTE who="susanblange"] <quoted text>
and what Adam and Eve did was sodomy.
The word sodomy was used in the Torah, but not in Genesis 2 or 3.
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>
Adam was the first and your typical male and in that sense all men have inherited original sin.
All HUMANS have.
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>
Satan (Adam) would be punished and executed with a sword mainly for the "crucifixion" which was actually something totally different and unique. Isaiah 27:1. Not only was Eve Adams wife, she was also his daughter and the seed of or second Eve (the Messiah) will conquer both Lucifer (Jesus) and Satan (Adam)
None of this is supported in the scriptures at all, you are merely making all of this up. And once again, you completely ignored Jeremiah 31. So you're no even a person that can have a serious, reasonable discussion. Thanks for your time.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#176160 May 15, 2013
SUSAN: "The snake was a part of Adams anatomy."

Snake refers to the peristaltic upsurge of the subtle force coiled in the force center at the base of Adam's spine that got aroused and snaked its way to the emotional force center in the middle of the chest region. This means that Adam was fully involved in vital emotions of the baser kind and that the mind element in him was hardly awakened. Yes, the entire scripture is based on the lower vital consciousness-force that's figuratively depicted in the book as the breath/wind of life or the vital airs.
the profit

Lowell, MA

#176161 May 15, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
SUSAN: "The snake was a part of Adams anatomy."
Snake refers to the peristaltic upsurge of the subtle force coiled in the force center at the base of Adam's spine that got aroused and snaked its way to the emotional force center in the middle of the chest region. This means that Adam was fully involved in vital emotions of the baser kind and that the mind element in him was hardly awakened. Yes, the entire scripture is based on the lower vital consciousness-force that's figuratively depicted in the book as the breath/wind of life or the vital airs.
Verses please? The snake was a symbol of evil, nothing more. I didn't read were they had sex as soon as they ate the fruit or were Adam got horny and decided to convince Eve to eat the fruit. All I read was that they were embarrassed about being naked after eating the fruit. Both you and susan are just making up whatever you feel like.
the profit

Lowell, MA

#176162 May 15, 2013
BTW, I hope people realize that the story of Adam and Eve has Sumerian roots.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#176163 May 15, 2013
Eating the fruit symbolizes perceiving the world through the sensual faculties that as a result awakened in them the baser emotions.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#176164 May 15, 2013
the profit wrote:
<quoted text>
Verses please? The snake was a symbol of evil, nothing more. I didn't read were they had sex as soon as they ate the fruit or were Adam got horny and decided to convince Eve to eat the fruit. All I read was that they were embarrassed about being naked after eating the fruit. Both you and susan are just making up whatever you feel like.
I am with you on this. They did not have sex in the Garden.

It might have gone like this:

Said Eve, "You look funny! Something dangling down there."

Said Adam, "You also look funny with some extra things on top and nothing dangling."

Joel believes in the same but puts in a longer way.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#176165 May 15, 2013
the profit wrote:
BTW, I hope people realize that the story of Adam and Eve has Sumerian roots.
Quite possible. They might have had a prophet, who told them long, long before Abraham. And things changed over centuries.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#176166 May 15, 2013
the profit wrote:
<quoted text>
A mere 20 or so verses from deut show us clearly what was meant by brothers in 18:18
Deuteronomy 17
14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me;
15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.
Deuteronomy 18
15 The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken;
17 And the Lord said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken.
18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
It's impossible to think that God would tell the Jews to appoint Arabs, who were pagan at that time, to be kings over them rather than fellow Israelites. Brothers or fellow bretheren meant fellow Israelites.
20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.
Muhammad clearly DID die and Muslims merely ignore this. One can argue whether Jesus actually died or not, but I don't think it's about him either. But it's CLEARLY not about Muhammad.
Well, that was my point. It's clear from the Deut 18:15-18 that YHVH promised to raise up a prophet among the people Moses freed that will heir the promise land. Muhammad was an arab of Yemeni origin and he didn't come for the people of the promise land.

WTF Muhammad has to do with Deut 18:15-18 is a mystery. But then a Muslim has not choice but to obey to Allah aka Muhammad said about himself, so you have their nonsense. There is no way you cant change their minds.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#176168 May 15, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, that was my point. It's clear from the Deut 18:15-18 that YHVH promised to raise up a prophet among the people Moses freed that will heir the promise land. Muhammad was an arab of Yemeni origin and he didn't come for the people of the promise land.
WTF Muhammad has to do with Deut 18:15-18 is a mystery. But then a Muslim has not choice but to obey to Allah aka Muhammad said about himself, so you have their nonsense. There is no way you cant change their minds.
Instead of getting biased and raising foolish exception, did our prophet "started his mission" saying Bible mentions me as a Prophet?

Who were his first audiences? Pagans of Makkah. What did they know of Bible and its prophesies?

And our prophet had not read Bible, neither OT nor NT, he was not able to read and write, and he had no human teacher or tutor.

The Question as to he being prophesized in Jewish and Christian scriptures rose when he fled to Medina and had dealings with Jews and Christians.

It was there that Quran told that He was prophesized by Moses and Jesus. And when we see the OT and NT, we find him being mentioned there!!

So your argument is basically wrong, our prophet did not claim prophethood because he was aware of these "prophesies" in OT and NT.

That was one side of the argument, now you analyze Deut. 18:18 and tell me which prophet God raised that matches the criterion of that verse.

Hint:

That prophet had not come into the word by the time Time of John the Baptist, as Gospel of John chapter 1 verses 1-27 confirm.

This is a good subject and let us hear your views on it.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#176169 May 15, 2013
the profit wrote:
<quoted text>
Please stop musing about what you are not educated about. Thank you.
LOL

I'm afriad he won't stop it. For some arcane reason he thinks to know Science arts better than anyone else but at the same he's not aware of the crap he writes, and keep himself in high esteem.

Well, let him go on with this writing, at least we can have a good laugh.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#176170 May 15, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.

So if you can "prove" that GOB is copied from Dante, what can I say about it.
You need more than this info to "prove" that GOB copied from Dante.
Since GOB is much older in time than Dante. If any one "copied" from GOB, it would be Dante.
Divine Comedy was composed between 1308-1321

The two manuscripts of GOB were composed 16th century AD.

What is the oldest? Besides I gave you the entire version of the similarity between the two books, there are things in there about hell that no found any confirmation from the Bible. Where did GOB got that? Meantime make your Math.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#176171 May 15, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. Search your own scripture and find out "all the qualities" of True prophets of God that are mentioned there.
Combine then and make a list, and check and verify as to how many qualities and criterion whom you "believe" to be True prophets fulfill.
This is a time consuming and slow process and needs thorough study of your own scripture.
Some time back I started this discussion with some one on this very thread, but after a couple of exchanges, my correspondent lost interest in the discussion, because he did not study his scripture well.
If you think, you have patience and time for doing it with me, I will be very happy.
But it has to be done is a slow process, one point at a time, not a free for all, moving around the circle type of endless arguments, which are trade marks of these threads,
02. It is not as simple as that , You should have criterion for which book is greatest also.
Fix those criterion and then let us analyze, which is the Greatest book in the world.
Let us be logical and objective and do not deal in hyperbole, should we?
I don't have any scripture so I don't know what you are talking about? Just answer to simple questions, who, where, and when was set the criterion to establish whether or not someone is a true prophet of god.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#176172 May 15, 2013
the profit wrote:
BTW, I hope people realize that the story of Adam and Eve has Sumerian roots.
Like the deluge story.

No, people here won't realize that as they are not free thinkers nor do they have made some research about the book they are putting faith in.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#176173 May 15, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Instead of getting biased and raising foolish exception, did our prophet "started his mission" saying Bible mentions me as a Prophet?
Who were his first audiences? Pagans of Makkah. What did they know of Bible and its prophesies?
And our prophet had not read Bible, neither OT nor NT, he was not able to read and write, and he had no human teacher or tutor.
The Question as to he being prophesized in Jewish and Christian scriptures rose when he fled to Medina and had dealings with Jews and Christians.
It was there that Quran told that He was prophesized by Moses and Jesus. And when we see the OT and NT, we find him being mentioned there!!
So your argument is basically wrong, our prophet did not claim prophethood because he was aware of these "prophesies" in OT and NT.
That was one side of the argument, now you analyze Deut. 18:18 and tell me which prophet God raised that matches the criterion of that verse.
Hint:
That prophet had not come into the word by the time Time of John the Baptist, as Gospel of John chapter 1 verses 1-27 confirm.
This is a good subject and let us hear your views on it.
Me and the profit already pointed out it's not Muhammad by analizing the text, and you didn't prove me wrong, you have juust made your interpretation based on Quran claim. What reason do I have to continue to explain simple verses to someone who is obtuse and suffers of delusion?
the profit

Lowell, MA

#176174 May 15, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, that was my point. It's clear from the Deut 18:15-18 that YHVH promised to raise up a prophet among the people Moses freed that will heir the promise land. Muhammad was an arab of Yemeni origin and he didn't come for the people of the promise land.
WTF Muhammad has to do with Deut 18:15-18 is a mystery. But then a Muslim has not choice but to obey to Allah aka Muhammad said about himself, so you have their nonsense. There is no way you cant change their minds.
Muhammad never even said this about himself. All he said was that he was written about or prophecized in their books, but notice he never says where. Never. Because if he did, people could scrutinize his claim. I read the Quran. Whenever Muhammad was asked any challenging questions, he never answered them and instead threatened them with hell and told them that God has sealed their hearts.

In the story of Jesus, he more than answered their questions. He gave very deep answers that they never expected and he exposed them as the hypocrites they were. THAT'S what a wise man does when asked questions, rather than avoiding them and threatening the questioner.
the profit

Lowell, MA

#176175 May 15, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
I'm afriad he won't stop it. For some arcane reason he thinks to know Science arts better than anyone else but at the same he's not aware of the crap he writes, and keep himself in high esteem.
Well, let him go on with this writing, at least we can have a good laugh.
It's easy to spot a phony, especially when he is claiming to know Physics. If he would have said he knows the science of flipping burgers, I would have believed him. He should have tried that story instead if he was a little smarter.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#176176 May 15, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello, Ignorant Fool!
When you don't know Arabic and are not sure, then do not copy and paste.
The word for Persecution is not "Idtihad", idiot, which you copied and pasted from some
answering-Islam Idiot.
Fitnah means persecution or trial. For example Jesus was under Satan's Fitnah.

My Reply:
I am sure of the meaning in the correct context pertaining to Jihad against those that reject Muhammad.

It is stupid on the part of Muslims to commit Jihad against non-Muslims and expect non-Muslims not to know the reason why Muslims are murdering non-Muslims.

It is Muslims them self that boast that all non-Muslims that reject Muhammad are guilty of transgressions against Muhammad's religion of Islam.
Muslims preach that to the face of non-Muslims that they are guilty of transgressions against the religion of Muhammad's Islam, then Muslims teach to us that lying to non-Muslims is permissible to further the cause in protecting the honoring of Muhammad.

Then on top of that Muslims shove their god Allah out in front as a shield as a protection, using Allah as an excuse, that non-Muslims are ordered by Allah in the Quran to punish non-believers of their god Allah, and his messenger Muhammad.

The Quran is full with orders given to Muhammad by their god Allah to kill those that reject Muhammad's Allah god and his messenger Muhammad.

If the consequence of all that carried out by Muslims was not the lost of life, it would be an amusing comedy unfolding right before our very eyes.

But it is an evil reality that non-Muslims are confronted with.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Speaking of religion: Pagans stir a fuss in Beebe (Jun '14) Feb 28 guest 119
News Looking for a Pagan community in Kentucky? (Mar '12) Feb 27 Not a modern Chri... 15
News Man wins OK to wear goat horns in driver's lice... Feb 26 stalk this 19
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Feb 22 Eagle 12 4,947
omens of dead animals (Aug '08) Feb 22 Nicole Orsak 117
ecoven on Facebook. secret group free classes a... (Apr '14) Feb '17 Kcreoke 2
News 'Everyone will be Muslim because of our stupidi... Jan '17 Rabbeen Al Jihad 20
More from around the web