I am trying to inject some sense in Shamma's Christian mind that Jesus is neither God nor the Savior.<quoted text>
But by giving Isaiah 43:11 to Shamma what are you trying to accomplish?
According to Christians the Nazarene is god. So even if you bring a verse where god said to be the only savior doesn't mean anything to a Christian, since they believe the Nazarene is god. So actually you are confirming what Shamma and other Christians think.
So make a little of cerebral effort and prove to them that he, as a savior, was a failure.
He reads one part of his book A, the Old Testament and denies that through the false part B, which is the New Testament.
I am condemning what Shamma and the Christians think as they have been lied to. Christians can claim all rubbish only if they tear the OT away and throw it in the litter bin.
Why did you find my post so difficult to understand. Jesus was no savior and neither is he the so-called Savior.