Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 256358 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#166833 Mar 11, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Squirm all you want muztard.
The FACT is that if the funeral inscription is in Greek then that will be the language that the deceased spoke.
Two thirds of the funeral inscriptions from Judea were in Greek indicating that two thirds of the people there spoke Greek as their native tongue.
And Jesus was from Galilee, where the proportion of Greek speakers was even higher.
Jesus spoke Greek and you know it liar.
Your issues are so deep that it would be a waste of time for me to respond.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#166834 Mar 11, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Off-Topic again!
What has this got to do with what I wrote?
I had written this:
"The true Scripture would have said, "Do not give to Caesar what does not belong to him and do not throw your pearls to Caesar and stand up for your rights!"
I do not believe that Jesus made such a stupid statement.
If he did, then he was being diplomatic!
It is a forgery and was added in to please HM Constantine and appease the Romans."
A man like Jesus, who stood up to Pilate and the San Hedrin, cannot be expected to make that silly statement like a wimp!
What can be said from your post is that you are not a Christian. You need to put on the new man in Christ to properly understand Sacred Scripture. You are going about in the futility of your own thinking.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#166835 Mar 11, 2013
bmz wrote:
Just for knowledge
From the Church:
""Our documentary sources of knowledge about the origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the New Testament Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a great extent, take for granted.
"
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 712) ""
Shows God's Catholic Church - the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - never was a fundie church; Jesus did not hand out bibles. This makes your whole method of argument moot since it relies on a fundie interpretation of Sacred Scripture. Sacred Scripture can only be properly understood through Sacred Tradition.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166836 Mar 11, 2013
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>

Tell us Joe of your pagan belief of what happens after some one dies?
I said let us explore the phenomenon of the afterlife in a logical manner.

Why not let me know your views on the subject?
John

Brisbane, Australia

#166837 Mar 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Your issues are so deep that it would be a waste of time for me to respond.
A cowardly ploy.
You have no response to facts that contradict your bullshit.
In the time of Christ most Jews spoke Greek, including Jesus.
That is why the Gospels are in Greek, because Jesus mostly preached in Greek so that the Jews could understand him.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#166838 Mar 11, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
A cowardly ploy.
You have no response to facts that contradict your bullshit.
In the time of Christ most Jews spoke Greek, including Jesus.
That is why the Gospels are in Greek, because Jesus mostly preached in Greek so that the Jews could understand him.
This is a New Angle that Jesus spoke Greek!!

Then what about those words of Jesus preserved in Aramaic in the Gospels?

Just displaying his "dual language skills"?

How you translate 'Eli, Eli Lama Sabaqtani" in Greek?

The problem is when you speak one lie, to justify it you have to speak more than hundred lies and still the lie will be lie!!

Why malign the name of Jesus and involve him into controversy about which he knew nothing?

Christianity is already weakest of world religions to justify the "innovations of St. Paul"....why you want to weaken its further by "manufacturing truth"?
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#166839 Mar 11, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Shows God's Catholic Church - the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - never was a fundie church; Jesus did not hand out bibles. This makes your whole method of argument moot since it relies on a fundie interpretation of Sacred Scripture. Sacred Scripture can only be properly understood through Sacred Tradition.
Bible as we know today was "most certainly" not existing in the times of Jesus!!

It was not a bound book in his time and the copies were not so easily available as to be given as a "hand out"?

There were scrolls for each book and it was a prized possession, I doubt if many people in the city had "all the scrolls of OT books with them".
John

Brisbane, Australia

#166840 Mar 11, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a New Angle that Jesus spoke Greek!!
Then what about those words of Jesus preserved in Aramaic in the Gospels?
Just displaying his "dual language skills"?
How you translate 'Eli, Eli Lama Sabaqtani" in Greek?
The problem is when you speak one lie, to justify it you have to speak more than hundred lies and still the lie will be lie!!
Why malign the name of Jesus and involve him into controversy about which he knew nothing?
Christianity is already weakest of world religions to justify the "innovations of St. Paul"....why you want to weaken its further by "manufacturing truth"?
What new angle???
Christ lived in a Hellenised world.
This has been known for 2000 years.
The Jews of the time of Christ spoke Greek.
The gospels were written in Greek.
The words "Eli, Eli Lama Sabaqtani" are the only time he is quoted as speaking anything other than Greek, and then it is translated into Greek.
Face it wog, your bullshit about Greek being "non scriptural" is a joke.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#166841 Mar 11, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Bible as we know today was "most certainly" not existing in the times of Jesus!!
It was not a bound book in his time and the copies were not so easily available as to be given as a "hand out"?
There were scrolls for each book and it was a prized possession, I doubt if many people in the city had "all the scrolls of OT books with them".
All of this started with BMZ's comment that Greek was not a scriptural language. Furthermore, Eric pointed out that the NT is not a revealed text.

Nothing of consequence has been introduced by those posters to alter any of the above statements of fact.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166842 Mar 11, 2013
A revealed text preaching mumbo jumbo and evil means nothing. Tanakh, NT, Quran, Ramayana and certain Puranas fall under this category. The language of revelation counts for nothing, content is everything.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166843 Mar 11, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>

Why do you still sin?
Why are you a satanist and a brainless idiot?
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166844 Mar 11, 2013
Mengal wrote:
JOEL wrote:

<quoted text>

JOEL - Why is burial a better method of disposing off a corpse than cremation? Give the details.

MENGAL - The bones remain buried and hidden after the body has rotted. Cremation still leaves bones and fragments scattered unless ashes are collected and stored properly.
ROFL.

You have the intelligence of a kid of 5.
John

Brisbane, Australia

#166845 Mar 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
All of this started with BMZ's comment that Greek was not a scriptural language. Furthermore, Eric pointed out that the NT is not a revealed text.
Nothing of consequence has been introduced by those posters to alter any of the above statements of fact.
The new testament "scriptures" are written in Greek. Therefore Greek is a scriptural language.
Duh.
The new testament is a collection of Christian texts, some historical and some revealed, including the great revelation called Revelations.
Is Revelations a "revealed text" do you think???
Sheesh.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166846 Mar 11, 2013
Mengal wrote:
<quoted text>

JOEL - Do you think evolutionary forces will throw up the new species through man by an act of emergence of the involved ranges of consciousness and energy?

MENGAL - No.
Why not?

How did the species arise? From nothing? How?

So, you naively believe that the universe as it is is the final expression of an extra-cosmic and anthropopathic God who created it from nothing?

Is the first word the last word?

What do you understand by the term - evolutionary forces?
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166847 Mar 11, 2013
Mengal wrote:
<quoted text>

JOEL - Why is a death an inevitability on the plane of matter till now?

MENGAL - Death will always remain there, regardless of any plane.
LOL.

That's an observation and a baseless speculation.

I asked - WHY is death an inevitability till now? I want to know the reasons underlying death.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166848 Mar 11, 2013
Mengal wrote:
<quoted text>

JOEL - Is reincarnation possible given the cyclical nature of everything that we see around us?

MENGAL - No. Recycling is only for materials, not for birds, beasts, fish and humans.
I asked if reincarnation of the released consciousness and energy of an individual is possible after death since everything in nature progresses in cycles in keeping with the causal laws.
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166849 Mar 11, 2013
Mengal wrote:
<quoted text>

JOEL - Is there anything like nothing? If so, define nothing.

MENGAL - There is nothing like nothing.
If there's nothing like nothing, as you say, then, why do you believe in creation from nothing as preached by that dumb fu-ck, who authored the Quran? Is creation from nothing possible? how?
JOEL

Mumbai, India

#166850 Mar 11, 2013
Mengal wrote:
<quoted text>

The answers given by dear BMZ are high standard.
The rest of your answers are as stupid as your previous ones.

BMZ of Singapore is as intelligent as an ass or a retard and you are like him, dear inbred Pakistani.

Warm wishes.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#166852 Mar 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Ripe comment from someone who can not read the native text. What is your basis for your judgement? a TRANSLATION made by an external party, with a theological bias, that you can not proof?
There is no logic in that.
My post explains it self.
Your main emphases is on a language and not on subject matter of its contents.

In translating Hebrew one can understand what it says.
But the underlining issue is why if the Jews understood their own language as the spoken word of God failed to obey God?

Their failure to obey God is evident that the language is less important.
For understanding the Hebrew language, it did not stop the Jews from disobeying God.

What I am saying is that it was the translations of the Apostles of the Hebrew language into other languages that spread the word of God to the people of all languages.

Its the obeying the Word of God in any language that is acceptable to God.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#166853 Mar 11, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Bible as we know today was "most certainly" not existing in the times of Jesus!!
It was not a bound book in his time and the copies were not so easily available as to be given as a "hand out"?
There were scrolls for each book and it was a prized possession, I doubt if many people in the city had "all the scrolls of OT books with them".
So what are you saying. Jesus did not hand out the bible but established the Catholic Church. To argue based solely on bible verses is a flawed approach to understanding Jesus and His mission to reconcile man to God and to open the gates of heaven.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 19 hr John 4,952
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) May 27 John 14,736
omens of dead animals (Aug '08) May 26 Tete Rouge 119
News Harrogate mother says foster families are relig... (Nov '15) Apr '17 Jogirl 52
News Magic 101: Who was Aleister Crowley? (Mar '11) Apr '17 skeptic 176
News Speaking of religion: Pagans stir a fuss in Beebe (Jun '14) Feb '17 guest 119
News Looking for a Pagan community in Kentucky? (Mar '12) Feb '17 Not a modern Chri... 15
More from around the web