Who Is Allah?

Aug 24, 2007 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Brussels Journal

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Comments
154,901 - 154,920 of 200,096 Comments Last updated 8 hrs ago
Eric

Lombard, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164985
Feb 24, 2013
 
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>His commentary was based on his Agnostic view that we cannot know anything about the existence of God and His nature.
Maimonides's family, along with most other Jews, chose exile. Some say, though, that it is probable Maimonides feigned a conversion to Islam before escaping,[10] his forced conversion was ruled legally invalid per Islamic law when brought up by a rival in Egypt.[11] For the next ten years Maimonides moved about in southern Spain, eventually settled in Fes in Morocco, the capital of the Almohads, where he studied at the University of Al-Karaouine. During this time, he composed his acclaimed commentary on the Mishnah in the years 1166–1168.[14]
His works were influenced by his conversion to Islam.
Please answer the question.

You said: "the Jewish Scriptures were re-translated after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ in the 13th century by Moses Maimonides a Jewish Agnostic philosopher."

From what language did he TRANSLATE THE SCRIPTURES and to WHAT LANGUAGE DID HE TRANSLATE THE SCRIPTURES? Emphasis on the word scriptures. Commentary is not scripture.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164986
Feb 24, 2013
 
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: do not blame TheBoth of Us, for your failure. i have not yet failed any of you, no matter how much you have all failed G-D and i. and you had better watch your mouth and fingers, about what you say about G-D and i. do not make your, troubling the waters my falt.
i am not the antichrist, i am not even the one who helped decieve their grandmother of all again. you all helped the same old devil, decieve your grandmother chaooah again. and i don't care how much, you all reject how this story really happens here in TheTorah. you all blew out, your own pilot light a long time ago.
Salaams, Rabbee

We never blame Adam and Eve for anything. To us, they made a mistake of forgetting the instruction and later God forgave them.

That Adam and Eve sinned, comes from the self-loathing sinners of the Christian Church and they made a shameless and revulsive doctrine out of it.

Christianity is the only religion that has sin as the soft sand bed of her foundation.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164987
Feb 24, 2013
 
Eric wrote:
Please answer the question.

You said: "the Jewish Scriptures were re-translated after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ in the 13th century by Moses Maimonides a Jewish Agnostic philosopher."
From what language did he TRANSLATE THE SCRIPTURES and to WHAT LANGUAGE DID HE TRANSLATE THE SCRIPTURES? Emphasis on the word scriptures. Commentary is not scripture.
Shaman is notoriously famous for not answering a question. That includes Paul WV too.

If he has said that the Jewish Scriptures were re-translated after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ in the 13th century by Moses Maimonides a Jewish Agnostic philosopher., then he is definitely an ignorant fool.

He is not able to differentiate between a Mishnah (Study book) or Tafsir (Commentary or explanation) and a Scripture.

He does not even know that Maimonides wrote in Hebrew and Arabic.

So, please do not expect any serious answer.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164988
Feb 24, 2013
 
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
Please answer the question.
You said: "the Jewish Scriptures were re-translated after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ in the 13th century by Moses Maimonides a Jewish Agnostic philosopher."
From what language did he TRANSLATE THE SCRIPTURES and to WHAT LANGUAGE DID HE TRANSLATE THE SCRIPTURES? Emphasis on the word scriptures. Commentary is not scripture.
His cometary and rabbinic law writing was based on the Hebrew Scriptures, but he inserted his Agnostic view in the Hebrew Scriptures as influenced by his conversion to Islam.
Jews say that the Shema (pronounced "Shmah"), "Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord"1 contradicts the Christian doctrine that Jesus is God. In addition the Shema, there are a number of other Old and New Testament verses that proclaim that God is one (see God is One). However, the triunity of God is taught throughout the Old Testament, even in the Shema!
Oneness implies plurality

How can a statement of oneness imply plurality? In the Shema, the word translated "one" from the Hebrew is echad, which demonstrates compound unity of oneness. Specific examples of how echad demonstrates compound unity are found below:

For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one [echad] flesh.(Genesis 2:24)
Now the whole earth used the same [echad] language and the same [echad] words.(Genesis 11:1)
And the LORD said, "Behold, they are one [echad] people, and they all have the same [echad] language. And this is what they began to do, and now nothing which they purpose to do will be impossible for them.(Genesis 11:6)
Then we will give you our daughters and take your daughters for ourselves. We'll settle among you and become one [echad] people with you.(Genesis 34:16)
Then Moses came and recounted to the people all the words of the LORD and all the ordinances; and all the people answered with one [echad] voice, and said, "All the words which the LORD has spoken we will do!" (Exodus 24:3)
Then they came to the valley of Eshcol and from there cut down a branch with a single [echad] cluster of grapes; and they carried it on a pole between two men, with some of the pomegranates and the figs.(Numbers 13:23)
The whole [echad] assembly numbered 42,360,(Ezra 2:64)
They will be my people, and I will be their God. I will give them singleness [echad] of heart and action, so that they will always fear me for their own good and the good of their children after them.(Jeremiah 32:38-39)

Maimonides did away with the compound unity of echad and replaced it the word yachid all through the Jewish scriptures.

So the Jewish word for the plurality echad of God does not exist in the Jewish scriptures any more.

So Jews today holler and scream that Christians mus-inter pet the Jewish scriptures.

Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164989
Feb 24, 2013
 
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus cured on the Sabbath, so if someone was starving and pork was the only thing available He would have said it was okay to eat the pork.
My questions to you were obviously referring to normal day to day use of "pork".

If you are honest with yourself, you are embarrassed by the "true" followers of Jesus who eat pork daily without stopping to think about Jesus' dietary practices. They may even be thanking "jesus" for the pork that Jesus abstained from eating!!!

Let me ask again...

1) POPE and PORK:

DOES POPE EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DOES POPE EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DOES POPE EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DOES POPE EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DOES POPE EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DOES POPE EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DOES POPE DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

2) JESUS and PORK
As a MAN......
DID JESUS EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DID JESUS EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DID JESUS EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DID JESUS EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DID JESUS EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DID JESUS EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

DID JESUS DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO

PS: Good knowledgeable Christian HughBE and Australian poster "christian" said "NO" to each question.

Even Shamma has given an answer "Don't know".

3.You said "if someone was starving and pork was the only thing available He would have said it was okay to eat the pork"

Please give us the Chapters and Verses from you books (NT), NOT the Jewish books. Thank you.
Eric

Lombard, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164990
Feb 24, 2013
 
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>
His cometary and rabbinic law writing was based on the Hebrew Scriptures, but he inserted his Agnostic view in the Hebrew Scriptures as influenced by his conversion to Islam.
This is not what you said. You said that "the Jewish Scriptures were re-translated after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ in the 13th century by Moses Maimonides a Jewish Agnostic philosopher."

Please show where he re-translated scripture. Please tell us what language the scriptures were in prior to Moses Maimonides and what language they were in after Moses Maimonides. The last time I read any Jewish scripture it was in Hebrew.

I will not for the present time be distracted from the above. Even the unethical link from which you quote doesn't attribute anything to Moses Maimonides.

Please answer the question.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164991
Feb 24, 2013
 
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
My questions to you were obviously referring to normal day to day use of "pork".
If you are honest with yourself, you are embarrassed by the "true" followers of Jesus who eat pork daily without stopping to think about Jesus' dietary practices. They may even be thanking "jesus" for the pork that Jesus abstained from eating!!!
Let me ask again...
1) POPE and PORK:
DOES POPE EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
2) JESUS and PORK
As a MAN......
DID JESUS EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
PS: Good knowledgeable Christian HughBE and Australian poster "christian" said "NO" to each question.
Even Shamma has given an answer "Don't know".
3.You said "if someone was starving and pork was the only thing available He would have said it was okay to eat the pork"
Please give us the Chapters and Verses from you books (NT), NOT the Jewish books. Thank you.
Your post reflects the stupidity of Muhammad.
Muhammad use to talk like that when he chopped off the heads of those that rejected him.

Are you about to chop off Paul WV head?
Do you have a special sword you use to chop off heads?

You are in frenzy mode Alex,
You cannot control your stupidity.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164992
Feb 24, 2013
 
Shamma wrote:
" For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one [echad] flesh. "

When Jesus heard of this, he left his mother and was united to God, his wife, and both became one flesh.

How does this Echad sound?

Why were the founding fathers sooooo obsessed with the word Echad, which to the Hebrews, the Jews and even the Muslims, seems so easy to understand.

Why doesn't the Church Mill consider this translation form NLT?

"New Living Translation (©2007)

"Listen, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the LORD alone."

This removes the Echad misinterpretation, you adulterous person (I have used brother James'
language)!

The cardinal truth is that there is only one God.

" Hear, O Israel: The LORD thy God is one LORD". So stick to this one true God but not to the absurd Triune God, which does not exist.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164993
Feb 24, 2013
 
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
My questions to you were obviously referring to normal day to day use of "pork".
If you are honest with yourself, you are embarrassed by the "true" followers of Jesus who eat pork daily without stopping to think about Jesus' dietary practices. They may even be thanking "jesus" for the pork that Jesus abstained from eating!!!
Let me ask again...
1) POPE and PORK:
DOES POPE EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
2) JESUS and PORK
As a MAN......
DID JESUS EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
PS: Good knowledgeable Christian HughBE and Australian poster "christian" said "NO" to each question.
Even Shamma has given an answer "Don't know".
3.You said "if someone was starving and pork was the only thing available He would have said it was okay to eat the pork"
Please give us the Chapters and Verses from you books (NT), NOT the Jewish books. Thank you.
Jesus had no problem with pork eating or any other food. Jesus made all foods clean. Jesus said it was not what went into the mouth that defiles man but what comes out of it; such as, the hate speach from muslim preachers.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164994
Feb 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
My questions to you were obviously referring to normal day to day use of "pork".
If you are honest with yourself, you are embarrassed by the "true" followers of Jesus who eat pork daily without stopping to think about Jesus' dietary practices. They may even be thanking "jesus" for the pork that Jesus abstained from eating!!!
Let me ask again...
1) POPE and PORK:
DOES POPE EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DOES POPE DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK IS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
2) JESUS and PORK
As a MAN......
DID JESUS EAT PORK REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT BACON REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT HAM REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT PORK SAUSAGE REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT ANY MEAT FROM A PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS EAT BLACK PUDDING REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER FOOD WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
DID JESUS DRINK ANY BLOOD OFF PIG REGULARLY OR OCCASIONALLY EVEN IF OTHER DRINK WAS AVAILABLE? YES/NO
PS: Good knowledgeable Christian HughBE and Australian poster "christian" said "NO" to each question.
Even Shamma has given an answer "Don't know".
3.You said "if someone was starving and pork was the only thing available He would have said it was okay to eat the pork"
Please give us the Chapters and Verses from you books (NT), NOT the Jewish books. Thank you.
What will happen to a muslims who eats pork? Will they go to hell?
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164995
Feb 24, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
" For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one [echad] flesh. "
When Jesus heard of this, he left his mother and was united to God, his wife, and both became one flesh.
How does this Echad sound?
Why were the founding fathers sooooo obsessed with the word Echad, which to the Hebrews, the Jews and even the Muslims, seems so easy to understand.
Why doesn't the Church Mill consider this translation form NLT?
"New Living Translation (©2007)
"Listen, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the LORD alone."
This removes the Echad misinterpretation, you adulterous person (I have used brother James'
language)!
The cardinal truth is that there is only one God.
" Hear, O Israel: The LORD thy God is one LORD". So stick to this one true God but not to the absurd Triune God, which does not exist.
There is only one God. The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. allah is a fictional character based on the head of the arab pagan gods.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164996
Feb 24, 2013
 
Shamma wrote:
There are dozens of verses in the OT, which show that there is only one LORD God. Such verses blow up the triune God.

See, Shaman, when the Church fathers were building up lies, they made a mistake of binding the OT with their NewT. Fortunately Satan never inspired them to throw the OT away. OT is like a
self-appointed Accredited Checker that rejects and condemns all Christian beliefs and the NT.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164997
Feb 24, 2013
 
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
There is only one God. The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. allah is a fictional character based on the head of the arab pagan gods.
I was telling readers here that the even the forged OT rejects and condemns the NT.
Eric

Lombard, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164998
Feb 24, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
" Hear, O Israel: The L-RD thy G-d is one L-RD".
This is the unethical practice from the link in question that I referred to. The above is the way the link states the Shma. But it is followed by a footnote. When you go to the footnote it repeats the above, but adds that the prayer comes from Deuteronomy with a link. When you click the link to Deuteronomy, the translation of the Hebrew is different and lends a different meaning to the prayer contrary to the original above. The passage from Deuteronomy substantiates the Jewish (and Muslim) concept.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164999
Feb 24, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
I was telling readers here that the even the forged OT rejects and condemns the NT.
Your problem is that you try to make one God into three gods. Christians believe in only one God; making all your arguments about three gods moot. Where do Christians say there are three gods? Scholars consider the Christian faith a monotheistic religion, so your arguments are based on a false belief in what Christians believe.
Christian

Croydon, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165000
Feb 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
You did not get my message:
Read again!
" The famous saying, "You reap what you sow", is what the West is getting now.
It is all political and it all started with the colonization of the world by the European looters, namely Britain, France, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Holland, etc. Add the names of some, if I forgot to mention.
Your own 'convicts' hunted and killed aborigines and the migrant Europeans wiped out the Red Indians in America. You can't do that anymore.
Britain was the most notorious, followed by France, Spain and Holland. Divide and rule was the motto of all of European looters and they are still at it as a group.
Muslims welcomed the miserable Bs of the past and they took advantage of their hospitality and screwed the hosts.
America's problem is that after the British were exhausted and almost finished, it carried the British' bastard babies but could not handle.
If you do not have a good knowledge of the past 250-300 years, then I suggest you better keep shut!
Do you think Christianity was ever a religion of peace? That was the religion of all the European looters, who wore crosses and fucked the whole world with their wicked behaviour and bigotry.
This is a fact, which you cannot deny!"
Having said that, I repeat that all the troubles in the world came through the filthy West of the past.
Let Muslims kill Muslims. What is that to you? You should be happy. The problem is that you guys have no political acumen and no knowledge. Muslims killing Muslims in Syria and you get dysentery. Why? Let them kill. You should rejoice.
You guys had civilized after massive killings of your own breed. After that killing and revolutions, came reconciliation. Who started the two World Wars? It was your own breed.
What is happening in the Muslim world falls under, "My enemy's friend is my enemy". So, others are going to kill the enemy's friends.
As for Christianity, it was a religion created by pagan Romans. Read the filthiest and the darkest History of Christianity.
We kiss no smelly feet. lol! Just tell your leaders to declare war on Islam and the Muslims and see how badly will you be screwed. They would not dare! Iran alone is making them shiver.
Muslims must be destroyed.

I read your post and I find it insulting to my intelligibly.

There can be no peace between Muslims and Christians, it's impossible.

The Europeans were exploring the world and bringing good things everywhere they went. They educated primitive tribes and gave them machines, medicine and technology. They should be grateful to us.

There can only be one conclusion to this problem. Nothing less than the total destruction of Islam will solve the problem.

Islam and Christianity are completely opposed, it's impossible to reconcile them. So the only outcome must be a war to end the problem once and for all.

Muslims will be completely destroyed, Christians are vastly superior in all departments.

Muslims are inbred morons, they are 2000 years behind modern people. Just look at Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and every other Islamic country. They are still stuck in the stone age.

The time for WW3 is here, the free world must rid the world of Islamic terrorists. We saw Islam's true colours when the Muslims attacked innocent people on 9/11.

You Muslims asked for trouble then you complain when we punish you, the USA never went to your countries to attack innocent people going about their business.

Muslims drew first blood, the West will do whatever it takes to teach you a lesson. The only language Muslims understand is bullets.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165001
Feb 24, 2013
 
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
This is not what you said. You said that "the Jewish Scriptures were re-translated after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ in the 13th century by Moses Maimonides a Jewish Agnostic philosopher."
Please show where he re-translated scripture. Please tell us what language the scriptures were in prior to Moses Maimonides and what language they were in after Moses Maimonides. The last time I read any Jewish scripture it was in Hebrew.
I will not for the present time be distracted from the above. Even the unethical link from which you quote doesn't attribute anything to Moses Maimonides.
Please answer the question.
It evident you know nothing about Maimonides.
In his mid-20s, he began authoring numerous volumes on the Mishnah, which he completed around ten years later. His intent was to assist those who could not understand the Mishnah's Hebrew and often cryptic text, and for that reason, the commentary was written in Arabic but with Hebrew lettering.
He then wrote a volume in Arabic called Sefer Hamitzvot, listing all of the 613 commandments. These volumes were later translated into Hebrew numerous times, once still in his lifetime.
Additional Works
----------
Main Article: Responsa
Maimonides also authored the Guide for the Perplexed, or Moreh Nevuchim, a foundational work on Jewish philosophy; the Letter of Martyrdom, a letter to Yemenite Jews encouraging them in their difficult plight; and other letters (gathered together in Pe'er Hador and today published as a single volume). Maimonides also wrote an Oath for Physicians, and various medical texts are attributed to him.
Code of Jewish Law
----------
Main Article: Codification of Jewish Law
Inner cover of the Rambam’s Mishneh Torah from the 1574 edition printed in Venice, Italy
Maimonides' magnum opus is his codification of Jewish law, which he called Mishneh Torah, or "second to the Torah." The fourteen volume work is a logical systematic codification of Jewish law.
Prior to Maimonides, in order to know Jewish law, one would have to learn the entire Talmud. And since the Talmud itself as at times indecisive, often incorporating conflicting opinions on Jewish law, it was necessary to then study the various commentaries, which clarified the final law. The famed Rabbi Yitzchak Alfasi, known as the Rif (the teacher of the aforementioned Ree Migash) was the first to codify applicable Jewish law—as a commentary to the Talmud.
The difficulty was, however, that the Talmudic rulings – as well as the aforementioned commentaries – were not organized in a strictly encyclopedic, logical fashion, making research extremely taxing. For example, in order to study the laws of Shabbat by exploring the Talmud, one needs to search through tens of tractates.
Maimonides was the first one to index the entire body of Oral Law – both Talmuds, the various halachic Midrashim, later works authored by the Geonim, and even kabbalistic texts – and compile it all in a logical and systematic fashion. The laws of Shabbat, for example, are all gathered in the third volume of Mishneh Torah (which is titled Zmanim, "Times," containing all laws pertaining to Shabbat and holidays) in thirty chapters, each divided into bite-sized sub-sections.
Maimonides codified the laws of Shabbat, holidays, prayer, dietary laws, and the laws that regulate the Jew's daily life. He also wrote a section on eating healthy, fitness, and mental health—teaching future learners that all our actions should be permeated with holiness and G&#8209;dliness. "The health and wellbeing of the body," he writes, "is part of one's service of G&#8209;d."
The Mishneh Torah also incorporates the basics of Jewish thought and belief.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165002
Feb 24, 2013
 
@ Eric Continued:

Another unique component of the volumes is that they are not limited to laws that pertain to our day and age, which constitute only a small part of the 613 biblical commandments, but also include laws that will pertain to the Messianic era, such as the laws of tithing, the Jubilee Year, and the Temple service.

In this area, Maimonides was more than a trailblazer; to this very day the Mishneh Torah remains the only work of this scope. No other work – authored beforehand or afterwards – covers the entire corpus of Jewish law.(Even the commentaries on Jewish law authored before Maimonides omit the laws that were not germane at the time.)

Maimonides also placed great emphasis on making his works available and understandable to all Jews, scholars and laymen alike. He also omitted sources, for brevity's sake, though later scholars compiled sources for every statement in the Mishneh Torah. Because of his unique style and clarity, he became known as "The Golden Tongue."

Since Maimonides, many subsequent scholars have analyzed every word and even letter in his volumes. They discuss at length why Maimonides chose to include certain laws, wrote one law before another, and why he chose to include laws in one volume but not the other. Some have speculated that the body of commentary on Maimonides' volumes could reach the same quantity as Talmudic commentary.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165003
Feb 24, 2013
 
Shamma wrote:
<quoted text>His commentary was based on his Agnostic view that we cannot know anything about the existence of God and His nature.
Maimonides's family, along with most other Jews, chose exile. Some say, though, that it is probable Maimonides feigned a conversion to Islam before escaping,[10] his forced conversion was ruled legally invalid per Islamic law when brought up by a rival in Egypt.[11] For the next ten years Maimonides moved about in southern Spain, eventually settled in Fes in Morocco, the capital of the Almohads, where he studied at the University of Al-Karaouine. During this time, he composed his acclaimed commentary on the Mishnah in the years 1166–1168.[14]
His works were influenced by his conversion to Islam.
LOL..Rambam the Muslim!!

The dilemma concerning Islam was addressed pragmati
cally and effectively by Maimonides (known commonly as the Rambam) in the 12th century. Maimonides,one of the key commentators and jurists throughout Jewish history, ruled firmly that the Islamic Faith should not be considered idolatry : "
The Ishmaelites [Muslims] are not idol worshippers at all, and it [idolatry] has ceased to exist in their mouths and hearts and they
attribute the proper Oneness to God with no blemish. And if someone will say that the house they worship in is an idolatrous shrine ... as their ancestors worshiped idols there—that does
not matter. Those who bow towards it today, their hearts are dedicated to heaven [towards the One God]... and the Ishmaelites today, all of them, women and children, have ceased to
believe in idolatry and their mistake is ... in other things ... however in attributing Oneness to God—they have no mistake at all
."
The significance of Maimonides’ ruling was immense. The vast majority of the later rabbis and commentators across future generations followed his guidelines concerning Islam and considered them as binding.
Thus, Islam was not to be considered a pagan system. To these rabbis, naturally, Islam was not to be considered equivalent to Judaism. However, Islam was acknowledged as very similar to Judaism in the emphasis of the Oneness of God. This monotheistic, all-encompassing principle became the distinguishing value of Islam compared to other, non-monotheistic idolatrous religions.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165004
Feb 24, 2013
 
Christian wrote:
<quoted text> Muslims must be destroyed.
I read your post and I find it insulting to my intelligibly.
There can be no peace between Muslims and Christians, it's impossible.
The Europeans were exploring the world and bringing good things everywhere they went. They educated primitive tribes and gave them machines, medicine and technology. They should be grateful to us.
There can only be one conclusion to this problem. Nothing less than the total destruction of Islam will solve the problem.
Islam and Christianity are completely opposed, it's impossible to reconcile them. So the only outcome must be a war to end the problem once and for all.
Muslims will be completely destroyed, Christians are vastly superior in all departments.
Muslims are inbred morons, they are 2000 years behind modern people. Just look at Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and every other Islamic country. They are still stuck in the stone age.
The time for WW3 is here, the free world must rid the world of Islamic terrorists. We saw Islam's true colours when the Muslims attacked innocent people on 9/11.
You Muslims asked for trouble then you complain when we punish you, the USA never went to your countries to attack innocent people going about their business.
Muslims drew first blood, the West will do whatever it takes to teach you a lesson. The only language Muslims understand is bullets.
Persecuting and Killing Jews over 1800 years as Christ killers for denying your mangod is not enough. You nearly wiped them off the face of planet earth and now you want to do the same to Muslims!!
Same MURDERING followers of MURDERER PAUL!!
ONLY THE INTENDED VICTIMS ARE DIFFERENT!
CALL THEM TERRORISTS...RAPE THEIR LANDS TAKE THEIR WEALTH BOMB MILLIONS OF THEIR WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN 20TH AND 21ST CENTURY!!
Jesus loves you for this!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••