Who Is Allah?

Aug 24, 2007 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Brussels Journal

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Comments
150,601 - 150,620 of 199,656 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160128
Jan 26, 2013
 
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought that on Sabbath you shouldn't use internet, as Frijoles and Eric do. Are you breaking the law, rabbee?
rabbee: it is not illegal to talk about G-D, on Shabbos. what one does for G-D, does not fit the definition of 'your' work. or do you think all Rabbeem, are sinning by moving their lips on Shabbos? or use ascii sign language, to speak to the deaf and dumb.

and in fact if you were to check, real scripture from G-D. i am doing exactly what, all are supposed to be doing. as long as i tell the truth from G-D, and do not lie, it is not my work.

and now Shabbos is over, for the whole world. for it is like, 9 PM in Ysrael. and i am still doing as G-D, commanded of me.
John Preacher

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160129
Jan 26, 2013
 
MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

www.islam-watch.org/authors/107-khalaf/1032-i...

Mohammad was a phedophile his youngest wife was 6. This man was evil, its no wonder his nurse said that he was possessed from birth. You have been deceived. No other prophet was accused of being demon posessed.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160130
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to read junk and stuff. Show me some letters from Jesus.
Galatians is just Paul's personal letter to some ignorant fools. It is not Scripture. Please educate yourself.
Did Mohammad write anything?

No. Right?

Then what makes what his scribes wrote "Scripture?"

It's the "fact" that HE (SAW, PBUH, Hot Diggety Damn Dog) said it. Right?

Gee, did Jesus say things that others recorded?

Yes, or No?

If Yes, then why don't you accept these records as "Scripture?"

If No, then what was your own "prophet" referring to when he mentioned the Injeel, which he clearly accepted as "Scripture?"

Are you stupid, or what?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160131
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Buford wrote:
<quoted text>You just don't get it. Why should the Jews honor the word of a madman who would just as soon turn against them whenever he saw a better advantage that could be had by unilaterally revoking his oaths, which is PRECISELY what your "prophet" did, by "ALLAH'S PERMISSION, no less!
Qur'an 66:2 Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths. And Allah is your protector, and He is the Knowing, the Wise.
You believe that that "prophet" of yours had every right to behave as horribly as he did with regard to his enemies because he was only doing "Allah's" will, but I think that he was a complete tool of hell and the "perfect" man for the job of sowing as much hatred as possible between Muslims and EVERYONE ELSE ON EARTH TO THIS VERY DAY.
What has our discussion got to do with dissolution of oaths?

Another silly off-topic reply, just like the off-topic replies in the gospels. Ever noted those?

The reason was that the leaders of Banu Qrayzah were treacherous. How many times do I have to tell you that Kinana and others got what they deserved?

The perfect hate, in the history of mankind, was the hate generated against the Jews by the gospels and the men, who penned the gospels. Others took the cue from the NT texts and started the butchery of Jews.

If your biblical Jesus had spoken a better language, the slaughter of Banu Israel, I mean the Jews, would not have happened.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160132
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

3

bmz wrote:
How many times do I have to tell you that Kinana and others got what they deserved?
Kinana was tortured with fire and then beheaded by that "prophet" of yours, who then made his widow his wife, two days later.

You deserve each other.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160133
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Did Mohammad write anything?

No. Right?

Then what makes what his scribes wrote "Scripture?"

It's the "fact" that HE (SAW, PBUH, Hot Diggety Damn Dog) said it. Right?

Gee, did Jesus say things that others recorded?

Yes, or No?

If Yes, then why don't you accept these records as "Scripture?"

If No, then what was your own "prophet" referring to when he mentioned the Injeel, which he clearly accepted as "Scripture?"

Are you stupid, or what?
You need to get Tu Quoque out of your mind, Buford. That will never help you.

Was this fellow Paul like Joshua or Isaiah or Jeremiah or Ezekiel and many others?

The man was neither a prophet nor ever had met Jesus. He did not even sit in the company of Jesus for a second.

So, in terms of Scripture, Paul was a nobody!

Was Luke a disciple of Jesus? Did he sit for ten seconds in the company of Jesus or his disciples?

Obviously, the answer is a NO!

And what is Paul's contribution? A dozen or so letters that he wrote to a few people? What right do you have to call those letters, scripture?

Same goes for the gospels! Was Mark a disciple of Jesus? No! Right? The man just collected tales and wrote his hadith book. He was the Ibne Ishaq of his time. Was that book endorsed by Jesus? Was it left by Jesus?

I have already told you that Injeel means the wisdom and knowledge granted by God to one of the most obedient slaves of God, namely Jesus.

The New Testament cannot be called a scripture. Period. Now, you know why I cannot call the NT a scripture.

Muhammad recited Qur'aan. What did Jesus recite or what did he exacly reveal? Nothing!

Jesus was just a teacher and he came to reform Judaism. That is why some of the Jews considered him a Rabbi.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160134
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Kinana was tortured with fire and then beheaded by that "prophet" of yours, who then made his widow his wife, two days later.
You deserve each other.
The story is absurd! Kinana was also a murderer. You know he had murdered a man. Right? Check your own sources.

He was killed for two reasons. One was his treachery, when he collaborated with Meccan pagans and wanted to kill the prophet and destroy Islam and the other was that he was a murderer.

The brother of the deceased killed him. The Prophet did not.

Why are you trying to defend a treacherous murderer? I sincerely hope that you are not from Kinana's lineage. lol!
endtime

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160135
Jan 26, 2013
 
.

A N T I C H R I S T ------

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160136
Jan 26, 2013
 
John Preacher wrote:
MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS
www.islam-watch.org/authors/107-khalaf/1032-i...
Mohammad was a phedophile his youngest wife was 6. This man was evil, its no wonder his nurse said that he was possessed from birth. You have been deceived. No other prophet was accused of being demon posessed.
There is a document that shows that Jesus was a pedophile and had pedophilia for young boys.

Why would such an accusation come, if he weren't? Surely, there must be soem truth in it. Right?

The Church has given you a white-washed and well-bleached Jesus.

The gospels suggest that he had pedophilia for boys and girls. They also suggest that he was a man of women and was maintained by women. The gospels suggest that he was arrested for being a gay.

Do you remember that at the time of his arrest, a young man ran away naked? So, what was going on in the garden?

By the way, Jesus was accused to be demon-possessed, a lunatic and a mad man. May be a nut too.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160137
Jan 26, 2013
 
endtime wrote:
.
A N T I C H R I S T ------
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
.
I believe the biblical Jesus was his own anti! He succeeded in that mission by behaving as a lemming!

But when I look at the facts, I also have to believe that the Culprit Church is the real Anti-Christ.

In fact, the writers, the disciples, Paul and the evolutionary Church, were all Anti-Christ.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160138
Jan 26, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to get Tu Quoque out of your mind, Buford. That will never help you.
Was this fellow Paul like Joshua or Isaiah or Jeremiah or Ezekiel and many others?
The man was neither a prophet nor ever had met Jesus. He did not even sit in the company of Jesus for a second.
So, in terms of Scripture, Paul was a nobody!
Was Luke a disciple of Jesus? Did he sit for ten seconds in the company of Jesus or his disciples?
Obviously, the answer is a NO!
And what is Paul's contribution? A dozen or so letters that he wrote to a few people? What right do you have to call those letters, scripture?
Same goes for the gospels! Was Mark a disciple of Jesus? No! Right? The man just collected tales and wrote his hadith book. He was the Ibne Ishaq of his time. Was that book endorsed by Jesus? Was it left by Jesus?
I have already told you that Injeel means the wisdom and knowledge granted by God to one of the most obedient slaves of God, namely Jesus.
The New Testament cannot be called a scripture. Period. Now, you know why I cannot call the NT a scripture.
Muhammad recited Qur'aan. What did Jesus recite or what did he exacly reveal? Nothing!
Jesus was just a teacher and he came to reform Judaism. That is why some of the Jews considered him a Rabbi.
Baloney
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160139
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
The story is absurd! Kinana was also a murderer. You know he had murdered a man. Right? Check your own sources.
He was killed for two reasons. One was his treachery, when he collaborated with Meccan pagans and wanted to kill the prophet and destroy Islam and the other was that he was a murderer.
The brother of the deceased killed him. The Prophet did not.
Why are you trying to defend a treacherous murderer? I sincerely hope that you are not from Kinana's lineage. lol!
Your "prophet" permitted that Kinana would be tortured with fire so that he would reveal where his tribe's treasure was hidden, and then he had him beheaded as payment for his involvement in the death of one of your "prophet's" soldiers.

Tell me, do Singaporean Muslim soldiers torture captives with fire to extract information about buried treasure, because that's what your "prophet" sanctioned?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160140
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a document that shows that Jesus was a pedophile and had pedophilia for young boys.
Why would such an accusation come, if he weren't? Surely, there must be soem truth in it. Right?
The Church has given you a white-washed and well-bleached Jesus.
The gospels suggest that he had pedophilia for boys and girls. They also suggest that he was a man of women and was maintained by women. The gospels suggest that he was arrested for being a gay.
Do you remember that at the time of his arrest, a young man ran away naked? So, what was going on in the garden?
By the way, Jesus was accused to be demon-possessed, a lunatic and a mad man. May be a nut too.
The Master of Stupid Commentary adds Lying to his resume.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160141
Jan 26, 2013
 
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
I may agree with you they are a bunch of tales that some folks invented. Where I disagree with you is on the explication.

If for example the story of Jesus walking on water is a cooked story because one is supposed to swim or float, then the story of him giving life to bird is false because only god is supposed to give life. Or Jesus spoke after few hours he was born, is another cooked story because no one is supposed to speak at the age.

What sense does it make to reject tales of a book and believe to tales of another book, when at the end of the day they are but tales?

Stop being hypocrite, your delusion is not any better. Your post posts amuse me.
Stop being silly and a clueless fool, Stefano!

You agree with me. That is enough.

My main point was that Jesus did not walk on water and neither did he rebuke the winds or storm. That is Horse shit! Stupid men made those tales.

Read the Bible, clueless fool!

Do you even know that God made a donkey speak? If God could make a donkey speak, why can't God make a baby, who was not a donkey, speak? And that was no ordinary baby. Right?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160142
Jan 26, 2013
 
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>The Master of Stupid Commentary adds Lying to his resume.
If Jesus were really innocent, why would somebody write that document?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160143
Jan 26, 2013
 
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Baloney
Is that all that you could spell and say?

Read again!

You need to get Tu Quoque out of your mind, Buford. That will never help you.

Was this fellow Paul like Joshua or Isaiah or Jeremiah or Ezekiel and many others?

The man was neither a prophet nor ever had met Jesus. He did not even sit in the company of Jesus for a second.

So, in terms of Scripture, Paul was a nobody!

Was Luke a disciple of Jesus? Did he sit for ten seconds in the company of Jesus or his disciples?
Obviously, the answer is a NO!

And what is Paul's contribution? A dozen or so letters that he wrote to a few people? What right do you have to call those letters, scripture?

Same goes for the gospels! Was Mark a disciple of Jesus? No! Right? The man just collected tales and wrote his hadith book. He was the Ibne Ishaq of his time. Was that book endorsed by Jesus? Was it left by Jesus?

I have already told you that Injeel means the wisdom and knowledge granted by God to one of the most obedient slaves of God, namely Jesus.

The New Testament cannot be called a scripture. Period. Now, you know why I cannot call the NT a scripture.

Muhammad recited Qur'aan. What did Jesus recite or what did he exacly reveal? Nothing!
Jesus was just a teacher and he came to reform Judaism. That is why some of the Jews considered him a Rabbi.

Question: Did Jesus ever talk to his disciples about Paul?
John Preacher

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160144
Jan 26, 2013
 
Please try and explain away that Mohamnad had sex with a dead woman to get her to heaven.
Muhammad had sex with a dead woman to qualify her for the perks of a prophetic wife. According to Hadiths and Sayings of Prophet on issues of women in "Al-Jami Al-Saghir" written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti. Narrated by Ibn Abbas: "I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt
that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and SLEPT with her in her coffin." The prophet was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali, his son-in-law. Commentators have offered differing views about the significance of Muhammad's sleeping with the dead-body of Fatimah in her coffin, some emphasizing that it had no sexual side. But Arabic scholar Demetrius explains that to express Muhammad sleeping inside Fatima's coffin with her dead-body, "The Arabic word used here is "Id'tajat", which literally means "lay down to have sex." Muhammad is also understood to have said that because he slept with her, she has become like a wife to his; so she will be considered like "mother of the believers". After Muhammad slept with her and "consummated", Medina women routinely offered themselves to Mohammad for sex so that the holy fluid of the prophet released into them will qualify them for paradise. Here is a hadith. MUSLIM ARE ALLOWED "ANAL" SEX EVEN WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS Sahih Muslim, Book of Menstruation, Hadith 525: "Our companions have said if a penile head has penetrated a woman's anus or penile anus, or an animal's vagina or its anus, then it is necessary to wash…" Watch this video for more detailed discussion on this topic. NOW IT MAY AN EGYPTIAN LAW TOO Egyptian husbands may be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives – for up to six hours after their death (sex performed after six hours will be considered adultery and the husband will be beheaded and buried with the wife) This law is part of measures being introduced by the Islamist- dominated parliament under ‘religious interpretations’. The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death (Al Arabiya News).

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160145
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>

He was killed for two reasons. One was his treachery, when he collaborated with Meccan pagans and wanted to kill the prophet and destroy Islam and the other was that he was a murderer.
Why do you say Kinanna deserved what he got if you don't know his story at all?

"Kinana al-Rabi, who had the custody of the treasure of Banu Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (Tabari says "was brought"), to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" He said "Yes". The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr Al-Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what he has." So he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud."

Kill him in this evil way because he didn't want to tell to your mad dog of your prophet where the treasure is cruel and definitely he (Muhammad) was not a messenger of any god.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160146
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

bmz wrote:
If Jesus were really innocent, why would somebody write that document?
To smear him. The question is why you would believe it.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#160147
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

4

2

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that all that you could spell and say?
Read again!
You need to get Tu Quoque out of your mind, Buford. That will never help you.
Was this fellow Paul like Joshua or Isaiah or Jeremiah or Ezekiel and many others?
The man was neither a prophet nor ever had met Jesus. He did not even sit in the company of Jesus for a second.
So, in terms of Scripture, Paul was a nobody!
Was Luke a disciple of Jesus? Did he sit for ten seconds in the company of Jesus or his disciples?
Obviously, the answer is a NO!
And what is Paul's contribution? A dozen or so letters that he wrote to a few people? What right do you have to call those letters, scripture?
Same goes for the gospels! Was Mark a disciple of Jesus? No! Right? The man just collected tales and wrote his hadith book. He was the Ibne Ishaq of his time. Was that book endorsed by Jesus? Was it left by Jesus?
I have already told you that Injeel means the wisdom and knowledge granted by God to one of the most obedient slaves of God, namely Jesus.
The New Testament cannot be called a scripture. Period. Now, you know why I cannot call the NT a scripture.
Muhammad recited Qur'aan. What did Jesus recite or what did he exacly reveal? Nothing!
Jesus was just a teacher and he came to reform Judaism. That is why some of the Jews considered him a Rabbi.
Question: Did Jesus ever talk to his disciples about Paul?
What I know about you is that you are a stupid liar. Period.

No one can deny this fact.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••