Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 254772 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160227 Jan 27, 2013
[16]"Toward the Light" in Five Tracts of Hasan al-Banna, trans. by Charles Wendell (Berkeley, 1978), ISBN 0-520-09584-7 pp.126f

[17]Cited in Lt. Col.(res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi,“The Muslim Brotherhood: A Moderate Islamic Alternative to al-Qaeda or a Partner in Global Jihad?” Jerusalem Viewpoints, Nov. 1, 2007, at http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.a...

[18]Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide Muhammad Badi, "How Islam Confronts the Oppression and Tyranny,” Sermon, Sept. 2010, translated at MEMRI at http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/46...

[19]“Muslim Brotherhood:‘We are against Zionism,’” The Jerusalem Post, Feb. 4, 2011, at http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx...

[20]Cited in Lt. Col.(res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi,“The Muslim Brotherhood: A Moderate Islamic Alternative to al-Qaeda or a Partner in Global Jihad?” Jerusalem Viewpoints, Nov. 1, 2007, at http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.a...

[21]Mathais Kunztel,“Jew-Hatred and Jihad: The Nazi Roots of the 9/11 Attack,” The Weekly Standard, Sept. 17, 2007, archived at http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/J...

[22]Cited in Lt. Col.(res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi,“The Muslim Brotherhood: A Moderate Islamic Alternative to al-Qaeda or a Partner in Global Jihad?” Jerusalem Viewpoints, Nov. 1, 2007, at http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.a... ?

Filed under Education, StandWithUs, Islamic Jihad on Friday, February 04, 2011 by Author: Admin.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#160228 Jan 27, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Classic!
Ignorant Fool!
The point was that Matthew churned out big lies. There was no massacre of little boys carried out.
If there were any massacre, it would have been reported and recorded in the Jewish History and also in the Roman History.
So, you should not give a rat's arse about Matthew's junk and stuff.
BMZ---The point was that Matthew churned out big lies. There was no massacre of little boys carried out.

If there were any massacre, it WOULD have been reported and RECORDED in the JEWISH History and also in the Roman History.

HughBe--- Greetings BMZ, I am going to make a few observations.

1. The Matthew that you speak of was a JEW.
2. This same JEW, Matthew, reported and recorded his JEWISH History.
3. Matthew the Jew was not writing his Jewish history for non-Jews but for the benefit of his fellow Jews.
4. Let me give a VERY GOOD reason why the massacre was not recorded by OTHER Jewish sources beside Matthew's account. It is to DISCREDIT Christianity and to support the programme of DECEPTION of the Jewish people by the rabbis.
Also, do NOT underestimate the CORRECTION of scriptures and other history by the rabbis and their disciples.
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160229 Jan 27, 2013
Hamas Charter

http://www.thejerusalemfund.org/www.thejerusa...

Article Thirty-Two (in part): The Attempts to Isolate the Palestinian People

World Zionism and Imperialist forces have been attempting, with smart moves and considered planning, to push the Arab countries, one after another, out of the circle of conflict with Zionism, in order, ultimately, to isolate the Palestinian People. Egypt has already been cast out of the conflict, to a very great extent through the treacherous Camp David Accords, and she has been trying to drag other countries into similar agreements in order to push them out of the circle of conflict. Hamas is calling upon the Arab and Islamic peoples to act seriously and tirelessly in order to frustrate that dreadful scheme and to make the masses aware of the danger of coping out of the circle of struggle with Zionism. Today it is Palestine and tomorrow it may be another country or other countries. For Zionist scheming has no end, and after Palestine they will covet expansion from the Nile to the Euphrates. Only when they have completed digesting the area on which they will have laid their hand, they will look forward to more expansion, etc. Their scheme has been laid out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and their present [conduct] is the best proof of what is said there.
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160230 Jan 27, 2013
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of...

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion or The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion is an antisemitic hoax purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination. It was first published in Russia in 1903, translated into multiple languages, and disseminated internationally in the early part of the 20th century. Henry Ford funded printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the US in the 1920s.

Adolf Hitler and the Nazis publicized the text as if it were a valid document, although it had already been exposed as fraudulent. After the Nazi Party came to power in 1933, it ordered the text to be studied in German classrooms. The historian Norman Cohn suggested that Hitler used the Protocols as his primary justification for initiating the Holocaust —his "warrant for genocide".

The Protocols purports to document the minutes of a late 19th-century meeting of Jewish leaders discussing their goal of global Jewish hegemony by subverting the morals of Gentiles, and by controlling the press and the world's economies. It is still widely available today and even now sometimes presented as a genuine document, whether on the Internet or in print in numerous languages.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160231 Jan 27, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
But they did not have high resolution night vision, which Jesus had. Please read this story from Mark 6 and look out for Stefano's 'Grande' comment:
"45 Immediately Jesus made his disciples get into the boat and go on ahead of him to Bethsaida, while he dismissed the crowd. 46 After leaving them, he went up on a mountainside to pray.
47 Later that night, the boat was in the middle of the lake, and he was alone on land.
48 He saw the disciples straining at the oars, because the wind was against them. Shortly before dawn he went out to them, walking on the lake......."
Having studied the three accounts, I conclude that the boat had not gone far out at all.
If it had been stuck up at about 4 miles, Jesus would not have been able to see men straining at oars in the dark, even if it were a full moon night. And how could have those men seen Jesus walking in the dark stormy night?
I think the boat was stuck up all night, a few metres away from the shore and Jesus waded in to help and the fools thought he was walking on water.
The story is absurd!
Why did you call me out for this?

Didn't I make it already clear that I REJECT any miracolus story related to the Nazarene from any so called holy book, Bible and Quran included?

Has the only neuron you have decided last night to make his "harakiri"?

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160232 Jan 27, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe in Muhammad's testimony for a very good reason and that is:
Your God is only one God! There is no other besides God.
So the good reason why you believe in Muhammad, leaving aside all the absurdity recorded in Quran, that them alone are enough to disbelieve him, is because he introduced to pagans the monotheistic idea of god? LOL

Do you have the capacity of thinking of a child? Have you ever thought to use the brain to reason?

Has ever passed in your mind that is not the number of gods the main factor to believe or reject a god or religion but the evidences that a prophet, messenger, spokesman ect brought to the folks?

As far as we know Muhammad had brought no evidences at all to support the claim of the existence of his god.

I do wonder why you tell to others to think hard when from your post that attitude totally miss?

What a hilarious ignorant fool you are, really.
John

Australia

#160235 Jan 27, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Those filthy orders in the Bible, were given by Yahweh and are the description of what was required by Yahweh. Of course Yahweh did not screw 32 women. They were offered to the priests.
No, the orders were given by Moses, the same Moses punished by God in the desert for his crimes.
This kind of behaviour is a criminal aeration to Christians and Jews, it is a way of life for the sick muztards.
John

Australia

#160236 Jan 27, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
For absurd stories, you must read the not-so-holy Bible.
About the absurd story of Jesus walking on water, my point could be read again here:
"45 Immediately Jesus made his disciples get into the boat and go on ahead of him to Bethsaida, while he dismissed the crowd. 46 After leaving them, he went up on a mountainside to pray.
47 Later that night, the boat was in the middle of the lake, and he was alone on land.
48 He saw the disciples straining at the oars, because the wind was against them. Shortly before dawn he went out to them, walking on the lake......."
Having studied the three accounts, I conclude that the boat had not gone far out at all.
If it had been stuck up at about 4 miles, Jesus would not have been able to see men straining at oars in the dark, even if it were a full moon night.
And how could have those men seen Jesus walking in the dark stormy night?
I think the boat was stuck up all night, a few metres away from the shore and Jesus waded in to help and the fools thought he was walking on water."
Nothing can walk on water. Either you swim or float or dive. If Jesus had tried that, he would have drowned.
Jesus is more than a man and has supernatural powers you moron.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160237 Jan 27, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Those filthy orders in the Bible, were given by Yahweh and are the description of what was required by Yahweh. Of course Yahweh did not screw 32 women. They were offered to the priests.
There is no Yahweh in the Bible, ignorant fool.
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160238 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
So the good reason why you believe in Muhammad, leaving aside all the absurdity recorded in Quran, that them alone are enough to disbelieve him, is because he introduced to pagans the monotheistic idea of god? LOL
Do you have the capacity of thinking of a child? Have you ever thought to use the brain to reason?
Has ever passed in your mind that is not the number of gods the main factor to believe or reject a god or religion but the evidences that a prophet, messenger, spokesman ect brought to the folks?
As far as we know Muhammad had brought no evidences at all to support the claim of the existence of his god.
I do wonder why you tell to others to think hard when from your post that attitude totally miss?
What a hilarious ignorant fool you are, really.
Earlier I got bmz to admit that his assertion that God actually spoke to Mohammad was something that Mohammad never said happened.

(I then called him a liar, not that he even realizes it.)

Howeever, Mohammad DID speak about this "Jibreel" creature who supposedly gave him "revelations" from "Allah" about things that supposedly occurred many centuries before Mohammad ever went into the prophet/warlord business.

The thing is, this "Jibreel" creature didn't introduce itself by name. Rather, it was Mohammad's wife's quasi-Christian cousin Waraqa who suggested that it was "Jibreel," a.k.a., "Gabriel," who was recorded in the Hebrew and Christian SCRIPTURES as being an angellic messenger sent by God, so OF COURSE, it only made sense that the creature that appeared to Mohammad in some fashion and scared him so badly that he went running home to mommy Khadija like a scared rabbit could only have been the same messenger "Jibreel/Gabriel" that appeared to Mary and others because, after all, Mohammad could not possibly have had a psychotic meltdown after spending so many days alone in that dark, dark cave...right?

Tabari VI:70 "He went to Khadija and said,'I think that I have gone mad.'"
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160244 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO,

Can you see this post and my earlier ones today about the Muslim Brotherhood?

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160246 Jan 27, 2013
Buford wrote:
STEFANO,
Can you see this post and my earlier ones today about the Muslim Brotherhood?
I see it, they are 6. Why?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160247 Jan 27, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you gone senile on us?
No, not on you.

That was a response to the Christian bigot.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160248 Jan 27, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Earlier I got bmz to admit that his assertion that God actually spoke to Mohammad was something that Mohammad never said happened.
(I then called him a liar, not that he even realizes it.)
Maybe you know yet, but I'll tell it anyway...

In many cases when bmz is caught in error in islamic doctrine, the fool does not admit openly his mistakes, but try to ignore them.
Buford wrote:
<quoted text> Howeever, Mohammad DID speak about this "Jibreel" creature who supposedly gave him "revelations" from "Allah" about things that supposedly occurred many centuries before Mohammad ever went into the prophet/warlord business.
The thing is, this "Jibreel" creature didn't introduce itself by name. Rather, it was Mohammad's wife's quasi-Christian cousin Waraqa who suggested that it was "Jibreel," a.k.a., "Gabriel," who was recorded in the Hebrew and Christian SCRIPTURES as being an angellic messenger sent by God, so OF COURSE, it only made sense that the creature that appeared to Mohammad in some fashion and scared him so badly that he went running home to mommy Khadija like a scared rabbit could only have been the same messenger "Jibreel/Gabriel" that appeared to Mary and others because, after all, Mohammad could not possibly have had a psychotic meltdown after spending so many days alone in that dark, dark cave...right?
Tabari VI:70 "He went to Khadija and said,'I think that I have gone mad.'"
The funny thing is that a teenager like Mary is said to have encounter Jibreel, but she wasn't that shocked from that, while Muhammad was so shocked that he got the fever. What a masculine prophet they have.
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160249 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
I see it, they are 6. Why?
Good! It's just that my posts hadn't been judged by the crew/s of islamozombies that usually track/s my posts, so I honestly wondered if maybe the Moderator had blocked my IP address because of the rude way that I address people like "Braindead Muslim Zealot" and "Al-EX the Phallocentric," not to mention "MUQtard/MUQturd" -I might just start calling him Dr. Barnabas.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#160250 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no Yahweh in the Bible, ignorant fool.
O wise monkey you are correct in your "little bubble" or bible...where Jehovah has nothing to do with YhWh and
JW are not important!

Isaiah 12:2
English Revised Version
Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and will not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and song; and he is become my salvation.

Webster's Bible Translation
Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#160251 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you know yet, but I'll tell it anyway...
In many cases when bmz is caught in error in islamic doctrine, the fool does not admit openly his mistakes, but try to ignore them.
<quoted text>
The funny thing is that a teenager like Mary is said to have encounter Jibreel, but she wasn't that shocked from that, while Muhammad was so shocked that he got the fever. What a masculine prophet they have.
hey idiot...
By agreeing with the chap who is marginally less stupid than you does not make you clever!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#160252 Jan 27, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you gone senile on us?
@ frijoles...
I have read your comments and express my appreciation for your long overdue challenge to some of the bigoted Christians from a Jewish point of view.

Such strong challenges are needed to stop these poor deluded people from carrying out more holocausts, murders and crusades against the infidel - Jews and Muslims.

I am not for one moment suggesting that Muslims are blameless. There are many dumb Muslims who use relgion as an excuse to promote their own agendas. I am sure you will agree the same goes for Jews.
Thanks again.

Let's remind ourselves of Christian love...(I used to make many excuses saying these were in the past...BUT they are happening NOW, but the Priests are wearing Politician's uniform so they don't look "religious"!!)

"Sprees of MURDER and ARSON were LED BY PRIESTS, and the same pattern was repeated every time a NEW CRUSADE (War on Terror!!!!!) was PREACHED. As one influential ABBOT, Peter of Cluny, pointed out:

It was EXPENSIVE in men and money TO TRAVEL to the end of the world TO FIGHT MOHAMMEDANS, YET there were INFIDELS living LOCALLY who were were FAR MORE GUILTY TOWARDS CHRIST.

The implication is that it would be MUCH CHEAPER, EASIER, SAFER, and WORTHIER TO MASSACRE LOCAL JEWS than to attack distant MUSLIMS - who WERE LIKELY TO FIGHT BACK (AS HAPPENING NOW!!!!!).

PREACHERS promoting the SECOND CRUSADE prompted MASSACRES OF JEWS across Germany and France.

http://www.heretication.info/_jews.html
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160253 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you know yet, but I'll tell it anyway...
In many cases when bmz is caught in error in islamic doctrine, the fool does not admit openly his mistakes, but try to ignore them.
<quoted text>
The funny thing is that a teenager like Mary is said to have encounter Jibreel, but she wasn't that shocked from that, while Muhammad was so shocked that he got the fever. What a masculine prophet they have.
Luke 1
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...

Rather than me posting the entire chapter here, please follow the link and read the chapter in its entirety. It introduces us to angel Gabriel who allegedly visited both Zechariah and Mary to pre-announce the births of their respective children: John the Baptist and Jesus. Their different reactions to this news is striking.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#160254 Jan 27, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no Yahweh in the Bible, ignorant fool.
Hello, Clueless Ignorant Fool

I did not say that Yahweh was in the Bible. I spoke about Yahweh's share.

Now, to show that you are really a clueless and an ignorant fool, the names Yahweh and Jehovah are in the Bible. See here:

The Jerusalem Bible:

Genesis 2:4 "Such was the story of heaven and earth as they were created. At the time when Yahweh God made earth and heaven"

Genesis 2:4
Lexham English Bible (LEB)
The Generations of Heaven and Earth

4 These are the generations[a] of heaven[b] and earth[c] when they were created, in the day that Yahweh God made earth and heaven[d]—

"Exodus 6:3 King James Version (KJV)

3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name Jehovah was I not known to them."

And this is how they cover it:

Genesis 2:4 Good News Translation (GNT)

4 And that is how the universe was created.
When the Lord God made the universe,

Footnotes:

Genesis 2:4 Where the Hebrew text has Yahweh, traditionally transliterated as Jehovah, this translation employs Lord with capital letters, following a usage which is widespread in English versions.

You really have a long way to study, learn and grasp. I guess another 20 years.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Curtis Brown column: Trick-or-Treat not to ever... (Oct '10) Sep 19 T Marie 10
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Sep 14 Pariah 4,886
News Athiest tells high schoolers God is evil (May '11) Sep 14 Bob of Quantum-Faith 843
News Remembering a Christian and a Jew who traced an... Sep 13 Philbert 23
Anyone still at this forum Aug '16 Sarah Good 1
When do you know if you are truly Wiccan? (Nov '07) Aug '16 Tekmoses 137
Convert me from Agnostic to Atheist Jul '16 ATHEOI 2
More from around the web