Your "prophet" permitted that Kinana would be tortured with fire so that he would reveal where his tribe's treasure was hidden, and then he had him beheaded as payment for his involvement in the death of one of your "prophet's" soldiers.<quoted text>
The story is absurd! Kinana was also a murderer. You know he had murdered a man. Right? Check your own sources.
He was killed for two reasons. One was his treachery, when he collaborated with Meccan pagans and wanted to kill the prophet and destroy Islam and the other was that he was a murderer.
The brother of the deceased killed him. The Prophet did not.
Why are you trying to defend a treacherous murderer? I sincerely hope that you are not from Kinana's lineage. lol!
Tell me, do Singaporean Muslim soldiers torture captives with fire to extract information about buried treasure, because that's what your "prophet" sanctioned?