Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 256009 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#160060 Jan 25, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
No, he was a lying sick wog animal like you.
A propagandist.
A propagandist? You say?

The book was "unknown" until it came to light by "accident".

No Muslim knew about its existence, until it was "discovered" by Christians?

What type of picture of the "author" you want to paint?

A highly knowledgeable person with so deep knowledge of Gospels and OT books, write a book "hidden from people's eyes" and inserts it amongst Christian's books and vanishes away till his work is discovered centuries afterwards?

Are you talking of a Sherlock holmes case?

Where you thinking powers and imaginations go?
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#160061 Jan 25, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is that the majority of Christians have neither read their Bible nor have they studied it.
The reason is that folks did not have any scripture to read at all as only the Church had access to the books. The Church DID NOT allow people to have a BIble. Reading was forbidden.
Even after the arrival of the printing press, books were not that easy to get and were expensive. That kept the Bible away from the Christians.
When the Bible was churned out in millions, people bought but had no time to read it. How can they read and understand a book that makes no sense?
Truly, truly, I tell you, MUQ, that Muslims have read the Bible more than Christians. For example, you, Alex, some other Muslims and yours truly have read and studied all the three Bibles.
Salaams
BMZ
I think the "best way" to read OT and NT books is to study them in the light of Quran.

In that way, you can straightaway see which portions are true and which are corrupted by human hands.

Any one studying in this way can separate grain from the lots and lots of chaff that human hands have inserted in the books of God.

Salaam

MUQ
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#160062 Jan 25, 2013
Excerpts from the Gospel of Barnabas, Part-40A

Chapter 82

Then Jesus gave a sigh and wept, saying: "Woe to you, Judea, for you glory, saying: "The Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord," and live as though there were no God; given over wholly to the pleasures and gains of the world; for this woman in the day of judgment shall condemn you to hell; for this woman seeks to know how to find grace and mercy before God."

And turning to the woman he said: "O woman, you Samaritans worship that which you know not, but we Hebrews worship that which we know. Truly, I say to you, that God is spirit and truth, and so in spirit and in truth must he be worshipped. For the promise of God was made in Jerusalem, in the Temple of Solomon, and not elsewhere. But believe me, a time will come that God will give his mercy in another city, and in every place it will be possible to worship him in truth. And God in every place will have accepted true prayer with mercy.

Chapter 83

…And lifting up his eyes, Jesus said: "How far off is the harvest;?" The disciples answered: "Three months." Jesus said: "Look now, how the mountain is white with corn; truly I say to you, that today there is a great harvest ;to be reaped." And then he pointed to the multitude who had come to see him. For the woman having entered into the city had moved all the city, saying: "O men, come and see a new prophet sent of God to the House of Israel"; and she recounted to them all that she had heard from Jesus.

When they were come thither they besought Jesus to abide with them; and he entered into the city and abode there two days, healing all the sick, and teaching concerning the kingdom of God;.*Then said the citizens to the woman: "We believe more in his words and miracles than we do in what you said; for he is indeed a holy one of God, a prophet sent for the salvation of those that shall believe on him."

After the prayer of midnight; the disciples came near to Jesus, and he said to them: "This night shall be in the time of the Messiah, Messenger of God, the jubilee every year that now comes every hundred years.…

Note: This episode is also mentioned in other Gospels but the emphasis is different- MUQ
(Abridged)
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#160063 Jan 25, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Those, who corrupted the bible were not the subtle beasts. They were wild beasts. The Bible was corrupted over centuries.
Mine came when the corruption of the Bible, was at the peak and it was time to bring up all the forgeries and corruptions in public, through the Arabs.
So, mine straightaway condemned the so-called Son of God absurdity and blasted the Trinity, concocted by beasts of the Church.
You can see that from another corruption of yours known as TheTorah in which you reside.
See, Rabbee, the Scriptures were written in the language that the men of distant past spoke and understood. They knew exactly what they meant. The Hebrews and the Jews did not create the absurdity known as the Son of God. If there were one, they would have introduced it centuries before the miraculous woman conceived.
And now, you are also lying through your false teeth.
rabbee: i am sorry but: TheSon of G-D is validated in not Only TheWritten Torah, but with what G-D actually came and said to me. His Name is Adam, and is TheOnly One Made in TheOUR IMAGE of G-D.

and it is not my falt, you all screwed up by calling Him, the fake name jesus. TheTorah has TheCorrect Version, and your's and their's are all screwed up.

and when you add your own gnosticism, then you are also deleting from TheWord of G-D that is TheTorah. and calling yourself muslem, christian, jew won't save anyone.

so what is your calling me a liar, with all of your pre-deemed lies worth to you? is it worth losing, your eternal soul into eventual oblivion? there is no peace, in any new testament yours or theirs.

we are all here in This Same Story of ThePhysical Creation again. and it is called TheTorah, from G-D. you have been lied to and decieved, by the subtle beasts. so get over, it! their vanity in you is not worth it.

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#160064 Jan 25, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the "best way" to read OT and NT books is to study them in the light of Quran.
In that way, you can straightaway see which portions are true and which are corrupted by human hands.

Any one studying in this way can separate grain from the lots and lots of chaff that human hands have inserted in the books of God.

Salaam
MUQ
Dear MUQ,

I have already done that over the years.

Which ever way you choose to read, the Bible cannot stand under the scrutiny. Very little grain but lots and lots of chaff.

I can stand all the lies and nonsense but the thing that irritates and annoys me most, is Matthew's lying account of the massacre of little kids ordered by Herod.

Thanks and salaams
BMZ

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#160065 Jan 25, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: i am sorry but: TheSon of G-D is validated in not Only TheWritten Torah, but with what G-D actually came and said to me. His Name is Adam, and is TheOnly One Made in TheOUR IMAGE of G-D.
and it is not my falt, you all screwed up by calling Him, the fake name jesus. TheTorah has TheCorrect Version, and your's and their's are all screwed up.
and when you add your own gnosticism, then you are also deleting from TheWord of G-D that is TheTorah. and calling yourself muslem, christian, jew won't save anyone.
so what is your calling me a liar, with all of your pre-deemed lies worth to you? is it worth losing, your eternal soul into eventual oblivion? there is no peace, in any new testament yours or theirs.
we are all here in This Same Story of ThePhysical Creation again. and it is called TheTorah, from G-D. you have been lied to and decieved, by the subtle beasts. so get over, it! their vanity in you is not worth it.
The so-called Son of God does not exist, Rabbee. This alleged person has no place in the Torah. Period!
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#160067 Jan 25, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
The so-called Son of God does not exist, Rabbee. This alleged person has no place in the Torah. Period!
rabbee: you are a liar and an enemy, of G-D and Adam. it says that Only Adam, is created in TheOUR IMAGE of G-D, in Parashas Bereesheees. "(and G-D said, "let US make Adam in OUR IMAGE, after OUR LIKENESS, they shall rule over the fish in the sea, the birds of the sky, and over the animal, the whole earth, and every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth. so G-D created Adam in HIS IMAGE, in The Image of G-D HE created HIM; male and female HE created them.

G-D blessed them, and G-D said to them, "be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and subdue it: and rule over the fish in the sea, the bird of the sky, and every living thing that moves on the earth. ")"
John Preacher

Ashburn, VA

#160068 Jan 25, 2013
Let us study a prophecy, which the Lord gave to Moses concerning
the coming Messiah. The Moslem community maintains that this
prophecy concerns the coming of Muhammed, however the Bible states
clearly, to whom this Mosiac prophecy relates-Jesus Christ:
I will send them a prophet like you from among their own people; I
will tell him what to say, and he will tell the people everything I
command. He will speak in my name, and I will punish anyone who refuses to obey him.(Deut. 18:18-19)
In the age in which Jesus came, the Jewish Priests and Levites were
still excepting the appearance, of the one whom Moses called “the
Prophet.” So it is apparent that this prophecy was not fulfilled by any of
the Old Testament prophets, who had come before. For we find, the
Jews sending the Priests and Levites to John the Baptist, asking him if, may-be he himself was “the Prophet”
John did not refuse to answer, but spoke out openly and clearly, saying:
“I am not the Messiah.”“Who are you, then?” they asked.“Are you
Elijah?”“No, I am not,” John answered.“Are you the Prophet?” they asked.“No he replied.(John 1:19) So then, who was “the Prophet?”
In John 1:46 a man named Philip; an apostle, said to Nathanael,“We
have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth”– Yes, Jesus confirms that, He is indeed the one whom Moses spoke of and whom the Jews were looking for:
Jesus says,
“For had you believed Moses, you would have believed me; for HE WROTE OF ME.”(John 5:45-46)
Jesus again confirms, that it was He of whom Moses spoke:
And Jesus explained to them what was said about himself in all the
Scriptures, beginning with the books of Moses and the writings of all the prophets.(Luke 24:27)
The Apostle Peter also left no doubt in the minds of the Jews, while
referring to this prophecy in Acts, as concerning Jesus.
"For Moses truly said unto the fathers, a prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me (Paul declares it was Jesus) Acts 3:22
Muslims have misinterpreted the word brethen, claiming it means descendants of Ishamel. But the hebrew word is "ach" meaning "relative" or "same tribe" - thus he is speaking of the Jews not Ishmaelites.
Read My free book, please don't be deceived:
www.sharepdfbooks.com/HANMQ56EZYWI/The_Islami...
John MacArthur Sermon
www.youtube.com/watch...
Joel Richardson's website for more books and dvds
www.joelstrumpet.com
Its Supernatural - Joel Richardson interview:
www.sidroth.org/site/News2...
Armageddon News - Mark of the beast Revealed
www.youtube.com/watch...
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#160069 Jan 25, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear MUQ,
I have already done that over the years.
Which ever way you choose to read, the Bible cannot stand under the scrutiny. Very little grain but lots and lots of chaff.
I can stand all the lies and nonsense but the thing that irritates and annoys me most, is Matthew's lying account of the massacre of little kids ordered by Herod.
Thanks and salaams
BMZ
I understand what you mean. The "poor Matthew", he had to compare Jesus with Moses and find "parallels between them" while there are no two personalities who are so different from each other as Moses and Jesus"!!

But I think you already know that Gospel of Matthews we have in our hands today was not written by Matthew , One of the Chosen Twelve Disciple of Jesus.

It is an anonymous book on which some "unknown hand" has put on title page "Gospel according to Matthew".

Salaam

MUQ
John

Brisbane, Australia

#160070 Jan 26, 2013
You can spin the bullshit any way you want muztards, but a murderer and a paedophile cannot be a prophet from god.

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#160071 Jan 26, 2013
John wrote:
You can spin the bullshit any way you want muztards, but a murderer and a paedophile cannot be a prophet from god.
Hello, Christ-turd

We don't have to spin any thing. The Christian Bible can be spun anyone, one wants.

We were discussing the gospels. Actually none of them makes any sense and do not have any core message of any value.

What we have is the bullshit spun by the early Church fathers, which is still kept wet and damp by folks like your goodself.

By the way, do you seriously believe that Herod, a Jew, ordered the slaughter of little kids? Do you think Matthew was copying the script to talk about Pharoah?

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#160072 Jan 26, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand what you mean. The "poor Matthew", he had to compare Jesus with Moses and find "parallels between them" while there are no two personalities who are so different from each other as Moses and Jesus"!!
But I think you already know that Gospel of Matthews we have in our hands today was not written by Matthew , One of the Chosen Twelve Disciple of Jesus.
It is an anonymous book on which some "unknown hand" has put on title page "Gospel according to Matthew".
Salaam
MUQ
That is correct, MUQ.

No one knows exactly, who wrote these gospels. Even Bishops agree that John was written by many Johns.

Luke and Matthew copied Mark wholesale. The Church realized this very late and John was ordered.

Yes, that is why they are called, "Gospel, according to.....".

Salaams
BMZ

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#160075 Jan 26, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: argue against G-D, all you want. bur i know what G-D, came and said about me and the woman again. and your a liar, just like the rest of this world of all liars. for i choose the G-D of my visitations as adam, here in TheStory of Creation again for all of my absolute truth. and reject all the talking critters, against HIM.
I thought that on Sabbath you shouldn't use internet, as Frijoles and Eric do. Are you breaking the law, rabbee?
truth

Perth, Australia

#160076 Jan 26, 2013
which law..opinion which others try control..not control anyone..nobody will listen law at all..does metter what you or others say..will be finito

3x heaven
byyyyyyyyyyyyy
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160079 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in the hell did this junk stuff come from? Tell me the name of the man and his son, who said such rubbish!
It is amazing to see fools talking about his birth, without a word about it, from the man, himself.
Thanks
Sr. Anne Catherine Emmerich saw it in vision, not that you believe her or would ever even read her "Life of Jesus Christ and Biblical Revelations" (See: http://www.tanbooks.com/index.php/page/shop:f... ), not when your "prophet's" word on the subject is sufficient for you.
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160080 Jan 26, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the "best way" to read OT and NT books is to study them in the light of Quran.
In that way, you can straightaway see which portions are true and which are corrupted by human hands.
Any one studying in this way can separate grain from the lots and lots of chaff that human hands have inserted in the books of God.
Salaam
MUQ
Your "best way" is like using a counterfeit dollar bill to judge the authenticity of an original dollar bill. It's a backward and illogical argument, but its obvious why Muslims insist upon it, because the Qur'an contradicts the Hebrew and Christian scriptures that came before it. Of course, FEW if ANY Muslims would dare to even consider the possibility that Mohammad was decieved or misinformed by Waraqa, I mean, "Allah, via Jibreel."
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160081 Jan 26, 2013
CORRECTION:

Your "best way" is like using a counterfeit dollar bill to judge the authenticity of an original dollar bill. It's a backward and illogical argument, but its obvious why Muslims insist upon it, because the Qur'an contradicts the Hebrew and Christian scriptures that came before it. Of course, FEW if ANY Muslims would dare to even consider the possibility that Mohammad was DECEIVED or misinformed by Waraqa, I mean, "Allah, via Jibreel."
Buford

Scott Depot, WV

#160082 Jan 26, 2013
bmz wrote:
We were discussing the gospels. Actually none of them makes any sense and do not have any core message of any value.
My, you are outdoing yourself in the stupid comments category!

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#160083 Jan 26, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Sr. Anne Catherine Emmerich saw it in vision, not that you believe her or would ever even read her "Life of Jesus Christ and Biblical Revelations" (See: http://www.tanbooks.com/index.php/page/shop:f... ), not when your "prophet's" word on the subject is sufficient for you.
So, what you have, comes from one called Anne catherine Emmerich, who came a thousand plus seven hundred years later.

Did you even read my post? My point was that we have nothing from Jesus' own mouth about his mother's conception and his birth, etc.

How come Jesus did not say anything to his disciples about the alleged Word, that he was already in Mary, when SHE was born and other junk and stuff?

I would really like to know how educated folks like you can accept funny stories and tales?

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#160084 Jan 26, 2013
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>
My, you are outdoing yourself in the stupid comments category!
No!

I am providing the right conclusions.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Dec 3 Eagle 12 4,907
omens of dead animals (Aug '08) Nov 25 Jillifitz 115
News Paganism no better than Atheism (May '10) Nov 17 Amused 30
News Why All Jews Should Hate Halloween - And So Sho... Oct '16 Hecate 1
Beauty spell worked last year but not anymore Oct '16 Prettyicy 1
Wiccan Coven Secrets Anyone? Oct '16 Julius the Jules 1
Need info Oct '16 Fraidy Cat 2
More from around the web