Who judges the posts are one or two Muslims that use different browsers to judge more. If you start to talk about judging, then it's the signal you don't know what else say.<quoted text>
You have been rightly judged 5 times as Funny, 5 times as Clueless and two times as a Spammy by the intelligent readers at Topix.
The Quran contains biblical and extra biblical stories , ignorant fool. So yes it was gathered from various books and legends and put all in one book named Quran. Learn what canonize means before to tell me that it was not.<quoted text>I had written this:
"In the case of Qur'aan, it was not gathered from various books, written by men. So, there was no such thing as Canonizing of Qur'aan.
You started to tell me I wrote a nonsense in the other post, so if you like to play dumb, I decided to play with you, mr (un)well read. I know what you have written before and after that but I focalize only on this part "Qur'aan, According to" because there are at least two grammar mistakes, even the rest of the sentence contains the same mistakes that you repeated it without being minimally aware of. Too bad for someone who consider himself, "intelligent" and "well read"<quoted text> If many men had written Qur'aan, then we would have had Qur'aan, According to Aleph; Qur'aan, According to Kaaf; Qur'aan, According to Meem and so on but we do not have. There is no ACCORDING TO for Qur'aan."
Were you able to spot the line "If many men had written Qur'aan, then we would have had"?
This line is written before Qur'aan, According to".
Please learn how to read and understand, and do not touch the keyboard before you grasp the content of my post fully.
If you are incapable to figure them out it shows that your stupidity and ignorance has not limits at all.