What does this have to do with what I wrote? I wrote: " That is correct and the game is valid.<quoted text>
US does not owe Pakis a living. If not for US and Intl aid, Pakistan is incapable of sustaining itself. That country is suffering from hyper inflation and the people are feeling the pinch. In Karachi, you can have a man killed for $700.00 - thats all it takes.
The US is itself double dealing with all the Muslims countries. It deserves what it gets from the Pakis.
I don't think Pakistan is running on American aid.
As long as the US remains in Afghanistan, it has to keep spending. An early exit will save the US billions of dollars that it keeps on wasting.
The US is not sincere to Pakistan, so do not expect the Pakis to be sincere to US. Why should they be?"
How much aid is given to Pakistan by the US and a few other countries? It is silly and absurd to suggest that the country is run on foreign aid.
In the US, you can have a man killed for USD 10,000/- or less, because the American can pay more and the killer knows that he can get more.
My point was that America is not sincere with the Muslim world and that is a fact. It plays a double game, so Pakis can play the same game. So, there is no point in whining and ranting about it.
You know well that politics is dirty. Don't you? Politics cannot be played without bigotry. Diplomacy is a fine word for bigotry and double standards. It applies to all.