Who Is Allah?

Aug 24, 2007 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Brussels Journal

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Comments (Page 7,398)

Showing posts 147,941 - 147,960 of198,674
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157042
Jan 1, 2013
 
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Braindead Muslim Zealot,
I expected this sort of mockingly stupid reply from you.
Gentile pagan Mules?Ö.
The poor clueless gentile pagan Christian is so misinformed that he not only carries the books of non gentiles on his back like a mule, he worships a non gentile man and carries non gentiles on his back like a clueless donkey even today!!!

Fake non-gentile atheists?Ö..
http://www.thejewishweek.com/features/new-yor...
Never trust some key non gentiles when they say they are atheists!
They are simply saying (fingers crossed!) that they reject Jesus Christ as God!
They will continue to deal only with their own tribal racist sexist bigoted anti gentile slave god.

Why canít the non-gentiles be honest about Jesus?.........
They sort of know that Jesus came for them only as a messenger/anointed one but NEVER as god in human form to die for their sins!
So why donít non-gentiles try and correct the clueless pagan gentiles who worship Jesus?
Is it because they wish to satisfy themselves that they have always been correct in rejecting BJ who is now being worshipped as god thus proving that he was a deceiver and a seducer? The more BJ misleads the more sins get loaded on to him thus proving Deuteronomy!
Are the non-gentiles making sure that BJ remains a sinner?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157043
Jan 1, 2013
 
This tribal racist sexist bigoted anti-gentile jealous slave god of non-gentiles, comes as his own son to annoy the hell out of the non-gentile masters.
The non-gentile masters get so p'd off with their slave god that they kill him off!
Was that the original plan by this clueless slave god?
No wonder the non-gentiles hate him!

Or was the anti-gentile slave god of the non-gentiles got so fed up with the non-gentiles that he got himself killed by the non-gentiles to take on the form of a "risen" gentile god?????!!
What a clever ploy!!!
Hooray!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157044
Jan 1, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Braindead were those, who showed four Roman soldiers dividing Jesus' clothes and his tunic and completely braindead are those, who seriously believe that "Dividing garments and casting lots" means taking somebody's clothes and leaving him naked.
Braindead were also those, who do not know and do not wish to mention that Jesus' bones and joints were not dislocated.
Braindead are also those, who do not know that Jesus had no children, when the quote Psalms 22.
Braindead are also those, who do not know that he was not buried in the graveyard, with the wicked.
Yet the braindead quote Psalms foolishly!!!
You must learn to appreciate the sarcasm in my posts.
Dear brother Happy New Year and a Happy New year to fellow humans, braindead and brainAlive!
Some great points....
About BJ being naked....hmmm...it is very easy for them to get naked those days...simon peter the naked fisherman, the much loved, breast pressing, naked disciple who fled...and the naked "risen" BJ the gardener who was chasing seven demons off magda to the shouts of "oh my god..oh my god"....!

Here's another thought....
They keep bragging about sinless BJ the sacrifical lamb (who got up and ran off!!)....!
Why was BJ hiding from his potential "killers"?
The longer he lived on planet earth the more sins he was able to commit including his famous "living tadpole water proposal" to a helpless woman when her husband was away and also rebuking many peasants while cursiong helpless fig trees and calling poor helpless women "dogs"...
At worst he should have walked straight out of river jordan, post batism to put his head on a chopping board for a Jewish priest to do the business!
What does he do, instead? Confuse clueless Satan who did not even realise BJ was "god"!!! lol....
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157045
Jan 1, 2013
 
Happy New Year Alex, MUQ and all.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157049
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Buford wrote:
As for my own faith stance, I was raised as a Christian, and still prefer Jesus to Mohammad. Why? Because unlike your thin-skinned "prophet," Jesus didn't order the murders of his critics. Nor did he condone highway robbery or the rape of captive women, behaviors that you excuse because "Allah" ordered them! Instead, Jesus prayed for his enemies and murderers in the "Authentic Gospels," based on what his "Father" had commanded of him.

"Braindead's" argument is that Jesus would have been as ruthless as your "prophet" if only he'd had more support from his wretched disciples. What's your excuse?
Are you suggesting that Jesus was a thick-skinned person? If you are, then I agree with you that Jesu was really a thick-skinned person. Actually he proves that himself. lol!

Actually, Buford, Jesus was a nobody among his people. He had no say and no one listened to him.

You must keep in mind that he was not sent to pagans. He came with nothing, brought nothing new and gave nothing new. He was sent to a people, who believed in God and had the Scriptures.

The man was not terrorized by fellow Jews, was free to move and deliver speeches, yet to no avail.
Neither he nor a bunch of his followers were attacked and they did not even have to fight.

Thus, he had nothing to do and yet the man failed and wasn't recognized. The biblical Jesus was a softy and a wimp, who did not stand up to the leadership from day one.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157050
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Spamboy,
I DID read your disclaimer at the start of your "Barnabas the Muslim" spamfest, so there's no need to post it again, but I'll tell you this; STRICTLY SPEAKING, your own "prophet" clearly had more faith in the reliability of the "Authentic Gospels" than you do.
Here's proof:
Quran 5:46 After them we sent forth Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming the Torah already revealed, and gave him the Gospel, in which there is guidance and light, corroborating what as revealed before it in the torah, a guide and admonition to the righteous.
47. Therefore let those who follow the Gospel judge according to what God has revealed therein. Evil-doers are those that do not judge according to God's revelations.
Qur'an 29:46 And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, except with means better (then mere disputation), unless it be with those of them who inflict wrong (and injury); But say, "We believe in the Revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our God and your God is One...
Qur'an 3:3 He has revealed to you the Book with the Truth, confirming the scriptures which preceded it; for He has already revealed the Torah and the Gospel for the guidance of mankind, and the distinction of right and wrong.
Qur'an 5:66 If they observe the Torah and the Gospel and what is revealed to them from their Lord, they shall enjoy abundance from above and from beneath.
You suppose wrongly that Christians don't look for truth outside of their own "Canonic Gospels," as though the Church didn't weigh hundreds if not thousands of manuscripts in its early centuries before settling on what it determined to be true and worthy of inclusion in the Canon. Your medieval forgery known as the "Gospel of Barnabas" is a mockery of that effort, quite frankly; it could only have been written by a calculating liar and taqiyya practioner who depended on the ignorance, willful or otherwise, of his readers. In short, he was a Mohammadan.
As for my own faith stance, I was raised as a Christian, and still prefer Jesus to Mohammad. Why? Because unlike your thin-skinned "prophet," Jesus didn't order the murders of his critics. Nor did he condone highway robbery or the rape of captive women, behaviors that you excuse because "Allah" ordered them! Instead, Jesus prayed for his enemies and murderers in the "Authentic Gospels," based on what his "Father" had commanded of him.
"Braindead's" argument is that Jesus would have been as ruthless as your "prophet" if only he'd had more support from his wretched disciples. What's your excuse?
Bu(tteredButtturdlick)ford.... .take your nose off the non-gentile asses and stick it back in your wood glue!
That will stop help slow down your dementia and prevent your single brain cell from slipping out through your nose..lol.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157051
Jan 1, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you suggesting that Jesus was a thick-skinned person? If you are, then I agree with you that Jesu was really a thick-skinned person. Actually he proves that himself. lol!
Actually, Buford, Jesus was a nobody among his people. He had no say and no one listened to him.
You must keep in mind that he was not sent to pagans. He came with nothing, brought nothing new and gave nothing new. He was sent to a people, who believed in God and had the Scriptures.
The man was not terrorized by fellow Jews, was free to move and deliver speeches, yet to no avail.
Neither he nor a bunch of his followers were attacked and they did not even have to fight.
Thus, he had nothing to do and yet the man failed and wasn't recognized. The biblical Jesus was a softy and a wimp, who did not stand up to the leadership from day one.
He was good at running very fast... even uphill.
Why didn't he take part in the old olympics? it has been going on since 776BC..lol..
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157052
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear brother Happy New Year and a Happy New year to fellow humans, braindead and brainAlive!
Some great points....
About BJ being naked....hmmm...it is very easy for them to get naked those days...simon peter the naked fisherman, the much loved, breast pressing, naked disciple who fled...and the naked "risen" BJ the gardener who was chasing seven demons off magda to the shouts of "oh my god..oh my god"....!
Here's another thought....
They keep bragging about sinless BJ the sacrifical lamb (who got up and ran off!!)....!
Why was BJ hiding from his potential "killers"?
The longer he lived on planet earth the more sins he was able to commit including his famous "living tadpole water proposal" to a helpless woman when her husband was away and also rebuking many peasants while cursiong helpless fig trees and calling poor helpless women "dogs"...
At worst he should have walked straight out of river jordan, post batism to put his head on a chopping board for a Jewish priest to do the business!
What does he do, instead? Confuse clueless Satan who did not even realise BJ was "god"!!! lol....
Happy New Year, Alex

The problem is that the Church fathers impressed the fools and the ignorants, who had no access to any books and were neither well-read nor knew the metaphors and figurative language of the Jews.

Those, who knew Hebrew, understood well what the language meant. And here, we have the Church, the evangelists, the pastors and the masses, who foolishly take dividing clothes and garments to mean as if a person's clothes were really taken and shared using a lottery.

In Arabic, there is this saying "Do not eat or devour the property of orphans and the weak", and if Jesus had said that, the Christians would have taken it to seriously mean "Eating the food and grabbing the plates or bowls of the orphans and the poor".

Buford is trying his level best not to understand. lol!
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157053
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

@ Alex

Another point

Jesus did not leave any scripture behind.

When he was presented to the Gentiles, the scripture was created and written by men, who did not even sit in the company of Jesus or his disciples.

Even the gospels do not know what all the disciples really did.
Frijoles

Stamford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157054
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Alex123 aka WM wrote:
This tribal racist sexist bigoted anti-gentile jealous slave god of non-gentiles, comes as his own son to annoy the hell out of the non-gentile masters.
The non-gentile masters get so p'd off with their slave god that they kill him off!
Was that the original plan by this clueless slave god?
No wonder the non-gentiles hate him!
Or was the anti-gentile slave god of the non-gentiles got so fed up with the non-gentiles that he got himself killed by the non-gentiles to take on the form of a "risen" gentile god?????!!
What a clever ploy!!!
Hooray!
Alex take your meds
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157055
Jan 1, 2013
 
Hi Frijoles,

I hate to put you on the spot, but the Singaporean and supposed Hebrew scholar is making assertions, yet again, this time about what Psalm 22:19 REALLY means, to wit:

"They part my garments among them, and for my vesture do they cast lots."

The author of John's Gospel references this passage with regard to the disposition of the clothes that Jesus was wearing when he was led out to be crucified.

I should add that whether or not one even agrees that the event occurred, the question here concerns what ACTUAL and not PRETEND Hebrew scholars have to say about the meaning of this passage from Pslam 22.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157056
Jan 1, 2013
 
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Bu(tteredButtturdlick)ford.... .take your nose off the non-gentile asses and stick it back in your wood glue!
That will stop help slow down your dementia and prevent your single brain cell from slipping out through your nose..lol.
Wow! New Year's Day is more than halfway over and not once have you written the word PHALLUS, at least not in this thread. Was this your resolution for the year 2013 A.D., to try and overcome your PENlS obsession?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157057
Jan 1, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
Actually, Buford, Jesus was a nobody among his people. He had no say and no one listened to him.
This must be why the early Church was composed entirely of Jews, with 3000 being added to it on Pentecost, you BRAINDEAD MUSLIM ZEALOT.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157058
Jan 1, 2013
 
Oh, wait! Don't tell me! The Acts of the Apostles is FICTIONAL, right?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157059
Jan 1, 2013
 
bmz wrote:
The biblical Jesus was a softy and a wimp, who did not stand up to the leadership from day one.
What an ignorant fool of a liar you are, easily discredited!

See: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157060
Jan 1, 2013
 
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>Wow! New Year's Day is more than halfway over and not once have you written the word PHALLUS, at least not in this thread. Was this your resolution for the year 2013 A.D., to try and overcome your PENlS obsession?
You have always been the fall guy...the dunce..the feed...the moronic bu(ttlicker)ford!
I have delegated that task to you...and you have written both words!
Did you finally take your nose off the non-gentile butts to stick back in your wood glue..?
Good boy.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157061
Jan 1, 2013
 
Buford wrote:
Oh, wait! Don't tell me! The Acts of the Apostles is FICTIONAL, right?
lol...hey moron...ask me..I am the ex priest.
How did the conmen become "apostles"?
Tell us about them...Especially about Mr paul who never met Jesus!
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157062
Jan 1, 2013
 
HAPPY NEW YEAR, Frijoles.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157063
Jan 1, 2013
 
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Alex take your meds
The defender of non-gentiles appears from nowhere!
But...why don't you tell us about Jesus?
Thanks...
Otherwise..let me make this point..
This tribal racist sexist bigoted anti-gentile jealous slave god of non-gentiles, comes as his own son to annoy the hell out of the non-gentile masters.
The non-gentile masters get so p'd off with their slave god that they kill him off!
Was that the original plan by this clueless slave god?
No wonder the non-gentiles hate him!
Or was the anti-gentile slave god of the non-gentiles got so fed up with the non-gentiles that he got himself killed by the non-gentiles to take on the form of a "risen" gentile god?????!!
What a clever ploy!!!
Hooray!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157064
Jan 1, 2013
 
Buford wrote:
Hi Frijoles,
I hate to put you on the spot, but the Singaporean and supposed Hebrew scholar is making assertions, yet again, this time about what Psalm 22:19 REALLY means, to wit:
"They part my garments among them, and for my vesture do they cast lots."
The author of John's Gospel references this passage with regard to the disposition of the clothes that Jesus was wearing when he was led out to be crucified.
I should add that whether or not one even agrees that the event occurred, the question here concerns what ACTUAL and not PRETEND Hebrew scholars have to say about the meaning of this passage from Pslam 22.
awww...this fake gentile needs approval from a non-gentile who rejects his "mangod" as a liar and a false prophet!
lol...
Rock on bu(tteredbuttturdlick)ford...l ol

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 147,941 - 147,960 of198,674
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••