Who Is Allah?

Aug 24, 2007 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Brussels Journal

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Comments (Page 7,344)

Showing posts 146,861 - 146,880 of198,660
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155672
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

1

bmz wrote:
Fire insurance will not help. Brother Jesus agrees with eternal damnation. Does the Lake of Fire ring a bell?
So, how can you save ex-Mohammadan Mahmood? Do you think Christianity can save and provide fire insurance?
Here's the thing, No Nails,

It's very bad manners to ever say to someone, "You will burn in hell" for the alleged sin of calling the MOHAMMADAN holy book the KORAN.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155673
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

2

bmz wrote:
That was precisely my point. So, it was wrong of you to say that people call Muslims, Mohammadans because they read or say Mohammadan in "'Mohammadan Rasool Allah".
It was the Midevil (Medieval) Christian world that started it and it was heavily used by the Christian polemicists of the last four centuries.
You already know my opinion about these so-called modern scholars, whom I consider half-baked. Hence, no comment on those junkies. Junkies can say whatever they like.
I call Muslims MOHAMMADANS for two main reasons:

1. Mohammad MUST be mentioned by name in the Muslim confession of faith, the Shahada, otherwise it isn't an authentic conversion or "reversion" to Islam. It strikes me as odd that the one religion on earth that most apoplectically declares that Allah has no partners has in fact made Mohammad Allah's indispensable partner on earth.

2. Muslims worship Mohammad -hailed as the *Perfect Man*. See: The Doctrine of the Perfect Man (Al-Insan al-Kamil) and its Significance Today
http://www.israinternational.com/the-perfect-... - when the records as compiled by the earliest MOHAMMADANS like Ibn Ishaq, Bukhari, Tabari, Muslim, et al., clearly show him to be a lying, thieving, rape enabling, sadist and murderer. The willingness of MOHAMMADANS to forgive the man his many glaring faults because he was serving "the cause of Allah" is nothing less than idolatry.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155674
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

2

Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
I was once at a seminar in Toronto and the lecturer was Norman Stillman from the Univ of Oklahoma. I asked him if Moses ever existed and did he write the Torah. His answer to me was that from a theological perspective he did all of the above but if examined from a scientific perspective, none of it is true.
I think Norman Stillman did not answer to your question. You said to him if Moses ever existed and he told you that from a theological point of view he DID all, and from a scientific viewpoint none of it is true, meaning anything it said he dd was false.

So he rejected what he (Moses) did but has not answered about his existence.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155675
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

1

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the news. How many more Senior Al-Qaidah leaders are left? Why can't the US finish 'em all? That should be fast, so that people can live in peace and harmony, after the trouble-makers have left.
Disaster in Iraq, Disaster in Afghanistan and Disaster in Pakistan.
Please inform all the old hags at Capitol Hill to stop this useless war of terror, which is not wroking at all and has turned into a Disaster for the US.
Thanks
The US can't "finish 'em all" because Al-Qaidah takes its marching orders directly from the KORAN.

KORAN:2:216 "Jihad is ordained for you, though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not."

KORAN:33:22 "Among the Believers are men who have been true to their covenant with Allah and have gone out for Jihad. Some have completed their vow to extreme and have been martyred fighting and dying in His Cause, and some are waiting, prepared for death in battle."

KORAN:9:111 "Allah has purchased the believers, their lives and their goods. For them (in return) is the Garden (of Paradise). They fight in Allah's Cause, and they slay and are slain; they kill and are killed."

Bukhari:V1B2N25 "Allah's Apostle was asked,'What is the best deed?' He replied,'To believe in Allah and His Apostle Muhammad.' The questioner then asked,'What is the next best in goodness?' He replied,'To participate in Jihad, religious fighting in Allah's Cause.'"

You see, then, that the only way to "finish 'em all" is to redact all ayats from the KORAN that advocate jihad, which is another way of saying that Mohammad must be discredited as a prophet, but no MOHAMMADAN would ever abide this insult to his idol, no matter how "moderate" and "peaceable" he is. Isn't that so?
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155676
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

4

1

bmz wrote:
Actually all the Patriarchs and Prophets/Messengers of God were illiterate fellows.
Prove it.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155677
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
May the good LORD shower more patience upon me, when dealing with you.
I wrote this:
"It is funny that you question and provide answers, which you fail to understand.
Wrong!
It wasn't said and it wasn't written : "Thou shall not take the name of the Lord."
It was said and it was written: "Thous shall not take the name of thy LORD in vain."
That means, one shall not take the name of the LORD in vain deeds, false oaths, false swearing, etc.
Moses was calling the LORD most of the time. If you read Jewish Scriptures, you will find instructions to remember the LORD and teach/preach/pray, etc., while sitting, standing and lying down.
When praying to the LORD was not forbidden, how could calling the name of the LORD fall in VAIN?
Do people pray to the LORD by spelling out a G, a hyphen and a D?
God is not the son of a man or a man to have a name. You can give beautiful names to God and there is no harm. Moses called God Almighty LORD, which is Adonai in Hebrew.
You are the one, who mentions it, so you should ask. If I were wrong, the members of Jewish faith would have certainly posted a note to correct me.
Where do you see G-d in here? "
Also, I had given you the links to Jewish sources, where God was spelled properly and you do not see any G-d there. Did you read at the two links which I gave you? Obviously not!
And now you write: " The question is the following, which name the god his lord does not want to be said/pronunced in vain?"
Is that what you understand by 'taking the name of the LORD in vain"?
Girls getting fucked, cry in ecstasy "Oh my God!" This is an example of calling the name of God in vain. Do you think God gave another name to be called in vain deeds?
One cannot tell his friend, "By God, I will take that girl to bed and fuck her!" This will be calling the name of God in vain.
A man deceives another by promising him in the name of God that he would help him in distress, swears upon God but does not keep that particular promise. That is an example of calling the name of God in vain.
Do you think God gave Moses another name for such activities? LMAO! You crack me up!
Why can't you understand?
Next time, please address my post para by para in separate short posts, as I do with Mahmood.
By the way it wasn't NEITHER written as you reported "Thou shall not take the name of the Lord in vain. but "Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain". You eliminated that part to make your point that I have demolished easily.

Moreover I haven't heard or seen any prayer using the name of god - YHVH. If yes tell us which Jewish prayer is.

The English word god is just a title used in ancient time by pagans and not a proper name. In today world the word Allah is translated as to god or the god. But is Allah (the god) the proper name of that divinity? No.

Ancient Jews thought the word god used in Europe was the proper name of that divinty, hence since they are prohibited to pronunce his name they wrote that word like this (g-d). And this thing passed on generation by generation. But as said above god is just a title and there is no reason for Jews to eliminate the vowel from that word. Am not surprised if some wrote tha wod properly, i.e. god.

To answer to my question what's the name of god is, you wrote: "Girls getting fucked, cry in ecstasy "Oh my God!" This is an example of calling the name of God in vain."

If until today, after that the Jews, here, have explained that their god goes by the name of YHVH, and after MAAT and Rabbee as explain to you that this god has a name, and it's not god the name, and after my many explications you still think that as in your example of girls in ecstasy screaming "Oh my God" that this is a calling the name of god in vain, then there is no point for anyone to discuss with a person so obtuse such as yourself.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155678
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the news. How many more Senior Al-Qaidah leaders are left? Why can't the US finish 'em all? That should be fast, so that people can live in peace and harmony, after the trouble-makers have left.
Disaster in Iraq, Disaster in Afghanistan and Disaster in Pakistan.
Please inform all the old hags at Capitol Hill to stop this useless war of terror, which is not wroking at all and has turned into a Disaster for the US.
Thanks
Many of these made up chaps are inside White House, Pentagon and CIA!
A character from a Tom Sharpe book written nearly 40 years ago says something like:

"Tell them there is a terror threat and don't know from where but we are prepared to defend the nation and that will make sure the the voters will forget about economic and other problems and keep us in power!

This is exactly what the liars are doing:

They go over to Iraq and Afghanistan...blow up innocent women and children....get a few chaps p'd off....and bingo...we get more terrorists...

War on terror is Invasion promoting terror.

Plus they use it to steal oil/natural resources, plus sell arms to dictators, charge an arm an a leg for re-constrution of infrastructure, that was fine until these maniacs deliberately and repeatedly bombed anything and everything!

Whenever they want the billions of dollars banked by the idiot dictators, they vilify them, arrest them, "cease" their assets and execute them!!

When will these moronic dictators learn?
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155679
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
May the good LORD shower more patience upon me, when dealing with you.
I wrote this:
"It is funny that you question and provide answers, which you fail to understand.
Wrong!
It wasn't said and it wasn't written : "Thou shall not take the name of the Lord."
It was said and it was written: "Thous shall not take the name of thy LORD in vain."
That means, one shall not take the name of the LORD in vain deeds, false oaths, false swearing, etc.
Moses was calling the LORD most of the time. If you read Jewish Scriptures, you will find instructions to remember the LORD and teach/preach/pray, etc., while sitting, standing and lying down.
When praying to the LORD was not forbidden, how could calling the name of the LORD fall in VAIN?
Do people pray to the LORD by spelling out a G, a hyphen and a D?
God is not the son of a man or a man to have a name. You can give beautiful names to God and there is no harm. Moses called God Almighty LORD, which is Adonai in Hebrew.
You are the one, who mentions it, so you should ask. If I were wrong, the members of Jewish faith would have certainly posted a note to correct me.
Where do you see G-d in here? "
Also, I had given you the links to Jewish sources, where God was spelled properly and you do not see any G-d there. Did you read at the two links which I gave you? Obviously not!
And now you write: " The question is the following, which name the god his lord does not want to be said/pronunced in vain?"
Is that what you understand by 'taking the name of the LORD in vain"?
Girls getting fucked, cry in ecstasy "Oh my God!" This is an example of calling the name of God in vain. Do you think God gave another name to be called in vain deeds?
One cannot tell his friend, "By God, I will take that girl to bed and fuck her!" This will be calling the name of God in vain.
A man deceives another by promising him in the name of God that he would help him in distress, swears upon God but does not keep that particular promise. That is an example of calling the name of God in vain.
Do you think God gave Moses another name for such activities? LMAO! You crack me up!
Why can't you understand?
Next time, please address my post para by para in separate short posts, as I do with Mahmood.
Para by para?
He doesn't address what we give...he addresses his own assumtpions.
He is a robot without stop, rethink, admit mistake, apologise buttons!
Good luck with mr. Stupido Colonic irrigator!!!
Salaams
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155680
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

@ BMZ....Correction..
I have succumbed to the relentless onslaught on Queen's English by mr Stupido Colonic irrigator!
"Cease" assets?
"Seize" or "sequestrate"!! Duh!!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155681
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Buford wrote:
<quoted text>In case you missed it, according to Alex 123456789akaWhackyMuslim, "You will burn in hell."
Here's hoping that you have fire insurance.
lol...
Hello anti-gentile christ killer bu(ttturdlick)ford!
You will be in hot excrement and semen, instead of Jesus, according to the revised Talmudic pronouncements.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155682
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Buford wrote:
"You know why...you are deliberately referring to the Holy Quran as koran.
You are referring to Muslims as mohamamdans." ~ Alex1234567890akaWhackiestOfAl lPossibleMuslims
He's wrong. I know for a FACT that you refer to the Qur'an as the Koran, and to mohammadans as Mohammadans, but the Medicated One likes to rewrite history. It's his schtick.
hello anti-gentile christkiller bu(ttturdlick)ford!
Why don't you circumcise yourself again and read the Talmudic writings on Jesus?
Holy Quran is doing fine without you.
Mahmood

Mississauga, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155683
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
That was precisely my point. So, it was wrong of you to say that people call Muslims, Mohammadans because they read or say Mohammadan in "'Mohammadan Rasool Allah".
It was the Midevil (Medieval) Christian world that started it and it was heavily used by the Christian polemicists of the last four centuries.
You already know my opinion about these so-called modern scholars, whom I consider half-baked. Hence, no comment on those junkies. Junkies can say whatever they like.
Just because you dont have a good word to say about any scholar, does not mean what they'v written is not true. Forget about old Christians writers, Chritian scholars are now coming out and challenging Christianity, can a Mohammadan scholar do the same about his own religion in Iran or Pakistan?

Critcal Christians regard writings of the Hebrew Bible and the NT as products of human authors who wrote them under the inspiration of the Spirit of God while you guys regard the Koran as the literal word of God and that is a problem. Critical research into the sources of the Koran & Hadith was discouraged and even banned in Islamic countries as result belief in the un-createdness and infallibility of the Koran triumphed over belief in its historicity.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155684
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

1

1

Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
Never work from memory. Should have been no. 3.
And don't give me that freudian slip bs.
yes dear "honest" person.
No 1 is your category!
You know No. 3 is the best.
Being one of your fellow non-gentile...will Freud get a ticket too?
Do you really think that readers are stupid?
We all know that the chaps in No. 1 will never allow others join it.
They slipped up by inventing Noahidism, a fourth class ticket to nowhere!!!!!!
Enjoy ring side seats with the other 143,999 members!!
But only 12000 from the tribe of Judah will be admitted I guess!
Why does the OT make Judah the biggest murderer in town?
Why does he wipe off all the 11 tribes out of 12?
Does he want all 144000 tickets?
When he realises that the tickets are for a different game with very hot oil and burning fire...it will be too late.
Yep..No. 3 is the BEST.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155685
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Was Ruth a "convert of convenience "to give legitimacy to David?
Any takers?
Mahmood

Mississauga, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155686
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

1

bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
That was precisely my point. So, it was wrong of you to say that people call Muslims, Mohammadans because they read or say Mohammadan in "'Mohammadan Rasool Allah".
It was the Midevil (Medieval) Christian world that started it and it was heavily used by the Christian polemicists of the last four centuries.
You already know my opinion about these so-called modern scholars, whom I consider half-baked. Hence, no comment on those junkies. Junkies can say whatever they like.
I call my own relatives Mohammadans and they dont give a rats ass so why does it bother you so much? I told you, the Koran is Mohammad's manifesto to control the credulous minds of those camel dung cleaning Arabs and in the process people like you and I got engulfed due to no fault of our own. The only difference is that you'v stayed and I left.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155687
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
What I am suggesting is that Allah is Mohammad's alter ego and that is why I call you guys Mohammadans. If you read the Koran, Allah is just pawn in this whole grand scheme of Mohammad's. You guys see god as having tailored the Koran's different verses to the varying circumstances Mohammad would encounter. My assumption in contrast is that Mohammad himself was doing the tailoring - even if often unconsciously and even if convinced god was doing it.
Hello bu(ttturdlick)ford's alter ego!
If you read the OT, the god of judah is a pawn.
If you call us muhammadan we shall call you a monkey.
Mahmood

Mississauga, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155688
Dec 8, 2012
 
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Norman Stillman did not answer to your question. You said to him if Moses ever existed and he told you that from a theological point of view he DID all, and from a scientific viewpoint none of it is true, meaning anything it said he dd was false.
So he rejected what he (Moses) did but has not answered about his existence.
Well, he did shrug his shoulders and tell me that there was no Moses, the conversation just didn't end there. Its hard for me to explain over the internet.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155689
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Alex123 aka WM wrote:
Was Ruth a "convert of convenience "to give legitimacy to David?
Any takers?
Was Joseph's Egyptian wife a CONVERT?

Recall, she had TWO tribes of Israel, Manasseh and Ephraim. Yes these TWO TRIBES of Israel had an EGYTIAN mother.

This clearly exposes the LIES of man-made doctrine about mothers i.e. they determine if you are an Israelite. Wake-up, seed of Israel.

Oh Joseph's wife's father was a PAGAN priest. "daughter of Potipherah priest of On " So what would be his daughter?

Also, no converts here "And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;

12 Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;

13 And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.

14 And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her."

Tell me, who would CONVERT under these conditions and in 30 days or ONE month? NOBODY!!! ONLY a DECEIVER and a LIAR would suggest otherwise.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155690
Dec 8, 2012
 
bmz wrote:
@ Buford
Please read again, as i have added a new term for Christians:
Actually all the Patriarchs and Prophets/Messengers of God were illiterate fellows.
Try to whack and screw Jesus in the Philippines or the Maluku Islands, also known as the Moluccas, or in Africa or among the Egyptian Copts and see how the JESUSARIANS would go berserk and fly into murderous frenzies.
As for the Western Christians, it is perfectly all right for others to bash and screw Jesus in the West. It is fine with them.
By the way, God is a potent He in Christianity too, because God is the Father, not the Mother. Right?
In Islam, God is not the Father.
rabbee: well then i guess that makes, all these religions wrong including your's. more proof to me, that if the world teaches it. then it, is must be a lie. just more proof to me, that your're all the enemy of G-D.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155691
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he did shrug his shoulders and tell me that there was no Moses, the conversation just didn't end there. Its hard for me to explain over the internet.
Personally I think it doesn't really matter who is to affirm something but rather the evidence(s) that a person brings to support its affermation.

Said this, there are no evidences to affirm Moses existed, as well as there are no evidences to affirm he never existed. So untill one person has no proof to affirm something, those who claim he didn'texist and those who claim he existed, can be putted at the same level.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 146,861 - 146,880 of198,660
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••