Who Is Allah?

Aug 24, 2007 Full story: The Brussels Journal 207,192

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Full Story

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154790 Nov 23, 2012
Buford wrote:
CORRECTION:
IRANIAN rap artist, Shahin Najafi, has been condemned to death for insulting a Shia Imam.
Your dearest and most beloved Iranian friend is safe. He is living in Germany now. So, please tell him not to worry.

And you stop worrying too.

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154791 Nov 23, 2012
Buford wrote:
BTW, insulting Immaculate Mary is not a capital offense in any branch or sect of Christianity.
Please go to Benghazi, insult Mary loudly in public and see what happens. And before you do that, please make sure no one is inside the US embassy.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#154792 Nov 23, 2012
Surprise! Surprise! Part 2

Opponents of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi are protesting violently in several Egyptian cities, after Morsi gave himself unprecedented powers.
http://news.msn.com/world/morsi-called-pharao...

CAIRO - Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi's decree exempting all his decisions from legal challenge until a new parliament was elected caused fury amongst his opponents on Friday who accused him of being the new Hosni Mubarak and hijacking the revolution.

Thousands of chanting protesters packed Tahrir Square, the heart of the 2011 anti-Mubarak uprising, demanding Morsi quit and accusing him of launching a "coup". There were violent protests in Alexandria, Port Said and Suez.

Morsi's aides said the presidential decree was to speed up a protracted transition that has been hindered by legal obstacles but Morsi's rivals were quick to condemn him as a new autocratic pharaoh who wanted to impose his Islamist vision on Egypt.

Buoyed by accolades from around the world for mediating a truce between Hamas and Israel, Morsi on Thursday ordered that an Islamist-dominated assembly writing the new constitution could not be dissolved by legal challenges.

"Morsi a 'temporary' dictator," was the headline in the independent daily Al-Masry Al-Youm.

Morsi, an Islamist whose roots are in the Muslim Brotherhood, also gave himself sweeping powers that allowed him to sack the unpopular general prosecutor and opened the door for a retrial for Mubarak and his aides.

The president's decree aimed to end the logjam and push Egypt, the Arab world's most populous nation, more quickly on its democratic path, the presidential spokesman said.

"President Morsi said we must go out of the bottleneck without breaking the bottle," Yasser Ali told Reuters.

Speaking at a Cairo mosque, Morsi told worshippers Egypt was moving forward. "I fulfill my duties to please God and the nation," he said, the official news agency reported.

The president's decree said any decrees he issued while no parliament sat could not be challenged, moves that consolidated his powers but look set to polarize Egypt further, threatening more turbulence in a nation at the heart of the Arab Spring.
__________
I get it. Morsi will only be a temporary dictator for life.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154793 Nov 23, 2012
Buford wrote:
Positive Spin:
Fallujah Today
http://northshorejournal.org/fallujah-today
Negative Spin:
Seven years after sieges, Fallujah struggles
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/201...
Yes for sure.
This is one big non-gentile asslicker.
Its funny how butt-licker pops up to defend the non gentiles who deny their god while he claims he was born a gentile!
funny little creep.
lying butt-turd licker
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154794 Nov 23, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Please go to Benghazi, insult Mary loudly in public and see what happens. And before you do that, please make sure no one is inside the US embassy.
Salaams brother!
butt-turd licker has nothing to do with christianity.
he is a non gentile barnacle on the backs of Christian gentiles.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154795 Nov 23, 2012
Buford wrote:
Surprise! Surprise! Part 2
Opponents of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi are protesting violently in several Egyptian cities, after Morsi gave himself unprecedented powers.
http://news.msn.com/world/morsi-called-pharao...
CAIRO - Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi's decree exempting all his decisions from legal challenge until a new parliament was elected caused fury amongst his opponents on Friday who accused him of being the new Hosni Mubarak and hijacking the revolution.
Thousands of chanting protesters packed Tahrir Square, the heart of the 2011 anti-Mubarak uprising, demanding Morsi quit and accusing him of launching a "coup". There were violent protests in Alexandria, Port Said and Suez.
Morsi's aides said the presidential decree was to speed up a protracted transition that has been hindered by legal obstacles but Morsi's rivals were quick to condemn him as a new autocratic pharaoh who wanted to impose his Islamist vision on Egypt.
Buoyed by accolades from around the world for mediating a truce between Hamas and Israel, Morsi on Thursday ordered that an Islamist-dominated assembly writing the new constitution could not be dissolved by legal challenges.
"Morsi a 'temporary' dictator," was the headline in the independent daily Al-Masry Al-Youm.
Morsi, an Islamist whose roots are in the Muslim Brotherhood, also gave himself sweeping powers that allowed him to sack the unpopular general prosecutor and opened the door for a retrial for Mubarak and his aides.
The president's decree aimed to end the logjam and push Egypt, the Arab world's most populous nation, more quickly on its democratic path, the presidential spokesman said.
"President Morsi said we must go out of the bottleneck without breaking the bottle," Yasser Ali told Reuters.
Speaking at a Cairo mosque, Morsi told worshippers Egypt was moving forward. "I fulfill my duties to please God and the nation," he said, the official news agency reported.
The president's decree said any decrees he issued while no parliament sat could not be challenged, moves that consolidated his powers but look set to polarize Egypt further, threatening more turbulence in a nation at the heart of the Arab Spring.
__________
I get it. Morsi will only be a temporary dictator for life.
no surprise!
butt-turd has a simple agenda!
and we all know it.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154796 Nov 23, 2012
A brief history of Israel
1897: Zionism gets established
Jews have been scattered around Europe and Russia for centuries. However, they were never welcome anywhere, except for brief periods. Not surprisingly, many Jews dreamed of having their own nation.

In 1897 Theodor Herzl officially announced the creation of the Zionist movement. The goal of Zionism was to create a nation for Jews in Palestine. Their goal was not to make friends around the world, nor to love other nations or other people.

The problem they faced was that the Arabs who were living there had no desire to give it up. Also, Turkey had control of Palestine of this time, and Turkey refused to give any part of Palestine to the Jews.

A few Jews moved into Palestine at this time, but only in small numbers were allowed in, and they could not take the land for their own nation.

The Arabs were not concerned when the first few Jews arrived. The Arabs did not realize what was coming up in the future, just as the Native Americans did not realize what was happening when the Pilgrims landed on their shore. Only after a few years, when the quantity of Jews increased, did the Arabs become angry.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154797 Nov 23, 2012
Zionists look for friends in high places
Britain was regarded as a world leader at this time (America in 1900 was not much above Australia in the world's social hierarchy). The Zionists thought that perhaps the British government could somehow help them.

The Zionists needed influence over the British government. They soon noticed a law firm in London in which one of the partners was also a government official. By going to this law firm for any legal help they needed,(or pretended to need), they would have access to a high-level government official. This gave them the opportunity to become friends (at least to a certain extent) with a government official. This contact with the law firm turned out to help them meet other government officials.

The Zionists spent a lot of time contacting British government officials and trying to convince them to help the Zionists cause, but the most the British government was willing to do was in 1903 when they offered to make some land in Uganda available to the Zionists.(Britain still had colonies around the world at this time.)

Since Turkey controlled Palestine, I have to wonder what the Zionists were thinking the British government could do for them. Did they think it was possible that the British government would convince Turkey into allowing a portion of Palestine to become Israel? Or did they think Britain would start a war with Turkey, drive the Turks out of Palestine, and then give Palestine to the Zionists?

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154798 Nov 23, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Salaams brother!
butt-turd licker has nothing to do with christianity.
he is a non gentile barnacle on the backs of Christian gentiles.
Salaams, bro.

Must be a lovely evening there. I have to go to bed. Good night

How nice would it be to see a Christian insulting Mary loudly in the Vatican compound! All will love him. lol!
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154799 Nov 23, 2012
The Brits, French, and Zionists try to use each other in WW1:::
Zionism got established in 1896, but not much happened with it until World War 1.
Exactly what role the Zionists played during World War 1 is a mystery. All we know for certain is that the Zionists were looking for help in creating Israel.
During wars there is a lot of lying, manipulation, spying, fake documents, and double crossing. You cannot expect historians to make sense of events during a war because the lying and deception is at extreme levels.
We know that during the war both the British and French governments gave the Zionists a document which offered support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, although in such a vague manner that neither government was actually committing to anything.

Did the Zionists outsmart the British and French in order to get those documents?

Or did the British and French give the Zionists those documents in an attempt to use the Zionists in some manner?

Or (most likely) were all three groups trying to take advantage of one another?

Some historians believe the British government was trying to use the Zionists to bring America into the war, thereby providing Britain with some assistance.

In this scenario, Britain wanted the Zionists to encourage the American Jews to put pressure on the American government to get into in the war.

Other historians believe that some British government officials may have been thinking that it would be to Britain's advantage to have Zionists in Palestine because that would put some friends of Britain near the Suez canal.

Furthermore, some historians believe that some British officials also made promises to Arabs, while other officials made promises to France.

If this situation seems confusing, remember, this was a time of war. Individual government officials sometimes act on their own, promising things they cannot deliver, and promising things that conflict with the promises of other officials. And sometimes government officials make promises that they have no intention of keeping.

Nobody will ever know exactly what the Zionists, British, or French were thinking (most of those people are dead already), or who was involved in what, or how these three groups were trying to use, abuse, and/or double cross one another.

All we know is that in June of 1917 the French gave the Zionists a document that expressed support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and in November of 1917 the British government did also.

The French document was so vague that it essentially stated, "Hey, a homeland for Jews! Great idea! Good Luck!"

The British document had a bit more substance. Not surprisingly, the French document never became important to the Zionists, while the British document became referred to as the “Balfour Declaration”.

The Balfour Declaration stated that the British government would help the Jews create a homeland in PALESTINE AS LONG AS IT DID NOT BOTHER THE REAL PALESTINIANS.

Exactly how the British could accomplish such a feat was what we might refer to as “a minor detail” that the British never bothered to explain.

The British government had agreed to something that they could easily back out of on the grounds that they cannot see how they can help the Jews without annoying the Palestinians.

What this means is that the Zionists did not get anything of value from the British or the French.

Did the British or the French get anything from the Zionists? Since it appears that the Zionists helped encourage America to get into the war, it seems that the British got what they wanted. Therefore, we might say that it appears as if the British outsmarted the Zionists in this particular situation.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154800 Nov 23, 2012
Britain becomes guardian of Palestine:::

World War One changed the situation dramatically in Palestine because Turkey was a loser in that war.

British troops in 1918 drove the Turks out of Palestine.

The Palestinians then became free to have their own nation again, but they did not have a government because they had been under Turkish control for many generations.

Britain agreed to maintain some troops in Palestine and protect the area until 1948 in order to give the Palestinians have a chance to form their own government and recover from the war.

This policy became official in 1922 when the League of Nations agreed to the plan.

The British protection was scheduled to stop in 1948, at which time it was assumed the Palestinians would be capable to taking care of themselves.

The protection of Palestine by the British created a dilemma for the Zionists.

The goal of Britain was to protect Palestine from outside forces, and that meant protecting them from Zionists.

However, the Balfour Declaration would come back to haunt the British.

When Turkey had control of Palestine, that declaration was a meaningless piece of paper.

Now that Britain was guardian of Palestine, the Jews would use it to pressure the British into letting Jews emigrate to Palestine.

After the war the Jews took the Balfour Declaration to the League of Nations and convinced them to approve it also.

Then they could put even more pressure on the British government by saying that even the League of Nations agrees to the idea of a Jewish home in Palestine. The Zionists had outsmarted the British.

(MY FOREFATHERS HAVE LOTS TO ANSWER FOR...)
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154801 Nov 23, 2012
Jews arrive in Palestine in large numbers:::

The Jews would push the British government into allowing a group Jews to emigrate to Palestine.

However, whenever a group of Jews arrived in Palestine, it would cause fights with the Arabs.

The British would respond by forbidding more Jews from emigrating to Palestine.

The Jews would then repeat the process. They would hold up the Balfour Declaration and beg, plead, and manipulate.

Time after time the British government officials would agree to allow another group of Jews to emigrate to Palestine, which would create fights in Palestine, and then the British would forbid Jews from emigrating to Palestine.

This cycle repeated over and over. Palestine was becoming a battlezone between Zionists and Palestinians, and the Zionist population kept rising.

The British government let themselves get pushed into a ridiculous situation.

They had signed the Balfour Declaration which gave their approval to a Jewish homeland in Palestine, but their main priority was to protect palestinians.

There was no way the British could appease both groups of people. They ended up doing what politicians in democratic nations do all the time. Namely, they occasionally appeased both groups.

The end result was that the situation became more of mess than before they got involved.

As the population of Jews in Palestine increased, the Jews became increasingly arrogant and demanding.

Some of the Jews eventually reached a point where there were no longer content to kill only the Arabs; specifically, they occasionally attacked the British, and even killed some British soldiers.

Israel had become more important than the lives of their British friends.
Morales

UK

#154802 Nov 23, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Salaams, bro.
Must be a lovely evening there. I have to go to bed. Good night
How nice would it be to see a Christian insulting Mary loudly in the Vatican compound! All will love him. lol!
He might insult Mary in the Vatican but he will not be put to death
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154803 Nov 23, 2012
The Americans could have been the first Nazis::::

The Zionists were considered terrorists prior to 1948, by both the British and Americans.

It is interesting to consider that if the Americans had been conducting their self-righteous, anti-terrorist campaign during the early 1900's, they would have been tossing those Daisy Cutter and other adorable bombs with cute names all over Palestine in order to kill the Zionists and defend both the Palestinians and the British.

The Americans would have been killing Jews before Hitler came to power.

The Jews benefitted from Hitler more than from Moses?????
The Zionist movement changed dramatically when Hitler came to power.

The Nazis considered the Jews to be a menace to society.

When the Nazis first acquired power in 1933, they confiscated businesses from the Jews and harassed them.

The Nazis wanted the Jews to get out of Germany.

The Zionists also wanted Jews out of Europe and into Palestine to help with the creation of Israel.

With so many people wanting to get Jews out of Europe, it is not surprising that many of the Jews reacted by leaving Germany.

The flow of Jews out of Germany helped the Zionist movement because some of those Jews decided to join the Zionist cause.

Some of those Jews moved to Britain where they assisted in outsmarting the British government officials into allow Jews to move to Palestine.

Some Jews moved to America where they assisted in outsmarting the Americans government officials.

Other Jews moved to Austrialia, Canada, and other nations, where they they assisted in outsmarting those governments.

Sometime after 1940 the Nazis decided that driving the Jews into the neighboring nations was not solving the Jewish problem since many Jews were refusing to leave Germany.

The Nazis decided to put those stubborn Jews into concentration camps.

After World War Two was over the Jews would remind Chrisitan West of the concentration camps and use them to gain pity from everybody on the planet.
(many nations and many people have suffered more and even today..but their plight is nothing compared with this)

Of course, there is evidence that Zionists were creating anti-semitism in order to drive Jews to Israel.

The Zionists were willing to sacrifice thousands of innocent Jews in order to help Israel develop.

From 1945 onward, the world has become saturated with sad stories about the Holocaust.

It seems as if every Jewish author has written at least one book, play, or article about the
Holocaust.

It seems as if every Jewish moviemaker has created at least one Holocaust movie.

It is difficult to get through a single day in America without hearing at least one reference to Nazis or Holocaust victims.

Consider just a few more examples of how the Jews use Hitler:

• Saddam was described as “the Hitler of the Mideast”.

• In 1984 Nathan Perlmutter of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, and Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice, referred to Minister Farrakhan as a "Black Hitler." http://abbc.com/islam/english/toread/farrfact...

• In May 2001 the President of Syria complained about Israel's occupation of Syria and Palestine. The next day many people in the media referred to him as a Hitler.http://www.mediamonitor s.net/khodr46.html
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154804 Nov 23, 2012
Morales wrote:
<quoted text>
He might insult Mary in the Vatican but he will not be put to death
ofcourse not!
It is run by non-gentiles!
otherwise, they would have done what they did during the inquisitions.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#154805 Nov 23, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
The Brits, French, and Zionists try to use each other in WW1:::
Zionism got established in 1896, but not much happened with it until World War 1.
Exactly what role the Zionists played during World War 1 is a mystery. All we know for certain is that the Zionists were looking for help in creating Israel.
During wars there is a lot of lying, manipulation, spying, fake documents, and double crossing. You cannot expect historians to make sense of events during a war because the lying and deception is at extreme levels.
We know that during the war both the British and French governments gave the Zionists a document which offered support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, although in such a vague manner that neither government was actually committing to anything.
Did the Zionists outsmart the British and French in order to get those documents?
Or did the British and French give the Zionists those documents in an attempt to use the Zionists in some manner?
Or (most likely) were all three groups trying to take advantage of one another?
Some historians believe the British government was trying to use the Zionists to bring America into the war, thereby providing Britain with some assistance.
In this scenario, Britain wanted the Zionists to encourage the American Jews to put pressure on the American government to get into in the war.
Other historians believe that some British government officials may have been thinking that it would be to Britain's advantage to have Zionists in Palestine because that would put some friends of Britain near the Suez canal.
Furthermore, some historians believe that some British officials also made promises to Arabs, while other officials made promises to France.
If this situation seems confusing, remember, this was a time of war. Individual government officials sometimes act on their own, promising things they cannot deliver, and promising things that conflict with the promises of other officials. And sometimes government officials make promises that they have no intention of keeping.
Nobody will ever know exactly what the Zionists, British, or French were thinking (most of those people are dead already), or who was involved in what, or how these three groups were trying to use, abuse, and/or double cross one another.
All we know is that in June of 1917 the French gave the Zionists a document that expressed support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and in November of 1917 the British government did also.
The French document was so vague that it essentially stated, "Hey, a homeland for Jews! Great idea! Good Luck!"
The British document had a bit more substance. Not surprisingly, the French document never became important to the Zionists, while the British document became referred to as the “Balfour Declaration”.
The Balfour Declaration stated that the British government would help the Jews create a homeland in PALESTINE AS LONG AS IT DID NOT BOTHER THE REAL PALESTINIANS.
Exactly how the British could accomplish such a feat was what we might refer to as “a minor detail” that the British never bothered to explain.
The British government had agreed to something that they could easily back out of on the grounds that they cannot see how they can help the Jews without annoying the Palestinians.
What this means is that the Zionists did not get anything of value from the British or the French.
Did the British or the French get anything from the Zionists? Since it appears that the Zionists helped encourage America to get into the war, it seems that the British got what they wanted. Therefore, we might say that it appears as if the British outsmarted the Zionists in this particular situation.
rabbee: boy all of your idolitry, misses all of G-D'S involvememt in this. gees! what a pagan you, are. giving all the credit, for G-D'S work to men. no wonder G-D, is angry at you pagan muslems.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#154806 Nov 23, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
Britain becomes guardian of Palestine:::
World War One changed the situation dramatically in Palestine because Turkey was a loser in that war.
British troops in 1918 drove the Turks out of Palestine.
The Palestinians then became free to have their own nation again, but they did not have a government because they had been under Turkish control for many generations.
Britain agreed to maintain some troops in Palestine and protect the area until 1948 in order to give the Palestinians have a chance to form their own government and recover from the war.
This policy became official in 1922 when the League of Nations agreed to the plan.
The British protection was scheduled to stop in 1948, at which time it was assumed the Palestinians would be capable to taking care of themselves.
The protection of Palestine by the British created a dilemma for the Zionists.
The goal of Britain was to protect Palestine from outside forces, and that meant protecting them from Zionists.
However, the Balfour Declaration would come back to haunt the British.
When Turkey had control of Palestine, that declaration was a meaningless piece of paper.
Now that Britain was guardian of Palestine, the Jews would use it to pressure the British into letting Jews emigrate to Palestine.
After the war the Jews took the Balfour Declaration to the League of Nations and convinced them to approve it also.
Then they could put even more pressure on the British government by saying that even the League of Nations agrees to the idea of a Jewish home in Palestine. The Zionists had outsmarted the British.
(MY FOREFATHERS HAVE LOTS TO ANSWER FOR...)
rabbee: there will never be enough muslems, jews, or christians against G-D. to stop even one, of G-D'S plans.

hell none of you, can even stop hasatan- more or less, baal hamolech, or halooseefer. so how can you stop, TheG-D in charge of them? your delusional fantacy thinking, certainly is not going to stop G-D.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#154807 Nov 23, 2012
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: no it means that all of you, are doing a lousy job. and this is why G-D, has unleashed the three angels hasatan, baal hamolech, and halooseefer upon the world. for G-D, is in charge of both the light and the dark. in this world, that prefers the dark side.
gilded calves are the result of worshiping the religion, and not worshiping G-D. being true to your religions, shall result in you not being true to G-D.
too proudly proclaiming, you are a jew, muslem, christian, buddist, or etc... comes with extreem dangers of idolitry. even claiming to be french, russian, brittish, american, or etc... comes with extreem dangers of national idolitry. when even following Moshe, Who is following G-D can present dangers. rather than following G-D with Moshe.
I find your post to have much merit, Rabbee. This does not mean that I agree with all of it.

You said "no it means that all of you, are doing a lousy job." and this was said in response to my assertion that the Creator is not the god of this world otherwise EVIL would not REIGN as it does now.

My logic is simple and it is this. One of the responsibilty of a RULER or manager is to CONTROL what goes on. Now, a failure to CONTROL is a failure of the RULER or manager to rule of manage.

Now, look at the MESS that the world is in with CRIMES of murder, rape and other forms of EVIL such as HATRED and DEVIL worship.

Now if God Almighty is supposedly running the show He is doing a very POOR JOB given that He hates RAPE, DECEIT, LYING etc.

Rabbee-- being true to your religions, shall result in you not being true to G-D.

HughBe--- much merit

Rabbee--too proudly proclaiming, you are a jew, muslem, christian, buddist, or etc... comes with extreem dangers of idolitry. even claiming to be french, russian, brittish, american, or etc... comes with extreem dangers of national idolitry. when even following Moshe, Who is following G-D can present dangers. rather than following G-D with Moshe

HughBe--- great deal of merit.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

#154808 Nov 23, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
Jews arrive in Palestine in large numbers:::
The Jews would push the British government into allowing a group Jews to emigrate to Palestine.
However, whenever a group of Jews arrived in Palestine, it would cause fights with the Arabs.
The British would respond by forbidding more Jews from emigrating to Palestine.
The Jews would then repeat the process. They would hold up the Balfour Declaration and beg, plead, and manipulate.
Time after time the British government officials would agree to allow another group of Jews to emigrate to Palestine, which would create fights in Palestine, and then the British would forbid Jews from emigrating to Palestine.
This cycle repeated over and over. Palestine was becoming a battlezone between Zionists and Palestinians, and the Zionist population kept rising.
The British government let themselves get pushed into a ridiculous situation.
They had signed the Balfour Declaration which gave their approval to a Jewish homeland in Palestine, but their main priority was to protect palestinians.
There was no way the British could appease both groups of people. They ended up doing what politicians in democratic nations do all the time. Namely, they occasionally appeased both groups.
The end result was that the situation became more of mess than before they got involved.
As the population of Jews in Palestine increased, the Jews became increasingly arrogant and demanding.
Some of the Jews eventually reached a point where there were no longer content to kill only the Arabs; specifically, they occasionally attacked the British, and even killed some British soldiers.
Israel had become more important than the lives of their British friends.
George,

Take your meds.
Alex123 aka WM

London, UK

#154810 Nov 23, 2012
Buford wrote:
<quoted text>George,
Take your meds.
say what non-gentile butt-turdlicker?
Jews arrive in Palestine in large numbers:::
The Jews would push the British government into allowing a group Jews to emigrate to Palestine.
However, whenever a group of Jews arrived in Palestine, it would cause fights with the Arabs.
The British would respond by forbidding more Jews from emigrating to Palestine.
The Jews would then repeat the process. They would hold up the Balfour Declaration and beg, plead, and manipulate.
Time after time the British government officials would agree to allow another group of Jews to emigrate to Palestine, which would create fights in Palestine, and then the British would forbid Jews from emigrating to Palestine.
This cycle repeated over and over. Palestine was becoming a battlezone between Zionists and Palestinians, and the Zionist population kept rising.
The British government let themselves get pushed into a ridiculous situation.
They had signed the Balfour Declaration which gave their approval to a Jewish homeland in Palestine, but their main priority was to protect palestinians.
There was no way the British could appease both groups of people. They ended up doing what politicians in democratic nations do all the time. Namely, they occasionally appeased both groups.
The end result was that the situation became more of mess than before they got involved.
As the population of Jews in Palestine increased, the Jews became increasingly arrogant and demanding.
Some of the Jews eventually reached a point where there were no longer content to kill only the Arabs; specifically, they occasionally attacked the British, and even killed some British soldiers.
Israel had become more important than the lives of their British friends.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) Dec 10 God worships Sin ... 14,477
Satanists Unveil Design for Statehouse Statue (Jan '14) Nov 22 buckwheat 12
Student expelled for casting a spell (Jan '14) Nov 22 Stay6c 6
Is reincarnation real?? (Feb '11) Nov '14 holysupremacy 70
Looking to correspond with Pagan's Nov '14 GordonM 1
drawing with pen Nov '14 scribbles 1
Shadow Energy / Shadow Magic (Feb '08) Nov '14 scribbles 25
More from around the web