Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 254779 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154243 Nov 15, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Moses????? really? When did Moses say "Jesus is God"?
Paul thought Jesus was god??? really? When did Paul say clearly "Jesus is God" (His Christ you will find is not exactly the Jesus referred to in the synoptic gospels!)
Peter ?? Jesus called him Satan! When did Peter say "Jesus is God"
Elijah??? When did Elijah say "Jesus is God"
John? John who? and when did John who say "Jesus is God"
Do you know something?
You claim the Jesus is God with NO evidence form anywhere.
Believe me I am an expert on this.
Good luck.
Of course, my dear ex-Father, you are an expert on above.

Peter, James, Paul and none of his disciples is on record for saying "Jesus is God".

Good point!
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154244 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
Peter, Paul, Moses, Elijah, John, etc. is Jew. And they believe in Jesus as perfectly God and perfectly human.
I do not believe that Peter, Paul, John and his disciples were truly mainstream Jews. All those men could have been members of various cults or sects or atheists or free-thinkers.

Not a single Jew of that time believed that Jesus was God. The Jews knew their God well.
abc

Klang, Malaysia

#154245 Nov 15, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Moses????? really? When did Moses say "Jesus is God"?
Paul thought Jesus was god??? really? When did Paul say clearly "Jesus is God" (His Christ you will find is not exactly the Jesus referred to in the synoptic gospels!)
Peter ?? Jesus called him Satan! When did Peter say "Jesus is God"
Elijah??? When did Elijah say "Jesus is God"
John? John who? and when did John who say "Jesus is God"
Do you know something?
You claim the Jesus is God with NO evidence form anywhere.
Believe me I am an expert on this.
Good luck.
Moses and Elijah talk to Jesus, where God the father again publicly announce Jesus is the Son of God.
Peter said Jesus is Messiah or Christ.
John said Jesus is God in the very first Chapter of John.
Pls read up before talking.
abc

Klang, Malaysia

#154246 Nov 15, 2012
Alex123 aka WM wrote:
<quoted text>
Moses????? really? When did Moses say "Jesus is God"?
Paul thought Jesus was god??? really? When did Paul say clearly "Jesus is God" (His Christ you will find is not exactly the Jesus referred to in the synoptic gospels!)
Peter ?? Jesus called him Satan! When did Peter say "Jesus is God"
Elijah??? When did Elijah say "Jesus is God"
John? John who? and when did John who say "Jesus is God"
Do you know something?
You claim the Jesus is God with NO evidence form anywhere.
Believe me I am an expert on this.
Good luck.
If early Christians were not Jews, who are them?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154247 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. it is formal, bmz is cleverer than demons. And yes, Satan did not believe because he knew Jesus is Son of God.
And Satan believes in Allah? sure, why not, but satan never said Allah is YHWH. So who is Allah? He is definitely a different god from YHWH.
Actually YHWH is no name. Why don't you start calling Jesus, YHWH and stop calling him Jesus?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154248 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
Moses and Elijah talk to Jesus, where God the father again publicly announce Jesus is the Son of God.
Peter said Jesus is Messiah or Christ.
John said Jesus is God in the very first Chapter of John.
Pls read up before talking.
John's gospel cannot be trusted and we do not even know, who wrote the very first chapter and the very 2nd last chapter.

In John 20:31, this can be found written:

"But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name."

And a Christian may not believe in anything more than this.

John 20:31 demolishes and pulverizes John 1:1-3 onwards
abc

Klang, Malaysia

#154249 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually YHWH is no name. Why don't you start calling Jesus, YHWH and stop calling him Jesus?
yea YHWH is no name. then what is YHWH? YHWH is God the Father, not God the Son
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154250 Nov 15, 2012
Addendum, abc

John's gospel shows that it was a 5th-6th or may be a 7th Century forgery.

If it had really been there and the all the Bishops had read John 20:31, no one would have called him God.

One Bishop would have said to another, "Hey, John told us to believe that at the most that he was messiah, the son of God. Nothing more."
abc

Klang, Malaysia

#154251 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
John's gospel cannot be trusted and we do not even know, who wrote the very first chapter and the very 2nd last chapter.
In John 20:31, this can be found written:
"But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name."
And a Christian may not believe in anything more than this.
John 20:31 demolishes and pulverizes John 1:1-3 onwards
John wrote it. John 20:31 is in no conflict with John 1:1-3.
abc

Klang, Malaysia

#154252 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
Addendum, abc
John's gospel shows that it was a 5th-6th or may be a 7th Century forgery.
If it had really been there and the all the Bishops had read John 20:31, no one would have called him God.
One Bishop would have said to another, "Hey, John told us to believe that at the most that he was messiah, the son of God. Nothing more."
DO you know that the earliest copy of scripture available now is John? and it is dated to AD 125. Do you know that the early fathers prior to 5th Century quoted on John. DO you know the bible in the earliest form contain John?
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#154253 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Rabbee,
Jesus is definitely not Adam and Adam was never defined as the Son of God or TheSonOfGod. You are in TheStrangeStory of your world and in TheStory of my world, there is no Son of God.
You are very close to belief in transmigration of souls into new babies, not animals. This belief has no place in TheTorah and the Torah.
rabbee: the story of Adam, and the story of jesus are too simular. to denounce them, as not being the same story. and what G-D came and said to me, does concur with what is written in TheTorah.

as that and what the last thing, G-D said to me in the first encounter makes sense now. when i asked, "then what do, all the liars call Us(me and the woman chaooah)?" and G-D replied: "the lord jesus christ of nazereth." now let me know, if that does not tell you somthing? because it tells me, we are all in TheExact Same Story again from G-D. conclusion, same story being give by G-D, and the same stupid brainwashed world rejecting being here in IT.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154254 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
John wrote it. John 20:31 is in no conflict with John 1:1-3.
Read again, please!

" But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name."

John DID NOT write:

"But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is Messiah, the God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." "

How hilarious and horrendous would this have been.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154255 Nov 15, 2012
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: the story of Adam, and the story of jesus are too simular. to denounce them, as not being the same story. and what G-D came and said to me, does concur with what is written in TheTorah.
as that and what the last thing, G-D said to me in the first encounter makes sense now. when i asked, "then what do, all the liars call Us(me and the woman chaooah)?" and G-D replied: "the lord jesus christ of nazereth." now let me know, if that does not tell you somthing? because it tells me, we are all in TheExact Same Story again from G-D. conclusion, same story being give by G-D, and the same stupid brainwashed world rejecting being here in IT.
lol!

Some crazy G-D you got, Rabbee. I think it is not G-d. The G-D, who comes to you, could be the Serpent, who previously went to Adam and Chaooah and now is after you and your wife.

You better look for G-d.
abc

Klang, Malaysia

#154256 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Read again, please!
" But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name."
John DID NOT write:
"But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is Messiah, the God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." "
How hilarious and horrendous would this have been.
The son is God. that is clear in the first chapter Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
the Word was with God and was God. Jesus clearly.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154257 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
DO you know that the earliest copy of scripture available now is John? and it is dated to AD 125. Do you know that the early fathers prior to 5th Century quoted on John. DO you know the bible in the earliest form contain John?
No Carbon-dating has ever been done. They dare not hand over any scrap or bits of paper for Carbon-dating tests. I do not believe that.

My point is simple. None of the men, who said, "Jesus is God" had ever read John, specially John 20:31.

If all had really read John 20:31, then no one would have said, "Jesus is God".
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154258 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
John wrote it. John 20:31 is in no conflict with John 1:1-3.
John was written by many Johns. Even Christian scholars and Bishops agree.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#154259 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Rabbee.
Adam was not begotten. He was created. That God begat sons, is a lie.
If God had started begetting, there would have been a load of Gods and the Godess would ahve been tired. lol!
rabbee: just what do you think, the word begotten by G-D means? just as you were begotten, by your parents. so am i begotten, by my PARENT/S. and was made into flesh, by the surrogate Mother also. as claimed by G-D, as to how i got here. So that i also do not, have a natural mother and father on earth. and that G-D gave birth to me, and placed me in the woman's woumb. which also explains a lot, about the strange circumstances of my birth.

and sex once a Week, is not a bad average for G-D. and not only that, we do not know about the rest of TheAngels and angels. as to how, they are procreated by G-D. not to mention, you miss the descrition of G-D, as The HE/SHE G-D UNITY (YHVH). Yeshooah is, HOO VHEE. which translated means: Redemption is, HE And She.

so now, you really need to put on, your thinking cap. and forget about what this, lying world of gogs and magogs have taught you.

so in conclusion - begotten of G-D, means i am created by G-D only. and do not have any, real worldly parents. just a surrogate Mother, just like jesus was sent into this world. the one you call jesus christ, Who G-D claims is Adam in the same again story from HIM.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154260 Nov 15, 2012
abc wrote:
<quoted text>
yea YHWH is no name. then what is YHWH? YHWH is God the Father, not God the Son
God, the Son is a post-Jesus concoction by men, who had never read and studied 20:31 in John's gospel.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#154261 Nov 15, 2012
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: just what do you think, the word begotten by G-D means? just as you were begotten, by your parents. so am i begotten, by my PARENT/S. and was made into flesh, by the surrogate Mother also. as claimed by G-D, as to how i got here. So that i also do not, have a natural mother and father on earth. and that G-D gave birth to me, and placed me in the woman's woumb. which also explains a lot, about the strange circumstances of my birth.
and sex once a Week, is not a bad average for G-D. and not only that, we do not know about the rest of TheAngels and angels. as to how, they are procreated by G-D. not to mention, you miss the descrition of G-D, as The HE/SHE G-D UNITY (YHVH). Yeshooah is, HOO VHEE. which translated means: Redemption is, HE And She.
so now, you really need to put on, your thinking cap. and forget about what this, lying world of gogs and magogs have taught you.
so in conclusion - begotten of G-D, means i am created by G-D only. and do not have any, real worldly parents. just a surrogate Mother, just like jesus was sent into this world. the one you call jesus christ, Who G-D claims is Adam in the same again story from HIM.
lol!

Rabbee,

Try this:

G-D did not beget Adam.

G-D created Adam.

Jesus was neither the first Adam, nor the second or the last.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#154262 Nov 15, 2012
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
I heard G-d met Louis Farrakhan also. According to him, G-d was wearing jeans.
rabbee: well where is his name, in what you all call genesis? and i have never seen, G-D wear jeans or a tux. just glowing see through, Manly type of old time dresses.

if it is not in TheTorah, then it is not a true accounting. and this is why all you, nobodies are here in TheTorah again. because none of you nobodies, are being true to G-D here in TheSame OldStory again.

and this is also why, your grandmother of all. does not actually have her name in TheTorah. because you all, helped the beast convinced your grandmother to be a nobody here in TheTorah agains'es. and if your grandmother's name is not in, TheBook of Life, then neither are any of yours. since both adam's and Noach's mates, must both have a given name. for all of you, to become permenant party. otherwise none of you can actually of existed here in TheTorah again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Curtis Brown column: Trick-or-Treat not to ever... (Oct '10) Sep 19 T Marie 10
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Sep 14 Pariah 4,886
News Athiest tells high schoolers God is evil (May '11) Sep 14 Bob of Quantum-Faith 843
News Remembering a Christian and a Jew who traced an... Sep 13 Philbert 23
Anyone still at this forum Aug '16 Sarah Good 1
When do you know if you are truly Wiccan? (Nov '07) Aug '16 Tekmoses 137
Convert me from Agnostic to Atheist Jul '16 ATHEOI 2
More from around the web