Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

There are 14730 comments on the News24 story from Aug 27, 2012, titled Why Atheism Will Replace Religion. In it, News24 reports that:

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at News24.

PINCH111

Buckfastleigh, UK

#13616 Jul 25, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
I never wrote that people should free themselves from ideology, only that freedom from the need to defend it puts the sense of wonder back into seeking knowledge about the fabulous planet that we inhabit and the universe of which it is such a tiny part; that the need to debate limits one's thinking because the focus on ideas that support one's argument leads to a sort of intellectual tunnel vision. Letting go of the need to defend one's ideology frees the mind to see ideas in their full context. Such are the rewards for letting go of the ego's need to "win."
Well put,could not agree more.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13617 Jul 25, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe in Nature, as I pointed out in an earlier post.
So then, if as Spinoza suggested, we exist as a means for the universe to learn about itself .... is that not a "God" of a sort? Although, by this proposition, I would not see any rationale to believe in "divine intervention" making any sort of sense.

If you were to believe in Spinoza's God, could you really call yourself an "Atheist"?

How would you prove such a God exists? How would you prove such a God does not exist?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#13618 Jul 25, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
But you must admit, as Skeptic points out, it therefore 'equates' Knowledge and Faith where no such equality exists. In a way, our doubts are the only 'evidence' godbots have, whereas evidence of a tangible reality grows with each passing second.
Hear hear, finally someone understands why I demand proof from people how lie about god being real...

Agnosticism is not a position, its an excuse for not assessing information that is readily available.

Agnosticism is like not showing up for the exam because you did not do enough homework, and labeling willful ignorance as a "position".

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#13619 Jul 25, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, if as Spinoza suggested, we exist as a means for the universe to learn about itself .... is that not a "God" of a sort? Although, by this proposition, I would not see any rationale to believe in "divine intervention" making any sort of sense.
If you were to believe in Spinoza's God, could you really call yourself an "Atheist"?
How would you prove such a God exists? How would you prove such a God does not exist?
The definition of god itself is problematic. There is no universally accepted definition and no facts to define what it is.

Because of this, it isn't really a thing, just an empty headed made up concept that mentally ill people enjoy claiming they have contact with.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13620 Jul 25, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
The definition of god itself is problematic. There is no universally accepted definition and no facts to define what it is.
Because of this, it isn't really a thing, just an empty headed made up concept that mentally ill people enjoy claiming they have contact with.
Good point! So if you can not define a thing, it is rather silly to claim you know it exists or it doesn't .... right??

It seems, even based on your own description, agnosticism, which you rightly called "the highest form of ignorance", is the right call. There is no way to know ... possibly because there is nothing to know.
henry

Zwickau, Germany

#13621 Jul 25, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Computers have a long, long, long way to go. Even a Josephson-junction-superconduc ting-supercomputer could only give us a brute-force simulation of what our brains can do. You could probably program such a computer to recognize a match, pick it up and light a cigarette, but, it would have to be reprogrammed to scratch it's own ass.
Whatever one may say: the nuclear Age is the end . AKWs in a capitalist System is the last for human Society. We will not overcome it, it is too late. Together with the other natural calamities we will not survive as mankind.
henry

Zwickau, Germany

#13622 Jul 25, 2013
RHill wrote:
Oh and on that "designed to fall apart" note ... we are. Momma Nature knows about 'transcription errors' and she knows that if organisms were 'allowed' to live forever or breed indefinitely, we would eventually be passing a lot of seriously screwed up genes down the line. Can't let that happen.
She's in it for the species, boys, so let's keep those zippers up and both hands on the wheel!!!
Humanity had its Chance but it missed it.
henry

Zwickau, Germany

#13623 Jul 25, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not I who is equating Faith and Knowledge, rather the Agnostic who declares 'we cannot know'. It is only here, on this particular thread where "Atheism" has liberally been defined as "includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans" etc. In fact, Atheism does not include or encompass these lessor or philosophically ambiguous divergences.
I know there is no God because I have looked, admittedly through other's eyes, at our reality from dancing sub-atomics to filigreed galaxies and he's not there. Anyone who says different best come up with some evidence beyond mere longing. If you relish the 'fog of uncertainty', so be it. Sounds a lot like "fence setting" to me. We're here to argue the one side or the other, not the gray area in-between. Hell, it's so small it's more like an infinitely fine line connecting two points ... not an "area" at all.
I find in the nuclear Age and the final end of man religions are superfluous. Our survival chances as man are Zero. We are on its way of extinction.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13624 Jul 25, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, if as Spinoza suggested, we exist as a means for the universe to learn about itself .... is that not a "God" of a sort? Although, by this proposition, I would not see any rationale to believe in "divine intervention" making any sort of sense.
If you were to believe in Spinoza's God, could you really call yourself an "Atheist"?
How would you prove such a God exists? How would you prove such a God does not exist?
The brief descriptions of "Spinoza's God" I have read simply equate "God" to Nature. Nature devoid of any of our popular anthropomorphism's that invest God with what are clearly reflections of our own notions. I really don't believe the Universe wants "to learn about itself". That's what drives us ... the Universe as a system of physical laws lacks even that capacity. "Spinoza's God" just seems an attempt to revere Nature as we would a more conventional reverential 'construct'. Now, if Spinoza was really saying the Universe has it's own motives and goals then that's a Horse of a Different Color. It would be, in fact, the same old song & dance.

On the other hand, we are clearly 'matter organized to such an extent that it wants to understand itself' and perhaps unique or, at least, very rare in the Universe. That does, I believe, place a burden of responsibility upon us, while also investing us with that 'specialness' godbots seem to yearn for. We have some obligation to preserve and utilize our intelligence and make efforts to spread it around. But, ultimately, in a Universe destined for some kind of 'heat death' or 'big crunch', even these goals are entirely of our own ambition, not part of some 'grand scheme' by the disorganized matter that surrounds us.

We are tiny parts of something very big. Scary. Something inside us seems to murmur that if we do the right thing or say the right thing or worship something the right way we can enhance our position. Nope. Nothing knows or care what we do or say. We just have to learn to deal with it. Those who have learned, more or less, to 'deal with it' call themselves Atheists, for lack of a better name.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13625 Jul 25, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Hear hear, finally someone understands why I demand proof from people how lie about god being real...
Agnosticism is not a position, its an excuse for not assessing information that is readily available.
Agnosticism is like not showing up for the exam because you did not do enough homework, and labeling willful ignorance as a "position".
Couldn't agree more!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13626 Jul 25, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
The definition of god itself is problematic. There is no universally accepted definition and no facts to define what it is.
Because of this, it isn't really a thing, just an empty headed made up concept that mentally ill people enjoy claiming they have contact with.
There ain't been a god one that wasn't anthropomorped in some kind of way. Invested with all our hopes, dreams and jealousies. Kind of silly really. Even a Universe wanting to understand itself ... a reflection of us.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13627 Jul 25, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point! So if you can not define a thing, it is rather silly to claim you know it exists or it doesn't .... right??
It seems, even based on your own description, agnosticism, which you rightly called "the highest form of ignorance", is the right call. There is no way to know ... possibly because there is nothing to know.
I believe you've missed his point. No offense intended, Agnostics are rocking the boat and that's certainly a step in the right direction!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13628 Jul 25, 2013
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever one may say: the nuclear Age is the end . AKWs in a capitalist System is the last for human Society. We will not overcome it, it is too late. Together with the other natural calamities we will not survive as mankind.
We have our minds, our intellects, the resources of a Solar System at our disposal ... if we don't survive it's our own fault. Evolution has provided us a way to survive virtually any calamity. Unfortunately,'stupid' genes seem to be dominant. I like to look at it as if all the wars, all the churches, all the religions, in fact, any thing that breeds ignorance and detracts from our ultimate destiny 'off planet' are, well ... evil.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13629 Jul 25, 2013
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
Humanity had its Chance but it missed it.
We haven't "missed it" yet ... not by a long shot. Given the enormity of the task though, a certain amount of despair seems appropriate.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13630 Jul 25, 2013
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
I find in the nuclear Age and the final end of man religions are superfluous. Our survival chances as man are Zero. We are on its way of extinction.
If we only stay on the Earth, we are indeed doomed. The "nuclear Age" is as likely to give us propulsion systems that might ultimately save us as it is to destroy us. Let's not be too harsh on the old Nuclear Age. I think we've managed to eek our way through most of the Mutual Assured Destruction scenarios.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#13631 Jul 25, 2013
This is not the first time Germany has proposed a final solution.
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
Humanity had its Chance but it missed it.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13632 Jul 25, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
The brief descriptions of "Spinoza's God" I have read simply equate "God" to Nature. Nature devoid of any of our popular anthropomorphism's that invest God with what are clearly reflections of our own notions. I really don't believe the Universe wants "to learn about itself". That's what drives us ... the Universe as a system of physical laws lacks even that capacity. "Spinoza's God" just seems an attempt to revere Nature as we would a more conventional reverential 'construct'. Now, if Spinoza was really saying the Universe has it's own motives and goals then that's a Horse of a Different Color. It would be, in fact, the same old song & dance.
On the other hand, we are clearly 'matter organized to such an extent that it wants to understand itself' and perhaps unique or, at least, very rare in the Universe. That does, I believe, place a burden of responsibility upon us, while also investing us with that 'specialness' godbots seem to yearn for. We have some obligation to preserve and utilize our intelligence and make efforts to spread it around. But, ultimately, in a Universe destined for some kind of 'heat death' or 'big crunch', even these goals are entirely of our own ambition, not part of some 'grand scheme' by the disorganized matter that surrounds us.
We are tiny parts of something very big. Scary. Something inside us seems to murmur that if we do the right thing or say the right thing or worship something the right way we can enhance our position. Nope. Nothing knows or care what we do or say. We just have to learn to deal with it. Those who have learned, more or less, to 'deal with it' call themselves Atheists, for lack of a better name.
RE: ".... the universe wanting to learn or having it's own motives ..." .... prove it does or prove it doesn't ..... I'll wait ....

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13633 Jul 25, 2013
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever one may say: the nuclear Age is the end . AKWs in a capitalist System is the last for human Society. We will not overcome it, it is too late. Together with the other natural calamities we will not survive as mankind.
I've often stated that mankind will create it's own successor, either by accident or on purpose. Even if not by our own action .... Evolution does seem to march on .... in the long run, you are correct, mankind is doomed .... but then, so what?
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#13634 Jul 25, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
I've often stated that mankind will create it's own successor, either by accident or on purpose. Even if not by our own action .... Evolution does seem to march on .... in the long run, you are correct, mankind is doomed .... but then, so what?
Do you mean EVERYONE who is born dies? What is THAT for humanity being doomed?

"Every man is at a loss" Quran says, "Except those who believe, do good deeds, enjoin truth to others and show patience and perseverance (received by doing do)"

They die in this world and get eternal life in the next world.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#13635 Jul 26, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you mean EVERYONE who is born dies? What is THAT for humanity being doomed?
"Every man is at a loss" Quran says, "Except those who believe, do good deeds, enjoin truth to others and show patience and perseverance (received by doing do)"
They die in this world and get eternal life in the next world.
Still no word from you as to why your religion abuses, rapes and murder little girls and why you support such barbarity.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Who Is Allah? (Aug '07) 10 min MUQ2 255,928
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 11 hr Amused 4,906
omens of dead animals (Aug '08) Nov 25 Jillifitz 115
News Paganism no better than Atheism (May '10) Nov 17 Amused 30
News Why All Jews Should Hate Halloween - And So Sho... Oct '16 Hecate 1
Beauty spell worked last year but not anymore Oct '16 Prettyicy 1
Wiccan Coven Secrets Anyone? Oct '16 Julius the Jules 1
More from around the web